This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore

From: Christian Bruel <christian dot bruel at st dot com>
To: Peter Bigot <bigotp at acm dot org>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:09:55 +0200
Subject: Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore
References: <4FA79172.9000508@st.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205070952470.9883@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4FA7AD1F.5080002@st.com> <CAPOJ94OfaYQi5WozK083w3C6V4CZuouuVVL_2dRHDdihKcOtqA@mail.gmail.com>

> I think http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49858 is
> essentially this issue.  It can probably be closed as "won't fix",
> though I notice the spec file format is still documented in the user
> manual.
> 
> Peter
> 

yes, same root problem, although BSP design is a different usage (yet
quite common). I wouldn't be in favor moving all the spec support to the
GCC internals if this deprecates the ‘-specs=’ user option .

many thanks

Christian

References:
- gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore
  - From: Christian Bruel
- Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore
  - From: Christian Bruel
- Re: gcc doesn't accept specs options anymore
  - From: Peter Bigot

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]