gcc archive
date index for May, 2012

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2012
23:23 Re: Distributing 'make check' across a cluster Benjamin Kosnik
22:48 gcc-4.5-20120531 is now available gccadmin
22:20 Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7 James Y Knight
21:58 Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7 Jonathan Wakely
21:39 Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7 Jonathan Wakely
21:35 Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7 James Y Knight
20:44 backporting PR52558 to 4.7? Aldy Hernandez
14:38 Re: Distributing 'make check' across a cluster Diego Novillo
14:29 Re: Distributing 'make check' across a cluster Joseph S. Myers
13:59 Distributing 'make check' across a cluster Diego Novillo
08:56 Re: ICE with MEM_REF when Pmode is different from word_mode Richard Guenther
02:36 Re: MIPS: 2'nd pass of ira, causes weird register allocation for 2-op mult Vladimir Makarov
02:27 Re: MIPS: 2'nd pass of ira, causes weird register allocation for 2-op mult Klaus Pedersen

May 30, 2012
18:28 Re: OPTION_DEFAULT_SPECS question David Edelsohn
17:39 OPTION_DEFAULT_SPECS question Steve Ellcey
16:32 Re: Different __WCHAR_TYPE__/wchar_t for gcc -m32 on Linux/i386 and Linux/x86-64 H.J. Lu
16:25 Re: Different __WCHAR_TYPE__/wchar_t for gcc -m32 on Linux/i386 and Linux/x86-64 Joseph S. Myers
16:07 Different __WCHAR_TYPE__/wchar_t for gcc -m32 on Linux/i386 and Linux/x86-64 H.J. Lu
14:36 Re: ICE with MEM_REF when Pmode is different from word_mode Mohamed Shafi
13:45 Re: Maybe expand MAX_RECOG_ALTERNATIVES ? Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:09 GCC 4.7.1 Status Report (2012-05-30) Richard Guenther
12:25 Re: How to compare two text files? Using sed, cmp, diff, tr? Georg-Johann Lay
09:15 RE: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23. Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath
08:15 Re: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23. Tristan Gingold
04:55 Re: gcov / lcov producing icorrect results due to white space in source. Ian Lance Taylor
03:48 Re: gcov / lcov producing icorrect results due to white space in source. TK Banks

May 29, 2012
22:27 Re: gcov / lcov producing icorrect results due to white space in source. Ian Lance Taylor
22:23 Re: Question about gcse.c vs cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
18:42 Re: MIPS: 2'nd pass of ira, causes weird register allocation for 2-op mult Vladimir Makarov
17:36 gcov / lcov producing icorrect results due to white space in source. TK Banks
17:19 Re: array bounds violation in caller-save.c : duplicate hard regs check added DJ Delorie
17:12 Re: array bounds violation in caller-save.c : duplicate hard regs check added Jeff Law
17:11 Re: array bounds violation in caller-save.c : duplicate hard regs check added DJ Delorie
17:00 Re: Question about gcse.c vs cc0 Jeff Law
16:57 Re: array bounds violation in caller-save.c : duplicate hard regs check added Jeff Law
15:35 [AVR,Committed]: Re: How to run a compiled C program? Georg-Johann Lay
14:30 [cxx-conversion] Merge from trunk Diego Novillo
13:57 Re: Bootstrapping trunk error with gcc 4.6.2 Ian Lance Taylor
13:36 internal compiler error using lambda and this Andreas Karrenbauer
13:16 Re: [cxx-conversion] gcc-4.7.0 on Cygwin and MinGW32 with --enable-build-with-cxx successes Diego Novillo
12:02 Re: ICE with MEM_REF when Pmode is different from word_mode Richard Guenther
11:58 ICE with MEM_REF when Pmode is different from word_mode Mohamed Shafi
11:07 build results for 4.6.3 JohnT
10:25 regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23. Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath
09:04 Question about gcse.c vs cc0 Steven Bosscher
06:34 Re: MIPS: 2'nd pass of ira, causes weird register allocation for 2-op mult Richard Sandiford

May 28, 2012
23:25 Re: Fixincludes Jonathan Wakely
23:20 Fixincludes Jeremy Huntwork
22:56 Re: MIPS: 2'nd pass of ira, causes weird register allocation for 2-op mult Vladimir Makarov
19:10 Re: MIPS: 2'nd pass of ira, causes weird register allocation for 2-op mult Richard Sandiford

May 27, 2012
22:48 gcc-4.8-20120527 is now available gccadmin
21:57 Bootstrapping trunk error with gcc 4.6.2 Thomas Koenig

May 26, 2012
22:52 gcc-4.7-20120526 is now available gccadmin
21:12 Re: How to compare two text files? Using sed, cmp, diff, tr? Miles Bader
18:58 Re: How to run a compiled C program? Ian Lance Taylor
18:08 Re: How to compare two text files? Using sed, cmp, diff, tr? Joern Rennecke
17:04 Re: Work in your project Diego Novillo
15:42 Re: How to compare two text files? Using sed, cmp, diff, tr? Joerg Wunsch
15:14 Re: How to compare two text files? Using sed, cmp, diff, tr? Jonathan Wakely
15:03 Re: How to compare two text files? Using sed, cmp, diff, tr? Kevin
10:03 How to compare two text files? Using sed, cmp, diff, tr? Georg-Johann Lay
09:37 How to run a compiled C program? Georg-Johann Lay
08:46 Work in your project Serg Anohovsky
01:53 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Lawrence Crowl

May 25, 2012
23:19 array bounds violation in caller-save.c : duplicate hard regs check added DJ Delorie
23:00 Re: Should --with-build-sysroot be default to --with-sysroot? NightStrike
22:54 gcc-4.6-20120525 is now available gccadmin
22:46 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Jonathan Wakely
22:00 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Lawrence Crowl
21:53 [cxx-conversion] gcc-4.7.0 on Cygwin and MinGW32 with --enable-build-with-cxx successes Aaron Gray
21:13 Re: Should --with-build-sysroot be default to --with-sysroot? H.J. Lu
20:26 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Diego Novillo
18:54 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Joseph S. Myers
18:41 Re: Should --with-build-sysroot be default to --with-sysroot? H.J. Lu
18:37 Re: Should --with-build-sysroot be default to --with-sysroot? NightStrike
18:34 Should --with-build-sysroot be default to --with-sysroot? H.J. Lu
16:32 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Diego Novillo
16:26 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Jason Merrill
15:38 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Joseph S. Myers

May 24, 2012
23:08 Re: Status of the PPH implementation Diego Novillo
22:49 gcc-4.5-20120524 is now available gccadmin
19:45 Re: error: call of overloaded ‘foo(int)’ is ambi guous (0 vs null ptr) Jonathan Wakely
19:39 Re: error: call of overloaded ‘foo(int)’ is ambi guous (0 vs null ptr) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:22 error: call of overloaded âfoo(int)â is amb iguous (0 vs null ptr) Peter A. Felvegi
18:32 [gimplefe] Merge from trunk, preparation for gimple testsuite Diego Novillo
16:44 RMS to present at the Cauldron Diego Novillo
11:07 Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ? niXman
10:58 Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ? Kai Tietz
10:46 Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ? niXman
10:29 Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ? Kai Tietz
09:26 how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ? niXman
03:01 Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7 Jeffrey Yasskin

May 23, 2012
22:51 Re: MPC/MPFR/GMP Usage niXman
22:47 MPC/MPFR/GMP Usage Andrew Burks
22:37 Please Update the Installing GCC: Binaries Page Colin Prior
22:13 Re: mkconfig.sh incrementality? Ian Lance Taylor
22:11 Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info Ian Lance Taylor
16:04 mkconfig.sh incrementality? Jay K
14:40 Re: making sizeof(void*) different from sizeof(void(*)()) Georg-Johann Lay
13:23 Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info Rohit Arul Raj
03:15 Re: A question about loop ivopt Andrew Pinski
03:05 RE: A question about loop ivopt Jiangning Liu

May 22, 2012
15:48 Re: MULTILIB_OPTIONS and DRIVER_SELF_SPEC Paulo J. Matos
15:19 RE: Enabling a function based on Language Iyer, Balaji V
14:05 C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7 Jeffrey Yasskin
10:36 Re: A question about loop ivopt Richard Guenther
09:21 RE: A question about loop ivopt Jiangning Liu
07:25 Re: Enabling a function based on Language Tobias Burnus
00:31 Re: Enabling a function based on Language Ian Lance Taylor

May 21, 2012
22:52 Enabling a function based on Language Iyer, Balaji V
20:50 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Ian Lance Taylor
20:35 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Ian Lance Taylor
20:19 RE: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Jay K
19:32 cine castiga cramer
18:03 Re: Problem of gfortran compilation with -O option Tobias Burnus
16:57 Re: Extension to compare-elim Paulo J. Matos
14:26 Problem of gfortran compilation with -O option PERRONNET Alain
14:26 Re: MULTILIB_OPTIONS and DRIVER_SELF_SPEC Christian Bruel
13:48 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Ian Lance Taylor
07:46 RE: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Jay K
06:44 Re: About trees and expanded code by macros Dodji Seketeli
05:41 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Ian Lance Taylor
05:24 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Gabriel Dos Reis
05:08 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Ian Lance Taylor
03:56 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:33 Re: tree-nomudflap.c dependency on gt-tree-mudflap.h not needed Ian Lance Taylor
03:31 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Ian Lance Taylor

May 20, 2012
22:47 gcc-4.8-20120520 is now available gccadmin
19:24 Failing bootstraps --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto Toon Moene

May 19, 2012
22:53 gcc-4.7-20120519 is now available gccadmin
15:39 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Jonathan Wakely
11:36 Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Gabriel Dos Reis
09:26 Re: Reusing stack space for variables recorded during gimple lowering Andrew Pinski
07:30 Proposition Li Hao
05:17 Reusing stack space for variables recorded during gimple lowering Andrew Jenner
05:04 tree-nomudflap.c dependency on gt-tree-mudflap.h not needed Jay K
03:53 -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks building go? (older g++, -disable-bootstrap) Jay K

May 18, 2012
23:43 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Jonathan Wakely
22:53 gcc-4.6-20120518 is now available gccadmin
22:01 Re: [RFD+PATCH] ISA bit treatment on the MIPS platform Maciej W. Rozycki
19:20 Re: Use of stack VECs in df-scan.c:df_bb_verify Diego Novillo
17:59 Re: Use of stack VECs in df-scan.c:df_bb_verify Ian Lance Taylor
17:37 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Ian Lance Taylor
16:15 Use of stack VECs in df-scan.c:df_bb_verify Diego Novillo
15:54 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Joel Sherrill
15:51 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Ian Lance Taylor
14:11 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Joel Sherrill
14:05 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Ian Lance Taylor
13:50 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Joel Sherrill
13:34 Re: Insufficient access check for private static member in base class Ian Lance Taylor
13:27 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Ian Lance Taylor
12:04 Insufficient access check for private static member in base class Peter A. Felvegi
08:22 Re: Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Ralf Corsepius
07:24 Option -pthread in test suite with cross compilers Sebastian Huber

May 17, 2012
22:47 gcc-4.5-20120517 is now available gccadmin
22:34 Re: making sizeof(void*) different from sizeof(void(*)()) Michael Meissner
19:50 Re: [discuss] [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 psABI to support x32 H.J. Lu
17:37 Re: Extension to compare-elim Paulo J. Matos
17:11 Question about pointer use-def/def-use information operation and maintainance toddy wang
16:46 Re: Extension to compare-elim Richard Henderson
15:03 RE: Vectorizer question Bingfeng Mei
05:07 国雄(高仿)香烟商行 张先生
04:09 Re: Vectorizer question Tim Prince

May 16, 2012
23:02 Vectorizer question Iyer, Balaji V
20:29 announce: The C Conference; San Diego, CA; August 28th Brandon Philips
07:37 Probably inaccuracy in GCC 4.7.0 documentation. Роман Саженков

May 15, 2012
21:45 Re: How do I set SIG_ATOMIC_TYPE to a variant of a C-type? Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:06 Re: How do I set SIG_ATOMIC_TYPE to a variant of a C-type? Joseph S. Myers
19:34 How do I set SIG_ATOMIC_TYPE to a variant of a C-type? Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:59 Re: Build problem with libgo runtime Ian Lance Taylor
18:12 Re: Trying to track down a register allocation issue Paul_Koning
16:18 Re: [discuss] [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 psABI to support x32 H.J. Lu
16:07 Re: [discuss] [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 psABI to support x32 Michael Matz
14:16 Re: A question about loop ivopt Richard Guenther
14:14 Re: A question about loop ivopt Zdenek Dvorak
13:00 Extension to compare-elim Paulo J. Matos
12:26 Help with 'ev_sl' PowerPC SPE Intrinsic Rohit Arul Raj
10:18 Re: A question about loop ivopt Zdenek Dvorak
09:12 Re: A question about loop ivopt Richard Guenther
07:47 мой зайчик.)) Руся Эрнет
05:04 A question about loop ivopt Jiangning Liu
01:19 Re: confusion about fma description in section 16.9 of gccint doc. Kenneth Zadeck
00:06 Re: confusion about fma description in section 16.9 of gccint doc. Ian Lance Taylor

May 14, 2012
22:41 Re: How do I disable warnings across gcc versions? Robert Dewar
22:27 How do I disable warnings across gcc versions? Andy Lutomirski
22:23 Re: gcc 4.3.x: Bug in ieee754-{df,sf}.S Sven Köhler
22:21 confusion about fma description in section 16.9 of gccint doc. Kenneth Zadeck
21:47 Re: Trying to track down a register allocation issue Joern Rennecke
21:24 Re: gcc 4.3.x: Bug in ieee754-{df,sf}.S Joern Rennecke
21:01 Re: gcc 4.3.x: Bug in ieee754-{df,sf}.S James Dennett
20:35 gcc 4.3.x: Bug in ieee754-{df,sf}.S Sven Köhler
20:02 Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions Richard Henderson
19:59 Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions DJ Delorie
18:39 RE: Add STB_SECONDARY to gABI Lowell, Randy
17:44 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 psABI to support x32 H.J. Lu
17:34 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 psABI to support x32 H. Peter Anvin
17:31 [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 psABI to support x32 H.J. Lu
17:03 RE: Add STB_SECONDARY to gABI Suprateeka R Hegde
16:54 [cxx-conversion] Merge from trunk Diego Novillo
16:41 RE: Add STB_SECONDARY to gABI Suprateeka R Hegde
16:36 Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions Steven Bosscher
16:04 Trying to track down a register allocation issue Paul_Koning
15:37 [RFD+PATCH] ISA bit treatment on the MIPS platform Maciej W. Rozycki
14:23 Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions Richard Henderson
14:20 Aukcijski centar Aukcijski centar
13:43 RE: Add STB_SECONDARY to gABI Lowell, Randy
13:21 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? H.J. Lu
11:33 Został przekroczony limit przechowywania w skrzynce pocztowej Helena Mikušová
09:10 Re: About trees and expanded code by macros Paulo J. Matos
09:07 Re: About trees and expanded code by macros Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:50 Re: About trees and expanded code by macros Paulo J. Matos
07:53 About trees and expanded code by macros Alberto Lozano Alelu
07:35 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? Richard Guenther
07:34 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? Richard Guenther
05:24 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? amylaar
03:21 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? H.J. Lu
03:17 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? Joern Rennecke
02:27 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? Geert Bosch
02:07 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? H.J. Lu
01:17 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? amylaar
01:13 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? Joern Rennecke

May 13, 2012
23:19 gcc-4.8-20120513 is now available gccadmin
21:59 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? H.J. Lu
19:01 Re: Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? Richard Guenther
18:41 Back end for DCPU-16 architecture Fredrik Rothamel
16:33 Will backend ever see an memory operand with address wrap around? H.J. Lu

May 12, 2012
22:51 gcc-4.7-20120512 is now available gccadmin
15:51 R: CLOOG-PPL fails to build (OS X) Erotavlas_turbo at libero dot
14:04 Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions Eric Botcazou
13:56 Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions Steven Bosscher
13:53 Add STB_SECONDARY to gABI H.J. Lu
13:49 Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions Jan Hubicka
13:01 Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions Steven Bosscher
01:14 Re: Maybe expand MAX_RECOG_ALTERNATIVES ? Greg McGary

May 11, 2012
23:55 CLOOG-PPL fails to build (OS X) Sergey Oboguev
23:01 Maybe expand MAX_RECOG_ALTERNATIVES ? Greg McGary
22:51 gcc-4.6-20120511 is now available gccadmin
16:23 Re: TPF unwinding broken DJ Delorie
15:51 Re: TPF unwinding broken Richard Henderson
15:48 Re: TPF unwinding broken Richard Henderson
15:45 Re: TPF unwinding broken DJ Delorie
15:37 Re: TPF unwinding broken Richard Henderson
13:17 MULTILIB_OPTIONS and DRIVER_SELF_SPEC Paulo J. Matos
12:28 Re: gimple vs gimple_seq in 4.8 trunk Basile Starynkevitch
12:13 Re: gimple vs gimple_seq in 4.8 trunk Michael Matz
11:41 gimple vs gimple_seq in 4.8 trunk Basile Starynkevitch
02:20 Build problem with libgo runtime William J. Schmidt

May 10, 2012
22:54 gcc-4.5-20120510 is now available gccadmin
21:07 Re: h8300-elf build broken DJ Delorie
20:50 Re: h8300-elf build broken Gabriel Dos Reis
20:49 i386-rtems (and elf?) broken Joel Sherrill
20:33 Re: h8300-elf build broken DJ Delorie
11:51 Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:53 Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc Iain Buclaw
09:48 Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc Richard Guenther
09:37 Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc Iain Buclaw
09:02 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Nick Hudson
08:03 Re: Question about bitsizetype Richard Guenther
00:16 TPF unwinding broken DJ Delorie

May 09, 2012
22:16 Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more Marc Glisse
21:44 Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more Daniel Marschall
20:53 Re: Question about bitsizetype William J. Schmidt
20:48 Re: Question about bitsizetype Andrew Pinski
20:39 Question about bitsizetype William J. Schmidt
20:08 Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more Daniel Marschall
19:48 Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more Marc Glisse
19:37 Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more Daniel Marschall
18:30 Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more Ian Lance Taylor
18:22 Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more Daniel Marschall
14:58 Re: fwprop not propagating Paulo J. Matos
13:59 Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more Ian Lance Taylor
13:49 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Aurelien Buhrig
13:40 fwprop not propagating Paulo J. Matos
11:40 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Ulrich Weigand
11:38 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Ulrich Weigand
11:29 Re: Register constraints + and = Paulo J. Matos
10:53 Re: Register constraints + and = Paul_Koning
09:35 Re: Register constraints + and = Paulo J. Matos
09:18 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Eric Botcazou
08:57 Re: h8300-elf build broken Marc Glisse
08:46 Re: h8300-elf build broken Gabriel Dos Reis
08:43 Re: h8300-elf build broken Gabriel Dos Reis
08:41 Re: h8300-elf build broken Marc Glisse
08:41 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Aurelien Buhrig
08:27 Re: h8300-elf build broken Richard Guenther
06:29 G++ could optimize ASM code more Daniel Marschall

May 08, 2012
23:24 Re: h8300-elf build broken Gabriel Dos Reis
22:14 h8300-elf build broken DJ Delorie
21:12 Re: Register constraints + and = Ian Lance Taylor
20:57 Re: Register constraints + and = Jan Hubicka
20:51 Re: Register constraints + and = Ian Lance Taylor
20:38 Re: Register constraints + and = Jan Hubicka
20:16 Re: Register constraints + and = Ian Lance Taylor
18:14 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Steven Bosscher
17:54 Re: Register constraints + and = Jan Hubicka
16:52 Re: Register constraints + and = Ian Lance Taylor
16:48 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Andrew Pinski
16:05 Re: Register constraints + and = Paulo J. Matos
12:37 Re: i386 define_asm_attributes question Jan Hubicka
11:57 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Ulrich Weigand
08:00 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Michael Haubenwallner
07:09 Re: i386 define_asm_attributes question Steven Bosscher
02:08 Re: Question on scan_one_insn in IRA about load parameters from stack slot. Bin.Cheng
01:01 Re: i386 define_asm_attributes question Andrew Pinski

May 07, 2012
23:28 Re: i386 define_asm_attributes question Jan Hubicka
23:05 Re: i386 define_asm_attributes question H.J. Lu
22:02 i386 define_asm_attributes question Steven Bosscher
20:27 Add microblaze-*-rtems* Joel Sherrill
19:26 The Linux binutils 2.22.52.0.3 is released H.J. Lu
19:25 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? John David Anglin
19:23 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Steven Bosscher
19:14 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? John David Anglin
19:12 GCC 4.6.2/Red Hat Linux 6.1 thread cancellation C++ runtime issue Mike Dalpee
18:30 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Jeff Law
18:25 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? John David Anglin
18:20 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Steven Bosscher
18:01 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? John David Anglin
17:59 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Joel Sherrill
17:50 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Matthias Klose
17:45 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Dennis Clarke
17:43 Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Jeff Law
17:33 Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8? Steven Bosscher
16:16 Re: [LLVMdev] updated code size comparison James Courtier-Dutton
15:52 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Aurelien Buhrig
14:34 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Joseph S. Myers
14:22 Re: Question on scan_one_insn in IRA about load parameters from stack slot. Vladimir Makarov
13:26 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Joel Sherrill
13:14 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Christian Bruel
13:11 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Christian Bruel
12:57 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Joel Sherrill
12:53 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Joseph S. Myers
12:10 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Christian Bruel
11:33 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Peter Bigot
11:09 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Christian Bruel
10:10 Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Joseph S. Myers
09:10 gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore Christian Bruel
08:54 Your Criminal Record may have been updated recently pytladyk_abk at yahoo dot com

May 06, 2012
22:46 gcc-4.8-20120506 is now available gccadmin

May 05, 2012
22:48 gcc-4.7-20120505 is now available gccadmin
11:07 Workshop on Essential Abstractions in GCC (June'12, Mumbai IN) Prashant Singh Rawat

May 04, 2012
23:28 Re: small problem with auto (c++0x) Jonathan Wakely
23:04 small problem with auto (c++0x) Amit Markel
22:47 gcc-4.6-20120504 is now available gccadmin
21:26 Re: Why doesn't GCC generate conditional move for COND_EXPR? Andrew Pinski
20:53 Re: Why does lower-subreg mark copied pseudos as "decomposable"? Andrew Stubbs
18:49 Re: Register constraints + and = Ian Lance Taylor
18:00 Re: Register constraints + and = Paul_Koning
17:52 Re: Register constraints + and = Ian Lance Taylor
17:39 Re: clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Richard Henderson
15:49 Re: Register constraints + and = Paul_Koning
15:39 Re: Register constraints + and = Ian Lance Taylor
15:36 Re: Register constraints + and = Paul_Koning
15:28 Re: Register constraints + and = Paulo J. Matos
14:50 Re: clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Richard Henderson
14:09 RE: type argument in FUNCTION_ARG macro BELBACHIR Selim
14:07 Re: clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Camm Maguire
13:58 Re: type argument in FUNCTION_ARG macro Ian Lance Taylor
13:56 Re: clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Camm Maguire
13:54 RE: type argument in FUNCTION_ARG macro BELBACHIR Selim
13:48 Re: type argument in FUNCTION_ARG macro amylaar
13:45 Re: Register constraints + and = Ian Lance Taylor
13:40 Re: clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Camm Maguire
11:54 type argument in FUNCTION_ARG macro BELBACHIR Selim
09:41 Register constraints + and = Paulo J. Matos
08:58 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Eric Botcazou
07:36 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Aurelien Buhrig

May 03, 2012
22:49 gcc-4.5-20120503 is now available gccadmin
21:06 Re: clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Witold Baryluk
20:05 GNU Tools Cauldron 2012 - Hotels and registered presentations Diego Novillo
18:35 Re: clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Richard Henderson
17:52 Re: clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Camm Maguire
17:41 Re: Missing compile-time warning for orphaned memory Samuel David
17:29 Re: Missing compile-time warning for orphaned memory Jonathan Wakely
17:25 clear_cache on Alpha architecture not implemented? Witold Baryluk
16:17 Re: Missing compile-time warning for orphaned memory Samuel David
14:31 Re: -Os seems to remove a variable necessary for my transformation Richard Guenther
13:31 -Os seems to remove a variable necessary for my transformation Matt Davis
12:22 Re: 4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure. Richard Guenther
12:14 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Aurelien Buhrig
12:09 Re: Porting new target architecture to GCC Ben Morgan
12:03 RE: 4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure. Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath
11:51 Re: Porting new target architecture to GCC Ben Morgan
11:44 Re: 4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure. Richard Guenther
11:34 RE: 4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure. Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath
11:19 4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure. Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath
07:55 This could reveal your love life greatly Godwin Dooley

May 02, 2012
19:37 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Eric Botcazou
19:11 Re: making sizeof(void*) different from sizeof(void(*)()) Peter Bigot
17:49 Re: Using movw/movt rather than minipools in ARM gcc Ramana Radhakrishnan
16:19 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm Richard Earnshaw
14:58 Re: Porting new target architecture to GCC Alexander Monakov
14:52 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Aurelien Buhrig
14:42 Re: Porting new target architecture to GCC Aurelien Buhrig
14:42 Spital nou de pediatrie cramer
14:42 Re: Paradoxical subreg reload issue Ian Lance Taylor
14:37 Re: Porting new target architecture to GCC Ian Lance Taylor
13:44 Re: Porting new target architecture to GCC Georg-Johann Lay
13:17 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm nick clifton
13:08 Re: making sizeof(void*) different from sizeof(void(*)()) Paulo J. Matos
12:47 Paradoxical subreg reload issue Aurelien Buhrig
12:47 [ANN] ODB C++ ORM 2.0.0 released Boris Kolpackov
12:22 Re: Porting new target architecture to GCC Alexander Monakov
12:12 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm Jonathan Wakely
11:53 Re: Porting new target architecture to GCC Basile Starynkevitch
11:30 Porting new target architecture to GCC Ben Morgan
09:50 Re: [RFC] Converting end of loop computations to MIN_EXPRs. Richard Guenther
09:38 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm David Brown

May 01, 2012
18:20 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm Ian Lance Taylor
18:12 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm Joern Rennecke
17:42 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm Richard Sandiford
15:50 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm nick clifton
13:52 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm Ian Lance Taylor
12:59 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm Richard Sandiford
09:20 Re: No documentation of -fsched-pressure-algorithm nick clifton
06:37 Re: [RFC] Converting end of loop computations to MIN_EXPRs. Ramana Radhakrishnan


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3