This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:08:53 -0700
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <20031216204323.GE20094@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka write
s:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:09:07AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > According to the current GIMPLE grammar this is invalid. It seems to me
>> > that these should be accepted as gimple ID, is that right?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> Really we should be using magic decls, but that means moving quite
>> a lot of except.c into tree-except.c; something I'm not prepared to
>> do right away.
>
>OK, thanks.
>I've bundled this into the verify_gimple_grammar patch already, so
>everything should be fine.
Any chance you could verify that tree-simple.[ch] comments are up-to-date in
regards to this extension to the simple grammar?
jeff