gcc archive
date index for April, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2005
23:50 gcc-4.0-20050430 is now available gccadmin
23:12 Re: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc Paolo Carlini
23:06 Re: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc Vladimir A. Merzliakov
22:49 FAIL: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc Paolo Carlini
22:45 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Nix
21:28 GCC-3.3.6 prerelease for testing Gabriel Dos Reis
19:50 Slow _bfd_strip_section_from_output H. J. Lu
19:40 PATCH: Speed up ELF section merge H. J. Lu
19:37 PATCH: Speed up AR for ELF H. J. Lu
19:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Giovanni Bajo
19:24 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Eric Botcazou
19:22 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Giovanni Bajo
19:18 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Giovanni Bajo
19:15 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Giovanni Bajo
19:14 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
17:44 Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status Roger Sayle
17:31 GCC-3.3.6 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
17:15 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea Roger Sayle
15:11 Re: PPC 64bit library status? Andrew Pinski
13:46 Re: PPC 64bit library status? Andreas Schwab
12:55 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
12:37 Re: libjava/3.4.4 problem Thorsten Glaser
12:28 PPC 64bit library status? Bill Northcott
12:14 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea tbp
11:25 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea Scott Robert Ladd
09:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
09:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
02:59 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
01:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
00:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
00:29 RE: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin Amir Fuhrmann
00:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Daney
00:17 gcc-3.4-20050429 is now available gccadmin
00:10 Re: Struggle with FOR_EACH_EDGE Kazu Hirata
00:05 The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.2 is released H. J. Lu

April 29, 2005
23:51 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Matt Thomas
23:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Hugh Sasse
22:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Henderson
22:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
21:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
21:40 Re: libjava/3.4.4 problem (was Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)) Andrew Pinski
21:39 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29) Mark Mitchell
21:37 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29) Joseph S. Myers
21:34 libjava/3.4.4 problem (was Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)) Thorsten Glaser
21:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Stan Shebs
21:02 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Paolo Carlini
20:54 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Joe Buck
20:52 Re: C54x port: some general technical questions Joe Buck
20:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Henderson
20:11 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Paolo Carlini
20:11 C54x port: some general technical questions Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault
20:04 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Mark Mitchell
19:44 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Andrew Pinski
19:39 Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Paolo Carlini
19:35 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea Uros Bizjak
19:33 Re: CC_REG: "Ian's cc0 replacement machinery", request for stage2 conceptual approval Mark Mitchell
19:18 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
19:01 GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29) Mark Mitchell
18:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
18:43 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu Diego Novillo
17:30 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
17:29 GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea Scott Robert Ladd
17:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
16:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
16:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Diego Novillo
16:08 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Dan Kegel
16:08 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
15:36 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
15:21 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andreas Schwab
14:59 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
14:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:19 Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?) Andrew Haley
14:16 Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?) Scott A Crosby
12:02 i?86-*-sco3.2v5* / i?86-*-solaris2.10 / x86_64-*-*, amd64-*-* Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
12:01 Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc Olivier Hainque
10:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Lars Segerlund
10:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0]. Joseph S. Myers
10:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jakub Jelinek
10:16 Re: Testcase for loop in try_move_mult_to_index? Zdenek Dvorak
10:06 Testcase for loop in try_move_mult_to_index? Richard Guenther
09:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
09:44 Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?) Andrew Haley
07:09 Tru64 5.1B gcc 4.0.0 build Andrey Ivanov
05:05 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jason Thorpe
04:44 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jason Thorpe
04:06 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
03:30 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?) Scott A Crosby
00:50 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin James E Wilson
00:37 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Dan Nicolaescu

April 28, 2005
22:04 Re: different address spaces Paul Schlie
21:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Dan Kegel
21:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
21:20 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
20:55 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly? Mark Mitchell
20:32 Re: different address spaces Martin Koegler
19:43 Re: different address spaces Paul Schlie
19:30 Re: std::string support UTF8? Zack Weinberg
19:11 Re: std::string support UTF8? Andrew Pinski
19:07 std::string support UTF8? Laurielle Lea
19:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0]. Richard Guenther
18:55 Re: Ada test suite Laurent GUERBY
18:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Hugh Sasse
18:31 successful build of GCC 4.0.0 on Mac OS 10.3.9 (bootstrap, Fortran95) Bojan Antonovic
18:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Edelsohn
18:16 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
18:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
18:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
18:08 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Devang Patel
18:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Matt Thomas
18:02 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
17:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
17:53 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly? Joe Buck
17:53 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly? Daniel Berlin
17:43 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Carlton
17:39 Re: Ada test suite Janis Johnson
17:31 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly? Steven Bosscher
17:26 Another ms-bitfield question... Joern RENNECKE
17:23 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Devang Patel
17:22 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
17:10 Re: different address spaces Martin Koegler
17:00 Successful gcc4.0.0 build (MinGW i386 on WinXP) Christian Ehrlicher
16:59 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
16:56 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly? Joe Buck
16:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Edelsohn
16:53 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Edelsohn
16:53 RE: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin Amir Fuhrmann
16:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
16:46 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
16:45 Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly? Steven Bosscher
16:38 Re: different address spaces Paul Schlie
16:36 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
16:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
16:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0]. Joseph S. Myers
16:24 gcc 4.0.0 test status on AIX 5.2 Eli Ben-Shoshan
16:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
16:21 gcc 4.0.0 build status on AIX 5.2 Eli Ben-Shoshan
16:17 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
16:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
16:09 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Edelsohn
16:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
15:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
15:44 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Gunther Nikl
15:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
15:01 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Gunther Nikl
14:35 [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0]. Richard Guenther
14:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Lars Segerlund
14:20 Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes Joern RENNECKE
14:01 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin E. Weddington
13:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andreas Schwab
13:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
13:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
13:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
13:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
13:28 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
11:32 [BENCHMARK] comparing GCC 3.4 and 4.0 on an AMD Athlon-XP 2500+ Rene Rebe
11:05 Re: Ada test suite Laurent GUERBY
10:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
10:20 Re: Ada test suite Arnaud Charlet
10:08 Re: Ada test suite Florian Weimer
10:03 RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Dave Korn
09:30 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
08:10 Re: Ada test suite Arnaud Charlet
08:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
07:45 Ada test suite Florian Weimer
07:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Thorsten Glaser
04:55 Global Objects initialization Problem....... Satendra Pratap
03:53 Mike Stump added as Darwin maintainer Joe Buck
03:21 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Zack Weinberg
03:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
03:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Zack Weinberg
02:28 Re: about madd instruction in mips instruction sets James E Wilson
02:18 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin James E Wilson
01:59 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 Marcin Dalecki
01:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
01:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
01:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
01:48 Re: GCC 4.0.0 build report on Fedora Core 3 James E Wilson
01:44 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Tom Tromey
01:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
01:06 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
01:01 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
00:28 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Zack Weinberg
00:16 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
00:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Zack Weinberg

April 27, 2005
23:59 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
23:53 Re: [RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewer patterns with more embedded code? James E Wilson
23:49 gcc-3.3-20050427 is now available gccadmin
23:48 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Kegel
23:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Zack Weinberg
23:40 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Zack Weinberg
23:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
23:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
22:13 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Stan Shebs
21:40 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin E. Weddington
21:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Pinski
21:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Paul Koning
21:30 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Mike Stump
21:26 Re: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin Mike Stump
21:25 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Matt Thomas
21:11 FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin Amir Fuhrmann
21:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Mike Stump
21:04 Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.] James E Wilson
20:59 Re: different address spaces Mike Stump
20:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Pinski
20:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
20:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Paul Koning
20:51 Re: Build gcc-4.0.0 James E Wilson
20:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Diego Novillo
20:41 Re: folding after TER notes Steven Bosscher
20:36 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
20:27 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? sjhill
20:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Paul Koning
20:04 different address spaces Martin Koegler
19:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
19:53 Re: Build gcc-4.0.0 Mike Stump
19:45 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Tom Tromey
18:25 GCC 4.0.0 build report on Fedora Core 3 David Gressett
17:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Mark Mitchell
17:47 Re: Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent Joe Buck
17:39 Re: gcc 4.0 miscompilation on sparc(32) with ultrasparc optmization Rene Rebe
17:16 Re: folding after TER notes Jeffrey A Law
17:16 Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous Richard Guenther
16:52 Re: folding after TER notes Jeffrey A Law
16:46 Dirac, GCC-4.0.0 and SIMD optimisations on x86 architecture Anuradha Suraparaju
16:44 Re: Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent Joe Buck
16:35 Re: folding after TER notes Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
16:34 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:33 Re: libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the-fvisibity-inlines Benjamin Kosnik
16:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
16:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
16:24 Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous Jeffrey A Law
16:19 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Edelsohn
16:02 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
15:56 RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Dave Korn
15:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
15:45 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Matt Thomas
15:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Edelsohn
15:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jonathan Wakely
15:27 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
15:20 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
15:15 building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
15:05 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Matt Thomas
15:00 RE: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Dave Korn
14:47 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
14:44 RE: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Dave Korn
14:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Edelsohn
14:40 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test() Clemens Koller
14:20 fold_indirect_ref bogous Richard Guenther
14:18 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
14:18 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler error in libm-test.c:ctanh_test() Andrew Pinski
14:18 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
14:16 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
14:14 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test() Clemens Koller
14:11 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
13:59 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
13:59 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
13:57 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
13:55 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test() Clemens Koller
13:50 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler error in libm-test.c:ctanh_test() Andrew Pinski
13:47 [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler errorin libm-test.c:ctanh_test() Clemens Koller
12:48 Re: folding after TER notes Andrew MacLeod
12:32 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
12:28 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
12:18 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
12:15 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Neil Booth
12:14 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
12:09 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
12:07 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Gabriel Dos Reis
11:56 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
11:55 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
11:34 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Andrew Haley
11:30 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Andrew Haley
11:26 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
11:16 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
10:38 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Andrew Haley
10:37 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Zack Weinberg
10:04 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Vincent Lefevre
09:49 gcc 4.0 miscompilation on sparc(32) with ultrasparc optmization Rene Rebe
09:47 Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.] Andrew Haley
08:35 about madd instruction in mips instruction sets zouq
08:23 Re: folding after TER notes Jeffrey A Law
07:58 Protoize does not build with gcc 4.x Andreas Krebbel
07:25 Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent Sriharsha Vedurmudi
06:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Dan Nicolaescu
06:56 Re: [RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewerpatterns with more embedded code? Eric Christopher
06:40 Re: folding after TER notes Zack Weinberg
06:36 folding after TER notes Jeffrey A Law
06:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Zack Weinberg
06:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Matt Thomas
06:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
05:50 RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Gary Funck
05:45 [RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewer patternswith more embedded code? Matt Thomas
05:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Matt Thomas
05:30 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Henderson
05:04 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
04:59 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
03:40 Re: Build gcc-4.0.0 James E Wilson
02:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Jacobowitz
02:50 GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Matt Thomas
02:29 Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types Devang Patel
02:25 [PATCH] VAX: cleanup; move macros from config/vax/vax.h to normalin config/vax/vax.c Matt Thomas
01:45 Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types Daniel Jacobowitz
01:38 Re: Submission Status: CRX port ? James E Wilson
00:55 Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types James E Wilson
00:41 Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.] James E Wilson

April 26, 2005
23:30 RE: Ada and bad configury architecture. Gary Funck
23:08 Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c) Geoffrey Keating
23:08 Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc Geoffrey Keating
22:20 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Alexandre Oliva
22:07 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Alexandre Oliva
22:02 Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces) James E Wilson
21:43 Re: Where did the include files go? James E Wilson
20:15 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Zack Weinberg
20:03 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Bruce Lilly
19:06 Re: libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the -fvisibity-inlines Paolo Carlini
18:58 libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the -fvisibity-inlines Panagiotis Papadakos
18:32 Re: sjlj exceptions? Mike Stump
18:02 Re: Re[2]: object code execution statistics James E Wilson
17:55 RE: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) Gary Funck
17:50 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) Bruce Lilly
16:32 Re: object code execution statistics Joe Buck
15:59 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
15:13 Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc Olivier Hainque
15:10 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Joseph S. Myers
15:06 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Vladimir Makarov
14:46 New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious Bruce Lilly
14:16 RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Jon Beniston
14:07 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Nathan Sidwell
13:49 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler David Edelsohn
13:42 RE: EABI stack alignment for ppc Dave Korn
13:42 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Vladimir Makarov
13:33 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) Bernd Jendrissek
13:25 EABI stack alignment for ppc Olivier Hainque
12:44 RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Richard Earnshaw
12:40 Build report for AIX 5.1 Mario Linke
12:28 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Nathan Sidwell
12:13 RE: Free-Standing Implementation Dave Korn
11:52 RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Jon Beniston
11:40 Free-Standing Implementation Sriharsha Vedurmudi
11:29 Re: Regression involving COMMON(?) Nathan Sidwell
10:59 Re: Regression involving COMMON(?) Paul Thomas
10:57 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Nathan Sidwell
10:50 Re: Side-effect latency in DFA scheduler Nathan Sidwell
08:59 Re[2]: object code execution statistics Sergei Tovpeko
08:01 sjlj exceptions? Thorsten Glaser
06:57 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Zdenek Dvorak
06:39 Successful Build Report for GCC 4.0.0 C and C++ Simon G Best
05:02 Re: Regression involving COMMON(?) Andrew Pinski
04:16 Re: Fixing of bug 18877 James E Wilson
03:46 Ada and bad configury architecture. Nathanael Nerode
02:38 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
02:37 Re: object code execution statistics James E Wilson
02:32 Re: gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning James E Wilson
01:18 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Andrew MacLeod
01:15 Re: tips on debugging a GCC 3.4.3 MIPS RTL optim problem? James E Wilson
00:54 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) Zack Weinberg
00:48 Re: c54x port James E Wilson
00:45 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) Andrew Pinski
00:43 Re: about how to write makefile.in config-lang.in for a frontend James E Wilson
00:41 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Zdenek Dvorak
00:40 Re: benchmark call malloc a lot? James E Wilson
00:36 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) Sebastian Biallas
00:35 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
00:32 Re: spill_failure James E Wilson
00:26 Re: Stack frame question on x86 code generation James E Wilson
00:15 gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) Bruce Lilly
00:02 Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves James E Wilson
00:01 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html Giovanni Bajo

April 25, 2005
23:23 Re: gcc-4.0.0 build problem on solaris James E Wilson
23:19 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Andrew MacLeod
23:18 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions James E Wilson
23:02 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
22:36 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Andrew MacLeod
22:36 Re: Where did the include files go? Mike Stump
22:30 Where did the include files go? Øystein Johansen
22:28 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? H. J. Lu
21:56 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
20:33 Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418 Sebastian Biallas
20:32 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? H. J. Lu
20:28 Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418 James E Wilson
20:22 Re: The subreg question James E Wilson
19:38 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
19:37 Side-effect latency in DFA scheduler Jon Beniston
19:34 Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Jon Beniston
19:06 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Zdenek Dvorak
19:05 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Andrew MacLeod
18:59 Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong? Richard Kenner
18:38 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
18:35 Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong? Steve Ellcey
18:07 Re: Build of GCC 4.0.0 successful Janis Johnson
17:09 Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces) Joseph S. Myers
16:38 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Andrew MacLeod
16:21 Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed for different address spaces) Martin Koegler
16:20 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
16:02 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
15:47 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Andrew MacLeod
15:33 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
15:30 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces Paul Schlie
15:22 Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces) Joseph S. Myers
15:11 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Rainer Orth
15:08 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Jeroen Scheerder
15:08 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Andrew MacLeod
15:06 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Daniel Jacobowitz
15:06 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Rainer Orth
15:05 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Jeroen Scheerder
15:01 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Daniel Jacobowitz
14:58 Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed for different address spaces) Martin Koegler
14:53 tree-cleanup-branch is now closed Diego Novillo
14:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Richard Earnshaw
14:10 Re: how small can gcc get? Paul Koning
13:42 Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes Joern RENNECKE
12:39 RE: Register allocation in GCC 4 Jon Beniston
11:38 Successful gcc4.0.0 build (Redhat 9. Kernel 2.4.25) Jeff Clifford
11:23 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Rainer Orth
11:12 Re: Register allocation in GCC 4 Nathan Sidwell
11:08 Re: Register allocation in GCC 4 Nathan Sidwell
10:35 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Jeroen Scheerder
10:28 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Rainer Orth
10:25 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Rainer Orth
09:57 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces Etienne Lorrain
09:55 Register allocation in GCC 4 Jon Beniston
09:13 Submission Status: CRX port ? Paul Woegerer
08:53 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Steven Bosscher
08:48 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Zdenek Dvorak
07:48 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? Nathan Sidwell
06:13 object code execution statistics Sergei Tovpeko
04:36 gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning William S Fulton
03:58 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces Paul Schlie
01:57 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Mark Mitchell
01:30 tips on debugging a GCC 3.4.3 MIPS RTL optim problem? Gary Funck
01:03 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Joe Buck
00:32 GCC 4.0.0: (mostly) successful build and installation on GNU/LinuxPowerPC Luca Saiu

April 24, 2005
22:53 GCC 4.0.0 bootstrap success Aaron Wilcox
22:52 CC_REG: "Ian's cc0 replacement machinery", request for stage 2 conceptual approval Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:19 Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418 Sebastian Biallas
22:07 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Melissa O'Neill
21:27 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu Diego Novillo
20:41 RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html Gerald Pfeifer
19:45 Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node Kazu Hirata
19:43 Re: how small can gcc get? Florian Weimer
19:39 [wwwdocs] PATCH for GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes Gerald Pfeifer
19:12 Re: how small can gcc get? Mike Stump
18:20 gcc-4.1-20050424 is now available gccadmin
17:36 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
17:30 Re: how small can gcc get? Philip George
17:00 Re: how small can gcc get? Dale Johannesen
16:55 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu Diego Novillo
16:52 Fixing of bug 18877 Martin Koegler
16:21 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? H. J. Lu
15:58 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
14:40 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces Martin Koegler
13:43 Re: how small can gcc get? Mike Stump
09:35 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? Nathan Sidwell
06:59 about how to write makefile.in config-lang.in for a frontend zouq
06:58 One fully and one partially successful build Jeroen Scheerder
04:51 Re: spill_failure Ian Lance Taylor
04:22 Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c) Ian Lance Taylor
03:15 benchmark call malloc a lot? Zhenyu Guo
02:08 Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? H. J. Lu
01:22 Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c) Stuart Hastings
00:57 Re: c54x port Bryan Richter
00:51 Re: spill_failure Rajkishore Barik
00:43 [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c) Matt Thomas
00:05 how small can gcc get? Philip George

April 23, 2005
23:47 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Andrew Pinski
23:45 gcc-4.0-20050423 is now available gccadmin
23:40 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
23:29 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:37 Re: spill_failure Steven Bosscher
22:20 spill_failure Rajkishore Barik
19:00 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Jeroen Scheerder
18:55 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces Paul Schlie
18:37 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces Richard Henderson
18:27 Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces Paul Schlie
18:09 Stack frame question on x86 code generation Gang-Ryung Uh
17:55 Re: tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend Gabriel Dos Reis
17:18 Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces Martin Koegler
16:48 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Joseph S. Myers
16:33 Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Jeroen Scheerder
16:24 Re: tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend Nathan Sidwell
16:22 Re: The subreg question Ling-hua Tseng
16:07 tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend Ian Lance Taylor
14:56 Re: different address spaces Paul Schlie
14:17 Re: A bug in the current released GCC 4.0.0 Andrew Pinski
14:16 Re: different address spaces Paul Schlie
13:55 Re: writeable-strings (gcc 4 and lower versions) clarification Mike Stump
13:29 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu Diego Novillo
13:03 gcc 4.0.0 successful build Jan Okrasinski
10:32 A bug in the current released GCC 4.0.0 聂久焘
08:26 Re: GCC 4.0.0 fsincos? Uros Bizjak
08:09 Build gcc-4.0.0 Jean-Paul Rigault
07:35 writeable-strings (gcc 4 and lower versions) clarification sting sting
07:07 Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
06:30 GCC 4.0.0 fsincos? Patrick Mitran
01:18 gcc-4.0.0 build problem on solaris Don Lindsay
01:17 Re: different address spaces Zack Weinberg
00:52 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410 Nick Rasmussen
00:02 gcc-3.4-20050422 is now available gccadmin
00:01 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362) James E Wilson

April 22, 2005
23:56 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 Joe Buck
22:56 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362) Paul Schlie
22:09 Build and test results for GCC 4.0.0 Joe Buck
21:56 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c Steve Kargl
21:56 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions Björn Haase
20:45 Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves Greg McGary
20:08 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 Mike Stump
20:04 Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418 James E Wilson
19:53 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 Eric Botcazou
19:52 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 Zack Weinberg
19:46 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 Mike Stump
19:44 Re: GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes Mark Mitchell
19:20 Re: GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes Toon Moene
18:36 Build of GCC 4.0.0 successful William Beebe
18:35 gcc 4.0 build status Bruce Lilly
18:15 Re: c54x port Bryan Richter
18:08 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362) James E Wilson
16:57 Re: c54x port Joe Buck
16:45 Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed Joe Buck
16:40 Re: gpg signatures on tar/diff Joe Buck
15:49 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c Steve Kargl
14:32 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
14:27 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c Kazu Hirata
13:31 RE: i want to join Dave Korn
12:41 i want to join Bingguang Peng
11:59 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362) Paul Schlie
11:10 Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.] Andrew Pinski
10:52 Re: Java field offsets [was; GCC 4.0 RC2 Available] Andrew Haley
10:28 Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.] Andrew Haley
09:59 RE: Help installing & using GCC Dave Korn
09:12 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c Rainer Orth
07:59 gpg signatures on tar/diff Adrian von Bidder
07:49 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 James E Wilson
07:15 GCC 4.0.0 has been released Mark Mitchell
07:13 GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes Mark Mitchell
07:10 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362) James E Wilson
06:58 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions James E Wilson
06:45 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362) James E Wilson
06:39 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Steven Bosscher
06:28 Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves James E Wilson
04:33 Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed Andrew Pinski
04:25 Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed Eric Lemings
04:19 gcc-4.0.0 build failed Eric Lemings
03:57 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 Andrew Pinski
02:59 GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9 shrao
02:27 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Canqun Yang
02:21 Help installing & using GCC Zhaohui Zhou
02:09 Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c Steve Kargl
01:07 c54x port Bryan Richter
00:15 Re: Help Required on HP-UX 11.0 & 11.11 John David Anglin

April 21, 2005
21:21 Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong? Steve Ellcey
21:00 Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong? Richard Kenner
20:52 IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong? Steve Ellcey
20:31 Re: Java field offsets Jason Merrill
19:06 Re: 转发: Call into a function? James E Wilson
18:59 Re: [gnu.org #232057] FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #2 John Sullivan via RT
18:58 Re: [gnu.org #232052] FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1 John Sullivan via RT
16:14 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler erroratdwarf2out.c:8362) Paul Schlie
14:34 Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418 Sebastian Biallas
14:25 Re: What's the fate of VARRAY_*? Nathan Sidwell
14:21 What's the fate of VARRAY_*? Kazu Hirata
14:18 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Nix
14:14 Help Required on HP-UX 11.0 & 11.11 Kumar, Vijay
13:53 Re: RFA: .opt files for x86, darwin and lynxos Kelley Cook
13:38 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Kate Minola
13:36 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 John David Anglin
10:13 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362) Björn Haase
09:45 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362) Martin Koegler
08:11 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions Björn Haase
06:36 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Nix
06:11 Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2 Denis Vlasenko
03:59 Mike Stump named as Objective-C/Objective-C++ maintainer Joe Buck
03:42 转发: Call into a function? Zhenyu Guo
03:32 Re: Call into a function? James E Wilson
03:21 Re: Call into a function? Daniel Jacobowitz
03:16 Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2 James E Wilson
03:11 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions James E Wilson
02:50 Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes James E Wilson
02:49 Re: RFA: .opt files for x86, darwin and lynxos Richard Kenner
02:40 Call into a function? Zhenyu Guo
02:21 Re: static inline functions disappear - incorrect static initialiser analysis? James E Wilson
01:42 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362) James E Wilson
00:56 emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves Greg McGary

April 20, 2005
23:43 gcc-3.3-20050420 is now available gccadmin
23:16 Typo in online GCJ docs. Thomas Zander
21:21 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go? tbp
20:25 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Daniel Jacobowitz
19:16 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Nix
18:50 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go? Øystein Johansen
18:33 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Paul Schlie
18:25 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go? Andrew Pinski
18:22 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go? Kelley Cook
18:14 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Paul Schlie
17:23 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Jeffrey A Law
16:52 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Eric Botcazou
16:26 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go? Ian Lance Taylor
15:33 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Jeffrey A Law
15:25 Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html Alec Voropay
15:21 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Eric Botcazou
15:17 Hey? Where did the intrinsics go? Øystein Johansen
15:12 Re: GCC 3.3 status Gabriel Dos Reis
13:01 Re: makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..} Karl Berry
10:57 Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html Gerald Pfeifer
10:56 makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..} Gerald Pfeifer
10:39 Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html Patrick McFarland
10:12 Re: Packaging error in 4.0RC1 docs? [was RE: Problem compiling GCC4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 ] Gerald Pfeifer
10:12 GCC 3.3 status Giovanni Bajo
10:12 Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html Gerald Pfeifer
06:49 Re: i386 stack slot optimisation Øyvind Harboe
06:21 Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2 Denis Vlasenko
04:45 Re: Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues Dan Kegel
03:08 Re: 2 suggestions Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:47 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:36 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Geoff Keating
01:04 Java field offsets [was; GCC 4.0 RC2 Available] Per Bothner
00:18 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Josh Conner
00:09 Re: Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues Daniel Berlin

April 19, 2005
23:20 Re: i386 stack slot optimisation James E Wilson
23:17 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
23:14 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
23:13 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
23:04 Unnesting of nested subreg expressions Björn Haase
22:12 Re: i386 stack slot optimisation Øyvind Harboe
21:49 Re: i386 stack slot optimisation James E Wilson
21:37 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Eric Botcazou
21:27 Re: line-map question Per Bothner
21:25 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Koning
21:04 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Robert Dewar
20:45 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Koning
20:33 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joe Buck
20:26 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Robert Dewar
20:05 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Jeffrey A Law
19:58 RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes Joern RENNECKE
19:50 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 Björn Haase
19:39 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Eric Botcazou
19:27 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Eric Botcazou
19:09 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type Devang Patel
19:04 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joe Buck
18:51 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joseph S. Myers
18:51 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type James E Wilson
18:40 Re: The subreg question James E Wilson
18:30 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Andrew Haley
18:28 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Ken Raeburn
18:23 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Tom Tromey
18:10 Re: front-end tools for preprocessor / macro expansion Tom Tromey
18:03 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Paul Schlie
17:42 Re: CPP inconsistency Zack Weinberg
17:34 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Paul Schlie
17:06 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Andrew Haley
17:00 Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value Daniel Berlin
16:50 Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value Jerome Guitton
16:33 Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value Daniel Jacobowitz
16:29 register name for DW_AT_frame_base value Jerome Guitton
16:24 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joe Buck
16:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
16:20 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joseph S. Myers
16:13 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Richard Kenner
16:13 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joe Buck
16:09 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Jeffrey A Law
16:09 Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility Peter FELECAN
16:04 Re: GCC superblock and region formation support Daniel Berlin
16:03 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
16:03 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Andrew Haley
15:58 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
15:58 Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility Joe Buck
15:57 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
15:56 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
15:54 Re: CPP inconsistency Joe Buck
15:49 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
15:44 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
15:34 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Paolo Bonzini
15:31 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
15:22 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Andreas Tobler
15:18 Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility Peter FELECAN
15:17 GCC superblock and region formation support Robert Kidd
15:16 static inline functions disappear - incorrect static initialiseranalysis? Daniel Towner
15:02 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type Devang Patel
14:59 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Gareth Elston
14:20 Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility Jakub Jelinek
13:33 Re: CPP inconsistency Daniel Jacobowitz
13:28 CPP inconsistency Etienne Lorrain
13:25 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Andrew Haley
13:19 Re: target_shift_truncation_mask for all shifts?! Richard Sandiford
13:06 target_shift_truncation_mask for all shifts?! Andreas Krebbel
12:26 libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility Peter FELECAN
11:45 Re: The subreg question Ling-hua Tseng
10:56 Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0 Jonathan Larmour
10:50 Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues Virender Kashyap
09:15 different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362) Martin Koegler
07:53 Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0 Richard Sandiford
07:39 Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0 Zack Weinberg
07:29 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available James E Wilson
07:21 Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0 Richard Sandiford
07:09 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Richard Sandiford
06:59 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Paolo Bonzini
06:53 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Eric Botcazou
06:16 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Eric Botcazou
06:02 Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before Jeffrey A Law
05:09 Re: Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0... Dan Kegel
05:01 Re: sync operations: where's the barrier? Richard Henderson
04:23 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type Eric Christopher
04:18 Re: Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0... Eric Christopher
03:35 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 James E Wilson
03:32 Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0... Steven J. Hill
02:43 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type Devang Patel
02:41 Re: sync operations: where's the barrier? Geoffrey Keating
02:16 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type Mike Stump
02:07 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:29 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type James E Wilson
01:25 Re: sync operations: where's the barrier? David Edelsohn
01:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Andrew Pinski
01:07 Re: The subreg question James E Wilson
01:07 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Geoffrey Keating
00:47 Re: compile error for gcc-4.0.0-20050410 James E Wilson
00:43 Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment James E Wilson
00:36 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joe Buck
00:35 Re: ppc32/e500/no float - undefined references in libstdc++ _Unwind_* James E Wilson
00:23 Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC? Steven Bosscher
00:20 Re: Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS James E Wilson
00:13 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joe Buck

April 18, 2005
23:26 Re: Can I comment out a GTY variable? Geoffrey Keating
22:45 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Mike Stump
22:30 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 James E Wilson
22:18 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Julian Brown
22:17 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Robert Dewar
22:08 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Ken Raeburn
21:51 Re: Novell thinks you are spam Andreas Schwab
21:47 sync operations: where's the barrier? Geoffrey Keating
21:38 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Daniel Berlin
21:26 Novell thinks you are spam Steven Bosscher
21:25 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Laurent GUERBY
21:08 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Joe Buck
20:47 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Laurent GUERBY
20:36 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Dan Nicolaescu
19:45 MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0 Jonathan Larmour
19:26 Re: line-map question Devang Patel
19:19 Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC? Nicholas Nethercote
19:08 Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC? Steven Bosscher
19:06 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Steven Bosscher
18:54 Re: line-map question Mike Stump
18:54 Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC? Nicholas Nethercote
18:44 i386 stack slot optimisation Øyvind Harboe
18:36 Re: Can I comment out a GTY variable? Andrew Pinski
18:11 Can I comment out a GTY variable? H. J. Lu
17:42 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Richard Kenner
17:28 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Andreas Krebbel
17:04 Re: hot/cold vs glibc Daniel Jacobowitz
16:55 line-map question Devang Patel
16:48 Re: hot/cold vs glibc Caroline Tice
16:29 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Daniel Berlin
15:42 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Roger Sayle
15:42 Re: Processor-specific code Vincent Lefevre
15:35 hot/cold vs glibc Daniel Jacobowitz
15:06 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Richard Kenner
15:03 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Richard Kenner
14:44 GCC 4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
14:37 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Paolo Bonzini
14:35 missed mail Aldy Hernandez
14:30 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Steven Bosscher
14:15 front-end tools for preprocessor / macro expansion Henrik Sorensen
14:12 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes Mike Hearn
13:45 Re: libraries - double set Eric Botcazou
13:37 libraries - double set Ray Holme
12:50 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Richard Kenner
12:46 i386 stack slot optimisation Øyvind Harboe
12:36 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Richard Kenner
11:09 Re: Processor-specific code Joseph S. Myers
10:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
10:01 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Steven Bosscher
07:27 Re: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1 Marcin Dalecki
07:23 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes Marcin Dalecki
06:57 Re: Processor-specific code FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
05:46 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Roger Sayle
05:44 Re: Processor-specific code Geoffrey Keating
05:44 Re: Processor-specific code Geoffrey Keating
05:44 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Geoffrey Keating
05:44 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Geoffrey Keating
03:02 Re: empty switch substituion doesn't erase matching switch? Daniel Jacobowitz
02:56 RE: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1 Gareth Pearce
02:49 empty switch substituion doesn't erase matching switch? Gary Funck
02:44 Re: Processor-specific code Brooks Moses
02:43 Re: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1 Andrew Pinski
02:40 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Steve Kargl
02:37 function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1 Gareth Pearce
02:23 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes Dan Kegel

April 17, 2005
19:57 Re: Processor-specific code FX Coudert
18:14 Re: How to -Werror in a fortran testcase? Mike Stump
18:11 gcc-4.1-20050417 is now available gccadmin
18:00 Re: Vectorizing my loops. Some problems. Gerald Pfeifer
17:48 [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type Paul Schlie
17:03 [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type Devang Patel
16:48 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 Björn Haase
16:42 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes Mike Hearn
16:01 re: Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS... Daniel Kegel
15:39 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Björn Haase
15:31 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Status Eric Botcazou
14:26 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Daniel Jacobowitz
14:20 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Jason Merrill
14:15 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Björn Haase
13:02 Re: The subreg question Björn Haase
10:54 Re: How to -Werror in a fortran testcase? Paul Brook
09:25 Re: Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS... Giovanni Bajo
09:11 Re: Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS James Tabor
09:01 The subreg question Ling-hua Tseng
06:54 GCC 4.0 RC2 Status Mark Mitchell
06:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Christian Joensson
06:04 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Peter Barada
05:17 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers James A. Morrison
05:10 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Tobias Schlüter
05:07 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze James A. Morrison
04:51 Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS... Steven J. Hill
04:31 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes Joe Buck
03:39 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Jack Howarth
03:33 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Branko Äibej
03:23 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Zack Weinberg
02:56 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Branko Äibej
02:48 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Richard Kenner
02:03 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Zack Weinberg
01:28 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Ian Lance Taylor

April 16, 2005
23:52 gcc-4.0-20050416 is now available gccadmin
23:37 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Peter Barada
22:37 C++ ABI mismatch crashes Mike Hearn
20:33 compile error for gcc-4.0.0-20050410 Guochun Shi
19:45 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Nathan Sidwell
18:33 How to -Werror in a fortran testcase? Richard Guenther
18:18 My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization Roger Sayle
15:51 Re: Template and dynamic dispatching Larry Evans
15:29 Re: Doubt : Help Ian Lance Taylor
15:19 Re: Template and dynamic dispatching Larry Evans
14:56 Re: implicit type cast problem of reference of ponter to const type Jonathan Wakely
13:32 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 Martin Koegler
11:10 Re: 2 suggestions Gerald Pfeifer
08:19 Templates and C++ embedded subsets Robert Dewar
07:25 Doubt : Help Sachin Vijay Sonawane
05:13 implicit type cast problem of reference of ponter to const type Steve Yee
02:22 An old timer returns to the fold Michael Meissner
01:36 Re: Template and dynamic dispatching Robert Dewar
01:12 Re: Template and dynamic dispatching Gabriel Dos Reis
00:47 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Robert Dewar
00:22 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:02 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers James E Wilson

April 15, 2005
23:58 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Marcin Dalecki
23:56 gcc-3.4-20050415 is now available gccadmin
22:38 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Mike Stump
22:29 Re: Vectorizing my loops. Some problems. Øystein Johansen
22:20 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Marcin Dalecki
22:03 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Koning
22:01 Vectorizing my loops. Some problems. Øystein Johansen
22:00 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Mike Stump
21:55 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Marcin Dalecki
21:52 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Marcin Dalecki
21:37 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Mike Stump
21:20 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); E. Weddington
21:00 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); Ralf Corsepius
20:52 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Christopher Jefferson
20:07 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Peter Barada
19:39 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
19:24 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Joe Buck
19:21 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Mike Stump
19:19 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Mike Stump
19:08 Re: Objective-C++ Status Mike Stump
19:05 rtx/tree calling function syntax Chris Kirby
18:52 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Christopher Jefferson
18:50 Re: Processor-specific code Vincent Lefevre
18:31 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Schlie
18:30 Re: Processor-specific code Mike Stump
18:28 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Mike Stump
18:19 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Diego Novillo
18:18 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Mike Stump
18:17 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Ian Lance Taylor
18:14 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Andrew Pinski
18:05 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Peter Barada
18:00 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble Richard Guenther
17:56 Re: Processor-specific code Paul Brook
17:55 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Michael N. Moran
17:43 Re: Processor-specific code Vincent Lefevre
17:42 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Michael N. Moran
17:37 RE: Processor-specific code Paul Koning
17:29 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Ian Lance Taylor
17:23 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); E. Weddington
17:23 Re: "make bootstrap" for cross builds Janis Johnson
17:21 RE: Processor-specific code Dave Korn
17:20 RE: Processor-specific code Dave Korn
17:15 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); Andrew Haley
17:11 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); E. Weddington
17:08 RE: Processor-specific code Richard Earnshaw
17:05 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); Dale Johannesen
16:57 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Peter Barada
16:57 RE: struct __attribute((packed)); Joseph S. Myers
16:56 RE: Processor-specific code Paul Koning
16:53 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); Paul Koning
16:49 RE: Processor-specific code Dave Korn
16:42 Re: Processor-specific code Richard Earnshaw
16:39 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); E. Weddington
16:35 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); Paul Koning
16:35 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); E. Weddington
16:34 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Koning
16:28 RE: struct __attribute((packed)); Dave Korn
16:28 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); E. Weddington
16:22 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Schlie
16:19 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
16:10 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); E. Weddington
16:09 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Peter Barada
16:04 inline-unit-growth trouble Andreas Krebbel
16:03 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); Paul Koning
15:45 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); Ralf Corsepius
15:41 Successful bootstrap of GCC 3.4.3 on i586-pc-interix3 (with one little problem) Rob Hulswit
15:27 Re: struct __attribute((packed)); E. Weddington
15:07 struct __attribute((packed)); Ralf Corsepius
14:59 Re: Questions on CC Nathan Sidwell
14:50 Re: Processor-specific code Robert Dewar
14:44 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Ian Lance Taylor
14:39 re: some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3 Dan Kegel
14:39 Re: Processor-specific code Richard Earnshaw
14:31 Questions on CC Timothy Bowers
13:49 Re: Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment Petar Penchev
13:24 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Koning
13:22 Re: Objective-C++ Status James A. Morrison
12:53 Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment Paul Brook
12:33 Stack and Function parameters alignment Petar Penchev
11:35 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Michael N. Moran
11:12 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Michael N. Moran
10:55 [PATCH] RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dave Korn
10:25 ppc32/e500/no float - undefined references in libstdc++ _Unwind_* Clemens Koller
10:14 Re: some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3 Kai Ruottu
08:51 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e arcjai
08:38 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Steven Bosscher
07:54 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
07:54 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Jason Merrill
07:50 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
07:32 Re: Processor-specific code FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
07:24 some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3 zouq
07:21 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Duncan Sands
07:09 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
07:04 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
06:53 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Alexandre Oliva
06:44 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Mark Mitchell
05:23 Re: "make bootstrap" for cross builds Andrew Pinski
05:22 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Peter Barada
05:19 "make bootstrap" for cross builds Ranjit Mathew
04:52 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Devang Patel
04:50 Objective-C++ Status Douglas Charles
04:39 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Richard Henderson
03:48 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Marcin Dalecki
03:30 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Ian Lance Taylor
03:11 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Diego Novillo
02:32 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
00:26 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Mark Mitchell

April 14, 2005
23:14 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from Wolfgang Bangerth
23:10 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Richard Henderson
23:06 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from Andrew Pinski
23:05 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Mark Mitchell
23:04 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Mark Mitchell
22:51 Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from Wolfgang Bangerth
22:28 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 John David Anglin
22:09 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 E. Weddington
22:06 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Koning
22:06 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Laurent GUERBY
22:02 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 James E Wilson
21:56 Joseph appointed i18n maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
21:42 Re: 2 suggestions Gerald Pfeifer
21:33 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Jason Merrill
21:30 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Jason Merrill
21:06 Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS James Tabor
20:48 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Robert Dewar
20:33 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 Diego Novillo
20:32 Re: Processor-specific code Joseph S. Myers
20:29 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 H. J. Lu
20:29 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Diego Novillo
20:27 Re: 2 suggestions Georg Bauhaus
20:26 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:25 Re: 2 suggestions Georg Bauhaus
20:14 Re: Processor-specific code Richard Henderson
20:08 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:04 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Diego Novillo
19:57 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Robert Dewar
19:41 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Michael N. Moran
19:36 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Michael N. Moran
19:35 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Gerald Pfeifer
19:30 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 Diego Novillo
19:26 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Michael N. Moran
19:20 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 Mark Mitchell
19:05 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Mark Mitchell
19:00 Re: Processor-specific code Andrew Pinski
18:22 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
17:47 Re: Processor-specific code Steve Kargl
17:35 Re: Processor-specific code Richard Henderson
17:25 Re: ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so Diego Novillo
17:24 Re: ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so Richard Henderson
17:22 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
17:20 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Joseph S. Myers
17:12 Re: 2 suggestions Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:02 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410 Dale Johannesen
16:56 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Jason Merrill
16:54 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 H. J. Lu
16:50 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Richard Henderson
16:47 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 Diego Novillo
16:42 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410 Andrew Pinski
16:42 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410 Andrew Pinski
16:15 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 Jon Grimm
16:12 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Nathan Sidwell
15:58 Re: 2 suggestions Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
15:40 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Jason Merrill
15:34 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Kate Minola
15:28 Re: Processor-specific code FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
15:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Mark Mitchell
15:15 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 David Edelsohn
15:14 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
14:59 Re: 2 suggestions Gerald Pfeifer
14:57 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Kate Minola
14:55 Re: Processor-specific code Steve Kargl
14:42 Processor-specific code FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
14:31 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Paul Koning
14:31 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
14:28 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
14:21 [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers Peter Barada
14:13 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ Michael N. Moran
13:41 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 Diego Novillo
13:40 ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so Diego Novillo
13:38 RE: install Dave Korn
13:34 libstdc++ link failures on ppc64 Diego Novillo
12:45 Re: install Gerald Pfeifer
12:36 install Master Faris
12:35 install Master Faris
12:24 Heads-up: volatile and C++ Jason Merrill
12:05 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e Daniel Jacobowitz
11:02 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 Martin Koegler
10:05 Re: reload-branch created Ulrich Weigand
09:13 RE: 2 suggestions Dave Korn
09:12 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dave Korn
09:12 RE: 2 suggestions Dave Korn
08:51 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Richard Sandiford
07:37 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e Bernardo Innocenti
06:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Jakub Jelinek
06:07 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
06:02 re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410 Dan Kegel
06:02 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
06:02 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Mark Mitchell
02:41 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410 Michael Matz
01:34 Re: Help me about C language Specification Mike Stump
01:31 unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410 Nick Rasmussen
01:05 Re: 2 suggestions Georg Bauhaus
01:03 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Tom Tromey
00:11 Re: 2 suggestions Kaveh R. Ghazi

April 13, 2005
23:58 gcc-3.3-20050413 is now available gccadmin
23:24 Re: 2 suggestions Gerald Pfeifer
22:30 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm Steven Bosscher
22:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
21:49 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Paul Jarc
21:47 Re: FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1 James E Wilson
21:17 Re: Tree-ssa dead store elimination Andrew Pinski
21:13 Tree-ssa dead store elimination Pat Haugen
20:55 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 James E Wilson
20:52 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm Pat Haugen
20:51 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup fold_rtx, 1/n Steven Bosscher
19:28 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin James E Wilson
19:21 Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions Andrew Pinski
19:19 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup fold_rtx, 1/n Roger Sayle
19:10 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm Steven Bosscher
18:46 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm Pat Haugen
18:22 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andi Kleen
18:09 FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #2 Chris Miller
18:09 FW: [gnu.org #232014] GNU Mailing Lists Question #1 Chris Miller
18:02 FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1 Chris Miller
16:18 Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions Chris Kirby
16:07 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e Daniel Jacobowitz
15:56 Re: GCC Cross Compilation E. Weddington
14:40 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm Steven Bosscher
14:08 Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions Andrew Pinski
14:06 -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions Chris Kirby
13:51 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
13:31 Re: Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn?? Steven Bosscher
13:27 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Ian Lance Taylor
13:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
13:21 Re: Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn?? Vladimir N. Makarov
13:00 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
12:21 Re: exceptions with longjmp (perhaps i am too stupid) Andrew Haley
12:07 exceptions with longjmp (perhaps i am too stupid) Georg Steffers
11:48 Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn?? Steven Bosscher
10:19 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dave Korn
09:52 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Jakub Jelinek
09:50 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Pinski
09:39 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Jason Merrill
09:30 GCC Cross Compilation Vishal Kothari
09:24 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
08:59 Re: Help me about C language Specification Jonathan Wakely
08:30 Help me about C language Specification thanh tuan
08:10 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e Bernardo Innocenti
07:44 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e arcjai
07:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Bernardo Innocenti
07:07 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Bernardo Innocenti
06:52 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e Bernardo Innocenti
06:48 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Richard Sandiford
06:28 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e Bernardo Innocenti
05:41 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Ranjit Mathew
05:00 Re: About the number of DOM's iterations. Jeffrey A Law
04:32 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
04:23 Re: RFC:Updated VEC API Mark Mitchell
03:41 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Ian Lance Taylor
03:19 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Ian Lance Taylor
01:00 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Per Bothner
00:33 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Joseph S. Myers
00:31 Re: RTL code James E Wilson
00:24 Re: gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources] Mike Stump
00:12 Re: gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency importanton AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources] Nicholas Nethercote
00:07 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE whenoptimized James E Wilson

April 12, 2005
23:48 Re: RFC:Updated VEC API Daniel Berlin
23:28 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Per Bothner
23:16 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Per Bothner
22:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Thomas Fitzsimmons
22:18 Basic block reordering algorithm Pat Haugen
22:11 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Wielaard
21:52 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Bryce McKinlay
21:27 Re: PowerPC sections ? James E Wilson
21:15 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Richard Sandiford
21:04 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Per Bothner
20:55 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Richard Sandiford
20:46 Re: ada build failure? Laurent GUERBY
20:44 Re: New optimisation idea ? Andrew Pinski
20:40 New optimisation idea ? Christophe Jaillet
20:24 Re: ada build failure? Graham Stott
20:11 ada build failure? Richard Henderson
19:59 gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency important onAMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources] Karel Gardas
19:32 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dave Korn
19:32 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
18:59 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Steven Bosscher
18:48 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Wielaard
18:43 RFC:Updated VEC API Nathan Sidwell
18:42 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Daniel Kegel
18:37 About the number of DOM's iterations. Kazu Hirata
18:34 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Daniel Jacobowitz
18:30 Re: about the parse tree Mike Stump
18:23 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Per Bothner
18:15 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Wielaard
18:02 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Zack Weinberg
18:00 GCC 4.0 RC2 Mark Mitchell
17:55 Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources Mike Stump
17:45 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dave Korn
17:31 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Zack Weinberg
17:24 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dave Korn
17:19 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dave Korn
17:18 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dimitry Golubovsky
17:01 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Zack Weinberg
16:59 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Daniel Kegel
16:48 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Zack Weinberg
16:36 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
16:36 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dimitry Golubovsky
16:34 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andi Kleen
16:05 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Devang Patel
15:59 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Devang Patel
15:55 Pinapa: A SystemC front-end based on GCC Matthieu Moy
15:54 Re: Mainline has been broken for more than 3 days now Caroline Tice
15:30 Packaging error in 4.0RC1 docs? [was RE: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 ] Dave Korn
15:22 RE: GCC 3.4.3 Dave Korn
15:15 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 David Edelsohn
15:14 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Kate Minola
14:40 RE: GCC 3.4.3 Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
14:32 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Pinski
14:21 RE: GCC 3.4.3 Dave Korn
14:17 proposal: explicit context pointers in addition to trampolines in C frontend Clifford Wolf
14:10 gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin Dimitry Golubovsky
14:00 RE: GCC 3.4.3 Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
13:58 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 David Edelsohn
13:54 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Geoff Keating
13:54 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Geoff Keating
13:52 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Kate Minola
13:47 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
13:39 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Geoff Keating
13:38 Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compilinglarge C/C++ sources Karel Gardas
13:32 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
13:12 RE: GCC 3.4.3 Dave Korn
13:05 Mainline has been broken for more than 3 days now Diego Novillo
12:45 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Ray Holme
12:21 internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362 Martin Koegler
12:20 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
12:16 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Diego Novillo
11:40 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
11:26 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
11:23 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Georg Bauhaus
11:17 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
10:54 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e arcjai
10:49 Patches for coldfire v4e arcjai
10:42 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Laurent GUERBY
10:35 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Laurent GUERBY
10:33 OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compilinglarge C/C++ sources Karel Gardas
10:33 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC John David Anglin
10:25 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Giovanni Bajo
08:55 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Gabriel Dos Reis
08:42 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Bernd Schmidt
08:18 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time Andrew Pinski
08:11 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Andrew Pinski
07:16 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time Thorsten Glaser
07:10 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Paolo Bonzini
06:26 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
06:23 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Ranjit Mathew
06:09 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC Caroline Tice
06:02 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
05:13 Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC Kazu Hirata
05:09 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
04:37 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Gabriel Dos Reis
04:00 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Gabriel Dos Reis
03:52 RTL code Rajkishore Barik
03:15 about the parse tree zouq
03:11 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
02:55 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Geoffrey Keating
02:09 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Diego Novillo
02:08 Re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction inX11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro (worksforme) Roland Mainz
02:03 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Greg Schafer
01:33 Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Gabriel Dos Reis

April 11, 2005
23:48 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 James E Wilson
23:38 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Julian Brown
23:10 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Julian Brown
22:42 successful bootstrap/install of GCC 4.0 RC1 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
22:33 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Per Bothner
21:51 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Per Bothner
21:30 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
21:09 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Mike Stump
21:08 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Richard Henderson
20:42 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
20:05 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 David Edelsohn
19:57 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Andrew Pinski
19:55 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Alexandre Oliva
19:43 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
19:34 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
19:25 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Jeffrey A Law
19:02 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Marcus Meissner
19:01 Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Kate Minola
18:49 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:41 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Richard Sandiford
18:16 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Daniel Kegel
18:04 re: GCC Cross Compilation Daniel Kegel
17:53 GCC Cross Compilation Vishal Kothari
17:14 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Pinski
17:09 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
17:04 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Jakub Jelinek
17:04 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Daniel Jacobowitz
17:02 RE: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Daniel Kegel
16:57 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Joe Buck
14:41 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
13:40 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andrew Haley
13:36 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Marcin Dalecki
13:22 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Georg Bauhaus
12:56 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Richard Guenther
12:50 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
12:44 Re: reload-branch created Bernd Schmidt
12:20 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andrew Haley
12:12 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andreas Schwab
12:09 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Nathan Sidwell
12:07 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Gabriel Dos Reis
12:05 RE: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Rupert Wood
12:01 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andrew Haley
12:00 Re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro(worksforme) Clemens Koller
11:58 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Nathan Sidwell
11:46 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andrew Haley
11:43 Re: reload-branch created Bernd Schmidt
11:35 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Gabriel Dos Reis
11:31 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order offunctions and top-level asms via cgraph] Mostafa Hagog
11:18 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Nathan Sidwell
10:32 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andrew Haley
10:23 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Steven Bosscher
10:18 Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph] Andrew Haley
09:31 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Andrew Haley
09:00 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
06:16 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
05:09 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Jakub Jelinek
02:41 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Paul Schlie

April 10, 2005
22:57 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
22:53 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
22:30 Re: The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released H. J. Lu
22:05 GCC 4.0 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
21:27 Re: The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released Marcin Dalecki
20:48 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2* Gerald Pfeifer
19:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Eric Christopher
19:23 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Zack Weinberg
19:18 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Mark Mitchell
19:16 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Eric Christopher
19:13 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Thomas Koenig
19:03 Re: libiberty configure mysteries Gabriel Dos Reis
18:09 gcc-4.1-20050410 is now available gccadmin
17:43 The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released H. J. Lu
16:05 Re: libiberty configure mysteries Ian Lance Taylor
15:07 Re: libiberty configure mysteries Daniel Jacobowitz
14:59 Re: libiberty configure mysteries Gabriel Dos Reis
14:15 Re: libiberty configure mysteries Daniel Jacobowitz
14:09 libiberty configure mysteries Gabriel Dos Reis
14:00 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Toon Moene
09:36 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Laurent GUERBY
08:59 Propagating loop carried memory dependancies to SMS Mostafa Hagog
06:35 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Andreas Jaeger
03:23 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Diego Novillo

April 09, 2005
23:43 gcc-4.0-20050409 is now available gccadmin
23:13 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Andreas Schwab
23:07 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Laurent GUERBY
22:48 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Laurent GUERBY
19:47 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Eric Botcazou
19:46 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Laurent GUERBY
19:40 GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Matthias Klose
18:51 Re: [Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handlejunk strings Laurent GUERBY
17:22 Re: [Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handle junk strings Richard Kenner
16:18 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Paul Schlie
15:38 Re: Inline round for IA64 Richard Henderson
15:19 [Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handle junkstrings Laurent GUERBY
14:53 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Christian Parpart
14:51 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:42 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Diego Novillo
14:28 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Richard Kenner
14:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze Christian Parpart
14:04 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Andreas Schwab
13:19 Re: Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block? Kenneth Zadeck
12:41 Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074 Christian Joensson
12:31 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Richard Kenner
12:03 Re: Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block? Jan Hubicka
12:03 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Richard Kenner
11:59 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Richard Kenner
11:58 Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block? Steven Bosscher
10:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Eric Botcazou
10:18 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Laurent GUERBY
09:58 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Eric Botcazou
09:49 GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09) Laurent GUERBY
07:03 GCC 4.0 Freeze Mark Mitchell
05:21 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Richard Henderson
04:19 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Paul Schlie
01:54 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Diego Novillo
01:06 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Giovanni Bajo
00:14 gcc-3.4-20050408 is now available gccadmin

April 08, 2005
23:58 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Joe Buck
23:57 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Daniel Berlin
23:50 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Dale Johannesen
23:40 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Mark Mitchell
23:36 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Daniel Berlin
22:49 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Daniel Jacobowitz
22:36 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Steven Bosscher
22:33 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Diego Novillo
22:26 Re: Use normal section names for comdat group? H. J. Lu
21:11 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host E. Weddington
20:17 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
18:29 Re: Inline round for IA64 Steve Kargl
18:16 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Daniel Berlin
18:15 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Diego Novillo
18:14 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Daniel Berlin
18:13 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Marcin Dalecki
18:05 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
18:04 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
17:58 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Diego Novillo
17:56 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Diego Novillo
17:46 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
17:42 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Andrew MacLeod
17:42 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Daniel Jacobowitz
17:39 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Daniel Berlin
17:35 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Andrew MacLeod
17:34 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Joe Buck
17:33 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Frank Ch. Eigler
17:31 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Andrew MacLeod
17:28 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Andrew Pinski
17:27 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Andrew MacLeod
17:26 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Devang Patel
17:25 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jakub Jelinek
17:14 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Joe Buck
17:11 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Joe Buck
17:10 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
17:09 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
17:04 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Daniel Berlin
17:02 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Daniel Berlin
16:59 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jakub Jelinek
16:57 Re: Use normal section names for comdat group? H. J. Lu
16:55 Re: benchmarks Devang Patel
16:52 Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer Jeffrey A Law
16:45 Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols? Diego Novillo
15:45 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Richard Earnshaw
14:52 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized Andrew Haley
13:20 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Daniel Jacobowitz
13:06 GCC 3.4.3 Ray Holme
10:00 PowerPC sections ? Charles J Gillan
09:39 Re: Inline round for IA64 Canqun Yang
09:21 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Eric Botcazou
08:43 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch Bernd Schmidt
08:39 benchmarks vivek sukumaran
07:30 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch Steven Bosscher
06:56 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Arnaud Charlet
04:04 Re: How to specify customized base addr? Zhenyu Guo
02:31 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Eric Christopher
01:48 Re: Does anyone use -fprofile-use with C++? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:06 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Diego Novillo
00:57 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 James E Wilson
00:34 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Diego Novillo
00:28 Re: Does anyone use -fprofile-use with C++? Joe Buck
00:02 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Eric Botcazou

April 07, 2005
23:25 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Björn Haase
23:07 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Janis Johnson
22:38 Re: about alias analysis James E Wilson
22:36 Re: Use normal section names for comdat group? James E Wilson
22:32 Re: Does anyone use -fprofile-use with C++? Andrew Pinski
22:16 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Björn Haase
22:12 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch James E Wilson
22:08 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 James E Wilson
22:02 Does anyone use -fprofile-use with C++? Daniel Kegel
21:37 Re: How to "disable" register allocation? Øyvind Harboe
20:54 Re: 2 suggestions Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
20:47 Re: How to "disable" register allocation? Mike Stump
20:42 Re: How to specify customized base addr? Mike Stump
20:32 RE: How to specify customized base addr? Zagorodnev, Grigory
19:52 Re: ERROR : pls help Devang Patel
19:51 Re: 2 suggestions Gabriel Dos Reis
19:37 Re: ERROR : pls help Virender Kashyap
19:34 Re: Inline round for IA64 Geert Bosch
19:23 Re: 2 suggestions Joe Buck
19:21 Re: ERROR : pls help Dale Johannesen
19:11 Re: 2 suggestions Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:58 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized Andrew Pinski
18:58 ERROR : pls help Virender Kashyap
18:52 Re: 2 suggestions Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:49 Re: 2 suggestions Joe Buck
18:46 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Eric Christopher
18:28 Re: 2 suggestions Toon Moene
18:14 Re: Inline round for IA64 Paul Brook
17:59 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE whenoptimized Andrew Haley
17:54 Re: Inline round for IA64 Steve Kargl
17:41 Re: Inline round for IA64 Geert Bosch
17:40 Re: 2 suggestions E. Weddington
17:33 Re: 2 suggestions Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
17:32 Re: How to "disable" register allocation? Vladimir Makarov
17:31 Re: Inline round for IA64 Richard Kenner
17:28 Re: Inline round for IA64 Steve Kargl
17:22 Re: 2 suggestions Ray Holme
17:18 Re: 2 suggestions Ray Holme
17:15 Re: 2 suggestions Ray Holme
17:11 Re: Inline round for IA64 Geert Bosch
17:04 Re: ARM EABI Exception Handling Paul Brook
17:00 Re: 2 suggestions Eric Botcazou
16:46 ARM EABI Exception Handling Josh Conner
16:45 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host E. Weddington
16:37 Re: 2 suggestions Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:34 How to specify customized base addr? guozy03
16:31 Re: 2 suggestions Christian Joensson
16:18 Re: 2 suggestions Eric Botcazou
16:14 Re: Input and print statements for Front End? Paolo Bonzini
16:12 How to "disable" register allocation? Øyvind Harboe
15:59 Re: 2 suggestions Richard Guenther
15:54 Re: 2 suggestions David Edelsohn
15:48 Re: 2 suggestions Andrew Pinski
15:43 2 suggestions Ray Holme
15:37 Re: Inline round for IA64 Vincent Lefevre
15:14 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Richard Earnshaw
14:56 Re: Status of conversions to predicates.md Eric Botcazou
14:52 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Eric Botcazou
14:51 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P David Edelsohn
14:42 Status of conversions to predicates.md Kazu Hirata
14:34 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Richard Earnshaw
14:12 Re: Inline round for IA64 Steve Kargl
13:53 apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P Eric Botcazou
12:35 Re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro Clemens Koller
12:08 Re: Inline round for IA64 Geert Bosch
11:34 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch Bernd Schmidt
11:14 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
10:45 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Eric Botcazou
10:30 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
10:05 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Eric Botcazou
09:40 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
09:22 Inline round for IA64 Canqun Yang
00:49 gcc-3.3-20050406 is now available gccadmin

April 06, 2005
23:05 re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro Daniel Kegel
21:58 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Eric Botcazou
21:24 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
20:37 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" James E Wilson
19:21 Re: use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types Kumar Gala
19:12 Re: use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types David Edelsohn
18:59 use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types Kumar Gala
18:44 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contributionto FSF Toon Moene
18:13 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Eric Botcazou
17:53 Re: specs file Zack Weinberg
17:41 Re: Illegal promotion of bool to int.... Joe Buck
17:32 specs file Marek Krzyzowski
17:14 Illegal promotion of bool to int.... sjhill
16:33 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF David Edelsohn
16:12 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Denis Vlasenko
16:04 gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro Clemens Koller
15:46 RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 ->SparcSolaris 10 (& others)... Dave Korn
15:38 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Mark Mitchell
15:36 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
15:26 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Paolo Bonzini
14:51 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
13:48 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 E. Weddington
13:42 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
13:25 RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 ->SparcSolaris 10 (& others)... Aaron Gaudio
13:23 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE whenoptimized Ranjit Mathew
13:20 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Richard B. Johnson
13:03 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2* Karl Berry
13:02 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized Diego Novillo
12:57 HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized Andrew Haley
12:39 Re: Input and print statements for Front End? Paul Brook
12:36 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Andrew Haley
12:23 Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement tbp
12:08 Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement tbp
12:06 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Christophe Saout
12:00 Input and print statements for Front End? Harry Goulding
11:56 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Dave Korn
11:53 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Dave Korn
11:38 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
11:13 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Dave Korn
11:06 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Dave Korn
10:52 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Joseph S. Myers
10:15 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Denis Vlasenko
09:37 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Richard Earnshaw
09:28 RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 -> SparcSolaris 10 (& others)... Dave Korn
06:25 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices Eric Christopher
04:20 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" feng qiu
02:57 about alias analysis zouq
01:37 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" James E Wilson
01:19 Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement James E Wilson
01:16 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices nkavv
00:46 Re: 4.0-20050319 / 4-020050402 build error due to --enable-mappedlocation James E Wilson

April 05, 2005
23:30 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Mark Mitchell
23:12 Use normal section names for comdat group? H. J. Lu
23:05 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Joe Buck
22:59 Re: call for testers! John David Anglin
22:21 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" Mike Stump
21:45 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices Eric Christopher
21:45 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Mark Mitchell
21:43 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Mark Mitchell
21:26 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF toon via RT
21:26 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF toon via RT
21:25 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices Richard Sandiford
21:25 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contributionto FSF Toon Moene
20:59 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Richard Sandiford
20:40 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2* Gerald Pfeifer
20:26 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Daniel Jacobowitz
20:05 Re: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 -> SparcSolaris 10 (& others)... Aaron Gaudio
18:41 RE: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Dave Korn
18:31 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Paul Schlie
17:02 Re: sparc.c:509:1: error: "TARGET_ASM_FILE_END" redefined... Christian Joensson
16:34 [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy Christophe Saout
16:30 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF Peter Brown via RT
15:47 Re: call for testers! Kelley Cook
15:37 Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 Kazu Hirata
15:16 wiki changed to require fake logins Daniel Berlin
14:47 Re: sparc.c:509:1: error: "TARGET_ASM_FILE_END" redefined... Eric Botcazou
14:22 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Kelley Cook
14:12 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Nix
13:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Giovanni Bajo
13:15 Biagio Lucini [lucini@phys.ethz.ch] bouncing jgrant
13:14 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Paul Koning
11:28 sparc.c:509:1: error: "TARGET_ASM_FILE_END" redefined... Christian Joensson
11:26 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Marcin Dalecki
10:00 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
09:55 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Zdenek Dvorak
09:42 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
09:31 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
07:53 Re: about "Alias Analysis for Intermediate Code" zouq
07:49 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
07:10 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
06:46 Question about "#pragma pack(n)" feng qiu
06:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Mark Mitchell
06:04 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Mark Mitchell
05:48 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Jason Merrill
05:24 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Mark Mitchell
04:45 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Andrew Pinski
04:41 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Stefan Strasser
04:38 Re: call for testers! Andreas Tobler
04:31 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices nkavv
04:26 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices Daniel Jacobowitz
04:25 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices Daniel Jacobowitz
04:22 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices nkavv
04:19 Using inline assembly with specific register indices nkavv
03:49 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Mark Mitchell
01:52 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Daniel Berlin
01:01 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Richard Henderson
00:38 Re: call for testers! John David Anglin
00:22 Re: call for testers! Geoffrey Keating
00:22 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Joe Buck
00:17 Re: Problems using cfg_layout_finalize() James E Wilson
00:14 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Andrew Pinski
00:14 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Andrew Pinski
00:09 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Giovanni Bajo
00:06 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Diego Novillo

April 04, 2005
23:39 Re: HPUX/HPPA build broken (was Re: call for testers!) John David Anglin
23:32 HPUX/HPPA build broken (was Re: call for testers!) Joe Buck
23:31 Re: call for testers! John David Anglin
23:29 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Nix
23:26 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) Mark Mitchell
22:57 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
22:45 Re: call for testers! Geoffrey Keating
22:36 Re: call for testers! Joe Buck
22:36 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Dale Johannesen
22:28 Re: call for testers! David Edelsohn
22:22 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
21:48 call for testers! Geoffrey Keating
21:36 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Dale Johannesen
21:33 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
20:49 Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 Steven Bosscher
20:43 Re: specification for gcc compilers on sparc and powerpc James A. Morrison
20:05 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Marcin Dalecki
20:00 Re: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Richard Sandiford
19:48 specification for gcc compilers on sparc and powerpc Marek Krzyzowski
19:24 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Robert Dewar
19:13 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Andrew Pinski
19:12 Re: Cross-compiling for PPC405 core... Mike Stump
18:33 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Andrew Pinski
18:14 Cross-compiling for PPC405 core... François Mainguy
17:47 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Dale Johannesen
17:01 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Andrew Haley
16:59 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Devang Patel
16:49 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Devang Patel
16:48 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Giovanni Bajo
16:33 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Andrew Haley
16:29 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Joe Buck
16:26 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Andrew Haley
16:26 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Giovanni Bajo
16:25 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Joe Buck
16:21 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Joe Buck
15:08 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed Andrew Haley
14:17 gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement tbp
14:07 Re: "personal" branch? Gerald Pfeifer
14:01 "personal" branch? Ben Elliston
12:07 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem Jonathan Wakely
12:03 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem Jonathan Wakely
11:08 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem tbp
11:08 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem Nathan Sidwell
11:08 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem Jonathan Wakely
11:05 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem Jonathan Wakely
11:03 Re: SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt Aldy Hernandez
11:03 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem tbp
10:56 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem tbp
10:50 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem Jonathan Wakely
10:22 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem Nathan Sidwell
10:15 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem tbp
09:54 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem Nathan Sidwell
09:48 gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem tbp
09:30 Re: PR 20505 Nathan Sidwell
08:55 Re: about "Alias Analysis for Intermediate Code" Steven Bosscher
08:35 about "Alias Analysis for Intermediate Code" zouq
08:33 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Nathan Sidwell
03:34 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Robert Dewar
01:08 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Robert Dewar
00:31 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Geert Bosch
00:03 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Georg Bauhaus

April 03, 2005
23:38 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Zack Weinberg
23:17 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Robert Dewar
22:59 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Robert Dewar
22:35 Comparing free'd labels Daniel Berlin
21:20 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Kai Henningsen
21:20 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Kai Henningsen
21:20 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Kai Henningsen
21:08 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Gerald Pfeifer
21:07 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Gerald Pfeifer
21:05 Re: SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt Richard Sandiford
20:41 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Paul Schlie
20:33 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Gerald Pfeifer
19:43 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Zack Weinberg
19:37 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Robert Dewar
19:06 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:45 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Robert Dewar
18:42 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Robert Dewar
18:38 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Robert Dewar
18:10 gcc-4.1-20050403 is now available gccadmin
18:06 4.0-20050319 / 4-020050402 build error due to --enable-mapped location Renà Rebe
17:08 Re: Sorry for the noise: Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR BjÃrn Haase
15:24 Re: Sorry for the noise: Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR Peter Barada
14:02 Sorry for the noise: Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR Björn Haase
11:20 Re: Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR Andreas Schwab
08:12 Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR Björn Haase
00:53 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Stefan Strasser
00:20 gcc-4.0-20050402 is now available gccadmin
00:04 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Joe Buck

April 02, 2005
23:10 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Andrew Pinski
23:09 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Stefan Strasser
22:35 Re: Bug#300945: romeo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Gabriel Dos Reis
22:03 Re: Bug#300945: romeo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Andrew Pinski
21:58 Re: Bug#300945: romeo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Andrew Pinski
21:53 Re: Bug#300945: romeo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Shaun Jackman
19:04 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Joe Buck
18:29 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Gerald Pfeifer
18:26 Re: GCC errors Steven Bosscher
18:20 GCC errors Rajkishore Barik
17:52 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Mattias Engdegård
16:51 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:39 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Larry Evans
14:22 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:34 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Sam Lauber
12:32 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Sam Lauber
12:32 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Sam Lauber
12:27 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Denis Vlasenko
12:19 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Denis Vlasenko
09:00 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Gabriel Dos Reis
08:50 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Stefan Strasser
06:23 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Joe Buck
06:10 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Andrew Pinski
03:21 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Georg Bauhaus
03:20 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux James E Wilson
03:17 Re: GNU toolchain for blackfin processor James E Wilson
03:12 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:08 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Russell Shaw
02:03 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization level Paul Schlie
01:30 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Georg Bauhaus
01:25 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Stefan Strasser
01:06 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Marcin Dalecki
00:56 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Marcin Dalecki
00:20 Re: Problems using cfg_layout_finalize() Grzegorz B. Prokopski
00:07 gcc-3.4-20050401 is now available gccadmin

April 01, 2005
23:12 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level E. Weddington
23:12 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Paul Koning
23:03 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Joe Buck
22:55 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Gabriel Dos Reis
22:40 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level E. Weddington
22:32 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Georg Bauhaus
21:59 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level E. Weddington
21:43 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Jan Hubicka
21:36 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Mark Mitchell
21:31 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Richard Guenther
21:24 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level E. Weddington
21:17 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Richard Guenther
21:07 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Mark Mitchell
20:36 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Dale Johannesen
20:22 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Gabriel Dos Reis
20:16 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Mark Mitchell
20:10 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Richard Guenther
19:56 Re: PR 20505 Nathan Sidwell
19:53 Re: PR 20505 James E Wilson
19:48 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Mike Stump
19:44 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Mike Stump
19:37 Re: i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end Mike Stump
19:37 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Mark Mitchell
19:36 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Diego Novillo
19:24 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Mark Mitchell
18:45 Re: i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end Stefan Strasser
18:33 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Joe Buck
18:16 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Kelly Murphy
17:46 Re: gcc and vfp instructions Richard Earnshaw
17:24 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Daniel Jacobowitz
17:09 Re: gcc and vfp instructions aram bharathi
16:45 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Stefan Strasser
16:31 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux Mark Mitchell
16:10 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Larry Evans
16:05 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Andi Kleen
15:56 Re: about new_regalloc Michael Matz
15:02 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Larry Evans
15:01 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Sam Lauber
13:36 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Andrew Haley
13:16 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Daniel Berlin
11:43 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Andrew Haley
11:40 Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? Sam Lauber
08:38 Re: PR 20505 Nathan Sidwell
07:51 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux Giovanni Bajo
06:39 i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end "하태준"
06:05 Re: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
05:11 Problems using cfg_layout_finalize() Grzegorz B. Prokopski
02:37 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch James E Wilson
01:14 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level Zack Weinberg
00:51 RFC: #pragma optimization_level Dale Johannesen
00:11 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch James E Wilson


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3