Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Dec 11, 2003, at 7:58 PM, Alan Modra wrote:

> I've mentioned this before on the gcc list, but didn't make a formal
> request to the gcc steering committee, so here goes:
>
> Please allow gcc's bugzilla to also be used by binutils.  I think it
> makes sense to share the infrastructure as binutils and gcc are closely
> related.  It will also be convenient when handling binutils bug-reports
> that are wrongly submitted as gcc bugs, or like the following PR that
> has a binutils dependency.

If you are willing to wait until i am finished with finals (the 21st), 
i can happily do this for you.
I just need to make some gcc-local things (like adding gcc-bugs to the 
cc list) that are currently unconditional, conditional on product==gcc.

If you want email followup capability, that'll require a few days too.
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 06:40:31PM +0000, wilson at tuliptree dot org 
> wrote:
> > There is no binutils bug db.  I will mention this to HJ, maybe he will
> > be interested in fixing the assembler bug.
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11999
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre