This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa
- From: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
- To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,Bugzilla Masters <bugzilla-masters at dberlin dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:46:29 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa
Joe Buck wrote:
> My suggestion is as follows: if it's a non-regression, and we don't plan
> to try to fix it for 3.4, marking it as fixed in tree-ssa seems right.
I don't think it is wise to mark bugs in released or to-be-released gcc
versions fixed in a branch that is not for sure going to be integrated in
any forseeable release, no? It would be better to only suspend it, I
think, as otherwise, in the odd case that tree-ssa doesnt get merged,
we're not missing them. Or maybe even add a state
fixed-in-development-branch or such would be useful here?
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/