This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:26:39 -0800
Subject: Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
References: <20031202153955.6E36B1587F1@kanga.canids> <3FCD0F8D.4090709@coyotegulch.com>

> 4) Is it reasonable to perform different optimizations on different 
> architectures? It seems to me that a PowerPC or Opteron has very 
> different characteristics from a P4, but maybe I'm splitting hairs.

I like the idea, but it really hurts trying to debug something on
multiple platforms - i.e. "this shows up with -Ox", and it might not on
one platform because of a different set of optimizations instead of not
showing up because of a difference on target.

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

References:
- Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
  - From: Felix Lee
- Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]