This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: position of section() attribute question

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: joseph at codesourcery dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:34:28 -0700
Subject: Re: position of section() attribute question
References: <200506100113.j5A1DjHf008324@greed.delorie.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506100136550.1367@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <200506100210.j5A2A9wx029563@greed.delorie.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506100215530.1367@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <200506101450.j5AEo1cO027069@greed.delorie.com>

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:50:01AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> typedef int __attribute__((section("foo"))) FOOINT;
> 
> FOOINT a;
> 
> Would it make sense to allow this sort of thing?

No more than it would make sense to have

typedef static int FOOINT;

IMO.



r~

References:
- position of section() attribute question
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: position of section() attribute question
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: position of section() attribute question
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: position of section() attribute question
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: position of section() attribute question
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]