This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:21:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <1070818186.7334.30.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <200312111936.hBBJabGj024859@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <20031211223056.GA20061@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1071515090.3354.1681.camel@p4>

On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 14:04, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

> Diego, default defs have a (void *)0 stmt, but we can still attach a
> stmt annotation to them right? (ie, they arent shared) We need to be
> able to, so you better say yes :-)
> 
Oh, OK.  If you insist.  Yes, tree-ssa.c:get_reaching_def.


Diego.

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]