This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bogous trees in ivopts again!
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:05:05 +0200
- Subject: Re: Bogous trees in ivopts again!
- References: <429E28AE.7070702@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Reply-to: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
The problem is (?) that get_base_address for
state_inD.6032_16->savedD.6026[regD.6037_3]
(which is of type <integer_type 0x4014a3cc char>)
returns
*state_inD.6032_16
(which is of type <record_type 0x4040621c>).
The documentation of get_base_address does not talk about any
type guarantees - but I guess IVOPTs rather wanted to have
state_inD.6032_16->savedD.6026[0]
?
I don't understand the global picture here - i.e. what rewrite_address_base
is actually trying to do here.