This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning
> In message <20031216153946.GL2199@kam.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka writes:
> >> eIn message <20031216143133.GE19896@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka
> >> write
> >> s:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >I got bit by the fact that tree-SSA does not emit statement with no
> >> >effect warnings currently, as these happens during expansion and we of
> >> >course elliminate such statement much earlier. What is the best place
> >> >to re-implement such a warnings?
> >> So how again did the latest cgraphunit.c changes pass a bootstrap test
> >> then? They're failing on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
> >
> >Did you disabled checking?
> That was from Diego's tester. I haven't updated my tree in a couple days
> simply because I'm trying to work through some engineering issues with
> the code to thread to blocks with have PHIs. Better to wrap my head
> completely around the issue than suck in a bunch of new code which
> may cloud/morph the issues I'm trying to wrap my head around.
Diego's tester runs checking disabled. OK as I've mentioned I will do
both bootstrap each time now to prevent similar situations.
Honza
>
>
> jeff
>