This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:42:24 +0200
- Subject: Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
- References: <20050531124837.GT3541@ay.vinc17.org><jefyw3tt8j.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20050531134304.GV3541@ay.vinc17.org><jeacmbtrnq.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20050531171400.GY3541@ay.vinc17.org><jer7fnjjek.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20050531195816.GE3541@ay.vinc17.org><jefyw3jguf.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20050531224258.GJ3541@ay.vinc17.org><jemzqb2eb2.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20050601002249.GK3541@ay.vinc17.org>
Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@vinc17.org> writes:
> On 2005-06-01 00:58:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> #include <assert.h>
>> #include <float.h>
>>
>> long double one = 1.0;
>> long double one_plus_eps;
>>
>> int
>> main (void)
>> {
>> long double one_plus_eps;
>>
>> one_plus_eps = one + LDBL_EPSILON;
>> assert (one != one_plus_eps);
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> I don't know how the standard should be interpreted (see below), but
> if your program fails, this means that either your program is buggy
> or the C implemention is buggy.
This works fine with a non-broken implementation which claims IEC 60559
compliance.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."