This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 30 Nov 2003 19:27:58 -0500
- Subject: Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
- References: <3FC8E44F.3050105@coyotegulch.com><3FC9272A.4070302@specifixinc.com><87isl2vib1.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><1070156852.1024.33.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org><20031130015502.GA15984@disaster.jaj.com><3FC95A67.7010703@specifixinc.com><20031130070305.GA20197@disaster.jaj.com><m3he0lgbff.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><20031201001434.GA2213@disaster.jaj.com>
Phil Edwards <phil@codesourcery.com> writes:
> > Calling the huge infrastructure change on tree-ssa branch "no
> > user-visible change big enough" is an exageration.
>
> Huh? It's /infrastructure/. Why would users care how the internal guts
> are arranged? They don't, and they shouldn't.
Well, when it significantly changes the compiler output, they do, and
they should.
The compiler is not a black box.
Ian