This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Lowering of types?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:06:55 -0700
Subject: Re: Lowering of types?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0506021116220.30087-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 11:21:31AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> During type checking of the middle-end in the tree-optimizers
> we run into type mismatches like

This isn't a type mismatch if the compatible_p langhook says
they aren't.  Which I expect is true.

> question is can we / do we want to lower types like gcov_position_t
> to their (correctly qualified) main variant (or whatever else is
> suitable) f.i. during gimplification to allow the optimizers create
> strictly typed trees?

I wouldn't think so, no.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lowering of types?
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Lowering of types?
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]