This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> writes: > Janis Johnson wrote: > >> Sounds like you need automated regression hunting tools. > > Yes ;) Could you possibly help? > > But we are already quite close: the breakage happened between 36 and > 24 hours ago, and the candidates are the changes to gcc/aclocal.m4, > gcc/configure and gcc/configure.in that happened in that time span. > > Just a couple of commits: can you help pinpointing the exact one? I gues it's this change but I'm double checking this right now... --- ChangeLog 7 Dec 2003 14:13:53 -0000 2.1950 +++ ChangeLog 7 Dec 2003 16:12:26 -0000 2.1951 @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ 2003-12-07 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org> + * configure.in, aclocal.m4: Revert to pre-2.5x conversion status. + * configure: Regenerate with autoconf 2.13. + * configure.in: Replace AC_INIT, AC_OUTPUT, AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM with modern equivalents. * configure: Regenerate. So, somehow the reversion or the regeneration was not ok. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |