gcc archive
date index for June, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2005
23:55 gcc-4.0-20050630 is now available gccadmin
23:29 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
23:26 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
23:25 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Joe Buck
23:06 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Vladimir Makarov
22:30 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Daniel Berlin
22:28 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) James E Wilson
22:26 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:23 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Vladimir Makarov
22:16 Problem with tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:get_computation-cost Richard Kenner
22:15 mirror health Mike Stump
22:11 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) James E Wilson
22:06 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Joe Buck
21:46 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler James E Wilson
21:32 Re: errors when compiling gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd-5.2.1. Gerald Pfeifer
21:30 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
21:12 Re: [C++] Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Geoffrey Keating
21:07 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
20:53 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Kai Henningsen
20:29 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
20:25 Re: Ada is broken in a clean directory Paul Brook
20:08 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Paul Schlie
19:47 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Steven Bosscher
19:15 Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Paul Schlie
19:06 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
19:02 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Daniel Berlin
18:48 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Giovanni Bajo
18:25 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Giovanni Bajo
18:23 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Jeffrey A Law
18:19 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Joe Buck
18:12 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Bernd Schmidt
17:51 PR 21963 & 22212 Richard Kenner
17:48 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Jeffrey A Law
16:55 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Steven Bosscher
16:47 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
16:28 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:constant_multiple_of Richard Kenner
16:08 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Andrew Pinski
16:04 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 fjahanian
15:51 Re: Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed Ulrich Weigand
15:13 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:constant_multiple_of Zdenek Dvorak
15:03 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 fjahanian
14:42 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 fjahanian
14:20 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Mostafa Hagog
14:19 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Andrey Belevantsev
13:50 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Vladimir Makarov
11:57 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
10:53 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Richard Earnshaw
10:22 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
09:32 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Richard Earnshaw
08:02 moene.indiv.nluug.nl is down and out ... Toon Moene
06:08 Re: Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Shaun Jackman
04:35 [C++] Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Richard Henderson
03:44 initializing wider-than-pointers DJ Delorie
03:24 Ada is broken in a clean directory Andrew Pinski
02:21 Re: Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Russell Shaw
02:17 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:constant_multiple_of Andrew Pinski
01:19 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Daniel Berlin
01:17 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Daniel Berlin
00:34 Re: Re: hpux regression vs 4.0.1 John David Anglin

June 29, 2005
23:55 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Richard Henderson
23:45 Re: Re: hpux regression vs 4.0.1 Jeffrey A Law
23:43 Re: Aalokrai Porwal
23:30 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Dale Johannesen
23:17 Re: Re: Joe Buck
22:57 PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Daniel Berlin
22:46 Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
21:57 Re: Geoffrey Keating
21:54 Re: Re: Jeffrey A Law
21:51 Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2 François-Xavier Coudert
21:49 Re: Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Shaun Jackman
21:42 Question on tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:constant_multiple_of Richard Kenner
21:28 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Marc
20:40 Re: Mark Mitchell
19:13 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nicholas Nethercote
18:48 Re: Bryce McKinlay
18:45 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Robert Dewar
18:37 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Olivier Galibert
18:32 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
18:01 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Daniel Berlin
18:01 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Vladimir Makarov
17:39 Re: Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Daniel Jacobowitz
17:34 Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Shaun Jackman
17:00 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Joe Buck
16:46 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
16:19 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Eric Botcazou
15:46 Pro64-based GPLed compiler Marc Gonzalez-Sigler
15:38 Re: named address spaces (update) E. Weddington
15:37 Re: named address spaces (update) E. Weddington
15:01 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Koning
14:59 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Schlie
14:21 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nicholas Nethercote
13:35 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Robert Dewar
13:15 Re: named address spaces (update) Daniel Jacobowitz
13:12 RE: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Dave Korn
12:55 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Daniel Berlin
12:51 Re: GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Daniel Berlin
12:44 Re: GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Steven J. Hill
12:18 Re: named address spaces (update) DJ Delorie
12:14 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Robert Dewar
11:16 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Michael Veksler
11:04 Re: GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Andi Kleen
09:47 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Theodore Papadopoulo
09:18 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Robert Dewar
09:04 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Michael Veksler
09:04 Re: GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Richard Henderson
08:48 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Eric Botcazou
08:48 named address spaces (update) Martin Koegler
08:42 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Robert Dewar
08:33 The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Michael Veksler
07:40 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Schlie
07:08 Re: A question about a possible build problem. Zack Weinberg
06:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Eric Botcazou
06:16 Re: [Ada] Patch needed to boostrap Ada on x86_64 as of 20050628 Laurent GUERBY
06:04 A question about a possible build problem. George R Goffe
05:17 Re: stage 2 date? Mark Mitchell
04:59 GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Steven J. Hill
04:18 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Joe Buck
03:13 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Scott Robert Ladd
02:19 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Marcin Dalecki
01:33 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Schlie
01:27 stage 2 date? Ben Elliston
01:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Diego Novillo
01:14 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:48 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
00:43 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:27 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
00:02 gcc-3.4-20050628 is now available gccadmin

June 28, 2005
23:53 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
23:05 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
22:58 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Georg Bauhaus
22:41 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Georg Bauhaus
22:19 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
22:16 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Falk Hueffner
22:09 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joseph S. Myers
21:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Mike Stump
21:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
21:57 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
21:53 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
21:50 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
21:48 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
21:44 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
21:41 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
21:39 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andreas Schwab
21:35 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
21:27 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Paul Koning
21:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
20:58 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:51 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:50 [Ada] Patch needed to boostrap Ada on x86_64 as of 20050628 Laurent GUERBY
20:37 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
20:31 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
20:24 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
20:18 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Paul Koning
20:08 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Jeffrey A Law
19:48 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:44 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Toon Moene
19:43 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:32 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
19:25 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
19:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
19:17 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
19:17 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
19:13 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
19:10 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
19:02 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:56 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
18:52 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
18:52 Re: Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed Diego Novillo
18:50 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
18:44 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
18:42 Re: Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed Andrew Pinski
18:40 Re: Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed David Edelsohn
18:38 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
18:38 Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed Ulrich Weigand
18:38 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Jeffrey A Law
18:36 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
18:28 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
18:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:12 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Mark Mitchell
18:09 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:02 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
17:58 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:51 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
17:46 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Theodore Papadopoulo
17:41 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Paul Schlie
17:36 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
17:35 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Diego Novillo
17:34 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
17:32 Re: G++ and ISO C++ Giovanni Bajo
17:23 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
17:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
17:18 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
17:16 RE: LCOV Dave Korn
17:10 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
17:08 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Daniel Berlin
17:03 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Mark Mitchell
17:00 Re: G++ and ISO C++ Kurt Wall
17:00 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Giovanni Bajo
16:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Morten Welinder
16:56 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
16:54 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Joe Buck
16:47 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Joseph S. Myers
16:42 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
16:39 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:38 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
16:32 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
16:15 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Joe Buck
16:07 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Jeffrey A Law
16:07 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Andrew Pinski
15:58 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
15:55 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:51 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Mark Mitchell
15:49 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
15:41 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Jeffrey A Law
15:30 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
15:04 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Haley
15:01 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
14:52 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
14:47 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:42 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
14:39 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
14:33 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
14:28 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Jonathan Wilson
14:24 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
14:23 Re: Some basic/beginner questions Diego Novillo
14:13 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:11 Some basic/beginner questions nico
14:05 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
14:05 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Andrew Pinski
13:59 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:58 G++ and ISO C++ Mirza
13:52 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
13:47 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Paubert
13:29 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
13:27 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Daniel Berlin
13:19 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:57 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
12:50 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Scott Robert Ladd
12:38 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
12:35 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
12:34 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:33 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:30 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
12:16 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Koning
12:09 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
12:08 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
12:08 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:07 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
12:03 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Ulrich Weigand
12:01 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:50 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:19 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
10:08 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Robert Dewar
09:49 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
09:48 Re: No tail call optimization in Thumb mode? Richard Earnshaw
09:43 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Giovanni Bajo
09:18 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
07:39 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Falk Hueffner
07:25 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
07:22 GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Mark Mitchell
07:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
06:55 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Steven Bosscher
06:01 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
05:34 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
05:13 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:50 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
04:34 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
04:08 signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
03:49 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:06 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Mark Mitchell
02:28 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types Richard Kenner
00:49 Re: some errors compiling gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2. Zack Weinberg
00:43 some errors compiling gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2. wangxiuli
00:43 errors when compiling gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2.1. wangxiuli

June 27, 2005
23:36 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types James A. Morrison
21:52 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
20:48 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types Richard Kenner
19:56 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Richard Henderson
19:20 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
17:41 LCOV Dickson Patton
17:03 Re: makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..} Karl Berry
16:40 Re: [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms Joe Buck
15:48 Newbie question: Offset for a pseudo. N V Krishna
15:30 Re: expanding builtins James Lemke
15:24 Re: expanding builtins Andreas Schwab
15:21 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
15:21 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:17 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:05 re: [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms Dan Kegel
14:47 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Koning
14:39 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Morten Welinder
14:36 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
14:26 Re: expanding builtins Jakub Jelinek
14:12 expanding builtins James Lemke
14:10 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:02 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
12:32 Re: [Ada] Current patch needed to build Ada as of 20050626 Eric Botcazou
12:18 Re: [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms Nathan Sidwell
08:56 Re: -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Liu Haibin
05:09 Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
01:56 Re: Confusing code in regrename.c Richard Henderson

June 26, 2005
22:11 Re: [Ada] Current patch needed to build Ada as of 20050626 Andrew Pinski
22:09 Re: attributes and templates Andrew Pinski
21:54 attributes and templates Nathan Sidwell
21:00 [Ada] Current patch needed to build Ada as of 20050626 Laurent GUERBY
16:53 Re: makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..} Gerald Pfeifer
16:11 Re: cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Gerald Pfeifer
15:27 Confusing code in regrename.c Steven Bosscher
13:42 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gerald Pfeifer

June 25, 2005
21:32 How to build GCC 3.2.2 on Fedora Core 3 with AMD64? Neo Jia
18:06 gcc-4.1-20050625 is now available gccadmin
06:58 RSS feed for webpage? Sam Lauber
00:06 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Steven Bosscher

June 24, 2005
23:46 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 fjahanian
23:11 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Gerald Pfeifer
22:17 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Andrew Pinski
22:06 [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
21:44 Re: removing src/{expect,dejagnu} Mark Kettenis
16:09 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
15:40 Re: Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish. Robert Dewar
13:57 Re: Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish. Andreas Schwab
13:51 removing src/{expect,dejagnu} Ben Elliston
13:27 Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish. Graham Pratt
10:16 RE: Cross compiler Dave Korn
10:10 Re: Cross compiler Ranjit Mathew
09:42 Cross compiler Eric Liu
06:15 No tail call optimization in Thumb mode? Kazu Hirata
05:53 gcc developers, donate money to help fight cancer! Patrick McFarland
03:01 Re: -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Liu Haibin
02:07 Re: dead label use? Geoffrey Keating
00:12 defaults.h silliness Mike Stump
00:06 gcc-4.0-20050623 is now available gccadmin

June 23, 2005
23:46 Re: -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Daniel Berlin
23:08 Re: -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Zdenek Dvorak
21:05 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status Mark Mitchell
18:42 Re: Changelog question for the FSF address change Zack Weinberg
18:41 [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms ransom
16:55 Re: Changelog question for the FSF address change Joseph S. Myers
16:00 Changelog question for the FSF address change Kelley Cook
15:58 Re: Forward: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED] Zack Weinberg
15:48 Re: does friend qualify as a forward decl? Andrew Pinski
15:39 does friend qualify as a forward decl? Tom Marshall
14:45 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status Andrew Pinski
14:08 GCC 4.0.1 Status Mark Mitchell
12:43 Re: add sourcefiles to gcc Rafael Espíndola
08:47 -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Liu Haibin
08:10 Re: add sourcefiles to gcc nico
07:27 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Paolo Bonzini
02:43 Re: dead label use? Ian Lance Taylor
01:09 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
00:56 The Linux binutils 2.16.91.0.1 is released H. J. Lu

June 22, 2005
23:40 dead label use? Mike Stump
22:04 Re: spec benchmark testing Andrew Pinski
21:36 spec benchmark testing Virender Kashyap
21:35 Re: CFT: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Geoffrey Keating
21:33 Re: cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Joe Buck
20:17 Re: cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:56 Re: cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Andrew Pinski
19:48 cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Gerald Pfeifer
19:44 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
19:41 Re: gcc template error? Shelly Adhikari
19:31 RE: gcc template error? Jason Mancini
19:29 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Zack Weinberg
19:00 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Giovanni Bajo
18:28 Re: -floop-optimize2 Scott Robert Ladd
18:14 Re: gcc template error? Andrew Pinski
17:58 gcc template error? Shelly Adhikari
17:52 Re: add sourcefiles to gcc Rafael Espíndola
17:41 Re: -floop-optimize2 Zdenek Dvorak
16:43 Re: Blogging the gcc summit Joe Buck
15:55 RE: Getting the byte offset of a member variable pointer type Dave Korn
15:52 Blogging the gcc summit dank
14:06 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Mark Mitchell
13:48 Getting the byte offset of a member variable pointer type Thomas Immich
13:25 CFT: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Paolo Bonzini
12:47 add sourcefiles to gcc nico
07:01 meet problem when building uCOSII with gcc-h8s ported version 唐 垠
05:46 Re: Cross compiler libgcc.a with -mthumb-interwork Jani Monoses
03:57 Re: [4.0.0] "make check-g++" fails linking tests on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Andrew Pinski
03:52 [4.0.0] "make check-g++" fails linking tests on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Douglas Gregor
01:55 Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Feng Wang

June 21, 2005
23:34 gcc-3.4-20050621 is now available gccadmin
22:46 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 DJ Delorie
22:44 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
22:35 Cross compiler libgcc.a with -mthumb-interwork John Carter
22:31 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
22:24 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 DJ Delorie
22:17 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
18:38 Bugzilla entries for arc-elf32 target Saurabh Verma
17:55 Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Joseph S. Myers
17:48 Re: Problem implementing faults in Objective-C Andrew Pinski
17:20 Re: Problem implementing faults in Objective-C Frederic Stark
17:02 Re: Template declaration inside function Mattias Karlsson
16:49 Re: Problem implementing faults in Objective-C Timothy J. Wood
16:44 Re: Template declaration inside function Florian Weimer
16:39 Template declaration inside function Mattias Karlsson
16:32 Re: -floop-optimize2 Scott Robert Ladd
16:30 Re: -floop-optimize2 Scott Robert Ladd
16:18 Re: -floop-optimize2 Richard Guenther
16:17 Re: -floop-optimize2 Steven Bosscher
16:14 Re: -floop-optimize2 Andrew Pinski
16:10 -floop-optimize2 Scott Robert Ladd
16:04 Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Giovanni Bajo
15:33 Re: An Rvalue references for g++ patch Gabriel Dos Reis
15:21 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
14:54 回复： Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Feng Wang
14:33 Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Tobias . Schlueter
14:21 How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Feng Wang
13:28 An Rvalue references for g++ patch Pedro LamarÃo
12:49 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
11:13 Problem implementing faults in Objective-C Frederic Stark
09:55 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Michael Meissner
06:38 Re: Software pipelining capabilities Vasanth

June 20, 2005
22:20 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Mike Stump
21:47 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Mike Stump
21:42 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier
20:58 Re: c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
19:53 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Kai Henningsen
19:53 Re: c/c++ validator Kai Henningsen
18:16 PATCH: PR 1025: binutils failed to build gcc 4.0.1 20050619 H. J. Lu
18:10 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question DJ Delorie
18:01 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
17:18 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
17:11 Re: Cygwin build failure Paul Thomas
16:57 Re: Cygwin build failure François-Xavier Coudert
16:52 Re: Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Daniel Berlin
16:09 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Benjamin Kosnik
16:07 Re: Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Joseph S. Myers
16:04 Re: Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Andrew Pinski
16:00 Re: Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Andrew Pinski
15:58 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
15:43 Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Daniel Berlin
15:36 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Pinski
15:29 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
15:04 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
15:01 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Pinski
14:56 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vectorshifts? Dorit Naishlos
14:55 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
14:54 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
14:35 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Pinski
14:28 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
14:26 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Pinski
14:25 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Scott Robert Ladd
14:04 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Haley
13:40 How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
13:22 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Sebastian Pop
13:17 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
13:14 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
13:13 PATCH: PR 1022: binutils failed to build gcc 4.0.1 20050619 H. J. Lu
13:09 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
13:01 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
12:59 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
12:53 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
12:46 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
12:39 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
12:23 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
12:09 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
12:09 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
12:08 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
11:34 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
11:32 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
11:26 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
11:14 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
11:04 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
10:56 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Joseph S. Myers
10:54 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
10:43 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
10:32 Re: PowerPC small data sections. Sergei Organov
10:14 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
09:50 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Michael Veksler
09:25 Re: libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 libraries Jonathan Wakely
08:13 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Steven Bosscher
07:51 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Michael Veksler
07:07 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Benjamin Kosnik
06:30 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Ranjit Mathew
06:21 PATCH: PR/1025: binutils failed to build gcc 4.0.1 20050619 H. J. Lu
06:12 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Mark Williams (MWP)
05:55 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
05:50 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
05:46 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Mark Williams (MWP)
05:41 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
05:32 Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Mark Williams (MWP)
05:22 gcc 4.0.1 (prerelease): new libstdc++ testsuite failures on sparc-linux Christian Joensson
02:44 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar

June 19, 2005
23:59 Re: c/c++ validator David Bremner
23:47 Getting to the gcc summit Daniel Kegel
23:26 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Gabriel Dos Reis
22:52 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Geoff Keating
22:49 libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 libraries Bill
22:45 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Gabriel Dos Reis
22:13 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vector shifts? Richard Henderson
21:56 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Geoffrey Keating
20:58 Re: c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
20:56 Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3 Kai Ruottu
20:55 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vectorshifts? Dorit Naishlos
20:43 Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3 Kai Ruottu
20:30 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Paolo Carlini
20:22 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues John David Anglin
20:21 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Marcin Dalecki
20:20 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Jakub Jelinek
18:23 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
18:10 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Joseph S. Myers
17:33 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vector shifts? Richard Henderson
17:20 question about match_operand and vec_select Ling-hua Tseng
17:14 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
17:08 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vectorshifts? Dorit Naishlos
16:50 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vector shifts? Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vectorshifts? Dorit Naishlos
16:17 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
16:06 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
15:55 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
15:53 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
15:50 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
15:48 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Paolo Carlini
15:46 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Mike Hearn
15:45 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Michael Veksler
15:40 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
15:33 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
15:18 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
13:57 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
13:54 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
13:52 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
13:48 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
13:40 Re: Bugzilla queries extremely slow Paolo Carlini
13:35 Re: Bugzilla queries extremely slow Daniel Berlin
13:07 Re: Bugzilla queries extremely slow Paolo Carlini
13:06 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Paolo Carlini
13:04 Bugzilla queries extremely slow Paolo Carlini
12:53 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Mike Hearn
11:16 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Steven Bosscher
11:11 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
10:56 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
10:54 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
10:49 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
10:18 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Kai Henningsen
10:18 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Kai Henningsen
10:17 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Haren Visavadia
09:47 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
09:42 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
09:29 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
09:25 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
09:15 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
09:12 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
09:04 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
08:59 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
08:55 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
08:50 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
08:35 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
03:48 Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3 Steven J. Hill
03:04 Re: c/c++ validator Mark Loeser
02:48 Re: c/c++ validator Gabriel Dos Reis
02:41 Re: c/c++ validator Florian Krohm
02:36 some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3 zouqiong
02:36 Re: some question about gc zouqiong
02:16 Re: c/c++ validator Mathieu Malaterre
02:05 Re: c/c++ validator Gabriel Dos Reis
01:44 Re: c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
01:03 Re: c/c++ validator Gabriel Dos Reis
01:02 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
00:45 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis

June 18, 2005
22:45 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Tristan Wibberley
22:39 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Paolo Carlini
22:38 Re: c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
22:33 Re: Forward: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED] Jakub Jelinek
22:32 Re: c/c++ validator Mathieu Malaterre
22:27 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Eric Botcazou
22:24 c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
22:06 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 David Edelsohn
22:01 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Ulrich Weigand
22:01 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
21:52 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain infrustrating reporters Laurent GUERBY
21:48 towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vector shifts? Dorit Naishlos
21:37 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
21:33 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustratingreporters Laurent GUERBY
21:30 Re: Forward: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED] Andrew Pinski
21:27 Forward: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED] "Martin v. LÃwis"
21:26 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
21:08 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
21:01 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Florian Weimer
20:55 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
20:45 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
19:57 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Joseph S. Myers
19:16 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
18:52 Re: Fortran left broken for a couple of days now Jan Hubicka
18:50 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
18:46 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Mark Mitchell
18:33 Re: Regressions Jan Hubicka
18:21 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Joseph S. Myers
18:13 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Benjamin Kosnik
18:12 gcc-4.1-20050618 is now available gccadmin
18:08 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Joseph S. Myers
18:05 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
17:44 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
16:19 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Joseph S. Myers
14:15 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
13:52 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
13:23 Re: Your rtti.c changes broke some obj-c++ tests Nathan Sidwell
13:22 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:18 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Toon Moene
13:15 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:12 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:10 Re: Your rtti.c changes broke some obj-c++ tests Nathan Sidwell
13:09 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:07 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:05 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
13:04 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Toon Moene
12:48 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
12:43 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
12:39 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
11:47 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Toon Moene
11:47 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Toon Moene
11:36 Re: Regressions Steven Bosscher
11:34 Fortran left broken for a couple of days now Steven Bosscher
11:11 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Sylvain Pion
10:54 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
07:09 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Patrick McFarland
06:52 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
05:12 Re: The tree API Mike Stump
04:39 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mike Stump
04:09 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Mike Stump
03:49 Re: PowerPC small data sections. Mike Stump
02:47 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Michael Meissner
02:02 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
01:10 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Dale Johannesen
00:59 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
00:23 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Andrew Pinski
00:20 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie

June 17, 2005
23:44 Your rtti.c changes broke some obj-c++ tests Giovanni Bajo
23:01 GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Mark Mitchell
22:48 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Diego Novillo
22:09 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paolo Bonzini
18:29 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
14:14 PowerPC small data sections. Sergei Organov
13:58 Keysigning at GCC summit Matthew Wilcox
13:54 Re: Major regression in 4.1. Daniel Berlin
13:11 Re: Bootstrap Failure (i686-pc-linux-gnu, --with-arch=pentium4) Ranjit Mathew
12:55 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
12:28 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Diego Novillo
12:26 Re: Major regression in 4.1. sjhill
12:09 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paolo Bonzini
12:02 Re: Bootstrap Failure (i686-pc-linux-gnu, --with-arch=pentium4) Volker Reichelt
12:01 building 3.4.x with in-tree binutils 2.16.* Jan Beulich
12:00 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
07:03 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paolo Bonzini
06:30 Re: Regressions Steve Kargl
06:02 Re: Regressions FX Coudert
05:57 Bootstrap Failure (i686-pc-linux-gnu, --with-arch=pentium4) Ranjit Mathew
04:38 Major regression in 4.1. Steve Kargl
04:28 basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
01:23 gcc-4.0-20050616 is now available gccadmin
00:14 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier

June 16, 2005
22:08 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Eric Botcazou
21:54 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
21:15 Re: Fixing Bugs Kai Henningsen
20:57 Re: x86-linux bootstrap broken on mainline? Jan Hubicka
20:47 Re: x86-linux bootstrap broken on mainline? Jan Hubicka
20:40 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Gabriel Dos Reis
20:06 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Mike Stump
19:47 RE: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Menezes, Evandro
19:20 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Joseph S. Myers
19:08 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
18:59 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
18:53 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
18:46 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Geoffrey Keating
18:03 x86-linux bootstrap broken on mainline? Laurent GUERBY
17:41 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
17:38 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
17:25 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Roberto Bagnara
17:05 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier
16:39 Re: build fails for 1st pass gcc 3.4.4 target=m68k-elf host=build=x86_64 Andrew Pinski
16:34 build fails for 1st pass gcc 3.4.4 target=m68k-elfhost=build=x86_64 Thomas Brinker
16:34 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
16:24 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters E. Weddington
16:12 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
16:06 Re: The tree API James A. Morrison
16:04 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
16:00 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
15:57 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Haren Visavadia
15:40 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Jakub Jelinek
15:30 problemns confgire/build gcc/libstdc++ for ColdFire v4e Peter Barada
15:22 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
15:16 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
15:16 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
15:13 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
15:12 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
15:12 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Eric Botcazou
15:10 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Joseph S. Myers
15:08 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gainin frustrating reporters Daniel Berlin
15:07 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Robert Dewar
15:03 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Daniel Berlin
15:02 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustratingreporters Daniel Berlin
15:00 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
14:59 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
14:57 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Jonathan Wakely
14:54 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain infrustrating reporters Daniel Berlin
14:52 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
14:45 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Steven Bosscher
14:40 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
14:39 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Dan Kegel
14:37 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
14:31 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
14:29 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
14:24 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
14:15 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
14:12 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mark Hahn
13:50 Re: The tree API Rafael Espíndola
13:38 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Jakub Jelinek
13:21 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
12:42 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustratingreporters Daniel Berlin
12:42 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Patrick McFarland
12:35 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Haren Visavadia
12:26 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Mirza
12:25 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Steven Bosscher
12:20 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustratingreporters Daniel Berlin
12:12 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustratingreporters Daniel Berlin
12:09 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
12:07 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Daniel Berlin
12:03 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
11:52 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Robert Dewar
11:43 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustratingreporters Daniel Berlin
10:18 The tree API ibanez
08:57 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Eric Botcazou
08:30 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Mirza
08:05 Re: Expanding an ADDSI3 into 2 x ADDHI3 does not work BjÃrn Haase
06:30 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Mike Stump
03:13 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Robert Dewar
02:44 Re: Bug in transparent union handling? Giovanni Bajo
01:37 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier
00:16 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Benjamin Kosnik
00:12 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Mike Stump

June 15, 2005
23:41 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Scott Robert Ladd
23:23 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
22:56 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Steven Bosscher
22:46 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Mike Stump
22:27 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Mike Stump
22:19 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Steven Bosscher
22:18 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
22:15 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
22:06 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) James A. Morrison
21:27 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Geoffrey Keating
21:13 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Marcin Dalecki
21:06 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Mike Stump
20:56 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Mike Stump
20:07 Re: help using mingw/gcc Björn Haase
19:28 Re: po file update "Martin v. Löwis"
19:22 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Florian Weimer
19:07 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Eric Botcazou
18:42 RE: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Dave Korn
18:41 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier
18:30 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Andrew Pinski
18:20 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier
17:44 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Aaron W. LaFramboise
17:25 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
17:14 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Richard Guenther
17:06 RE: help using mingw/gcc Dave Korn
17:00 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
16:53 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
16:53 Re: po file update Mark Mitchell
16:50 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
16:45 Re: help using mingw/gcc Jonathan Wakely
16:39 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
16:32 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Steven Bosscher
16:31 help using mingw/gcc darmay at mindspring dot com
16:28 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Dan Kegel
16:14 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
16:13 RE: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Dave Korn
16:12 copyright assignment Rafael Espíndola
16:09 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Sam Lauber
15:57 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Richard Guenther
15:49 Re: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Vincent Lefevre
15:46 Re: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Vincent Lefevre
15:45 Re: Bug in transparent union handling? Richard Henderson
15:31 Re: po file update Joseph S. Myers
15:29 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Scott Robert Ladd
15:16 Re: mudflap cache question Frank Ch. Eigler
15:03 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Giovanni Bajo
14:40 Re: Bug related to floating-point traps? Vincent Lefevre
14:36 Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Roberto Bagnara
14:35 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Graham Stott
14:14 po file update Jakub Jelinek
13:45 Re: Bug related to floating-point traps? Gabriel Paubert
13:15 Bug related to floating-point traps? Vincent Lefevre
13:03 Re: Software pipelining capabilities Ayal Zaks
11:59 Re: Expanding an ADDSI3 into 2 x ADDHI3 does not work Paolo Bonzini
11:52 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Scott Robert Ladd
11:36 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Ranjit Mathew
11:13 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Robert Dewar
11:11 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Robert Dewar
11:09 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Robert Dewar
11:09 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Vincent Lefevre
09:11 Re: Bug in transparent union handling? Giovanni Bajo
08:23 GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Volker Reichelt
07:16 Expanding an ADDSI3 into 2 x ADDHI3 does not work mhauff at bigpond dot net dot
06:23 Re: req. help on merging instructions Uros Bizjak
05:47 Re: About macro: SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P Richard Sandiford
05:41 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Daniel Kegel
05:41 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Marcin Dalecki
05:11 req. help on merging instructions mohit . sharma
05:11 Re: Bug in transparent union handling? Richard Henderson
05:08 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Richard Henderson
04:20 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options R Hill
04:00 Re: Problems with collect2 on hpux John David Anglin
03:49 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) R Hill
02:58 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Andrew Pinski
02:49 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Russell Shaw
02:45 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Timothy J. Wood
02:39 RE: Visual C++ style inline asms Bobby McNulty
02:29 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Gabriel Dos Reis
02:10 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
01:57 PR 14814 Giovanni Bajo
01:48 Re: [Gdb-discuss] Re: x86 Q: why aren't the SSE intrinsics always_inline? Fred Fish
01:29 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Andi Kleen
01:29 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Daniel Jacobowitz
01:26 Re: Visual C++ style inline asms Andrew Pinski
01:25 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Benjamin Kosnik
01:25 Visual C++ style inline asms Mike Stump
01:17 Re: [Gdb-discuss] Re: x86 Q: why aren't the SSE intrinsics always_inline? Daniel Jacobowitz
01:12 Re: [Gdb-discuss] Re: x86 Q: why aren't the SSE intrinsics always_inline? Fred Fish
00:06 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Giovanni Bajo
00:03 gcc-3.4-20050614 is now available gccadmin
00:00 Bug in transparent union handling? Daniel Berlin

June 14, 2005
23:44 Libstdc++ versioning issues Mark Mitchell
22:55 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Marcin Dalecki
22:32 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Marcin Dalecki
22:17 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
21:30 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Robert Dewar
21:23 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Robert Dewar
21:22 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Robert Dewar
20:33 mudflap cache question Herman ten Brugge
20:19 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Laurent GUERBY
20:13 Re: MIPS Tri-arch Question Jim Gifford
20:12 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
19:51 Build success for gcc 3.4.4 on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64UNIX) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
19:22 Re: Problems with collect2 on hpux Warren_Baird
18:30 Re: MIPS Tri-arch Question Eric Christopher
18:27 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) chris jefferson
18:14 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Devang Patel
17:57 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Vincent Lefevre
17:56 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Russell Shaw
17:45 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
17:38 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Scott Robert Ladd
17:38 RE: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Dave Korn
17:25 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Russell Shaw
17:12 Re: copyright assignment Florian Weimer
17:07 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Richard Guenther
16:56 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
16:19 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Diego Novillo
16:01 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Mark Mitchell
15:55 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
15:50 Re: copyright assignment James A. Morrison
15:47 copyright assignment Rafael Espíndola
15:37 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
15:29 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Vincent Lefevre
15:25 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Robert Dewar
15:16 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Daniel Jacobowitz
15:15 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Vincent Lefevre
15:13 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Robert Dewar
15:00 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Diego Novillo
14:55 Re: x86 Q: why aren't the SSE intrinsics always_inline? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:54 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
14:53 Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options Robert Dewar
14:52 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
14:46 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Joseph S. Myers
14:39 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Andrew Pinski
14:36 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
14:34 Porposal: Floating-Point Options Scott Robert Ladd
14:34 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Andrew Pinski
14:34 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Andrew Pinski
14:27 Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Andrew Pinski
14:16 Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing) Scott Robert Ladd
11:36 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Jan Hubicka
11:29 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Jan Hubicka
09:22 Re: x86 Q: why aren't the SSE intrinsics always_inline? Andrew Haley
08:45 About macro: SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P ibanez
08:05 MIPS Tri-arch Question Jim Gifford
08:02 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Matthew Sachs
07:55 Re: Problem with recompute_tree_invarant_for_addr_expr Zdenek Dvorak
06:43 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Zack Weinberg
06:39 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Mark Mitchell
06:27 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Dorit Naishlos
05:55 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Richard Henderson
03:47 Re: a "hello world" frontend James A. Morrison
03:11 Re: a "hello world" frontend Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
02:49 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Andrew Pinski
02:36 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Matthew Sachs
02:17 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Zack Weinberg
00:36 Re: Problem with recompute_tree_invarant_for_addr_expr Richard Henderson

June 13, 2005
23:41 Re: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Robert Dewar
23:40 Re: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Robert Dewar
23:13 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Mike Stump
22:58 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Geoffrey Keating
22:36 [gomp] New branch for OpenMP: gomp-20050608-branch Diego Novillo
22:35 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Mark Mitchell
21:24 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Devang Patel
21:15 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Florian Weimer
20:54 Re: Problem with recompute_tree_invarant_for_addr_expr Zdenek Dvorak
20:07 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Richard Henderson
20:03 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Daniel Jacobowitz
19:59 Re: [PATCH] Change bb-reorder.c to use succ block frequency Richard Henderson
19:57 Re: PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Richard Henderson
19:35 Re: RFA: Integrate ABI testsuite in GCC Sam Lauber
19:20 Re: In current gcc trunk: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules Giovanni Bajo
19:19 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB outputformat with the -multi_module option Sam Lauber
19:06 [PATCH] Change bb-reorder.c to use succ block frequency Pat Haugen
19:00 Re: rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Brett Porter
18:29 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Sebastian Pop
18:21 Re: Tracking down source of libgcc_s.so compatibility? Daniel Kegel
18:16 PATCH: Explicitly pass --64 to assembler on AMD64 targets Mark Mitchell
18:06 Re: rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Mike Stump
18:04 Re: Problem with recompute_tree_invarant_for_addr_expr Zdenek Dvorak
17:53 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Daniel Kegel
17:51 Re: Problem with recompute_tree_invarant_for_addr_expr Richard Henderson
17:44 Re: Tracking down source of libgcc_s.so compatibility? Mike Hearn
17:39 Problem with recompute_tree_invarant_for_addr_expr Zdenek Dvorak
17:37 Re: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Florian Weimer
17:08 RE: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Dave Korn
17:01 GCC port for the TI TMS320C5{4,5}x Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault
16:50 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Scott Robert Ladd
16:39 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Scott Robert Ladd
16:38 GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-13) Mark Mitchell
16:27 RE: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Menezes, Evandro
16:27 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Diego Novillo
16:20 RE: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Menezes, Evandro
15:08 Re: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Florian Weimer
15:05 RFA: Integrate ABI testsuite in GCC Michael Matz
14:47 Re: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Vincent Lefevre
14:23 Re: strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Andrew Pinski
14:20 strange double comparison results with -O[12] on x86(-32) Christian Bodenstedt
13:34 Re: Software pipelining capabilities David Edelsohn
08:17 Re: In current gcc trunk: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointerwill break strict-aliasing rules Nathan Sidwell
06:59 In current gcc trunk: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules Christian Joensson
05:23 Software pipelining capabilities Vasanth
03:13 cni-3.txt RefuX Zanzeebarr
02:58 Re: a "hello world" frontend James A. Morrison

June 12, 2005
23:17 Re: Typo in man page (atanh) Andrew Pinski
22:54 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Scott Robert Ladd
21:59 Typo in man page (atanh) Jerry DeLisle
19:36 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc David Edelsohn
19:26 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing René Rebe
19:26 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Steven Bosscher
17:51 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Gerald Pfeifer
16:02 a "hello world" frontend Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola
14:13 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Scott Robert Ladd
13:40 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Richard Guenther
13:33 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Daniel Berlin
09:46 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Robert Dewar
09:39 Re: Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Jan Hubicka
09:19 Big differences on SpecFP results for gcc and icc Uros Bizjak
07:11 Re: Getting started with contributing Eric Botcazou

June 11, 2005
19:40 Help ! Memory allocating problems Virender Kashyap
18:05 gcc-4.1-20050611 is now available gccadmin
16:39 Re: Problems with collect2 on hpux John David Anglin
09:36 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Richard Sandiford
01:09 Re: Question about new warning system DJ Delorie
01:04 Re: rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Brett Porter
00:52 Re: Question about new warning system Per Bothner
00:42 Re: rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Mike Stump
00:03 Re: rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Brett Porter

June 10, 2005
23:39 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB output format with the -multi_module option Mike Stump
23:16 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB outputformat with the -multi_module option Sam Lauber
22:33 Re: rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Mike Stump
22:27 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB output format with the -multi_module option Mike Stump
22:04 Re: rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Brett Porter
22:02 gfortran backports to 4.0 Mark Mitchell
21:48 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB output format with the -multi_module option Mathieu Malaterre
21:10 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Dorit Naishlos
20:51 Re: rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Mike Stump
20:35 Re: position of section() attribute question Richard Henderson
20:31 Re: How to check for MMX registers in function call? Richard Henderson
20:29 Problems with collect2 on hpux Warren_Baird
19:51 Re: Gcc 3.0 and unnamed struct: incorrect offsets Mike Stump
19:47 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB output format with the -multi_module option Mike Stump
19:28 Re: recommend use of gperf version 3 Mike Stump
18:54 Re: position of section() attribute question Joseph S. Myers
17:11 Re: Question about new warning system DJ Delorie
15:13 Re: Question about new warning system Gabriel Dos Reis
15:13 Re: Question about new warning system Gabriel Dos Reis
14:58 Re: Question about new warning system DJ Delorie
14:53 Re: Question about new warning system DJ Delorie
14:51 Re: position of section() attribute question DJ Delorie
14:36 Re: Question about new warning system Giovanni Bajo
14:32 Re: Question about new warning system Gabriel Dos Reis
14:30 rationale for bss patterns in default_section_type_flags ? Olivier Hainque
14:29 Re: Question about new warning system Nathan Sidwell
14:26 Re: Question about new warning system DJ Delorie
14:17 Re: Question about new warning system Gabriel Dos Reis
14:17 Re: Question about new warning system Giovanni Bajo
14:16 Re: Question about new warning system DJ Delorie
14:13 Re: Question about new warning system Giovanni Bajo
14:04 Re: Question about new warning system DJ Delorie
13:41 Question about new warning system Giovanni Bajo
13:34 Re: GCC question Robert Bernecky
11:29 Re: Fw: Can't bootstrap mainline on powerpc64-linux Adrian Straetling
09:02 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
08:45 Re: obj-c++ on sparc-linux: objc runtime: cannot find class Derived etc... Eric Botcazou
08:39 How to check for MMX registers in function call? Uros Bizjak
07:33 Re: extern const and all that Zack Weinberg
06:40 Re: obj-c++ on sparc-linux: objc runtime: cannot find class Derived etc... Eric Botcazou
05:26 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing R Hill
05:12 Re: obj-c++ on sparc-linux: objc runtime: cannot find class Derived etc... Ziemowit Laski
04:55 Re: extern const and all that Gabriel Dos Reis
02:47 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Scott Robert Ladd
02:40 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Scott Robert Ladd
02:27 Re: position of section() attribute question DJ Delorie
02:21 Re: position of section() attribute question Joseph S. Myers
02:11 Re: position of section() attribute question DJ Delorie
01:43 Re: position of section() attribute question Joseph S. Myers
01:23 Re: Getting started with contributing Bernardo Innocenti
01:13 position of section() attribute question DJ Delorie
00:57 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Arthur Nascimento

June 09, 2005
23:54 gcc-4.0-20050609 is now available gccadmin
23:38 Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Joe Buck
23:24 Re: Getting started with contributing Giovanni Bajo
23:03 Re: Getting started with contributing chris jefferson
22:59 extern const and all that Gabriel Dos Reis
22:49 Re: Can't bootstrap mainline on powerpc64-linux Dale Johannesen
21:31 Re: Fw: Can't bootstrap mainline on powerpc64-linux Daniel Berlin
21:27 Re: Getting started with contributing Eric Botcazou
21:20 Fw: Can't bootstrap mainline on powerpc64-linux Pat Haugen
20:57 Re: Getting started with contributing DJ Delorie
20:53 re: A Suggestion for Release Testing Daniel Kegel
20:47 Getting started with contributing Lee Millward
20:46 Floating-Point, Round 2 Scott Robert Ladd
20:45 Re: obj-c++ on sparc-linux: objc runtime: cannot find class Derived etc... Eric Botcazou
20:43 A Suggestion for Release Testing Scott Robert Ladd
20:34 obj-c++ on sparc-linux: objc runtime: cannot find class Derived etc... Christian Joensson
20:27 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Jonathan Wakely
20:17 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Andrew Pinski
19:54 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Jonathan Wakely
19:43 Can't bootstrap mainline on powerpc64-linux Pat Haugen
17:37 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Giovanni Bajo
16:00 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Janis Johnson
15:39 Re: Any docs about gcov impl change from 3.3 to 3.4 Janis Johnson
15:34 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Daniel Jacobowitz
15:29 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Devang Patel
15:24 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Giovanni Bajo
15:07 Re: Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Devang Patel
15:01 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Ulrich Weigand
13:47 Re: Tracking down source of libgcc_s.so compatibility? Marcin Dalecki
13:21 Re: Tracking down source of libgcc_s.so compatibility? Daniel Jacobowitz
12:23 INPUT for broken name-lookup in gcc4.0.0 Wyss Daniel
11:14 GCC 4.0.1 RC1 successful build William Beebe
10:29 Use of check_vect() in vectorizer testsuite Giovanni Bajo
09:44 Digitize your Records digitize at ricehuskash dot co
09:44 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
09:39 RE: Any docs about gcov impl change from 3.3 to 3.4 Fei, Fei
09:37 Digitize your Records digitize at ricehuskash dot co
08:23 Re: Any docs about gcov impl change from 3.3 to 3.4 Nathan Sidwell
07:44 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
07:28 Any docs about gcov impl change from 3.3 to 3.4 Fei, Fei
03:28 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Dale Johannesen
01:45 combine register note problem with multi-word values Miles Bader
00:09 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Georg Bauhaus
00:06 Re: Tracking down source of libgcc_s.so compatibility? Daniel Kegel

June 08, 2005
22:59 Re: Tracking down source of libgcc_s.so compatibility? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:57 Tracking down source of libgcc_s.so compatibility? Daniel Kegel
22:22 Re: vector alignment question Steve Ellcey
22:00 Re: vector alignment question Richard Henderson
21:08 [wwwdocs] IEEE 754r Steven Bosscher
20:04 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Michael Veksler
19:50 vector alignment question Steve Ellcey
18:16 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
18:16 Re: What to do with (known) ABI mismatches during compilation Richard Henderson
18:05 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Andrew Pinski
17:45 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
17:24 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
17:13 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
17:10 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Andrew Pinski
17:03 Re: GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Mws
16:58 GCC 4.01 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
16:37 What to do with (known) ABI mismatches during compilation Richard Guenther
16:34 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Joe Buck
16:12 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Bernd Schmidt
16:07 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Michael Veksler
15:36 RE: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Dave Korn
14:53 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
14:41 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Gabriel Dos Reis
14:37 Re: tree-ssa-address ICE Zdenek Dvorak
14:26 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Lassi A . Tuura
14:16 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
13:58 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
13:55 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
13:50 RE: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Dave Korn
13:49 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
13:42 RE: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Dave Korn
13:39 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
13:38 Re: Proposed obsoletions Paul Koning
11:25 Re: ARM and __attribute__ long_call error Jani Monoses
10:58 Re: ARM and __attribute__ long_call error Richard Earnshaw
10:53 Re: ARM and __attribute__ long_call error Jani Monoses
10:28 Re: ARM and __attribute__ long_call error Richard Earnshaw
10:27 MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX Eric Botcazou
10:19 Re: tree-ssa-address ICE Steven Bosscher
10:15 Re: ARM and __attribute__ long_call error Jani Monoses
10:04 tree-ssa-address ICE Nick Burrett
09:16 Re: Andreas Schwab m68k Maintainer Andreas Schwab
09:10 Re: Howto biarch compiler default to -m32? Jakub Jelinek
09:03 Re: Howto biarch compiler default to -m32? René Rebe
08:51 Re: Howto biarch compiler default to -m32? Andreas Jaeger
07:57 Howto biarch compiler default to -m32? Renà Rebe
01:01 Re: Andreas Schwab m68k Maintainer Bernardo Innocenti
00:00 gcc-3.4-20050607 is now available gccadmin

June 07, 2005
23:40 GCC 4.0.1 RC1 bits will be spun RSN Mark Mitchell
23:09 Re: Proposed obsoletions Nathanael Nerode
22:22 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Joe Buck
22:03 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
21:50 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
21:08 Re: Subversion migration plans Bernardo Innocenti
20:19 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Toon Moene
18:34 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Toon Moene
17:10 Re: Gcc 3.0 and unnamed struct: incorrect offsets Joe Buck
16:12 Re: ARM and __attribute__ long_call error Richard Earnshaw
15:47 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Florian Weimer
15:27 ARM and __attribute__ long_call error Jani Monoses
15:19 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
15:07 Andreas Schwab m68k Maintainer Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
14:57 Re: OCODE Backend Ian Lance Taylor
14:06 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Florian Weimer
13:31 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
11:39 Re: Value range propagation pass in 4.0.1 RC1 (or not) Diego Novillo
11:35 Re: Failures in tests for obj-c++.... David Ayers
11:21 Re: Failures in tests for obj-c++.... David Ayers
11:21 OCODE Backend Rasmussen, David Ravn
09:59 Re: Subversion migration plans Andreas Schwab
09:24 Re: Subversion migration plans Haren Visavadia
08:57 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
08:41 Re: Value range propagation pass in 4.0.1 RC1 (or not) nkavv
08:28 Subversion migration plans Bernardo Innocenti
07:56 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Florian Weimer
07:44 Re: Making GCC faster Paolo Bonzini
07:16 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
07:07 Re: Failures in tests for obj-c++.... Ziemowit Laski
06:43 Re: Making GCC faster Karel Gardas
06:11 Re: increase in code size with gcc3.2 Milind Katikar
06:04 Gcc 3.0 and unnamed struct: incorrect offsets Atul Talesara
05:27 Failures in tests for obj-c++.... Christian Joensson
02:18 Re: VRP in release version of GCC Jeffrey A Law
01:53 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
00:36 Re: Value range propagation pass in 4.0.1 RC1 (or not) Diego Novillo
00:24 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Sam Lauber
00:16 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB output Sam Lauber
00:07 Re: Will Apple still support signed overflow? E. Weddington
00:00 Will Apple still support signed overflow? Daniel Kegel

June 06, 2005
23:50 Re: VRP in release version of GCC Steven Bosscher
23:44 VRP in release version of GCC nkavv
23:38 Value range propagation pass in 4.0.1 RC1 (or not) nkavv
23:31 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
23:28 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Steven Bosscher
23:23 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
23:13 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Robert Dewar
23:04 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Robert Dewar
22:57 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
22:26 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Scott Robert Ladd
22:20 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB output Mathieu Malaterre
21:57 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB outputformat with the -multi_module option Sam Lauber
21:56 Re: ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB outputformat with the -multi_module option Sam Lauber
21:47 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Laurent GUERBY
21:36 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Mirza Hadzic
21:14 Re: Proposed obsoletions Richard Henderson
21:07 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Toon Moene
21:06 ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB output format with the -multi_module option Mathieu Malaterre
20:52 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Marc Espie
20:18 Re: gccbug submissions seem to be silently ignored Rainer Orth
20:14 Re: gccbug submissions seem to be silently ignored Daniel Berlin
20:03 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Alan Lehotsky
19:45 gccbug submissions seem to be silently ignored Rainer Orth
19:43 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Joe Buck
19:38 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Steven Bosscher
19:27 Re: Will Apple still support GCC development? Scott Robert Ladd
19:17 Will Apple still support GCC development? Samuel Smythe
18:16 Re: Follow up on simulators, documentation, etc. Eric Christopher
17:46 Making GCC faster Sam Lauber
16:17 Re: Proposed obsoletions Jeffrey A Law
16:06 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
14:46 Re: Proposed obsoletions Paul Koning
14:46 Re: Follow up on simulators, documentation, etc. Mark Mitchell
14:43 Re: Proposed obsoletions Mark Mitchell
14:09 Re: Killing fixproto (possible target obsoletion) Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
13:37 Re: increase in code size with gcc3.2 James A. Morrison
13:04 Re: recommend use of gperf version 3 Bruno Haible
12:35 Re: Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions Scott Robert Ladd
12:25 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
12:15 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Richard Guenther
12:13 increase in code size with gcc3.2 Milind Katikar
12:07 Re: recommend use of gperf version 3 Joseph S. Myers
11:39 Re: Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions Richard Guenther
11:36 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
11:35 Re: Proposed obsoletions Nathanael Nerode
11:28 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Segher Boessenkool
11:25 Re: Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions Georg Bauhaus
10:33 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Richard Guenther
10:27 recommend use of gperf version 3 Bruno Haible
10:06 Re: Follow up on simulators, documentation, etc. Richard Sandiford
10:01 Re: Proposed obsoletions Nathanael Nerode
09:56 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Eric Botcazou
08:37 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Segher Boessenkool
08:33 Re: Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions R Hill
07:16 Re: Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions René Rebe
07:02 Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions Daniel Kegel
00:30 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Mark Mitchell
00:30 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Diego Novillo

June 05, 2005
19:54 Re: collab.net have a spam open relay in operation at the moment. please give them grief about it. Florian Weimer
18:18 Re: Proposed obsoletions Mark Mitchell
18:13 Re: collab.net have a spam open relay in operation at the moment. please give them grief about it. kfogel
18:13 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Mark Mitchell
18:12 Follow up on simulators, documentation, etc. Mark Mitchell
18:05 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Andrew Pinski
18:01 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Mark Mitchell
17:55 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Mark Mitchell
17:54 Re: Proposed obsoletions Daniel Jacobowitz
17:47 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Andrew Pinski
17:41 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Devang Patel
17:37 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Steven Bosscher
17:33 Re: Java bootstrap fails compiling libjava Tom Tromey
17:29 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Mark Mitchell
17:21 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Steven Bosscher
17:18 GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-05) Mark Mitchell
16:55 Re: Proposed obsoletions Jan-Benedict Glaw
16:41 Proposed obsoletions Nathanael Nerode
16:19 Re: Killing fixproto (possible target obsoletion) Daniel Jacobowitz
16:00 Re: Killing fixproto (possible target obsoletion) E. Weddington
15:37 Killing fixproto (possible target obsoletion) Nathanael Nerode
14:13 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
13:36 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Eric Botcazou
12:55 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Nathanael Nerode
12:50 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
12:36 Re: Java bootstrap fails compiling libjava Richard Guenther
08:44 Re: RFC: Strategy for cc0 -> CCmode conversion for the AVR target. BjÃrn Haase
02:16 Re: RFC: Strategy for cc0 -> CCmode conversion for the AVR target. Ian Lance Taylor

June 04, 2005
22:29 Re: sizeof(int) in testsuite Björn Haase
20:56 Successfully built gcc 3.4.4 on PII 450 running GNU/Linux Slackware10.1 Gabriele Inghirami
18:04 gcc-4.1-20050604 is now available gccadmin
16:07 A renewed look at GCC's performance from rebuild_jump_labels's view Steven Bosscher
14:20 Re: RFC: Strategy for cc0 -> CCmode conversion for the AVR target. Björn Haase
13:54 Re: CVS locked? Steven Bosscher
13:50 CVS locked? Thomas Koenig
13:05 Re: RFC: Strategy for cc0 -> CCmode conversion for the AVR target. Paolo Bonzini
12:27 RFC: Strategy for cc0 -> CCmode conversion for the AVR target. Björn Haase
10:57 Re: Edges, predictions, and GC crashes ... Jan Hubicka
09:12 Re: Can't bootstrap current gcc cvs trunk on sparc-linux: SIGSEGV: build/genattrtab /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > tmp-attrtab.c Eric Botcazou
08:44 Re: Edges, predictions, and GC crashes ... Ulrich Weigand
07:34 Re: Can't bootstrap current gcc cvs trunk on sparc-linux: SIGSEGV: build/genattrtab /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > tmp-attrtab.c Christian Joensson
07:26 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Eric Botcazou
04:21 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
02:58 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Ian Lance Taylor

June 03, 2005
22:17 Re: Java bootstrap fails compiling libjava Bryce McKinlay
22:12 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Eric Botcazou
21:41 Java bootstrap fails compiling libjava Richard Guenther
21:26 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Robert Dewar
21:02 Re: Is it possible to catch overflow in long long multiply ? Joe Buck
20:54 Re: Is it possible to catch overflow in long long multiply ? Robert Dewar
20:24 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Geert Bosch
19:37 Re: Is it possible to catch overflow in long long multiply ? Geert Bosch
19:26 Re: Is it possible to catch overflow in long long multiply ? Bradley Lucier
19:05 Re: Edges, predictions, and GC crashes ... Jan Hubicka
17:43 Re: sizeof(int) in testsuite DJ Delorie
17:05 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Daniel Berlin
17:03 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
17:01 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Arnaud Charlet
16:49 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Joe Buck
16:25 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Florian Weimer
16:17 Re: sizeof(int) in testsuite Joe Buck
16:15 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Joe Buck
16:01 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Florian Weimer
15:43 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Andrew Pinski
15:38 Re: [Fwd: Uninitialized stack gaps and conservative garbage collection] Camm Maguire
15:35 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
15:21 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Andrew Pinski
15:18 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Florian Weimer
15:03 GCC Summit - rooms James Lemke
14:21 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Paul Schlie
13:02 Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Florian Weimer
10:22 Re: Can't bootstrap current gcc cvs trunk on sparc-linux: SIGSEGV: build/genattrtab /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > tmp-attrtab.c Christian Joensson
10:03 Re: duplicate -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed Jakub Jelinek
09:56 Re: duplicate -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed Nix
09:21 Re: sizeof(int) in testsuite Jakub Jelinek
09:14 Re: sizeof(int) in testsuite Jakub Jelinek
09:08 Re: sizeof(int) in testsuite Mark Mitchell
08:52 Re: sizeof(int) in testsuite Steven Bosscher
08:48 Re: sizeof(int) in testsuite Mark Mitchell
07:30 Ada front-end depends on signed overflow Andrew Pinski
07:04 RE: Please help ... Prafulla Shukla
06:42 Re: Please help ... Karel Gardas
06:34 Please help ... Prafulla Shukla
01:49 sizeof(int) in testsuite DJ Delorie
00:41 Re: Lowering of types? Geoffrey Keating

June 02, 2005
23:49 gcc-4.0-20050602 is now available gccadmin
20:50 Re: Edges, predictions, and GC crashes ... Ulrich Weigand
20:00 Re: Edges, predictions, and GC crashes ... Jan Hubicka
19:07 Re: Lowering of types? Richard Henderson
18:46 Re: Lowering of types? Richard Guenther
18:29 Re: Can't bootstrap trunk on hppa Eric Christopher
18:07 Re: Lowering of types? Richard Henderson
17:32 Can't bootstrap trunk on hppa John David Anglin
17:07 Re: Edges, predictions, and GC crashes ... Daniel Berlin
17:00 Edges, predictions, and GC crashes ... Ulrich Weigand
13:41 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Mostafa Hagog
13:19 RE: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Dave Korn
13:14 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Steven Bosscher
13:09 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Mostafa Hagog
12:47 Re: duplicate -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed Peter S. Mazinger
12:39 Re: Can't bootstrap current gcc cvs trunk on sparc-linux: SIGSEGV: build/genattrtab /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > tmp-attrtab.c Christian Joensson
12:26 Re: duplicate -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed Jakub Jelinek
12:24 Re: Can't bootstrap current gcc cvs trunk on sparc-linux: SIGSEGV: build/genattrtab /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > tmp-attrtab.c Eric Botcazou
12:15 Can't bootstrap current gcc cvs trunk on sparc-linux: SIGSEGV: build/genattrtab /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > tmp-attrtab.c Christian Joensson
12:00 duplicate -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed Peter S. Mazinger
10:38 Re: Problem with scan-tree-dump-times in dg.exp Richard Sandiford
09:21 Lowering of types? Richard Guenther
08:14 Re: Bogous trees in ivopts again! Richard Guenther
08:05 Re: Bogous trees in ivopts again! Richard Guenther
07:01 Changes in 'finstrument-functions' option Perret Yannick
05:56 Re: reload question Miles Bader
04:12 Re: Mac OS X Panther to Tiger Build Changes for GCC 3.3 and 3.4 Peter O'Gorman
03:39 Re: Mac OS X Panther to Tiger Build Changes for GCC 3.3 and 3.4 Mike Stump
02:02 Re: Mac OS X Panther to Tiger Build Changes for GCC 3.3 and 3.4 Peter O'Gorman
01:57 Re: [Fwd: Uninitialized stack gaps and conservative garbage collection] Raymond Toy
01:25 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Canqun Yang
01:13 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Canqun Yang

June 01, 2005
21:29 Bogous trees in ivopts again! Richard Guenther
18:33 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Mike Stump
18:01 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
17:46 Re: Hello,Gnu Mike Stump
17:32 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Mike Stump
17:29 Re: Mac OS X Panther to Tiger Build Changes for GCC 3.3 and 3.4 Mike Stump
14:35 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Steven Bosscher
14:28 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Canqun Yang
11:34 Re: help needed Jonathan Wakely
11:22 Hello,Gnu dk zhou
11:22 help needed sandeep nadkarni
08:42 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
08:19 Re: ERROR in the gfortran testsuite Jakub Jelinek
07:21 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
06:34 Re: Google Summer of Code Ranjit Mathew
05:59 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Alan Modra
05:35 Google Summer of Code Jeyasankar Kottalam
03:11 Mac OS X Panther to Tiger Build Changes for GCC 3.3 and 3.4 Dan Allen
03:02 Successful bootstrap of GCC 4.0 on Mac OS X 10.4.1 Dan Allen
01:57 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Marcin Dalecki
00:24 Re: ERROR in the gfortran testsuite Steve Kargl
00:23 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3