gcc archive
author index for December, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

"De Azcárraga, Joaquín"

• 2003-12-11 17:39 Compiling error

Aurélie

• 2003-12-03 08:47 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets

Etienne Lorrain

• 2003-12-19 11:43 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-19 15:15 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-22 09:54 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-22 11:00 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-22 13:36 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered

Luis Gonçalves

• 2003-12-04 22:22 Compilation Error- Seems a gcc Problem

Mads Lindstrøm

• 2003-12-07 19:05 more SIMD operations

Pop Sébastian

• 2003-12-17 10:55 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
• 2003-12-17 11:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Fix problem with loop notes emitted by targets
• 2003-12-31 15:27 [tree-ssa-lno] Commit rules for the lno-branch

Rama Singh

• 2003-12-10 15:55 Error building for mips variant
• 2003-12-12 07:19 Re: Error building for mips variant

gnu c

• 2003-12-02 19:28 LANG HOOKS

Michael Sogtrop

• 2003-12-01 09:00 Re: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing

Branko Äibej

• 2003-12-04 08:00 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-07 23:04 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Admin

• 2003-12-16 01:14 Attention All School Staff, Personnel, and Students:

Alan Modra

• 2003-12-12 00:58 Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla

Aldy Hernandez

• 2003-12-31 21:47 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction

Alex Hornby

• 2003-12-09 14:30 Re: Minor suggestion

Alexandre Oliva

• 2003-12-04 23:04 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-05 11:44 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-05 11:46 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-06 20:37 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-12 05:24 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-12 05:30 Re: Overriding DW_AT_comp_dir output?
• 2003-12-23 19:27 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275

Andras Tantos

• 2003-12-02 16:51 How to link in sub-object ganularity
• 2003-12-02 17:59 Re: How to link in sub-object ganularity

Andreas Jaeger

• 2003-12-02 05:40 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-02 13:37 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-02 20:38 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-06 12:11 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-08 20:06 Re: Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline))
• 2003-12-09 06:06 Re: Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline))
• 2003-12-11 19:52 What happened to the GCC 3.3 testsuite?
• 2003-12-13 10:24 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-13 18:47 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu
• 2003-12-14 07:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu
• 2003-12-14 10:13 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.3.2-hammer on i586-suse-linux-gnu
• 2003-12-14 16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu
• 2003-12-14 18:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu

Andreas Schwab

• 2003-12-10 09:53 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-10 14:19 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-29 14:57 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree

Andreas Tobler

• 2003-12-19 13:13 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-12-23 21:42 Re: Compiler timeouts in the basic_string tests
• 2003-12-24 06:51 Re: Compiler timeouts in the basic_string tests

Andrew Cagney

• 2003-12-04 14:16 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-31 19:52 Bogus PPC64 return-colum? Was: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] S/390 DWARF-2 CFIframe support]

Andrew Haley

• 2003-12-01 11:39 undefined symbol __pure_virtual
• 2003-12-03 20:45 [tree-ssa] Implement non-call exceptions
• 2003-12-04 18:52 constructors in unions
• 2003-12-06 11:25 Name of front-end
• 2003-12-08 17:32 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-19 11:59 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-22 13:07 Possible bug in floating point comparison
• 2003-12-30 20:12 Re: trouble with porting architecture

Andrew MacLeod

• 2003-12-09 14:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-09 20:11 [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-10 00:04 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-10 00:38 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 13:53 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 14:27 RE: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 14:34 RE: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 17:09 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 23:08 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 23:13 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 23:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 03:27 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-12 13:33 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-12 19:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 19:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 19:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-13 13:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-13 13:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 15:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 19:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 19:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 20:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 20:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 21:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 22:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 22:45 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-16 03:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-16 14:00 [tree-ssa] goto <bb x>
• 2003-12-16 21:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-16 22:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-17 14:33 [tree-ssa] dom1 bug.
• 2003-12-17 19:35 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug.
• 2003-12-17 20:26 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug.
• 2003-12-19 02:37 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 17:00 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 17:02 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion

Andrew Pinski

• 2003-12-01 00:12 Re: What's the point of libbanshee's existance?
• 2003-12-03 02:08 Re: Who is the boss here?
• 2003-12-03 08:05 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 01:49 Re: GCC 3.4 optimisation of if (&ptr == NULL)
• 2003-12-05 23:22 Re: subversions access problem.
• 2003-12-07 22:20 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org
• 2003-12-16 17:41 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build
• 2003-12-16 23:32 bugs fixed on the tree-ssa
• 2003-12-17 22:50 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-19 02:30 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
• 2003-12-19 11:00 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-19 13:14 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-12-19 19:12 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
• 2003-12-23 00:47 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-23 10:53 Bug Status (2003-12-23)
• 2003-12-29 03:55 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 21:02 Re: missed tail-optimization with templates
• 2003-12-30 05:20 Re: Bug Status (2003-12-23)

Anjali Sharma

• 2003-12-19 11:58 Memory Fault in "free"

Anmol Paralkar

• 2003-12-21 06:36 gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out
• 2003-12-21 17:12 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out
• 2003-12-21 18:56 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out
• 2003-12-22 01:34 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out

Arnaud Charlet

• 2003-12-03 17:26 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 23:00 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-07 09:15 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-08 10:42 Re: Ada testsuite
• 2003-12-08 11:02 Re: Ada testsuite

Arpad Beszedes

• 2003-12-08 14:43 Thumb in CSiBE benchmark
• 2003-12-11 15:01 Compilation time on CSiBE
• 2003-12-11 15:43 Re: Compilation time on CSiBE

Arthur I Schwarz

• 2003-12-03 01:54 /../gcc-3.3.2/boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h
• 2003-12-03 19:48 Cygwin/Ada Tasking Failure

aspiesrule

• 2003-12-01 00:08 What's the point of libbanshee's existance?
• 2003-12-03 23:13 Why can't I build a native i686-pc-cygwin compiler?
• 2003-12-21 00:44 Potential bug in jump optimization?

Attila Csosz

• 2003-12-01 22:13 constant initialziation (non-gcc)

Attila Sali

• 2003-12-21 19:53 gcc install result

Axel Scheepers

• 2003-12-07 15:26 cross compiling thoughts

Ayal Zaks

• 2003-12-11 16:39 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.)
• 2003-12-12 19:57 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.)

Bansidhar Arvind Deshpande - CTD, Chennai.

• 2003-12-14 15:33 Newline inside macro expansion
• 2003-12-22 06:56 regular expression

Ben Elliston

• 2003-12-02 22:08 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 10:49 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 23:38 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-09 11:32 Re: C-programming tutorial and reference

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2003-12-09 18:09 Re: optimization
• 2003-12-13 00:41 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 17:23 negating -include on the command line
• 2003-12-15 22:39 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 22:56 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind

Bernardo Innocenti

• 2003-12-16 19:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 20:57 friend declaration implicitly provides a prototype
• 2003-12-17 23:16 Re: friend declaration implicitly provides a prototype
• 2003-12-24 04:37 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build (MORE)
• 2003-12-29 01:24 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree
• 2003-12-30 01:22 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree

Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)

• 2003-12-04 21:03 RE: Why can't I build a native i686-pc-cygwin compiler?

Brad Roberts

• 2003-12-13 03:57 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora?

Bradley M. Kuhn

• 2003-12-29 23:06 Re: regarding CVS repository on Savannah

Brian Ryner

• 2003-12-05 01:50 Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-05 05:46 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-05 08:04 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-05 10:14 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)

Bruce Korb

• 2003-12-08 22:59 GCC3.3.2: gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative

Bruno Haible

• 2003-12-01 13:58 GNU gettext support for GCC internal format strings

Carlo Wood

• 2003-12-03 02:03 Who is the boss here?
• 2003-12-05 02:52 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-05 05:00 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-07 15:29 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 15:41 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 16:04 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-12 17:57 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-23 14:42 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-23 14:44 Re: Can I generate debug info without relocations?

Chevago Runcimonn

• 2003-12-31 01:52 Current status of Objective-C++

chewbaccathewookie

• 2003-12-02 23:48 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets

Chin-Hua Chang

• 2003-12-26 01:28 help :: virtual-incoming-args

Chris Lattner

• 2003-12-11 21:15 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 03:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 19:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 19:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-14 03:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-14 03:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 19:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 20:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 20:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 21:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 22:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 23:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 23:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-17 23:51 LLVM 1.1 Release
• 2003-12-18 05:18 [tree-ssa] Writing testcases for optimizations
• 2003-12-28 22:36 Column number information in 3.4.x?
• 2003-12-31 01:32 Re: Column number information in 3.4.x?

Christian Joensson

• 2003-12-22 13:21 Can't build gcc [tree-ssa] 20031222 on cygwin: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:1618 syntax error for ipc...

Christopher Eltschka

• 2003-12-18 22:32 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind

Christopher Faylor

• 2003-12-08 17:20 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org
• 2003-12-24 16:07 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-24 17:14 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah

Chunhua Liao

• 2003-12-18 02:40 From beginner: What is the workload of writing a RTL expander for a new IR?

Corn Hulio

• 2003-12-04 18:40 constructors in unions

Corn Hulio

• 2003-12-02 16:01 Name Mangling Without Return Type?

Cyrille Chepelov

• 2003-12-18 07:18 subversions.gnu.org down ?

Dale Johannesen

• 2003-12-04 00:13 PR 12828
• 2003-12-08 18:24 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-09 21:00 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-19 02:18 [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
• 2003-12-19 18:08 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
• 2003-12-23 01:29 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
• 2003-12-23 21:08 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? (tentative patch)
• 2003-12-24 00:01 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? (tentative patch)

Dan Kegel

• 2003-12-13 17:42 Time for a compile server status update?

Daniel Berlin

• 2003-12-01 00:11 Re: What's the point of libbanshee's existance?
• 2003-12-01 14:59 Re: cvs->bugzilla bridge bug?
• 2003-12-08 23:59 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-12 02:33 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.)
• 2003-12-12 02:36 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-12 03:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage on the rise again
• 2003-12-12 16:13 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-12 19:15 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-13 02:39 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora?
• 2003-12-15 21:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 23:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 23:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-17 20:18 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug.
• 2003-12-21 19:57 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla
• 2003-12-21 20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating new variables
• 2003-12-24 16:38 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 18:11 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-25 23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC - tree vectorizer
• 2003-12-28 18:46 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2003-12-01 00:01 Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions
• 2003-12-01 00:11 Re: What's the point of libbanshee's existance?
• 2003-12-02 20:21 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-02 20:39 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-03 21:35 MIPS ABI changes in GCC 3.4
• 2003-12-04 20:57 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-04 21:41 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-05 16:56 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-05 17:02 Re: Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name
• 2003-12-06 16:41 Re: Run-time noise from fp-bit:df_to_sf (truncdfsf2).
• 2003-12-06 23:59 [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:31 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:31 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:58 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 05:19 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 05:38 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-10 04:49 Re: web page cvs access snafu? [plus, where is the modules file?]
• 2003-12-12 18:27 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-21 17:59 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out
• 2003-12-22 15:31 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-23 01:28 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 05:17 Re: new FAILs on HEAD
• 2003-12-24 16:39 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-29 02:28 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-29 05:32 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 18:22 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions

DANIEL NORMAN HARRIS

• 2003-12-03 11:58 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets

Dara Hazeghi

• 2003-12-11 19:30 Compiling error
• 2003-12-17 22:58 version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0?
• 2003-12-18 04:01 Re: version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0?

David Abrahams

• 2003-12-12 22:54 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 13:28 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 23:32 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 23:34 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 11:55 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 12:23 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 20:05 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 20:53 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 21:49 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 23:55 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 03:48 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 11:22 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 16:57 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 18:25 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 21:30 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 15:34 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 19:06 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind

David Carlton

• 2003-12-02 16:57 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-02 17:36 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-02 20:21 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

David Edelsohn

• 2003-12-01 02:24 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues.
• 2003-12-02 17:23 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 22:47 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-05 17:27 Re: incredible increase in executable size (AIX)
• 2003-12-05 18:53 Janis Johnson appointed GCC compat testsuite maintainer
• 2003-12-11 06:29 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.)
• 2003-12-12 16:17 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-16 20:18 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-18 01:57 Re: Your assign_parms changes
• 2003-12-18 03:13 Re: Your assign_parms changes
• 2003-12-18 22:58 Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64?
• 2003-12-19 19:53 Re: Thread Local Storage

David Mosberger

• 2003-12-16 01:14 documentation for augmentations in .eh_frame?
• 2003-12-16 01:59 documentation for augmentations in .eh_frame?
• 2003-12-19 19:33 Re: documentation for augmentations in .eh_frame?

Davide Rossetti

• 2003-12-04 17:44 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers?

Denis Zaitsev

• 2003-12-24 16:32 i386 inline asm for string functions chaned with GCC 3.x. Why?
• 2003-12-25 00:21 i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-25 01:13 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-25 01:15 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-25 01:39 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-25 01:45 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-25 02:09 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-27 11:47 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-27 11:47 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-28 22:25 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 02:45 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 02:53 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 18:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 18:52 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 19:32 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 19:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions

Devang Patel

• 2003-12-04 19:09 [RFC] C++/Debug : 'using' in DWARF
• 2003-12-16 00:37 Re: negating -include on the command line
• 2003-12-31 01:05 [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question
• 2003-12-31 19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question
• 2003-12-31 21:35 [tree-ssa] Question: going in and out of SSA

Diego Novillo

• 2003-12-01 18:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 20:17 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-30-11
• 2003-12-05 14:50 [tree-ssa] Daily x86 RPM snapshots now available
• 2003-12-07 16:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-07 17:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-08 15:33 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-12-08 17:40 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org
• 2003-12-09 16:42 Re: optimization
• 2003-12-09 18:05 [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled.
• 2003-12-09 20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checkingdisabled.
• 2003-12-10 21:47 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checkingdisabled.
• 2003-12-12 20:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-13 02:41 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora?
• 2003-12-15 18:29 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-12-15 19:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 20:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-16 14:07 Re: [tree-ssa] goto <bb x>
• 2003-12-16 17:55 Re: [tree-ssa] goto <bb x>
• 2003-12-16 19:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-18 14:32 Re: From beginner: What is the workload of writing a RTL expanderfor a new IR?
• 2003-12-19 13:11 Mainline bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-12-19 14:33 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-12-31 16:13 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question
• 2003-12-31 17:25 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa)

DJ Delorie

• 2003-12-03 02:24 Re: Who is the boss here?
• 2003-12-04 21:00 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-24 15:48 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 16:45 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 18:17 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c

Dorit Naishlos

• 2003-12-08 16:55 Re: more SIMD operations
• 2003-12-16 12:56 [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
• 2003-12-21 18:30 [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating new variables
• 2003-12-22 07:59 Re: [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating new variables
• 2003-12-25 23:11 [tree-ssa] RFC - tree vectorizer
• 2003-12-31 13:03 [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa)
• 2003-12-31 13:19 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC - tree vectorizer
• 2003-12-31 19:07 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa)

Doug Evans

• 2003-12-10 04:46 web page cvs access snafu? [plus, where is the modules file?]

Douglas B Rupp

• 2003-12-18 18:14 Re: VMS and VAX support in GCC

Emmanuel R. Matuco

• 2003-12-03 23:07 RE: Obsoleting unmaintained targets

Erdi Chen

• 2003-12-20 07:08 static const class member is undefined
• 2003-12-21 06:35 Re: static const class member is undefined

Eric Atkins

• 2003-12-11 17:55 Wondering if you could help out

Eric Botcazou

• 2003-12-01 05:46 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 07:30 cvs->bugzilla bridge bug?
• 2003-12-01 15:12 Re: cvs->bugzilla bridge bug?
• 2003-12-03 07:07 gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 07:42 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 08:57 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 09:16 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 09:25 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 09:42 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-06 05:20 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-06 21:16 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-07 09:45 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-08 10:34 Ada testsuite
• 2003-12-08 12:12 Re: [objc] 64-bit failures
• 2003-12-09 05:04 Re: GCC3.3.2: gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative
• 2003-12-09 05:08 Re: [objc] 64-bit failures
• 2003-12-12 08:02 calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-12 08:53 GCC bugs on SH
• 2003-12-12 09:08 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-12 10:16 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-12 11:08 GCC bootstrap failure on i586
• 2003-12-12 11:44 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586
• 2003-12-12 16:11 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586
• 2003-12-17 18:48 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-18 10:14 Base class layout in C++
• 2003-12-19 10:45 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-19 19:51 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-20 08:39 Re: static const class member is undefined
• 2003-12-23 11:33 Re: Bug Status (2003-12-23)
• 2003-12-30 17:24 Re: trouble with porting architecture
• 2003-12-30 19:06 Re: trouble with porting architecture

Eric Christopher

• 2003-12-02 22:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-06 22:09 Re: cpplib
• 2003-12-08 10:20 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)

Erick Bourgeois

• 2003-12-22 21:51 strasp: a new string "splitter"

Evan Bigall

• 2003-12-18 04:23 gcov with dynamic c++ libraries

Eyal Lebedinsky

• 2003-12-10 08:47 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-10 23:01 [3.5-tree-ssa] off cvs build fails in cgraph.c
• 2003-12-10 23:06 Re: [3.5-tree-ssa] off cvs build fails in cgraph.c

Falk Hueffner

• 2003-12-04 14:30 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers?
• 2003-12-16 19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-22 09:59 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered

Felix Lee

• 2003-12-02 14:09 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-02 15:40 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:32 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:42 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 17:48 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-08 18:59 Re: Name of front-end

Florian Weimer

• 2003-12-31 22:57 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time

fpuentes

• 2003-12-17 11:22 TREE & RTL (intermediate code) documentation

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2003-12-29 20:05 Re: Can't build gcc [tree-ssa] 20031222 on cygwin: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:1618 syntax error for ipc...

Frank Cusack

• 2003-12-27 23:33 #pragma ident

Frank Mehnert

• 2003-12-01 17:06 g++3: Static Initializers occur twice in Binary

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2003-12-01 01:18 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 03:25 GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-01)
• 2003-12-02 20:36 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-04 01:01 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 01:44 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 11:16 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-07 02:55 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 03:00 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:28 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:36 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:42 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 05:09 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 05:25 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 15:45 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 16:10 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 18:09 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 19:25 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 23:22 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-08 04:28 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-09 01:32 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-09 09:46 GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-08)
• 2003-12-10 13:34 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-12 00:21 Re: What happened to the GCC 3.3 testsuite?
• 2003-12-12 16:56 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-15 18:49 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
• 2003-12-17 00:09 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275
• 2003-12-17 03:17 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275
• 2003-12-17 04:56 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275
• 2003-12-17 17:02 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 23:15 Re: version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0?
• 2003-12-18 17:22 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
• 2003-12-18 20:42 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-19 11:21 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
• 2003-12-19 13:57 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
• 2003-12-21 18:36 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla

Gagneet Singh

• 2003-12-19 14:44 ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-19 15:49 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-20 14:38 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-24 11:14 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-24 11:15 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-24 11:16 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-26 04:41 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-29 04:54 EOF character in parser

Gareth McCaughan

• 2003-12-02 11:38 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-05 11:46 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

gccadmin

• 2003-12-01 17:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20031201 is now available
• 2003-12-03 17:03 gcc-ss-3.4-20031203 is now available
• 2003-12-08 17:09 gcc-ss-3.3-20031208 is now available
• 2003-12-10 17:03 gcc-ss-3.4-20031210 is now available
• 2003-12-15 17:17 gcc-ss-3.3-20031215 is now available
• 2003-12-17 17:19 gcc-ss-3.4-20031217 is now available
• 2003-12-22 17:12 gcc-ss-3.3-20031222 is now available
• 2003-12-24 16:55 gcc-ss-3.4-20031224 is now available
• 2003-12-29 17:15 gcc-ss-3.3-20031229 is now available
• 2003-12-31 16:55 gcc-ss-3.4-20031231 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2003-12-15 21:11 Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 21:49 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 22:08 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 22:24 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-23 14:14 Re: How to determine access alignment in RTL ?
• 2003-12-30 17:36 Re: trouble with porting architecture

Geoff Keating

• 2003-12-01 19:41 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-02 19:50 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 20:26 Re: New target ported
• 2003-12-07 22:51 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-08 04:19 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-09 23:37 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-09 23:43 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-11 16:59 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 17:02 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-11 20:21 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-14 08:15 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora?
• 2003-12-14 08:27 Re: Compiled code crashes storing to read-only location
• 2003-12-15 21:40 Re: negating -include on the command line
• 2003-12-15 21:43 Re: Old K+R compatibility goo in c-decl.c::duplicate_decls - preserve?
• 2003-12-16 19:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 19:33 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-17 22:44 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-17 22:59 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 23:07 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-21 06:47 Re: static const class member is undefined
• 2003-12-31 21:30 Altivec discussion summary, future direction
• 2003-12-31 23:41 Re: Request for help performing CVS branch trick

Geoffrey Keating

• 2003-12-04 00:46 Re: PR 12828
• 2003-12-10 19:27 Re: Some GC marking inefficiency with chain_next and chain_prev

George Ciobanu

• 2003-12-03 17:33 GCC help

George Garvey

• 2003-12-04 13:51 Is a warning for a==a possible?

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2003-12-01 15:52 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-03 09:10 PATCH: lists.html
• 2003-12-03 09:39 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets
• 2003-12-03 10:29 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-06 17:42 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-08 10:11 pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 11:40 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 12:47 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-12 18:31 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-14 03:19 Re: PATCH: Re: sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk mirror out of date
• 2003-12-14 22:15 GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
• 2003-12-15 10:16 $PREFIX/lib and Java
• 2003-12-27 10:50 Re: please update http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html
• 2003-12-27 11:21 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-29 16:28 System V PowerPC ABI?
• 2003-12-29 17:22 PATCH for Re: System V PowerPC ABI?
• 2003-12-29 18:06 [tree-ssa] i386 bootstrap failure
• 2003-12-29 18:07 [tree-ssa] i386 bootstrap failure
• 2003-12-29 20:09 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah

Ghassan Shobaki

• 2003-12-03 06:25 Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC
• 2003-12-04 01:27 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC
• 2003-12-09 21:12 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC

Gilles LEBOURGEOIS

• 2003-12-19 19:39 Thread Local Storage

Gillman, David

• 2003-12-07 16:22 built gcc

Giovanni Bajo

• 2003-12-08 13:02 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 13:29 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 18:19 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-09 01:48 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-09 18:53 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-16 01:55 Re: using9.C failure
• 2003-12-17 11:33 Re: friend declaration implicitly provides a prototype
• 2003-12-17 11:39 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa
• 2003-12-17 23:39 Re: friend declaration implicitly provides a prototype
• 2003-12-19 19:07 Re: Questions about placement of qualifiers in member functions
• 2003-12-21 18:27 Regression information in Bugzilla
• 2003-12-21 18:43 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla

Glenn Burkhardt

• 2003-12-02 01:40 Re: g++3: Static Initializers occur twice in Binary

H. J. Lu

• 2003-12-04 20:50 PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-04 22:33 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-04 22:45 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-04 23:42 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-04 23:53 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-07 00:03 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning

Hans Boehm

• 2003-12-01 05:27 Re: Syntax error...

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2003-12-03 08:28 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-01)
• 2003-12-06 14:39 Run-time noise from fp-bit:df_to_sf (truncdfsf2).
• 2003-12-06 20:57 Re: Run-time noise from fp-bit:df_to_sf (truncdfsf2).
• 2003-12-11 11:11 Re: Register Spilling
• 2003-12-31 08:49 Trunk broken for mmix-knuth-mmixware

Henrik Sorensen

• 2003-12-06 09:49 Name of front-end
• 2003-12-06 14:24 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-06 14:31 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-07 08:49 Re: Name of front-end

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2003-12-01 00:28 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 00:30 Re: What's the point of libbanshee's existance?
• 2003-12-01 16:20 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:27 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:30 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:42 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:52 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 17:07 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 04:02 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 16:09 Re: Name Mangling Without Return Type?
• 2003-12-02 17:09 Re: How to link in sub-object ganularity
• 2003-12-02 18:04 Re: How to link in sub-object ganularity
• 2003-12-02 22:29 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 15:27 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:19 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:53 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 20:59 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-04 22:07 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-04 22:40 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-04 23:11 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-05 01:04 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-05 02:09 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-05 02:27 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-05 04:11 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-05 07:11 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-07 01:30 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning
• 2003-12-07 02:09 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:17 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:36 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:40 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 04:46 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-09 15:43 Re: in-charge/not-in-charge
• 2003-12-16 05:53 Questions about placement of qualifiers in member functions
• 2003-12-19 15:09 Re: Memory Fault in "free"
• 2003-12-19 19:11 Re: Questions about placement of qualifiers in member functions
• 2003-12-20 15:33 Re: generic libgcc1?
• 2003-12-20 15:38 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-21 13:10 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out
• 2003-12-21 14:47 Re: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level
• 2003-12-21 20:07 Re: generic libgcc1?
• 2003-12-21 20:14 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out
• 2003-12-22 14:37 Re: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level
• 2003-12-22 15:22 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out
• 2003-12-23 01:23 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-23 02:43 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 16:43 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-26 23:06 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch.

Jakub Jelinek

• 2003-12-02 17:44 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-02 20:37 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-05 08:52 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-05 09:55 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-05 10:42 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-12 10:39 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-13 10:15 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora?
• 2003-12-29 09:04 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 16:43 Re: System V PowerPC ABI?

James A Kirk

• 2003-12-08 06:49 Career Site Linking
• 2003-12-08 06:51 Career Site Linking

James Dessart

• 2003-12-30 15:28 trouble with porting architecture
• 2003-12-30 18:14 Re: trouble with porting architecture

James Lemke

• 2003-12-08 14:52 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion...

James Morrison

• 2003-12-02 04:37 Why does treelang not support tabs?

Jamie Lokier

• 2003-12-03 02:51 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-03 13:35 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-18 13:39 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 18:21 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 18:51 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 18:58 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 22:49 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-21 14:52 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch.

Jan Hubicka

• 2003-12-01 15:52 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 17:11 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 17:47 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 18:42 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-02 10:19 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs -fno-unit-at-a-time
• 2003-12-02 14:22 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 00:06 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC
• 2003-12-04 00:15 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 10:28 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC
• 2003-12-08 22:09 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
• 2003-12-09 20:26 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled.
• 2003-12-09 22:15 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled.
• 2003-12-09 23:56 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-10 00:18 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-10 11:28 Re: CFG not taken care
• 2003-12-10 22:49 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled.
• 2003-12-10 23:08 Re: [3.5-tree-ssa] off cvs build fails in cgraph.c
• 2003-12-11 18:11 [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back
• 2003-12-12 13:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage on the rise again
• 2003-12-13 00:09 [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?
• 2003-12-15 23:11 GIMPLE and datastructures
• 2003-12-15 23:31 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back
• 2003-12-15 23:46 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back
• 2003-12-16 14:31 [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 15:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 16:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 18:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 19:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 19:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 19:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 19:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 20:06 Re: GIMPLE and datastructures
• 2003-12-16 20:43 Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?
• 2003-12-17 11:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-17 11:57 Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?
• 2003-12-19 00:44 [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 00:57 [tree-ssa] Removing CALL_PLACEHOLDER mess, when?
• 2003-12-19 12:13 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 14:04 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 14:21 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 16:39 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 16:49 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-19 18:07 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 18:15 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-19 20:01 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-23 12:27 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
• 2003-12-31 20:47 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion

Jan-Benedict Glaw

• 2003-12-12 12:48 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");

Janis Johnson

• 2003-12-08 19:15 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)

Jason Merrill

• 2003-12-02 21:45 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-08 23:04 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 23:15 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-09 05:07 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-09 19:09 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-12 22:01 catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-13 06:52 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-13 06:55 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 20:29 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 00:52 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 20:31 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 23:44 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 03:21 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 03:45 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 07:04 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind

Jean-Eric Cuendet

• 2003-12-17 09:47 Linking static libraries

Jean-Pierre Radley

• 2003-12-22 16:59 Re: regular expression

jgrant

• 2003-12-21 14:26 Optimisation options turned on at a certain level
• 2003-12-22 09:56 RE: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level

Jim Wilson

• 2003-12-01 01:14 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer?
• 2003-12-01 01:29 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 01:57 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues.
• 2003-12-02 00:54 Re: g++3: Static Initializers occur twice in Binary
• 2003-12-02 23:18 Obsoleting unmaintained targets
• 2003-12-03 00:04 Re: order of constructors
• 2003-12-03 01:13 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets
• 2003-12-03 01:16 Re: LANG HOOKS
• 2003-12-03 03:38 Re: /../gcc-3.3.2/boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h
• 2003-12-03 04:06 Re: C tree question
• 2003-12-03 08:47 Re: C tree question
• 2003-12-04 00:35 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets
• 2003-12-04 20:01 Re: cygwin windows to linux cross compiler issues !!
• 2003-12-04 20:08 Re: GCC help
• 2003-12-04 20:19 Re: Why can't I build a native i686-pc-cygwin compiler?
• 2003-12-04 20:48 Re: PR 12828
• 2003-12-04 21:11 Re: New target ported
• 2003-12-05 07:15 Re: [PATCH] GNU/KNetBSD support (with ChangeLog)
• 2003-12-10 05:33 Re: cross compiling thoughts
• 2003-12-10 05:54 Re: built gcc
• 2003-12-10 05:58 Re: Which gcc is the most stable today ?
• 2003-12-10 06:04 Re: latency in define_insn_reservation
• 2003-12-11 07:43 Re: Register Spilling
• 2003-12-11 07:59 Re: Error building for mips variant
• 2003-12-11 08:03 Re: Need Help for a new target's assembly code
• 2003-12-12 07:50 Re: Error building for mips variant
• 2003-12-12 08:52 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-12 09:58 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-16 00:52 Re: RTL templates
• 2003-12-16 01:15 Re: [SH4] DFmode splits after reload
• 2003-12-16 01:23 Re: Porting GCC to new target, branch implementation
• 2003-12-16 01:52 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-16 02:04 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build
• 2003-12-16 02:28 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-16 03:16 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 07:46 RE: [SH4] DFmode splits after reload
• 2003-12-16 20:42 RE: splits after reload
• 2003-12-17 08:47 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-18 01:21 Re: How to determine access alignment in RTL ?
• 2003-12-18 01:36 Re: TREE & RTL (intermediate code) documentation
• 2003-12-18 02:00 Re: Facing problem to make/install gnu GCC2.95 cross compiler.
• 2003-12-19 08:05 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
• 2003-12-19 20:23 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-19 20:42 Re: gcov with dynamic c++ libraries
• 2003-12-19 21:12 Re: alias analysis
• 2003-12-19 21:19 Re: help on soft-float
• 2003-12-22 06:37 Re: Re: help on soft-float
• 2003-12-30 23:57 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-31 00:05 Re: How to determine access alignment in RTL ?

Jiri Pittner

• 2003-12-02 13:36 option for default 64-bit integers on Opteron and itanium
• 2003-12-02 14:15 Re: Re: option for default 64-bit integers on Opteron and itanium

jlquinn

• 2003-12-16 19:55 Unable to access subversion?

Joe Buck

• 2003-12-01 17:37 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 17:48 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 00:09 Re: constant initialziation (non-gcc)
• 2003-12-02 00:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 18:13 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 20:55 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 01:08 Re: order of constructors
• 2003-12-03 01:25 Re: order of constructors
• 2003-12-04 17:40 Re: Is a warning for a==a possible?
• 2003-12-04 17:43 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers?
• 2003-12-04 17:49 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 23:04 Re: Compilation Error- Seems a gcc Problem
• 2003-12-04 23:15 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-05 18:43 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-08 17:03 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org
• 2003-12-08 17:10 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-10 17:37 Re: Which gcc is the most stable today ?
• 2003-12-17 00:21 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa
• 2003-12-17 00:32 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-17 22:48 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-18 18:48 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 20:37 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 23:03 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-19 17:20 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings

Joel Sherrill

• 2003-12-03 00:50 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets
• 2003-12-05 16:54 Re: mixing C and assembly.
• 2003-12-13 16:02 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla

Joerg . Richter

• 2003-12-05 09:41 incredible increase in executable size (AIX)

Joerg Beyer

• 2003-12-09 12:05 in-charge/not-in-charge

Johan Rydberg

• 2003-12-16 17:30 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered

John David Anglin

• 2003-12-08 22:44 Re: [objc] 64-bit failures
• 2003-12-30 19:32 Re: HP-UX and core dumps and PHSS_26559

John Neil

• 2003-12-04 01:30 GCC 3.4 optimisation of if (&ptr == NULL)

John R. Shannon

• 2003-12-17 10:48 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build
• 2003-12-17 10:51 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build
• 2003-12-17 11:09 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build (MORE)

Jonathan Lennox

• 2003-12-18 21:40 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind

Joseph S. Myers

• 2003-12-01 00:47 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer?
• 2003-12-02 09:21 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-02 10:25 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-03 01:56 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-03 10:16 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-08 10:51 Re: Ada testsuite
• 2003-12-10 13:36 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-12 18:29 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-17 00:21 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-17 23:29 Re: version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0?
• 2003-12-19 20:02 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-19 20:42 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-23 21:33 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-31 19:56 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time
• 2003-12-31 23:39 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time

Josie Ellis

• 2003-12-12 08:55 Help installing gcc

K S Sreeram

• 2003-12-22 12:03 Possible bug in floating point comparison

Kai Henningsen

• 2003-12-01 01:14 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-12-19 12:15 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-22 12:51 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2003-12-08 02:59 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion...
• 2003-12-19 16:06 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-24 19:25 Eric Botcazou appointed SPARC maintainer

Kazu Hirata

• 2003-12-13 17:58 iq2000 port : bit rot already started.
• 2003-12-19 14:23 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-12-21 20:13 Rewriting C identifier lookup.

Kedar Namjoshi

• 2003-12-04 20:10 [tree-ssa] C++ parsing bug?

Kelley Cook

• 2003-12-01 00:30 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer?
• 2003-12-05 16:45 Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name
• 2003-12-05 21:30 Re: Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name
• 2003-12-09 15:37 Re: Which gcc is the most stable today ?
• 2003-12-09 20:48 Re: -funroll-loops experimental in gcc-3.3.2
• 2003-12-16 19:25 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-23 17:00 Re: Mainline: make[2]: ada/doctools/xgnatug: Command not found
• 2003-12-31 16:31 Anonymous CVS access to gcc.gnu.org

Lars Segerlund

• 2003-12-01 16:18 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Latchesar Ionkov

• 2003-12-15 19:19 Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
• 2003-12-17 20:39 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered

Laurent GUERBY

• 2003-12-08 23:48 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-23 08:19 Re: Mainline: make[2]: ada/doctools/xgnatug: Command not found
• 2003-12-24 17:37 Re: new FAILs on HEAD

law

• 2003-12-01 17:20 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 17:47 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 03:51 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 03:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 04:17 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-09 04:05 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
• 2003-12-09 06:52 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
• 2003-12-11 19:26 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 19:30 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-11 19:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-11 19:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-11 19:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-11 23:34 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-12 03:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 03:14 [tree-ssa] Memory usage on the rise again
• 2003-12-12 03:58 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-13 05:03 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-13 22:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu
• 2003-12-14 13:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu
• 2003-12-15 22:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 23:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 23:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 23:42 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back
• 2003-12-16 15:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 16:48 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 17:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-16 19:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-17 03:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-17 03:09 Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?
• 2003-12-17 03:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-17 03:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-17 03:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-17 03:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-17 17:40 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug.
• 2003-12-17 17:48 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug.
• 2003-12-17 19:41 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug.
• 2003-12-19 16:18 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
• 2003-12-19 16:25 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-22 23:33 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?

Liu Hongming

• 2003-12-19 06:48 RE: RTL Dumps
• 2003-12-19 06:50 help on soft-float
• 2003-12-19 08:50 Re: Re: RE: RTL Dumps
• 2003-12-22 05:09 Re: Re: help on soft-float

Luca Padovani

• 2003-12-29 20:52 missed tail-optimization with templates

Mad Hatter

• 2003-12-30 20:07 Debug class optimization

Maksim

• 2003-12-20 04:06 generic libgcc1?
• 2003-12-21 18:53 Re: generic libgcc1?
• 2003-12-22 22:25 insn "type" attribute

Marc Espie

• 2003-12-06 20:41 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-07 18:25 Re: PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp
• 2003-12-16 18:58 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-16 20:07 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-23 12:42 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build (MORE)
• 2003-12-23 13:31 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-29 14:04 where are char_traits<wchar_t> instances built ?

Mark Kettenis

• 2003-12-15 21:40 Debugging with stabs on Solaris x86 with GCC and the native as
• 2003-12-20 15:27 Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64?

Mark Mitchell

• 2003-12-01 02:54 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 04:05 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-15 20:26 Re: Old K+R compatibility goo in c-decl.c::duplicate_decls -preserve?
• 2003-12-15 22:01 using9.C failure
• 2003-12-16 00:08 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 02:18 Re: using9.C failure
• 2003-12-16 17:32 GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-16 17:48 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-16 18:05 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-16 18:24 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-17 01:26 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-17 02:37 Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-17 05:28 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 07:51 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 16:34 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 17:15 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 18:36 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 21:20 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 22:42 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 22:43 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 01:50 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-18 04:01 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 04:38 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 05:11 Re: version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0?
• 2003-12-18 16:48 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 18:53 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 18:56 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 19:02 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 20:42 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 22:34 [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List]
• 2003-12-18 22:38 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 23:10 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-19 17:44 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List]
• 2003-12-21 20:47 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla
• 2003-12-23 00:44 About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-23 00:52 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-23 01:27 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-28 18:21 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa
• 2003-12-28 18:33 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple
• 2003-12-28 19:11 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa
• 2003-12-29 02:33 const-elim-1.c

Martin Reinecke

• 2003-12-04 10:00 Fast operations on floating point numbers?
• 2003-12-04 14:22 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers?
• 2003-12-09 12:03 Missed optimization in gcc 3.4?

Marty Hauff

• 2003-12-21 23:00 Re: RE: RTL Dumps

Mathieu Lacage

• 2003-12-01 15:20 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 14:24 C tree question
• 2003-12-03 08:01 Re: C tree question
• 2003-12-19 08:00 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List]

Matt Austern

• 2003-12-01 18:19 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 17:35 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-02 20:15 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-02 21:00 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-16 19:50 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 20:46 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 21:55 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-17 21:51 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-18 18:04 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-19 18:35 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-19 20:43 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-19 20:46 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-22 19:31 Compiler timeouts in the basic_string tests

Matt Fago

• 2003-12-01 17:19 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 00:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 15:31 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Matthieu Moy

• 2003-12-22 09:50 How can I get the line number and file name from GCC tree.

Michael Chamberlain

• 2003-12-22 07:28 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

• 2003-12-05 07:05 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not)
• 2003-12-07 17:28 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-09 20:40 (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-16 19:15 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-24 03:39 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 06:10 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 19:22 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c

Michael Matz

• 2003-12-01 14:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 21:07 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119

Mike Stump

• 2003-12-02 01:58 Re: g++3: Static Initializers occur twice in Binary
• 2003-12-03 02:26 Re: Who is the boss here?
• 2003-12-04 01:17 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-09 21:45 Re: Minor suggestion
• 2003-12-11 22:36 [cs] Merge in tree-ssa-20020619-merge-20031207
• 2003-12-12 00:38 Re: [cs] Merge in tree-ssa-20020619-merge-20031207
• 2003-12-17 02:11 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-17 02:17 Re: How to share global data in a share library?
• 2003-12-17 22:10 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-18 04:28 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings

Mircea Namolaru

• 2003-12-08 15:06 Re: Intermodule constant propagation

ml

• 2003-12-09 06:01 latency in define_insn_reservation

mohanlal jangir

• 2003-12-03 09:22 cygwin windows to linux cross compiler issues !!
• 2003-12-04 04:25 Re: cygwin windows to linux cross compiler issues !!

Mostafa Hagog

• 2003-12-10 16:17 DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.)

mvm4j88

• 2003-12-17 13:26 eyes hitech software most extra low price stop

Nathan Myers

• 2003-12-13 08:28 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-14 03:59 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 04:49 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind

Nathan Sidwell

• 2003-12-22 14:12 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-22 15:59 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings

Nathanael Nerode

• 2003-12-03 17:16 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-01)
• 2003-12-03 17:23 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-05 19:01 Re: Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name
• 2003-12-07 16:05 Re: GCC build failed for native...
• 2003-12-07 17:36 Overriding DW_AT_comp_dir output?
• 2003-12-07 19:49 Re: Overriding DW_AT_comp_dir output?
• 2003-12-12 13:07 Re: What happened to the GCC 3.3 testsuite?
• 2003-12-18 16:45 Re: VMS and VAX support in GCC
• 2003-12-24 02:44 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 03:00 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build (MORE)
• 2003-12-31 22:57 Request for help performing CVS branch trick

Naveen Sharma, Noida

• 2003-12-02 13:01 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues.
• 2003-12-11 09:01 Re: Register Spilling
• 2003-12-11 13:22 Re: Register Spilling

Nedko Arnaudov

• 2003-12-14 07:03 Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build
• 2003-12-17 10:28 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build
• 2003-12-17 11:10 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build

Nick Burrett

• 2003-12-10 10:36 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple
• 2003-12-14 10:36 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple

Nithya Babu

• 2003-12-22 07:08 Porting GCC help/doubts
• 2003-12-22 10:17 RE: Porting GCC help/doubts
• 2003-12-22 10:48 Re: Porting GCC help/doubts

Nitin Jain

• 2003-12-11 05:12 Need Help for a new target's assembly code

Nix

• 2003-12-06 11:31 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Pablo Huerta

• 2003-12-04 10:16 New target ported

Paolo Carlini

• 2003-12-02 00:04 Libstdc++-v3 vs -fno-unit-at-a-time
• 2003-12-02 10:28 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs -fno-unit-at-a-time
• 2003-12-08 12:31 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 12:57 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 13:16 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 18:24 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 18:37 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 18:48 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-08 19:25 Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline))
• 2003-12-08 23:17 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
• 2003-12-16 20:04 Re: Unable to access subversion?
• 2003-12-18 15:53 Recent regressions in the libstdc++ testsuite
• 2003-12-21 22:26 Fix for c++/13387 -> libstdc++ regressions
• 2003-12-29 14:14 Re: where are char_traits<wchar_t> instances built ?

Paul Brook

• 2003-12-02 14:01 Re: option for default 64-bit integers on Opteron and itanium
• 2003-12-02 14:40 Re: option for default 64-bit integers on Opteron and itanium
• 2003-12-03 00:11 Re: LANG HOOKS
• 2003-12-22 10:33 Re: Porting GCC help/doubts
• 2003-12-22 10:54 Re: Porting GCC help/doubts

Paul Cadaret

• 2003-12-23 21:51 CVS login hangs
• 2003-12-28 20:35 Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224 tree
• 2003-12-29 06:16 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree

Paul Eggert

• 2003-12-01 20:50 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-02 21:29 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 21:37 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-08 22:35 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-10 00:03 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-31 19:34 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time
• 2003-12-31 23:27 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time

Paul Jarc

• 2003-12-01 19:21 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-03 15:59 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

Paul Koning

• 2003-12-04 14:52 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers?
• 2003-12-08 15:23 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-18 21:20 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-19 14:56 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings

Per Bothner

• 2003-12-06 21:56 Re: cpplib
• 2003-12-13 02:22 how to turn off PIE on Fedora?
• 2003-12-13 03:32 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora?
• 2003-12-13 04:14 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora?
• 2003-12-14 05:45 Re: Time for a compile server status update?
• 2003-12-31 01:26 Re: Column number information in 3.4.x?
• 2003-12-31 01:47 Re: Column number information in 3.4.x?

Petar Penchev

• 2003-12-12 08:35 RTL templates
• 2003-12-19 06:26 RTL Dumps
• 2003-12-19 08:16 Re: RE: RTL Dumps

Peter Barada

• 2003-12-03 01:13 Re: order of constructors
• 2003-12-04 13:53 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers?
• 2003-12-29 14:47 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree

Phil Edwards

• 2003-12-01 00:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-03 23:39 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets
• 2003-12-07 03:02 Re: [GCC] Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-16 20:16 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-18 18:36 Re: subversions.gnu.org down ?
• 2003-12-18 21:37 Re: Multilib configure failing
• 2003-12-19 05:45 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List]
• 2003-12-23 23:05 Re: CVS login hangs

Prashanth T

• 2003-12-23 12:14 Can I generate debug info without relocations?

Rainer Orth

• 2003-12-08 13:25 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-08 23:44 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-12 21:26 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida

• 2003-12-12 08:42 [SH4] DFmode splits after reload
• 2003-12-12 08:53 RE: RTL templates
• 2003-12-12 11:12 RE: Help installing gcc
• 2003-12-16 06:02 RE: [SH4] DFmode splits after reload
• 2003-12-16 10:16 RE: splits after reload

Rakhi Malik

• 2003-12-01 11:23 undefined symbol __pure_virtual
• 2003-12-01 11:32 undefined symbol __pure_virtual

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

• 2003-12-30 15:47 cvs.html not clear about cvs server

Ramadass, Ramanathan

• 2003-12-12 18:38 RE: Help installing gcc

Ranjit Mathew

• 2003-12-03 05:04 Re: Name Mangling Without Return Type?

Rayson Ho

• 2003-12-06 22:00 Re: cpplib

rbrown64

• 2003-12-02 07:05 Import zlib-1.2.1 into 3.5 since 3.4 is at stage 3?

Recreatie Media

• 2003-12-23 21:28 Gratis kamperen en meer....
• 2003-12-23 21:28 Gratis kamperen en meer....

Richard Earnshaw

• 2003-12-01 15:39 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 19:46 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-16 17:41 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)

Richard Guenther

• 2003-12-17 09:46 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa

Richard Henderson

• 2003-12-01 22:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-12-02 09:06 underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-02 09:45 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-02 18:39 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-02 22:05 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-03 03:14 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-03 23:03 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-03 23:07 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 01:51 Re: GCC 3.4 optimisation of if (&ptr == NULL)
• 2003-12-04 09:03 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 09:19 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-04 09:33 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets
• 2003-12-06 19:45 Re: [tree-ssa] c-semantics.c expanders
• 2003-12-08 11:07 [objc] 64-bit failures
• 2003-12-11 01:36 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.)
• 2003-12-15 04:46 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 21:38 Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?
• 2003-12-15 22:04 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-15 22:08 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back
• 2003-12-15 22:18 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 22:22 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 22:46 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 22:53 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-15 23:59 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 00:04 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 21:49 Re: documentation for augmentations in .eh_frame?
• 2003-12-16 22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
• 2003-12-17 20:32 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-25 00:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-25 01:54 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-27 04:58 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-31 18:51 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC - tree vectorizer
• 2003-12-31 23:45 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time

Richard Kenner

• 2003-12-01 01:50 Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 14:50 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 14:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:01 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:07 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:13 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:21 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:27 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:32 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:41 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:49 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:50 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 16:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 17:02 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 17:05 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 17:35 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 17:40 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-01 18:29 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-02 00:44 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG
• 2003-12-02 01:10 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 02:02 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 04:35 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 04:39 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 04:46 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 04:53 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 04:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-03 14:05 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 15:44 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 17:06 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-08 00:39 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion...
• 2003-12-08 14:58 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion...
• 2003-12-08 16:31 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-12 12:32 Re: [tree-ssa] PATCH: Feedback-based prefetching
• 2003-12-15 21:58 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 22:21 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 22:54 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 23:09 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 23:56 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-17 23:35 Problem with DECL_RTL in assign_parms
• 2003-12-18 00:09 Your assign_parms changes
• 2003-12-18 00:46 Problem with return register on x86-64
• 2003-12-18 02:42 Re: Your assign_parms changes
• 2003-12-18 16:56 Re: VMS and VAX support in GCC
• 2003-12-29 22:11 Missing documentation for PRINT_REG config macro
• 2003-12-30 00:52 Problem with "make" in libjava part for x86-64

Richard Sandiford

• 2003-12-03 22:06 Re: MIPS ABI changes in GCC 3.4
• 2003-12-19 15:01 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch.
• 2003-12-19 16:24 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch.

Richard Stallman

• 2003-12-03 17:17 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 07:33 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-05 17:26 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-05 23:20 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Robert Dewar

• 2003-12-01 04:45 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 06:28 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 14:01 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 14:38 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:46 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:51 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:03 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 00:38 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 00:45 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 00:48 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 01:11 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 02:49 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 18:54 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-02 20:37 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 21:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 15:12 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:03 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:12 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:38 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:46 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 17:07 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 01:27 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 05:44 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-05 00:17 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-06 13:47 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-08 16:56 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-08 23:31 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-09 00:00 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-09 14:34 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-10 12:28 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-10 13:12 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-16 03:10 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-19 21:46 Re: alias analysis

Robert Millan

• 2003-12-05 12:37 Re: [PATCH] GNU/KNetBSD support (with ChangeLog)

Robert Moss

• 2003-12-02 07:32 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-02 14:19 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119

Robert Schiele

• 2003-12-12 11:29 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586
• 2003-12-12 15:04 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586
• 2003-12-12 17:17 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586
• 2003-12-13 09:26 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586
• 2003-12-14 09:59 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.3.2-hammer on i586-suse-linux-gnu

Roger Sayle

• 2003-12-20 20:05 Help with fixing weak aliases
• 2003-12-23 04:11 Re: Mainline: make[2]: ada/doctools/xgnatug: Command not found
• 2003-12-23 04:40 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
• 2003-12-24 17:05 Successful build of 3.3.2 on ia64-hp-hpux11.22

Roland McGrath

• 2003-12-02 22:58 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119
• 2003-12-25 00:39 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions

Ross Smith

• 2003-12-19 05:37 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List]
• 2003-12-19 07:57 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List]

Rudy Gevaert

• 2003-12-24 11:19 please update http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html
• 2003-12-24 15:20 Re: [Savannah-hackers] Problems at checking gcc with cvs
• 2003-12-24 15:34 regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-25 08:57 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-26 07:23 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-27 11:25 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-29 16:35 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-29 20:00 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah

Rupert Wood

• 2003-12-04 14:43 RE: Fast operations on floating point numbers?

Russ Allbery

• 2003-12-05 04:50 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

S. Bosscher

• 2003-12-10 11:24 Some GC marking inefficiency with chain_next and chain_prev
• 2003-12-11 14:17 RE: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes
• 2003-12-16 13:27 RE: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
• 2003-12-19 13:14 RE: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86

Salim Belgroune

• 2003-12-05 16:39 mixing C and assembly.

Sanjiv Gupta

• 2003-12-11 08:23 RE: Register Spilling

Savithri Venkatachalapathy

• 2003-12-12 21:27 Porting GCC to new target, branch implementation

Scott A Crosby

• 2003-12-03 11:55 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2003-12-01 03:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 05:24 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 13:55 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 14:46 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:01 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:11 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:51 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:12 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:43 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 16:49 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 17:00 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 17:18 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 17:40 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 01:07 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 01:24 Re: Earn $$$ writing free software.
• 2003-12-02 14:08 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-02 14:16 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-02 22:21 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 04:15 Re: Who is the boss here?
• 2003-12-03 15:07 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 15:45 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:02 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-03 16:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 13:45 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-04 14:34 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers?
• 2003-12-09 18:18 Re: optimization
• 2003-12-16 15:45 Acovea 3.3, now with even more stuff!

Segher Boessenkool

• 2003-12-01 07:45 Re: FORTH, anyone?
• 2003-12-10 12:45 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-10 14:08 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");
• 2003-12-11 17:17 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n");

Simon de Hartog

• 2003-12-09 11:25 Minor suggestion

Simon Wu

• 2003-12-31 03:29 Link .o generated by GCC(arm-wince-pe) from Embeded VC ???

Song Wang

• 2003-12-17 01:21 How to share global data in a share library?

Stanley F. Quayle

• 2003-12-18 13:20 VMS and VAX support in GCC
• 2003-12-18 17:55 Re: VMS and VAX support in GCC

Stephan T. Lavavej

• 2003-12-03 21:10 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

Steve Kargl

• 2003-12-07 18:30 alternative to subversions.gnu.org
• 2003-12-08 17:11 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org

steven

• 2003-12-06 08:39 Re:New Introduce
• 2003-12-06 09:57 Re:New Introduce

Steven Bosscher

• 2003-12-01 15:03 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:27 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:42 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 15:47 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-01 18:11 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 18:37 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-07 21:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-08 00:35 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion...
• 2003-12-08 15:28 Why are BLOCK_HEAD/BLOCK_END not used?
• 2003-12-08 20:47 [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
• 2003-12-09 06:46 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
• 2003-12-10 07:55 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
• 2003-12-12 10:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage on the rise again
• 2003-12-13 18:03 Re: iq2000 port : bit rot already started.
• 2003-12-13 23:56 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple
• 2003-12-16 17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
• 2003-12-19 19:09 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
• 2003-12-28 14:52 What happened to the PPro DFA scheduler description?
• 2003-12-28 19:44 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple
• 2003-12-29 09:38 Trouble with --enable-coverage bootstraps

Stuart Hastings

• 2003-12-23 18:01 Re: Compiler timeouts in the basic_string tests

Stuart McRobert

• 2003-12-01 00:09 Re: PATCH: Re: sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk mirror out of date

Syd Polk

• 2003-12-19 19:49 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-19 20:24 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings

Tal Agmon

• 2003-12-09 17:29 -funroll-loops experimental in gcc-3.3.2
• 2003-12-17 14:22 Re: problem with subregs.

Taras Brodovych

• 2003-12-06 20:19 cpplib
• 2003-12-07 09:25 cpplib

Thaddeus H. Black

• 2003-12-09 05:20 C-programming tutorial and reference

The Penguine

• 2003-12-09 09:28 Which gcc is the most stable today ?

Theodore Papadopoulo

• 2003-12-05 23:18 subversions access problem.
• 2003-12-10 11:48 Re: CFG not taken care

Tim Josling

• 2003-12-03 09:21 Re: Why does treelang not support tabs?

tm_gccmail

• 2003-12-02 00:23 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues.
• 2003-12-09 20:41 Re: GCC ILP instruction scheduling?
• 2003-12-17 19:48 RE: splits after reload
• 2003-12-30 19:52 Re: trouble with porting architecture

Tom Lord

• 2003-12-29 23:35 Re: regarding CVS repository on Savannah

Tom Tromey

• 2003-12-02 17:14 Re: Import zlib-1.2.1 into 3.5 since 3.4 is at stage 3?
• 2003-12-15 18:19 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
• 2003-12-16 17:29 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
• 2003-12-16 18:14 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-18 16:55 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited

Toon Moene

• 2003-12-02 00:42 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 01:04 Earn $$$ writing free software.
• 2003-12-04 21:02 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-06 15:12 Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-13 11:58 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora?
• 2003-12-23 01:47 Mainline: make[2]: ada/doctools/xgnatug: Command not found
• 2003-12-28 15:19 Re: What happened to the PPro DFA scheduler description?

Trevor Jenkins

• 2003-12-06 20:45 Re: [GCC] Re: Name of front-end
• 2003-12-08 19:39 Re: [GCC] Re: Name of front-end

Ulrich Drepper

• 2003-12-16 00:29 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 01:42 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 04:58 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-29 03:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions

Ulrich Weigand

• 2003-12-18 17:31 Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64?
• 2003-12-18 21:04 Multilib configure failing
• 2003-12-30 01:09 Re: Problem with "make" in libjava part for x86-64

Umar Janjua

• 2003-12-10 14:17 Register Spilling
• 2003-12-18 11:08 b alias analysis
• 2003-12-18 17:13 alias analysis

Vic Gevirtz

• 2003-12-03 01:25 Another binary.

Victor Maurice Faubert

• 2003-12-09 14:04 Re: Name of front-end

Viktor Przebinda

• 2003-12-09 16:29 optimization

Vimal Kumar

• 2003-12-10 10:18 CFG not taken care

Vladimir Makarov

• 2003-12-04 15:55 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC
• 2003-12-08 17:42 Re: GCC ILP instruction scheduling?
• 2003-12-11 17:01 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.)
• 2003-12-15 22:19 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 22:52 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 23:05 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 23:41 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler

Vladimir Merzliakov

• 2003-12-29 18:21 Re: [tree-ssa] i386 bootstrap failure

Vladimir N. Makarov

• 2003-12-03 14:05 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC

Volker Reichelt

• 2003-12-04 02:36 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes

Waldek Hebisch

• 2003-12-14 04:23 Compiled code crashes storing to read-only location
• 2003-12-14 23:22 Re: Compiled code crashes storing to read-only location

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2003-12-02 22:47 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-12 09:14 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
• 2003-12-17 16:45 Merging binutils/gdb bug databases with the gcc bugzilla

y2bismil

• 2003-12-05 17:31 Re: mixing C and assembly.

Yang Yang

• 2003-12-06 07:05 GCC ILP instruction scheduling?

Yossi Markovich

• 2003-12-17 13:29 How to determine access alignment in RTL ?
• 2003-12-23 09:07 Re: How to determine access alignment in RTL ?

Zack Weinberg

• 2003-12-01 21:29 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-01 22:09 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 01:54 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 04:17 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-12-02 08:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-02 17:18 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-12-02 17:31 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-02 19:01 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-02 21:40 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-02 22:25 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-03 06:17 Re: underlying type for enums
• 2003-12-03 17:22 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 10:11 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 21:53 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 23:27 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-04 23:41 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-05 17:53 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-07 06:30 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 19:19 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
• 2003-12-07 19:20 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-07 19:34 Re: Overriding DW_AT_comp_dir output?
• 2003-12-08 00:27 Another bit of ISO C conversion...
• 2003-12-08 01:09 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion...
• 2003-12-08 03:30 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion...
• 2003-12-08 23:51 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-10 22:16 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
• 2003-12-12 05:38 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-12-14 08:10 Old K+R compatibility goo in c-decl.c::duplicate_decls - preserve?
• 2003-12-14 17:18 Re: Newline inside macro expansion
• 2003-12-15 21:39 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 21:54 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-15 22:05 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler
• 2003-12-16 01:18 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 01:42 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 04:23 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
• 2003-12-16 17:58 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-16 19:06 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
• 2003-12-17 00:43 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275
• 2003-12-17 03:28 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275
• 2003-12-17 09:54 Re: Linking static libraries
• 2003-12-19 22:35 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings
• 2003-12-21 00:55 Re: Potential bug in jump optimization?
• 2003-12-21 18:45 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla
• 2003-12-21 20:51 Re: Rewriting C identifier lookup.
• 2003-12-24 03:59 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-24 05:15 Re: new FAILs on HEAD
• 2003-12-24 05:22 Re: new FAILs on HEAD
• 2003-12-24 06:55 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c
• 2003-12-25 01:21 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-26 03:40 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-27 10:25 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-27 18:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-27 18:53 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah
• 2003-12-29 02:22 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 02:44 Re: const-elim-1.c
• 2003-12-29 02:46 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 03:57 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 05:55 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 19:09 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-29 19:15 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
• 2003-12-30 20:44 Re: Debug class optimization
• 2003-12-31 22:33 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2003-12-06 18:23 [tree-ssa] c-semantics.c expanders
• 2003-12-07 16:19 [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-07 17:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-07 17:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-09 20:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-09 21:01 Re: -funroll-loops experimental in gcc-3.3.2
• 2003-12-11 19:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-11 22:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-12 19:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 20:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-15 21:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
• 2003-12-15 21:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-16 17:40 Re: [tree-ssa] goto <bb x>
• 2003-12-16 22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
• 2003-12-17 10:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Fix problem with loop notes emitted by targets
• 2003-12-19 20:01 Re: calculate_global_regs_live

Ziemowit Laski

• 2003-12-23 23:06 The ObjC discussion list is here!

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)