This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore


FWIW RTEMS has long used BSP provided spec files from the command line. We have issues with using them in that they are a clear place where we depend on something that is compiler specific. But we do use them. If the support for the -specs option suddenly disappeared, we would have a problem. 

--joel

Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@st.com> wrote:

>> I think http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49858 is
>> essentially this issue.  It can probably be closed as "won't fix",
>> though I notice the spec file format is still documented in the user
>> manual.
>> 
>> Peter
>> 
>
>yes, same root problem, although BSP design is a different usage (yet
>quite common). I wouldn't be in favor moving all the spec support to the
>GCC internals if this deprecates the â-specs=â user option .
>
>many thanks
>
>Christian

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]