This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: "Menezes, Evandro" <evandro dot menezes at amd dot com>
- Cc: "Mirza" <mirza at seznam dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Jun 2005 22:41:04 +0200
- Subject: Re: Porposal: Floating-Point Options
- References: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A84302AFC206@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>
"Menezes, Evandro" <evandro.menezes@amd.com> writes:
| > If this option makes it into GCC, maybe it could be named
| > -O3_unsafe.
|
| How about the popular -fast?
But, some transformations can both be valid and generate "faster"
code. One of the confusions is that people tend to equate
"fast" with "valid transformations within limited reach, that produce
faster code in that domain". There is no need to conflate that confusion.
-- Gaby