This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:19:19 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312151353030.26453-100000@nondot.org> <1071521234.3257.1817.camel@p4> <20031215205553.GA24610@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1071522382.31157.1832.camel@p4> <20031215211120.GA27291@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 16:11, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:

> on contrary, I see this as a major architectural decision -- identifying the
> variable with the statement that defines it is a very interesting idea.
> 
Sorry?  SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT() tells you exactly that.  Or are you asking
something else?


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
  - From: Chris Lattner
- Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]