This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[tree-ssa] where to fix this?


I have a case where tree-ssa is calling fold() on this:

<plus_expr 0x9c80a0
type <integer_type 0x40d42528 int SI
size <integer_cst 0x8e4780 constant invariant 32>
unit size <integer_cst 0x8e4798 constant invariant 4>...
invariant
arg 0 <integer_cst 0x40d40570 type <boolean_type 0x40d427f8 _Bool> constant invariant 1>
arg 1 <integer_cst 0x97eed0 type <integer_type 0x40d42528 int> constant invariant 1>>


which gets into int_const_binop, which thinks the result is _Bool and truncates it to 0.
Not what we want. Would the preference be to fix this in fold(), or make tree_ssa
produce trees that incorporate the C promotions?



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]