This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
- From: David Abrahams <dave at boost-consulting dot com>
- To: mark at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Nathan Myers <ncm at cantrip dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, wekempf at cox dot net, fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:08 -0500
- Subject: Re: catch(...) and forced unwind
- References: <A156A7B0-3012-11D8-8564-00039390D9E0@apple.com><uu1409v32.fsf@boost-consulting.com><xypd6aoi0zz.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com><1071632782.3793.114.camel@minax.codesourcery.com><u4qvz8zae.fsf@boost-consulting.com><1071678864.4082.22.camel@minax.codesourcery.com><u3cbjmlgc.fsf@boost-consulting.com><1071681263.4082.30.camel@minax.codesourcery.com><uk74vjo92.fsf@boost-consulting.com><1071686175.21686.9.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com><20031217203056.GB4680@redhat.com><1071696033.21681.22.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> What David was proposing was that the cancellation request would be
> received, but queued until pthread_testcancel was called. In
> particular, "write" and such would not be cancellation points.
C'est exact.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com