This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing)

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: "Scott Robert Ladd" <scott dot ladd at coyotegulch dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 15 Jun 2005 05:38:54 +0200
Subject: Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing)
References: <42A8A9B9.3080601@coyotegulch.com><42AE7B9A.8080200@codesourcery.com> <42AEE65D.7090707@coyotegulch.com><024401c5713e$0ed15cc0$d6b22997@bagio>

"Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it> writes:

| Also, it seems you have the wrong belief that, if bug 323 were confirmed in
| Bugzilla, a patch would automatically appear. I think the two events are
| totally unrelated, especially for an issue which has been debated so much in
| the past years, and where most people have already a formed opinion on the
| matter.

That is untrue.  When something is considered not an issue, it is
usually hard to get a patch for it.

-- Gaby

References:
- A Suggestion for Release Testing
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: A Suggestion for Release Testing
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing)
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing)
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]