This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bug in transparent union handling?

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: "Richard Henderson" <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:44:21 +0200
Subject: Re: Bug in transparent union handling?
References: <1118793593.7908.6.camel@linux.site> <20050615051056.GA4112@redhat.com> <030b01c5718a$335b8ab0$d6b22997@bagio> <20050615154455.GA19694@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:

>>> This needs to use a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, at minimum.
>>
>> What about a compound literal instead?
>
> I suppose.  Why?

Nothing specifically. I just believe it is a cleaner way to transform the
argument into an aggregate, casts are ugly.

Giovanni Bajo

References:
- Bug in transparent union handling?
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Bug in transparent union handling?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Bug in transparent union handling?
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: Bug in transparent union handling?
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]