This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:03:43 -0700
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <200312161805.12816.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>, Steven Bosscher
writes:
>On Tuesday 16 December 2003 17:48, law@redhat.com wrote:
>> In message <20031216160527.GN2199@kam.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka writes:
>> >Ignore the comments about non-checking bootstrap. As I've checked
>> >Diego's machines did run earlier than I've commited the patch. Hope
>> >that all the problems are fixed by now.
>>
>> What I'm far more concerned about is the fact that a patch which didn't
>> bootstrap was checked into the tree to start with.
>
>Sometimes it unfortunately just happens. In case you forgot, only
>yesterday Diego broke bootstrap, and also remember:
Yes, but it is happening with alarming regularity. Diego has reverted
some of Jan's patches and so have I.
>2003-11-26 Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
>
> Revert
>
> 2003-11-25 Jeff law <law@redhat.com>
>
>(which, FYI, happened to break bootstrap for me.)
And if you recall, that bootstrapped for me with and without checking on
i686-pc-linux-gnu. I couldn't get it to fail unless I was on an alpha.
jeff