This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC)
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Olivier Galibert'" <galibert at pobox dot com>,"'Joe Buck'" <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- Cc: "'Andrew Haley'" <aph at redhat dot com>,"'Robert Dewar'" <dewar at adacore dot com>,"'Gabriel Dos Reis'" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>,"'Andrew Pinski'" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,"'gcc mailing list'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:38:43 +0100
- Subject: RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC)
----Original Message----
>From: Olivier Galibert
>Sent: 28 June 2005 19:29
> Incidentally, gcc itself makes most of these assumptions in its own
> code. I kinda doubt you can run it on a dsp or a machine with 16-bits
> ints. Which is different than generating code for them.
They aren't assumptions in GCC, they are *very clearly documented
requirements* for GCC host platforms.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....