This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
Cc: James E Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, Marc Gonzalez-Sigler <marc dot gonzalez-sigler at inria dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:30:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler
References: <42C2C231.6040508@inria.fr> <42C2E1DD.9090508@redhat.com> <1120094349.8950.15.camel@linux-009002219098> <42C4683C.3080909@specifixinc.com> <42C470EB.7000506@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 18:23 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> James E Wilson wrote:
> 
> > Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> >> A bunch of random code #ifdef KEY'd
> >
> >
> > FYI Pathscale was formerly known as Key Research.  So the KEY probably 
> > wouldn't mean anything special here, it is likely just a marker for 
> > local changes.
> 
> I heard a lot of this compiler and expected a better results for it. 

Don't believe the hype.
It's really not that good of a compiler :)
It has interesting loop nest optimizations, but, ...

References:
- Pro64-based GPLed compiler
  - From: Marc Gonzalez-Sigler
- Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler
  - From: Vladimir Makarov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]