This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?


 Perhaps you should read the f95 or f2k standards ?

 I fully agree with Stephen here, and I have a little bit of experience with compilers and fortran, ( +15 years ).

 Also why argue ? Code instead.

 1000 lines does more than 1000 words.

 / regards, Lars Segerlund.


On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:13:32 -0500
Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> wrote:

> Steven Bosscher wrote:
> 
> > The optimizations that Fortran needs are not the same as those necessary for 
> > an optimizing C++ compiler, but I'd certainly not call them low-level.
> 
> Right, quite the opposite really. These would normally be regarded as 
> very high-level optimizations, and I do think it is right that Fortran 
> has special requirements here.
> 
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]