This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Regressions
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:36:07 +0200
- Subject: Re: Regressions
- References: <42B24FD2.9060604@verizon.net> <42B2674B.4050008@gmail.com> <20050617063019.GA33404@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
On Friday 17 June 2005 08:30, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:01:47AM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
> > Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > >There appears to be numerous regression failures this evening. I
> > >suppose these are back end related.
> >
> > On i686-freebsd, i386-linux and x86_64-linux, I see failures for
> > gfortran.dg/pr19657.f and gfortran.dg/select_2.f90 at -O3,
> > gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90 at -O. And gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90, but
> > that one is not new.
> >
> > They were not present in 20050615, and appeared in 20050616. It is due
> > to an ICE, at -O3:
> >
> > O3.f: In function ?MAIN__?:
> > O3.f:11: internal compiler error: in tree_verify_flow_info, at
> > tree-cfg.c:3716
> >
> > This is now known as PR 22100.
>
> I can confirm the problem on amd64-*-freebsd. I is quite
> annoying that someone would make a change to the backend
> without testing it.
Indeed.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-06/msg00728.html...
Gr.
Steven