This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:36:36 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
References: <200504272055.j3RKtJfL013789@earth.phy.uc.edu><1114694844.2729.240.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com><17008.59023.361787.925505@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><m3sm1arhde.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

Ian Lance Taylor writes:
 > Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > > If ld can't accept a list of files from a stream but is instead
 > > limited by command line length, then that *is* the fault of ld.
 > 
 > GNU ld won't currently read a list of files from stdin, but it will
 > read a list of files from a file.
 > 
 > For example, look at /usr/lib/libc.so on a typical GNU/Linux system.

Yes thanks, I've had that pointed out to me.  Apparently the real
issue here is that we have an older version of libtool in the gcc
tree.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]