This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled.
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>,Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>,Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>,Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 23:16:00 +0100
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled.
- References: <1070993097.8617.10.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <1071001891.8617.29.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>
>
> Incidentally, please do not commit any patches that do not fix these
> regressions.
I've been looking into it with Jason and it seems to be that culprint is
misscopmilation in cp/class.o (at least replacing it by unoptimized
version makes the bug to go away).
The symptom is that method table contains bogus duplicated overload
entries, so it seems to be somewhere in add_method.
HTH
Honza
>
>
> Thanks. Diego.
>