gcc archive
author index for January, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

浅尾忍

2005-01-21 02:16 a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-21 04:56 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-21 06:06 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-26 01:32 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.

Øyvind Harboe

2005-01-27 07:12 setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
2005-01-28 08:05 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
2005-01-28 22:24 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
2005-01-29 20:48 Why is there no arg_pointer_needed?
2005-01-31 09:20 Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed?

Björn Haase

2005-01-01 21:04 Re: Request for documentation: Do "define_instruction_and_split" patterns apply also in the combiner pass?
2005-01-01 21:11 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0
2005-01-29 15:45 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no
2005-01-30 16:16 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no
2005-01-30 20:22 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no
2005-01-31 07:14 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no
2005-01-31 23:25 MODES_TIEABLE_P issue. Forwarded test results for libc library routines.

Fco. Javier Rodríguez G.

2005-01-11 20:05 GCC development for microcontrollers

Frédéric L. W. Meunier

2005-01-15 01:20 GCC 3.4.4 ?

François-Xavier Coudert

2005-01-25 20:00 Copyright assignment

François-Xavier Coudert

2005-01-31 20:54 Using HAVE_FOO_H and HAVE_FOO

Halldór Ísak Gylfasson

2005-01-17 12:25 Implementation of exceptions
2005-01-24 18:19 Building gcc

Peter Bühler

2005-01-13 09:14 Stack Frame Problem

Tobias Schlüter

2005-01-19 21:15 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch?

Aaron W. LaFramboise

2005-01-11 21:19 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotypeversion1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-12 20:23 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)

Administrator

2005-01-16 02:48 Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message with an unscannable attachment or body (SYM:01012470573105447031)

Adrian Robert

2005-01-25 14:15 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 15:18 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 15:36 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases

Alan Modra

2005-01-09 13:11 Re: __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set?
2005-01-11 04:07 Re: Varasm.c change.
2005-01-11 05:33 Re: Varasm.c change.
2005-01-14 00:17 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4
2005-01-14 00:37 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4
2005-01-14 00:59 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)
2005-01-24 22:32 Re: RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation

Aldy Hernandez

2005-01-10 23:42 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-12 16:55 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-12 17:53 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-12 18:23 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-12 20:21 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-17 17:04 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 18:46 Re: SPE configuration in GCC

Alex Perez

2005-01-25 02:15 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases

Alexander Strange

2005-01-28 03:27 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?

Alexandre Oliva

2005-01-17 18:32 Re: "make bubblestrap" weirdness
2005-01-17 19:14 Re: New GCC logotype development.
2005-01-17 19:38 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 14:44 Re: [dj@redhat.com: ./ diff Makefile.def Makefile.in Makefile.tpl]

Alfred M. Szmidt

2005-01-26 16:34 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-26 21:56 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-26 22:21 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 16:17 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 17:53 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

Allan B. Cruse

2005-01-13 20:33 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4
2005-01-14 06:11 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)

Amit Chordia

2005-01-25 07:24 Stable gcc release

Anders Carlsson

2005-01-02 22:46 SSE testcase failure
2005-01-03 09:30 Re: SSE testcase failure
2005-01-03 10:11 Re: SSE testcase failure

Andi Kleen

2005-01-01 09:33 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-07 16:58 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-28 05:50 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?

Andreas Jaeger

2005-01-03 07:21 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-03 07:34 Re: Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option
2005-01-04 07:33 Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help
2005-01-04 08:03 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help
2005-01-04 12:09 bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 12:02 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-06 06:43 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 07:21 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build
2005-01-06 07:46 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 10:13 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-07 21:12 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build
2005-01-09 12:42 Re: pr18241 tests
2005-01-28 05:32 Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64

Andreas Schwab

2005-01-02 18:25 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline
2005-01-05 17:01 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-14 10:23 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 16:36 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-15 22:05 Re: Incorrect warning message?
2005-01-17 22:22 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 16:01 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 17:12 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-23 14:05 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code
2005-01-24 16:50 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?
2005-01-24 21:15 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?

Andrew Cagney

2005-01-04 20:39 Re: Gdb complaints Incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers

Andrew Haley

2005-01-14 19:21 RE: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 19:21 RE: typeof and bitfields

Andrew MacLeod

2005-01-28 20:59 Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c

Andrew Pinski

2005-01-01 20:02 Re: Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-01-04 08:39 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-04 23:07 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 02:05 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 18:21 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 18:35 Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions
2005-01-05 18:48 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 20:06 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-05 22:17 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 22:31 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 22:33 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-06 15:43 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-07 00:09 Re: Bootstrap time regressions
2005-01-07 01:28 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-08 16:30 Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ?
2005-01-09 15:31 Re: __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set?
2005-01-10 14:17 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 14:31 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-11 19:20 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-11 21:00 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-13 04:45 Re: About support for architecture:
2005-01-13 05:04 Re: _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics
2005-01-13 23:59 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 00:19 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 13:38 Re: \bintuils and gcc system requirements
2005-01-15 01:48 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ?
2005-01-15 17:02 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?
2005-01-15 22:07 Re: can't compile 4.0 here
2005-01-16 04:22 Re: How to obtain info about `-ffixed-reg' at a compilation?
2005-01-17 16:22 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-17 17:15 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-18 14:33 Re: [Ada] Can't bootstrap gcc cvs 20050118 on i686-cygwin: ada/exp_ch2.adb:722: undefined reference to `_exp_ch2__expand_current_value__in_appropriate_scope.634'
2005-01-18 20:01 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-20 01:56 Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers
2005-01-21 06:15 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-21 19:47 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-22 17:38 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired)
2005-01-22 17:44 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x
2005-01-23 00:30 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x
2005-01-23 23:59 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs
2005-01-24 14:09 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute
2005-01-24 14:23 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute
2005-01-25 16:12 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 18:02 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...
2005-01-25 18:18 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.
2005-01-25 20:42 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-26 01:17 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.
2005-01-26 16:00 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-27 21:55 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?
2005-01-28 00:42 Re: RFC: PR 19650
2005-01-28 15:07 Re: typeof throws away the reference

Andy Hutchinson

2005-01-29 18:28 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no
2005-01-30 16:32 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no

Anthony Juckel

2005-01-25 19:39 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases

apollo

2005-01-13 21:32 how to add new instruction
2005-01-14 04:27 Re: how to add new instruction
2005-01-15 04:53 Re: how to add new instruction

aram bharathi

2005-01-09 06:46 how to debug gcc
2005-01-28 07:07 doubts in adding new instruction

Arnaud Charlet

2005-01-03 07:34 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-07 14:38 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-12 10:16 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check

Ayal Zaks

2005-01-05 10:32 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-23 00:05 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?

Balaji S

2005-01-03 06:50 Question about instruction packing
2005-01-05 05:46 Re: Question about instruction packing
2005-01-05 11:53 Re: Question about instruction packing

BaoMuabanRaovat . Com

Ben Elliston

2005-01-12 23:21 Re: Linking static and dynamic libraries
2005-01-19 00:35 Re: I have a problem, help me ...
2005-01-30 23:32 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works

Benben

2005-01-08 06:30 Successfull gcc-3.4.3 Installation On SCO OpenServer 5.0.6

Benjamin Kosnik

2005-01-04 23:31 Re: make check problems on multilib systems in libstdc++
2005-01-20 19:59 archive of http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/linux_compilers/

Benjamin Redelings

2005-01-25 17:59 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...
2005-01-25 19:11 FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse?
2005-01-25 19:19 Re: FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse?
2005-01-25 20:49 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...

Benjamin Redelings I

2005-01-07 21:52 Bug in mudflap?
2005-01-07 22:33 Re: Bug in mudflap?

Bernd Jendrissek

2005-01-14 07:32 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)
2005-01-26 14:21 define_constants and tm.h

Bernd Schmidt

2005-01-04 13:49 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 14:59 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-14 11:44 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-17 12:34 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-19 13:17 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-21 18:10 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-25 16:40 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0

Biagio Lucini

2005-01-19 08:21 [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch?

Bill Northcott

2005-01-04 07:13 C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-04 11:48 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-04 18:57 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-04 22:21 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-05 05:55 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-05 11:45 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?

Bj=F6rn=20Haase

2005-01-02 13:57 What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-02 14:35 What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets
2005-01-02 18:16 Re: philosophical argument / width of int for gcc targets
2005-01-02 18:43 Re: What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets
2005-01-08 00:40 avr-back-end: instruction splitting issue

Bradley Lucier

2005-01-02 07:27 Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5
2005-01-02 17:36 Re: Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5
2005-01-12 22:21 mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes
2005-01-13 15:16 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes

Brandan C Lennox

2005-01-06 17:07 ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b

Brian Inglis

2005-01-20 13:22 gcc-bugs ml archive [Thread-Prev] == [Date-Prev]

Bruce Korb

2005-01-20 17:13 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 17:21 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 18:30 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-21 03:11 Bootstrap failure?
2005-01-21 16:16 Re: Bootstrap failure?
2005-01-27 21:46 Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help

Bud Davis

2005-01-18 23:53 cvs access problems

Charles Manning

2005-01-10 06:02 ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-12 23:30 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-13 17:37 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-13 18:18 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?

checkpoint_05lottery

2005-01-13 17:58 Winning Notification
2005-01-13 18:44 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT.
2005-01-14 22:09 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT.
2005-01-15 00:32 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT.
2005-01-15 01:06 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT.

Chris Jefferson

2005-01-25 17:54 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-31 14:34 Re: optimisation question

Chris Lattner

2005-01-18 21:37 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-01-18 22:30 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-01-18 23:50 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).

Christian Joensson

2005-01-11 12:02 [Ada] testsuite failures on sparc-linux: Feedback?
2005-01-18 14:01 [Ada] Can't bootstrap gcc cvs 20050118 on i686-cygwin: ada/exp_ch2.adb:722: undefined reference to `_exp_ch2__expand_current_value__in_appropriate_scope.634'
2005-01-29 13:44 Status of PR19300?

Christoph Hellwig

2005-01-17 17:51 Re: SPE configuration in GCC

Christopher Faylor

2005-01-14 23:27 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-(

Clifford Wolf

2005-01-23 12:42 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x

2005-01-14 12:08 gcc 3.4.3 installed succefully on Debian 3.0 i586-pc-linux-gnu linux-2.4.27 libc6-2.2.5

ctmb1mf

2005-01-14 20:28 RE: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-14 22:40 RE:: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

Dale Johannesen

2005-01-01 22:28 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-15 21:29 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?
2005-01-24 19:11 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code
2005-01-24 23:20 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-27 23:20 RFC: PR 19650
2005-01-28 00:21 Re: RFC: PR 19650
2005-01-28 04:34 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?
2005-01-28 20:44 Re: RFC: PR 19650
2005-01-28 23:43 Re: RFC: PR 19650
2005-01-29 00:52 Re: RFC: PR 19650
2005-01-29 01:31 Re: RFC: PR 19650

Dan Kegel

2005-01-25 07:01 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b
2005-01-25 07:32 re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking
2005-01-26 06:47 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking
2005-01-27 02:10 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking
2005-01-27 15:34 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking

Daniel Berlin

2005-01-01 00:13 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 02:15 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 14:54 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 20:50 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base
2005-01-01 22:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 16:35 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-03 13:50 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression
2005-01-04 15:55 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 16:05 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 02:14 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 02:33 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 14:41 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 17:01 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 17:17 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-06 19:50 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 02:22 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 03:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 14:55 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 15:55 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 19:57 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 19:58 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 20:28 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 20:41 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 22:09 Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-07 22:37 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-07 23:39 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 16:23 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 17:02 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 18:36 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 19:16 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 19:35 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 22:13 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 22:47 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 23:37 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-12 18:26 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-12 18:43 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-12 19:33 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-13 15:28 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-13 19:33 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-17 18:14 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-19 15:56 Moving to bugzilla 2.19.2 sometime in the next few months
2005-01-20 18:48 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 19:04 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 19:12 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 19:47 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 21:40 Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-20 23:05 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-21 00:03 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-21 00:05 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-22 17:36 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired)
2005-01-23 23:44 wikidata dir added to htdocs
2005-01-23 23:58 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs
2005-01-24 14:46 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-24 14:58 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-24 16:58 Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org
2005-01-24 16:59 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-24 17:07 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org
2005-01-24 17:27 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-24 17:29 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org
2005-01-24 17:43 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org
2005-01-24 17:47 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org
2005-01-24 22:49 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 00:10 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 00:17 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 00:55 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 02:47 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 02:49 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 13:46 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 15:34 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 19:00 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 19:02 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 19:05 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 20:15 Re: GCC Wiki
2005-01-26 02:34 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-26 02:38 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 14:27 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-26 15:53 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-26 16:22 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-26 17:23 Re: Bugzilla misbehaving?!?
2005-01-26 20:08 mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c
2005-01-27 20:48 Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c
2005-01-28 15:31 Re: Continuing GCCNews

Daniel Brockman

2005-01-11 05:40 Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch
2005-01-11 05:49 Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch
2005-01-11 16:04 Re: Aw: Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch

Daniel Jacobowitz

2005-01-01 17:03 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 17:25 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 20:09 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base
2005-01-04 01:49 Re: isysroot and various headers
2005-01-04 16:46 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help
2005-01-04 18:45 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help
2005-01-04 20:54 Re: Gdb complaints Incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers
2005-01-04 22:06 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-04 22:29 Re: isysroot and various headers
2005-01-04 23:09 Re: isysroot and various headers
2005-01-05 00:42 Re: isysroot and various headers
2005-01-15 04:47 Re: make install fails?
2005-01-19 03:02 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote
2005-01-24 14:20 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute
2005-01-25 00:29 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-25 16:02 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 16:21 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-31 20:09 Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to ppc604/vxWorks

Daniel Jensen

2005-01-22 22:43 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ?

Dave Korn

2005-01-04 14:22 RE: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 14:32 RE: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-04 19:30 RE: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-07 13:31 RE: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-07 19:59 RE: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-14 16:00 RE: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 16:11 RE: \bintuils and gcc system requirements
2005-01-14 19:41 RE: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 19:43 RE: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 18:42 RE: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-19 15:03 RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions

Dave Parsons

2005-01-11 07:15 Re: GCC for OS/2

David Edelsohn

2005-01-01 07:36 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 01:27 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-04 15:47 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-12 18:21 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-12 18:34 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-17 17:16 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 17:36 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 18:59 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 19:31 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-19 17:48 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler
2005-01-19 18:48 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler
2005-01-20 00:23 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler
2005-01-25 18:02 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0

Dean Kolosiek

2005-01-01 06:22 Re: gcc 3.4.3 x86_64 built on Fedora Core 2 ????
2005-01-03 05:53 Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-03 10:33 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-04 00:12 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 08:19 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64

Denis Chertykov

2005-01-06 17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-06 17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-06 17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-06 17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-06 17:51 Re: new-new-ra thoughts
2005-01-06 17:51 Re: new-new-ra thoughts
2005-01-06 20:05 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 06:50 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-08 05:50 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-08 05:50 Re: avr-back-end: instruction splitting issue

Denis Zaitsev

2005-01-04 22:01 [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-04 22:18 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-04 22:59 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-04 23:16 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 22:10 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 22:26 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 22:30 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 22:55 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-15 21:08 Incorrect warning message?
2005-01-15 21:22 Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?
2005-01-15 21:41 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?
2005-01-15 22:32 Re: Incorrect warning message?
2005-01-18 23:12 Re: Incorrect warning message?

Der-Johng Sun

2005-01-17 12:26 a treelang question about printf.
2005-01-18 03:35 RE: a treelang question about printf.

Devang Patel

2005-01-04 01:09 isysroot and various headers
2005-01-04 22:10 Re: isysroot and various headers
2005-01-04 22:53 Re: isysroot and various headers
2005-01-04 23:39 Re: isysroot and various headers
2005-01-28 19:15 Re: TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type

Diego Novillo

2005-01-06 19:48 Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-06 20:24 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-07 13:56 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 14:51 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 20:10 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-09 16:35 Re: pr18241 tests
2005-01-17 15:48 are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-17 19:01 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-18 15:56 Re: Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block.
2005-01-18 23:04 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e
2005-01-19 18:23 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch?
2005-01-20 23:44 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-21 00:15 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-28 02:27 Bootstrap broken on x86-64

Dirk Zakofski

2005-01-10 06:29 Ich bekomm noch ne Kriese !
2005-01-10 06:35 Ich bekomm noch ne Kriese !

DJ Delorie

2005-01-03 20:22 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-04 19:52 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-04 19:55 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-04 20:33 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-05 05:00 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-05 18:28 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-10 20:30 suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars
2005-01-10 23:40 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars
2005-01-12 00:31 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars
2005-01-17 22:08 computation_cost too blind to hard regs
2005-01-20 02:20 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs

Dmitry K.

2005-01-16 04:18 How to obtain info about `-ffixed-reg' at a compilation?

dor kelman

2005-01-10 00:02 Help installing gcc

Dr. Franz Fehringer

2005-01-18 09:59 No .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support?

Duncan Sands

2005-01-07 13:43 ACATS c380004
2005-01-07 13:47 ACATS c43214c
2005-01-07 15:00 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-10 20:18 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 13:21 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 14:28 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 16:20 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-12 10:10 ACATS tests that fail valgrind check
2005-01-12 10:20 ACATS tests that fail valgrind check - pre-ssa baseline
2005-01-12 10:36 ACATS tests that fail valgrind - differences between pre-ssa and current
2005-01-12 10:54 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check
2005-01-12 23:54 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check
2005-01-13 16:41 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check

E. Weddington

2005-01-11 20:29 Re: GCC development for microcontrollers
2005-01-14 17:19 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdumpbug-report)
2005-01-17 20:14 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-19 21:15 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-25 07:30 Re: Stable gcc release
2005-01-25 19:11 Re: Stable gcc release
2005-01-27 16:37 Re: Continuing GCCNews

ed schonberg

2005-01-11 13:42 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 15:13 Re: ACATS c380004

Edward Peschko

2005-01-20 02:45 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3
2005-01-20 03:53 Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3
2005-01-24 22:32 forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-24 22:56 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-24 23:20 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-24 23:24 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-25 00:01 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-25 01:09 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-25 20:04 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-26 21:23 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-26 21:58 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-26 22:01 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 00:19 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 04:29 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

Eljay Love-Jensen

2005-01-18 20:06 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).

Eric Botcazou

2005-01-11 17:00 Re: Builtin argument type conversion and ftrapv-2.c failure
2005-01-11 18:48 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-12 08:56 Re: new-new-ra thoughts
2005-01-12 17:15 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-12 18:07 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-12 18:39 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-13 07:40 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes
2005-01-13 17:14 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes
2005-01-15 12:38 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?
2005-01-21 05:37 Re: Bootstrap failure?
2005-01-21 07:56 Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0
2005-01-22 17:35 Re: Ada failures due to -largs
2005-01-22 18:37 Re: Ada failures due to -largs
2005-01-25 08:13 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0
2005-01-30 07:09 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters

Eric Christopher

2005-01-01 21:15 Re: ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-11 00:25 Re: Varasm.c change.

Eric Frias

2005-01-21 20:55 pragma pack on hp-ux

Extremeliquidators.com

2005-01-20 22:41 Computer to Plate - Digital - Mitsubishi Genesis DPX 5080
2005-01-20 22:43 Computer to Plate - Digital - Mitsubishi Genesis DPX 5080

F. Heitkamp

2005-01-25 13:06 libstdc++ compile problem in head

Falk Hueffner

2005-01-16 19:37 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-29 23:20 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?

Fariborz Jahanian

2005-01-31 17:34 g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double
2005-01-31 18:25 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double
2005-01-31 21:06 g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend

Florian Weimer

2005-01-01 00:03 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-03 12:32 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 09:45 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 16:27 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 17:06 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 17:27 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-07 15:38 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-08 16:27 Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ?
2005-01-10 08:43 Re: Ich bekomm noch ne Kriese !
2005-01-12 11:51 Re: New GCC logotype development.
2005-01-13 12:38 GraphViz is now free software
2005-01-17 20:28 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:03 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-31 15:42 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2
2005-01-31 16:07 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2

Frank Ch. Eigler

2005-01-05 13:24 Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions
2005-01-07 22:11 Re: Bug in mudflap?
2005-01-07 22:41 Re: Bug in mudflap?
2005-01-07 23:14 Re: Bug in mudflap?
2005-01-26 17:22 Re: Bugzilla misbehaving?!?
2005-01-28 18:36 Re: mudflap problem
2005-01-28 20:57 Re: mudflap problem

Gabriel Dos Reis

2005-01-01 12:39 SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN
2005-01-01 15:20 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 00:29 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN
2005-01-02 01:29 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 10:59 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN
2005-01-02 21:25 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN
2005-01-04 15:03 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'
2005-01-04 20:46 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete
2005-01-04 20:47 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete
2005-01-04 20:49 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete
2005-01-04 22:30 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 00:39 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 00:41 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 08:48 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-05 22:40 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 22:45 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-07 22:33 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-07 23:18 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 00:39 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 16:31 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 16:39 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 16:43 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 17:21 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 18:57 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 19:32 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 22:10 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 22:40 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 23:26 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-09 00:36 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file
2005-01-09 00:42 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file
2005-01-10 04:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-10 21:50 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-11 13:38 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-11 13:40 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-12 23:21 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)
2005-01-13 23:02 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-(
2005-01-14 00:50 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 02:12 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 16:50 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 23:47 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-(
2005-01-15 23:19 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?
2005-01-17 00:23 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-17 02:20 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-17 02:36 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-17 03:16 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-18 01:00 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 01:08 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-18 11:57 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 17:18 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 18:07 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 19:27 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-20 20:18 Re: current mainline, port status
2005-01-20 23:40 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-21 00:24 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-21 17:34 GCC-3.3.6 release status
2005-01-21 20:04 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-22 22:16 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code
2005-01-23 04:43 Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status
2005-01-25 15:16 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 16:18 Re: Missing release information of 3.3.4 and 3.3.5 releases
2005-01-25 16:43 GCC Wiki
2005-01-25 18:30 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...
2005-01-25 21:00 Re: GCC Wiki
2005-01-26 01:54 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-28 16:04 Re: typeof throws away the reference
2005-01-28 16:10 Re: typeof throws away the reference
2005-01-28 19:39 Re: TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type
2005-01-30 01:16 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-30 01:59 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-31 19:11 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double
2005-01-31 19:12 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double
2005-01-31 22:08 Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend

gan_xiao_jun

2005-01-15 12:10 The meaning of number in output of "gcc -E mycode.c"

Gary Funck

2005-01-21 01:59 x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16 byte struct

gcc

2005-01-02 13:40 [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete

gccadmin

2005-01-02 18:07 gcc-4.0-20050102 is now available
2005-01-05 23:33 gcc-3.3-20050105 is now available
2005-01-08 00:25 gcc-3.4-20050107 is now available
2005-01-09 18:20 gcc-4.0-20050109 is now available
2005-01-12 23:24 gcc-3.3-20050112 is now available
2005-01-14 23:40 gcc-3.4-20050114 is now available
2005-01-16 18:09 gcc-4.0-20050116 is now available
2005-01-20 00:13 gcc-3.3-20050119 is now available
2005-01-21 23:48 gcc-3.4-20050121 is now available
2005-01-23 18:33 gcc-4.0-20050123 is now available
2005-01-26 23:47 gcc-3.3-20050126 is now available
2005-01-28 23:52 gcc-3.4-20050128 is now available
2005-01-30 19:57 gcc-4.0-20050130 is now available

Geert Bosch

2005-01-09 21:06 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-13 16:20 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check
2005-01-15 12:26 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?
2005-01-20 04:16 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs
2005-01-24 16:16 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?
2005-01-24 16:58 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?

Geoffrey Keating

2005-01-05 00:12 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-05 00:12 Re: RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule
2005-01-06 22:58 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-13 00:46 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:51 Re: PCH relocation ?

Georg Bauhaus

2005-01-07 01:32 is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-07 11:22 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-07 11:22 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-07 15:07 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-17 21:06 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 21:58 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:46 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:51 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-24 11:44 Re: Migrate to Autotest for testing framework?

Gerald Pfeifer

2005-01-03 12:08 Re: Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option
2005-01-03 16:58 Re: ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-13 21:06 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-16 21:29 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-18 22:51 Re: I have a problem, help me ...
2005-01-18 23:12 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-25 08:30 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0

Giovanni Bajo

2005-01-01 20:56 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 00:09 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 00:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 16:39 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN
2005-01-03 13:15 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs
2005-01-04 15:02 Re: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions( with 3.2.3)
2005-01-09 04:10 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-10 00:29 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-17 17:44 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 15:25 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 16:19 Re: openssl speed tests
2005-01-18 19:52 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-20 03:18 Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3
2005-01-21 16:51 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-24 16:23 Re: Incorrect C++ code or regression?
2005-01-25 12:02 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets
2005-01-28 10:52 Re: Continuing GCCNews
2005-01-28 15:04 Re: typeof throws away the reference
2005-01-28 15:06 Re: Continuing GCCNews
2005-01-28 15:16 Re: Continuing GCCNews

Greg Schafer

2005-01-07 00:07 Bootstrap time regressions

Gregory John Casamento

2005-01-24 22:43 Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 00:48 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases

Grumble

2005-01-24 16:07 Incorrect C++ code or regression?

Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz

2005-01-20 23:35 bug in head, can't compile
2005-01-20 23:56 Re: bug in head, can't compile

Gunther Nikl

2005-01-31 13:44 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2

H. J. Lu

2005-01-01 19:15 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base
2005-01-13 19:35 Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4
2005-01-13 22:48 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4
2005-01-14 00:27 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)
2005-01-14 21:49 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)
2005-01-21 04:57 RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?
2005-01-21 05:18 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?
2005-01-21 05:52 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?
2005-01-21 06:45 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?
2005-01-22 01:33 RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation
2005-01-22 18:51 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?

Hans-Peter Nilsson

2005-01-11 19:15 Re: ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-11 23:21 Re: ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-12 01:12 Re: ChangeLog rotated

Hao Qian

2005-01-03 07:20 Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option

hartmut . schirmer

2005-01-11 13:42 Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch

Helge Hess

2005-01-25 16:05 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-25 16:16 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 16:24 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-25 17:24 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-25 18:03 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 23:15 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0

huangzb_np

2005-01-13 06:42 Successfull gcc-3.4.3 Installation On SCO OpenServer 5.0.6

HutchinsonAndy

2005-01-27 01:02 MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no

Ian Lance Taylor

2005-01-01 16:51 Re: Debugging with gdb
2005-01-01 16:53 Re: ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-02 03:54 Re: Debugging with gdb
2005-01-04 12:54 Re: Any specific documentation for gcc3.4.3
2005-01-11 16:23 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-11 21:42 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-11 21:44 Re: ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-12 01:10 Re: ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-12 15:43 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)
2005-01-12 23:41 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-13 14:33 Re: Stack Frame Problem
2005-01-13 16:52 Re: [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only one from multi-lib configuration.
2005-01-13 18:17 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-14 03:03 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 03:21 Re: how to add new instruction
2005-01-14 14:54 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-14 16:11 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-15 14:42 Re: how to add new instruction
2005-01-17 01:08 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-17 02:30 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-17 02:45 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-17 18:05 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-17 18:28 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-17 20:02 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-19 00:03 Re: cvs access problems
2005-01-20 20:37 Re: Is mainline still in Stage 3?
2005-01-21 05:07 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?
2005-01-21 05:46 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?
2005-01-21 06:26 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?
2005-01-21 15:04 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-24 19:48 Re: RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation
2005-01-26 19:48 Re: how to pack data using gcc compiler?
2005-01-27 02:11 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 22:55 Re: link problem: BFD: Warning: Writing section `.text' to huge
2005-01-31 04:52 Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed?
2005-01-31 05:03 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?
2005-01-31 16:06 Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed?
2005-01-31 16:52 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2

Ivan Rachev

2005-01-04 13:09 c++ stub generator

J.T. Conklin

2005-01-24 02:55 Re: Migrate to Autotest for testing framework?

Jack Howarth

2005-01-19 15:26 correct way to access gcc's own static libs?

Jakub Jelinek

2005-01-21 10:52 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-25 09:22 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets
2005-01-26 23:17 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 07:17 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

James A. Morrison

2005-01-12 01:12 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-12 19:58 Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT
2005-01-17 00:32 Re: openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here]
2005-01-17 14:31 Re: a treelang question about printf.
2005-01-23 13:11 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc
2005-01-24 00:28 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc
2005-01-30 00:24 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?

James E Wilson

2005-01-04 22:57 Re: regmove and regclasses
2005-01-11 22:52 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars
2005-01-11 23:05 Re: Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot
2005-01-12 00:21 Re: new-new-ra thoughts
2005-01-12 02:55 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars
2005-01-13 21:24 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-14 01:35 Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays?
2005-01-14 21:34 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-15 01:53 Re: Test failure, documentation bugs?
2005-01-15 01:56 Re: how to add new instruction
2005-01-17 20:18 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-18 21:24 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-01-18 21:35 Re: No .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support?
2005-01-18 23:32 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-01-20 01:19 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs
2005-01-20 01:36 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works
2005-01-20 01:43 Re: correct way to access gcc's own static libs?
2005-01-20 02:06 Re: cmov and movnti in gcc
2005-01-20 04:42 Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3
2005-01-25 02:56 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?
2005-01-25 04:19 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?
2005-01-25 20:50 Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them alwaysinto long data
2005-01-26 00:29 Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them alwaysinto long data
2005-01-26 19:21 Re: make header flag
2005-01-26 19:42 Re: Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn
2005-01-27 03:51 Re: how to pack data using gcc compiler?
2005-01-27 04:03 Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use
2005-01-28 23:39 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-31 21:33 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL

James Morrison

2005-01-12 13:27 Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT

James Tung

2005-01-31 01:38 <netdb.h>
2005-01-31 15:11 wordsize.h

Jan Beulich

2005-01-03 09:47 default_section_type_flags and SECTION_SMALL
2005-01-04 16:53 ia64 vector mode support
2005-01-05 10:53 another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue
2005-01-05 11:45 Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue
2005-01-05 14:38 ia64 mulv8qi3 expander
2005-01-06 11:41 Re: ia64 vector mode support
2005-01-11 14:52 need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-12 08:06 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-12 09:20 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-12 11:59 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-12 12:02 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-13 07:37 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-24 13:29 bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?

Jan Vroonhof

2005-01-04 10:54 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

Jan Zizka

2005-01-31 03:24 Re: <netdb.h>
2005-01-31 23:45 Re: wordsize.h

Janis Johnson

2005-01-04 18:26 Re: What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets
2005-01-04 18:30 Re: Having dg-skip-if on the branches?
2005-01-04 18:35 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help
2005-01-04 18:38 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help
2005-01-19 21:32 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-21 20:30 RFC: logical expression in test directive target lists
2005-01-22 01:56 Re: RFC: logical expression in test directive target lists

Jari Petter Sundell

2005-01-28 14:48 typeof throws away the reference

Jason Merrill

2005-01-04 19:02 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete

Jeffrey A Law

2005-01-04 23:07 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-05 00:18 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-17 14:57 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-17 18:24 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-17 19:22 Re: Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot
2005-01-21 17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-21 17:58 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-26 18:27 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC
2005-01-27 20:15 Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c

2005-01-19 20:41 Gcc certification
2005-01-20 20:13 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 20:17 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 20:19 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 20:25 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 20:51 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 21:06 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-22 21:36 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-31 20:06 Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to ppc604/vxWorks

Jim McCarthy

2005-01-06 17:00 strip incompatible with gcc -Wl,-taso linker option on Alpha ?
2005-01-07 06:01 RE: strip incompatible with gcc -Wl,-taso linker option on Alpha ?

jlh

2005-01-15 13:27 Re: The meaning of number in output of "gcc -E mycode.c"
2005-01-15 13:36 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me?
2005-01-15 15:12 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me?
2005-01-15 15:21 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me?
2005-01-15 23:44 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?

Joe Buck

2005-01-05 17:48 Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions
2005-01-05 17:52 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-05 18:50 Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions
2005-01-06 23:11 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-10 19:32 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-10 22:32 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars
2005-01-11 05:46 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-11 18:59 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-13 18:00 Re: Stack Frame Problem
2005-01-17 16:49 Re: Incorrect warning message?
2005-01-17 17:00 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-17 17:02 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-18 19:15 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-19 21:44 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 22:48 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-20 22:50 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 23:29 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-21 00:00 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-21 00:10 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-21 17:28 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0
2005-01-22 01:18 Re: Arguments for Obj-C++ in GCC 4.0
2005-01-24 17:25 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org
2005-01-24 17:33 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs
2005-01-24 17:40 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b
2005-01-24 17:42 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org
2005-01-25 01:53 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b
2005-01-25 17:02 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-25 17:07 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 17:12 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 17:16 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 18:08 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 19:45 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 23:23 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 21:54 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-26 22:22 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-31 23:43 Re: optimisation question

Joe Hughes

2005-01-18 19:52 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).

Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp dot com>

2005-01-07 12:33 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-16 16:54 cross gnat tools on head question
2005-01-24 16:05 Re: -mno-80387 / -mno-fp-ret-in-387 question
2005-01-27 22:04 Re: Any issue with anon CVS?
2005-01-27 22:05 Re: Any issue with anon CVS?

Joern RENNECKE

2005-01-04 19:44 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-05 14:48 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-10 23:20 RFD: apply_change_group variant that doesn't apply changes
2005-01-11 20:39 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-12 15:30 comment / code incosistency in cfgcleanup.c:flow_find_cross_jump

John David Anglin

2005-01-22 02:12 Re: pragma pack on hp-ux
2005-01-26 15:56 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC
2005-01-27 04:22 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC

Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault

2005-01-07 15:17 TMS320C54x Port

Jonathan Wakely

2005-01-18 16:40 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-22 22:43 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code
2005-01-26 11:02 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...
2005-01-31 18:29 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double
2005-01-31 19:02 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double

Jonathan Wilson

2005-01-28 13:53 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?

Joseph S. Myers

2005-01-03 16:55 Re: ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-16 19:52 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-16 20:32 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-16 20:43 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 00:15 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-20 02:22 RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions
2005-01-23 23:56 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs
2005-01-24 00:04 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs
2005-01-27 11:31 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
2005-01-28 19:01 TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type

Kai Henningsen

2005-01-02 12:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 14:26 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-06 17:59 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-10 21:51 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-10 21:51 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations

Kai Ruottu

2005-01-21 10:34 Re: a question about fix-header.c

Karel Gardas

2005-01-04 09:36 [gcc3.4.0] ARM/uClinux libstdc++ build.
2005-01-05 21:04 Re: [gcc3.4.0] ARM/uClinux libstdc++ build.
2005-01-13 16:42 [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only one frommulti-lib configuration.
2005-01-27 17:03 Any issue with anon CVS?
2005-01-27 18:08 Re: Any issue with anon CVS?
2005-01-31 08:56 Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(20050127) on MICO sources
2005-01-31 14:55 Re: assembler generated code

Kaveh R. Ghazi

2005-01-01 16:35 Extra 3.3 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-01-01 17:08 Extra 3.4 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-01-01 19:54 Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-01-01 21:48 Re: Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-01-03 20:25 Having dg-skip-if on the branches?
2005-01-11 05:06 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-13 22:09 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes

Kazu Hirata

2005-01-18 15:25 Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block.
2005-01-26 14:54 A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC
2005-01-26 16:30 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC
2005-01-27 12:44 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC

Kelley Cook

2005-01-12 17:42 "make bubblestrap" weirdness
2005-01-12 22:27 Re: "make bubblestrap" weirdness
2005-01-18 12:42 Re: [dj@redhat.com: ./ diff Makefile.def Makefile.in Makefile.tpl]
2005-01-21 14:47 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0

Ken Raeburn

2005-01-05 11:47 Re: c++ stub generator
2005-01-05 22:41 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64

Kenneth Zadeck

2005-01-20 17:40 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 18:14 Re: a question about fix-header.c

Kevin Puetz

2005-01-18 06:37 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters

Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

2005-01-24 14:23 Away from email

kslindee

2005-01-14 13:32 \bintuils and gcc system requirements

Kumar Gala

2005-01-17 17:08 Re: SPE configuration in GCC

labam at rambler dot ru labam at rambler dot ru

2005-01-18 07:51 I have a problem, help me ...

Lars Segerlund

2005-01-10 11:06 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)

Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf

2005-01-21 23:20 Arguments for Obj-C++ in GCC 4.0
2005-01-25 20:37 Fw: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0

Laurent GUERBY

2005-01-07 21:19 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 21:03 Re: [Ada] testsuite failures on sparc-linux: Feedback?
2005-01-13 18:29 valgrind shows ada/i-cobol.adb real bug

Lin Gu

2005-01-15 04:28 does gcc remember register values through into functions?
2005-01-17 06:09 Re: does gcc remember register values through into functions?

Luca Benini

2005-01-03 07:45 Re: SSE testcase failure
2005-01-04 12:55 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-04 19:31 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete
2005-01-06 07:39 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 09:13 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 10:37 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 13:44 A question about a test
2005-01-07 19:22 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-08 13:50 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-10 12:26 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-10 18:52 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 19:14 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-11 22:06 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-12 18:31 Test failure, documentation bugs?
2005-01-15 13:24 Re: Test failure, documentation bugs?

Lucaz _

2005-01-25 05:58 make header flag

Marc Espie

2005-01-08 16:05 how can I tell ada it's been moved around ?
2005-01-08 18:53 Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ?
2005-01-11 12:27 Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?
2005-01-13 10:39 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)
2005-01-15 12:36 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?
2005-01-16 13:26 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?
2005-01-17 13:32 Re: C++ lexical analysis rework
2005-01-17 21:58 PCH relocation ?
2005-01-17 23:24 Re: PCH relocation ?
2005-01-18 11:22 trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?
2005-01-18 20:39 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?
2005-01-22 09:47 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-22 13:21 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?
2005-01-27 21:19 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-31 12:16 OpenBSD pch, take 2
2005-01-31 13:27 exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...
2005-01-31 14:37 PATCH: get PCH to fail reliably on OpenBSD
2005-01-31 15:12 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2
2005-01-31 15:57 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2
2005-01-31 16:26 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2
2005-01-31 18:48 Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...
2005-01-31 19:30 Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...

Marcel Cox

2005-01-15 09:58 Re: does gcc remember register values through into functions?

Marcin Dalecki

2005-01-04 22:45 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete
2005-01-06 19:45 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-07 09:31 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-07 16:54 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-18 03:14 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 03:33 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 03:36 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 05:45 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 07:58 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-21 16:20 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-25 23:39 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-26 16:02 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 04:06 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 17:34 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 17:39 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-31 08:46 tree-ssa-dom.c Bug or not?

Marcus Meissner

2005-01-26 07:14 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

Mark Mitchell

2005-01-03 02:49 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete
2005-01-03 19:58 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 18:48 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-04 21:41 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete
2005-01-04 22:27 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-05 08:14 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-06 16:20 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-06 19:55 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-10 01:25 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-17 16:54 SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 17:09 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 17:24 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 17:46 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 19:20 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-17 19:53 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-18 08:28 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 17:28 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 18:29 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 19:39 Re: PCH relocation ?
2005-01-18 19:47 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 19:55 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 19:57 Re: PCH relocation ?
2005-01-18 19:57 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 22:03 Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions
2005-01-19 00:32 Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions
2005-01-19 05:20 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-19 15:38 Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions
2005-01-20 01:42 Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers
2005-01-21 07:59 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0
2005-01-21 17:31 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0
2005-01-21 17:46 GCC 4.0 Status Report [2005-01-21]
2005-01-21 18:04 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-21 19:38 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-21 19:50 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-23 18:27 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ?
2005-01-25 00:55 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 03:26 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 14:23 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 14:30 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 02:04 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-31 18:16 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double
2005-01-31 18:38 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double
2005-01-31 19:16 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double

Martin Dalecki

2005-01-02 03:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations

Martin Reinecke

2005-01-31 09:49 Bootstrap broken because of warning
2005-01-31 09:54 Re: Bootstrap broken because of warning

Mathieu Malaterre

2005-01-08 23:42 [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file
2005-01-09 00:14 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file

Matt Austern

2005-01-02 18:48 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-09 01:50 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file
2005-01-10 20:36 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-10 20:56 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?
2005-01-11 20:40 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 20:52 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-12 21:47 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)
2005-01-13 23:56 typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 00:13 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 01:33 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 04:05 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 19:08 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-20 00:20 typedefs and elaborated type specifiers
2005-01-20 01:45 Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers
2005-01-28 04:22 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?
2005-01-31 18:21 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double
2005-01-31 21:12 Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend
2005-01-31 21:22 Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend
2005-01-31 22:15 Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend

Matthias Klose

2005-01-07 21:13 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build

Maurizio Monge

2005-01-26 23:40 float returned in xmm0

McDevitt Tavis J 1stLt 66 RQS/DOS

2005-01-10 01:30 GCC for OS/2

Michael Cieslinski

2005-01-10 12:54 Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot
2005-01-18 15:20 Re: Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot

Michael Matz

2005-01-10 13:37 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

Michael Ritzert

2005-01-09 11:22 pr18241 tests

Michael Sung

2005-01-26 19:44 how to pack data using gcc compiler?

Michael Veksler

2005-01-09 20:32 Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 07:41 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 14:34 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 16:00 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?

Mike Frysinger

2005-01-24 23:08 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

Mike Hearn

2005-01-05 17:09 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 18:47 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
2005-01-05 19:05 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?

Mike Stump

2005-01-02 17:49 Re: What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets
2005-01-02 17:54 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-02 18:12 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline
2005-01-10 02:00 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 19:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-18 00:26 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch
2005-01-18 22:37 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote
2005-01-19 01:59 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote
2005-01-25 22:38 Re: Building gcc
2005-01-25 23:40 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 01:56 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-27 20:41 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-27 22:18 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x
2005-01-27 22:21 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?
2005-01-28 21:39 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
2005-01-28 21:54 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?
2005-01-31 03:40 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no

Miles Bader

2005-01-27 09:01 meaning of floating-point comparison operators
2005-01-27 11:20 Re: meaning of floating-point comparison operators
2005-01-28 05:54 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)

Mircea Namolaru

2005-01-13 14:49 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-14 11:47 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions

Mostafa Hagog

2005-01-06 07:49 Re: Download
2005-01-24 11:56 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-24 12:04 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-25 17:07 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-25 21:02 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-25 22:11 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-26 16:01 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?

Mr david deng

2005-01-28 18:09 new mirror

Nathan Sidwell

2005-01-21 08:25 Re: typeof and bitfields

Nathanael Nerode

2005-01-02 20:51 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-05 03:40 new-new-ra thoughts
2005-01-05 03:50 new-new-ra thoughts

Neil Booth

2005-01-10 14:56 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 15:00 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-12 00:18 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-12 01:55 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-14 02:46 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-17 23:15 Re: Issues with gcc 3.4.2
2005-01-20 11:39 Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers

Nick Clifton

2005-01-06 17:23 Re: strip incompatible with gcc -Wl,-taso linker option on Alpha?

Nick Ing-Simmons

2005-01-04 11:11 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers
2005-01-04 11:50 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-05 10:38 Re: c++ stub generator
2005-01-06 20:49 Re: c++ stub generator

Nick NoSpam

2005-01-15 03:09 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-15 03:39 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-15 14:58 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?

Nicola Pero

2005-01-26 01:14 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 01:28 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 02:07 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases

Nix

2005-01-24 16:57 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works

Olaf Hering

2005-01-08 15:59 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 16:03 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 16:33 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-08 16:45 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer
2005-01-09 09:43 __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set?

Olivier Galibert

2005-01-01 15:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations

Olivier Hainque

2005-01-18 08:34 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-28 08:44 Re: Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help
2005-01-28 08:46 Re: Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help

Olly Betts

2005-01-12 23:42 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check
2005-01-24 16:35 Re: typeof and bitfields

Oscar Fuentes

2005-01-10 14:12 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 15:04 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?

Paolo Bonzini

2005-01-11 08:20 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 12:41 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 12:55 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-12 08:09 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-13 08:35 Re: make install fails?
2005-01-25 10:14 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSEinsn sets
2005-01-25 19:15 Re: FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse?
2005-01-26 14:05 Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use
2005-01-31 10:15 Re: New option?
2005-01-31 14:48 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2
2005-01-31 15:13 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2

Paolo Carlini

2005-01-01 20:38 Re: Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-01-01 22:47 Re: Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-01-13 22:41 Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-(
2005-01-13 23:06 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-(
2005-01-24 17:05 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org
2005-01-26 17:17 Bugzilla misbehaving?!?

Patrick McFarland

2005-01-25 12:13 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 22:55 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases

Paul Brook

2005-01-01 13:11 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 16:28 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 14:42 Re: [gcc3.4.0] ARM/uClinux libstdc++ build.
2005-01-06 13:35 Re: Adding new register
2005-01-09 18:37 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-10 01:13 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-14 10:14 Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays?
2005-01-17 17:24 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-20 17:21 Sign extension of const_int rtx
2005-01-21 18:23 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-24 18:29 Re: Building gcc
2005-01-31 21:04 Re: Using HAVE_FOO_H and HAVE_FOO

Paul Hunt

2005-01-20 10:59 Successful build of gcc 3.4.3

Paul Koning

2005-01-11 14:57 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 15:46 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 17:06 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-17 19:01 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 19:22 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 19:44 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:05 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:31 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters

Paul Schlie

2005-01-02 01:12 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 01:30 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 03:01 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 15:27 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 16:46 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 21:47 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-03 05:33 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-03 15:24 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-03 16:40 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-03 18:20 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs
2005-01-11 15:22 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-14 01:35 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 06:31 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 15:33 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 16:45 RE: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-14 18:27 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-17 01:06 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-17 23:41 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 15:03 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 17:04 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 18:05 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 18:43 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-18 18:53 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-22 00:03 x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16byte struct
2005-01-30 04:54 How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified forsetjump coding?
2005-01-30 05:44 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identifiedfor setjump coding?
2005-01-30 06:23 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identifiedfor setjump coding?

Per Bothner

2005-01-11 04:31 Re: Will someone answear me?

Petar Penchev

2005-01-05 12:05 Adding new register
2005-01-06 06:52 Adding new register

Pete French

2005-01-25 19:39 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0

Peter Barada

2005-01-20 17:29 Is mainline still in Stage 3?

Peter Cech

2005-01-24 13:54 Strange compiler error with g++ 3.3

Peter S. Mazinger

2005-01-04 15:29 binutils 2.15 / gcc-3.3.5 (3.4.3) produce text relocations on arm

Phil Prentice

2005-01-18 20:09 Floating point problems (accuracy).

Philipp Thomas

2005-01-19 19:49 Re: Issues with gcc 3.4.2

Pierre Chatelier

2005-01-14 10:26 Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-24 16:32 Re:Incorrect C++ code or regression?

R. D. Flowers

2005-01-27 15:40 Continuing GCCNews

Raffaele Rubino

2005-01-21 10:51 Successful build of gcc 3.2 on alphaev56-dec-osf5.1.

Raghu Annaluru

2005-01-04 06:09 Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions( with 3.2.3)
2005-01-05 04:53 C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions

Rajkishore Barik

2005-01-06 07:29 Download

Ralf Corsepius

2005-01-13 17:19 Re: [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only onefrom multi-lib configuration.

Ralf Wildenhues

2005-01-18 22:06 precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote
2005-01-18 23:05 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote
2005-01-19 09:04 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote
2005-01-20 08:14 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote

Ramana Radhakrishnan

2005-01-30 05:05 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified for setjump coding?
2005-01-30 18:46 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified for setjump coding?

Randy.Dunlap

2005-01-26 22:27 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking

Ranjit Mathew

2005-01-10 05:58 Re: how to debug gcc
2005-01-12 07:14 Re: OpenGL works! Was: Re: GCJ and OpenGL under Win32
2005-01-12 11:35 "make bubblestrap" weirdness
2005-01-12 11:46 Re: OpenGL works! Was: Re: GCJ and OpenGL under Win32
2005-01-13 06:20 Re: "make bubblestrap" weirdness

rd flowers

2005-01-12 15:59 Vague answer "better"
2005-01-28 05:49 Re: Continuing GCCNews
2005-01-28 13:27 Re: Continuing GCCNews
2005-01-28 16:10 Re: Continuing GCCNews

Remy Martin

2005-01-23 00:28 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x
2005-01-23 00:54 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x

Remy X.O. Martin

2005-01-22 17:41 longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x
2005-01-27 21:41 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc3.4.x
2005-01-27 21:47 Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?
2005-01-28 14:58 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?
2005-01-28 15:15 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?
2005-01-31 14:27 optimisation question

Rene Rebe

2005-01-27 08:39 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking

Richard Earnshaw

2005-01-04 14:03 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'
2005-01-04 14:18 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-10 11:54 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-11 17:49 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-13 12:28 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?
2005-01-25 15:41 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-27 09:56 Re: meaning of floating-point comparison operators

Richard Guenther

2005-01-01 21:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 14:50 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 22:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-09 18:56 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-10 12:50 [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays?
2005-01-10 14:06 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 14:34 Still fldl/fstpl use with fpmath=sse?
2005-01-14 09:17 Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays?
2005-01-17 11:16 -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-17 12:25 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 09:30 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 16:23 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 16:27 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 19:51 Re: PCH relocation ?
2005-01-18 19:54 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 20:00 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 22:36 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-19 09:21 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-21 10:38 fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
2005-01-24 13:03 PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-24 16:54 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-24 17:21 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 08:55 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets
2005-01-25 09:05 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 14:47 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 15:12 Re: [BENCHMARK] 3.4.4-pre Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets
2005-01-25 15:35 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 15:55 Aliasing not honouring const?
2005-01-25 16:58 Re: Aliasing not honouring const?
2005-01-26 08:58 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-26 09:18 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?

Richard Henderson

2005-01-01 00:57 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 10:12 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 20:37 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN
2005-01-02 07:47 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN
2005-01-03 20:24 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-03 20:33 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs
2005-01-04 00:39 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs
2005-01-04 17:15 Re: ia64 vector mode support
2005-01-04 17:58 Re: default_section_type_flags and SECTION_SMALL
2005-01-05 05:34 Re: discouraging register use
2005-01-05 11:11 Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue
2005-01-05 12:49 Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue
2005-01-05 21:21 Re: ia64 mulv8qi3 expander
2005-01-06 00:13 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-06 18:55 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 23:42 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-11 05:16 Re: Varasm.c change.
2005-01-11 06:05 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-11 06:08 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars
2005-01-11 18:40 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-12 09:10 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-12 09:50 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-12 19:32 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-12 23:11 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels
2005-01-13 00:00 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-13 00:10 Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT
2005-01-13 21:09 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)
2005-01-14 00:04 Re: sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit
2005-01-18 19:44 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?
2005-01-18 20:18 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-18 21:07 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?
2005-01-18 22:28 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-01-18 23:41 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-01-18 23:57 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
2005-01-20 00:14 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?
2005-01-20 03:48 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs
2005-01-20 18:16 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?
2005-01-20 19:03 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?
2005-01-20 19:19 Re: Sign extension of const_int rtx
2005-01-22 23:30 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x
2005-01-23 02:07 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x
2005-01-24 23:04 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets
2005-01-24 23:09 Re: SSE scalar/float transition
2005-01-24 23:10 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-24 23:38 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
2005-01-24 23:43 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 09:01 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets
2005-01-26 00:06 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...
2005-01-26 00:17 Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them always into long data
2005-01-26 01:51 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-26 18:17 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-28 00:43 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-28 21:08 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-28 21:50 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-31 17:24 Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...
2005-01-31 19:07 Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...

Richard Kenner

2005-01-01 00:36 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-04 00:16 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs
2005-01-04 01:13 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs
2005-01-04 16:04 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 16:21 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 16:24 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 17:12 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-05 02:16 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 16:27 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-05 16:40 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-05 19:24 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada
2005-01-07 02:47 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 02:51 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-07 04:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 14:34 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-07 15:23 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-10 20:38 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 14:30 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 21:31 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-18 22:55 ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e
2005-01-19 00:14 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e
2005-01-19 00:16 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e
2005-01-19 00:18 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e
2005-01-25 03:24 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?
2005-01-25 04:29 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?
2005-01-26 00:32 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.
2005-01-26 01:38 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.

Richard Sandiford

2005-01-06 15:36 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64

Richard Stallman

2005-01-01 05:31 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful
2005-01-01 05:31 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful

Robert Baruch

2005-01-10 15:55 How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-11 19:38 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-11 23:47 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-13 00:53 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-14 04:16 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-15 21:22 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-17 16:44 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?
2005-01-22 17:32 Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn

Robert Dewar

2005-01-01 06:49 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 14:54 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 14:57 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 16:41 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 17:13 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 17:15 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 17:44 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 22:52 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 00:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 01:09 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 01:22 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 05:03 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 14:33 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 16:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 16:52 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-02 23:22 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-03 12:26 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-03 14:08 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-03 14:11 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-03 16:48 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-04 01:34 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-04 22:22 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-05 03:27 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-05 14:18 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 16:48 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 17:16 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 17:21 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 21:27 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64
2005-01-05 22:04 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-06 10:58 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 23:59 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-07 02:26 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-07 02:59 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-07 13:53 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-07 13:54 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both?
2005-01-07 15:32 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-10 03:18 Re: GCC for OS/2
2005-01-10 03:25 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-10 12:27 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-10 12:37 Re: how to debug gcc
2005-01-10 13:49 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 14:24 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 14:25 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 15:14 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 16:55 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 20:12 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 14:24 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 14:28 Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-11 14:30 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-11 14:39 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 14:42 Re: ACATS c380004
2005-01-11 21:29 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 21:30 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-12 01:15 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-12 01:32 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-12 12:45 Re: New GCC logotype development.
2005-01-14 15:48 Re: valgrind shows ada/i-cobol.adb real bug
2005-01-15 05:26 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-15 11:38 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-15 14:12 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?
2005-01-16 03:14 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-16 20:34 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-16 21:16 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 18:44 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 18:49 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me?
2005-01-17 18:51 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me?
2005-01-17 19:09 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 19:13 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 19:35 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 21:45 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:06 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:10 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 22:16 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 23:21 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 02:39 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 04:58 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 05:00 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 06:20 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 12:50 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 12:52 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 20:38 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-18 20:47 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?
2005-01-19 23:43 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 20:43 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 20:44 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 20:57 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 22:41 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 23:01 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-20 23:47 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-22 23:09 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code
2005-01-23 15:34 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code
2005-01-25 14:22 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 15:30 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 22:50 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-25 23:33 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0
2005-01-30 00:28 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-30 01:23 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-31 22:33 Re: optimisation question

Roger Sayle

2005-01-02 15:14 MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs
2005-01-23 04:34 Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status
2005-01-28 00:04 Re: RFC: PR 19650
2005-01-28 21:50 Re: RFC: PR 19650
2005-01-29 01:15 Re: RFC: PR 19650

Roman Pagac

2005-01-12 18:08 Linking static and dynamic libraries

Russ Allbery

2005-01-08 21:11 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer

Russell Shaw

2005-01-01 03:59 Debugging with gdb
2005-01-01 04:41 Debugging with gdb
2005-01-01 15:38 Debugging backend with gdb
2005-01-01 17:09 Re: Debugging with gdb
2005-01-02 07:12 Re: Debugging with gdb
2005-01-02 07:39 Re: Debugging with gdb
2005-01-02 09:15 Re: Debugging with gdb
2005-01-09 07:05 Re: how to debug gcc

Sam Lauber

2005-01-02 21:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-03 01:16 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-03 20:13 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 01:26 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-08 06:39 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-15 03:52 Re: make install fails?
2005-01-22 21:58 GCC rejecting (I think) valid code
2005-01-24 02:38 Migrate to Autotest for testing framework?
2005-01-24 02:42 Migrate to Autotest for testing framework?
2005-01-29 02:02 New option?
2005-01-30 01:14 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?

Sam Ravnborg

2005-01-21 23:43 Deprecated -I-, any good replacement?

Sami Khawam

2005-01-26 11:38 PUSH and POP next to first/last register use

san bangalore

2005-01-31 13:24 assembler generated code

Sanjiv Pandey

2005-01-28 19:58 linear_search_fdes problem on linux

saurabh verma

2005-01-10 05:37 Re: how to debug gcc

Schouten, Frits JF

2005-01-17 22:05 Issues with gcc 3.4.2

Scott Dudley

2005-01-19 17:26 Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler
2005-01-19 18:13 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler
2005-01-19 19:05 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler

sean darcy

2005-01-29 23:08 -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?
2005-01-30 17:00 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?
2005-01-30 17:09 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?

siddharth godbole

2005-01-13 04:42 About support for architecture:

Stan Shebs

2005-01-17 19:59 Re: SPE configuration in GCC
2005-01-28 03:18 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?
2005-01-28 05:09 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?

Stefan Strasser

2005-01-25 18:23 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-29 15:55 template_decl's
2005-01-29 23:34 Re: template_decl's

Steve Ellcey

2005-01-19 17:47 IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?
2005-01-20 17:26 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?
2005-01-20 18:31 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?
2005-01-25 18:04 PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them always into long data
2005-01-26 00:12 Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them always into long data
2005-01-26 01:13 Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-26 16:29 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-26 18:26 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-27 23:24 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-28 17:00 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-31 17:43 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-01-31 22:21 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL

Steve Kargl

2005-01-05 20:04 -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 15:42 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-06 19:40 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?
2005-01-12 19:27 Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT

Steven Bosscher

2005-01-01 15:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 16:24 ChangeLog rotated
2005-01-01 21:59 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 22:27 regmove and regclasses
2005-01-02 10:45 Re: Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5
2005-01-02 13:04 What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-02 21:29 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-03 07:53 Re: Question about instruction packing
2005-01-04 11:15 Re: I require gcc4.0.0 source
2005-01-04 11:35 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 14:00 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-04 17:03 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-05 09:30 Re: new-new-ra thoughts
2005-01-05 10:43 Re: Question about instruction packing
2005-01-06 13:28 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-06 18:21 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-06 20:21 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 00:12 Re: Bootstrap time regressions
2005-01-07 08:04 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 09:18 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-07 21:03 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-14 20:33 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-17 07:25 Re: does gcc remember register values through into functions?
2005-01-18 23:05 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e
2005-01-20 23:46 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki
2005-01-21 14:54 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0
2005-01-23 14:01 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report [2005-01-21]
2005-01-24 14:08 What to do with the transparent_union attribute
2005-01-25 16:36 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 17:44 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 23:29 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 01:16 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 23:52 Re: float returned in xmm0
2005-01-28 08:38 Re: [PATCH]: Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64
2005-01-28 12:18 Re: Building Supergraph (at call graph level)

Steven L. Zook

2005-01-18 21:15 Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions
2005-01-19 00:06 RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions
2005-01-22 00:53 array of unknown bound handling

tbp

2005-01-03 06:46 gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression
2005-01-03 08:19 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression
2005-01-03 09:29 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression
2005-01-03 13:17 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression
2005-01-05 23:13 some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-06 12:47 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-06 13:44 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-06 16:44 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-06 20:13 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-06 20:31 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
2005-01-13 05:02 _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics
2005-01-13 05:11 Re: _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics
2005-01-13 23:51 sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit
2005-01-14 00:13 Re: sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit
2005-01-24 20:36 SSE scalar/float transition
2005-01-24 23:52 Re: SSE scalar/float transition
2005-01-27 11:36 -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-27 15:20 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-27 16:47 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-28 15:54 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-28 16:23 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-28 21:43 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-28 21:59 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-28 23:38 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles

Ted Sung

2005-01-18 21:39 dynamic library version crashes but static version works
2005-01-20 18:38 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works

Ted Teah via RT

2005-01-26 14:59 [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment

Thorsten Glaser

2005-01-05 16:23 Re: gcc-3.4-20041224 is now available
2005-01-10 18:47 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-12 18:32 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)
2005-01-14 00:15 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4

Tikkanen Tuomo (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki)

2005-01-25 15:43 Missing release information of 3.3.4 and 3.3.5 releases

Timothy J . Wood

2005-01-02 03:23 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline

tm_gccmail

2005-01-24 15:43 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b

Tom Tromey

2005-01-15 06:41 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-16 03:05 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters
2005-01-17 18:01 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-17 18:09 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-17 18:21 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL?
2005-01-18 18:54 Re: typeof and bitfields
2005-01-25 19:35 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-25 20:05 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases

Tommy Vercetti

2005-01-15 22:04 can't compile 4.0 here
2005-01-15 22:49 openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here]
2005-01-15 22:59 openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here]
2005-01-18 14:27 Re: openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here]
2005-01-18 16:02 openssl speed tests
2005-01-19 12:08 cmov and movnti in gcc
2005-01-19 12:17 Re: cmov and movnti in gcc
2005-01-23 12:55 can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc
2005-01-23 13:17 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc
2005-01-25 01:40 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b
2005-01-27 15:41 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

Toon Moene

2005-01-06 07:10 Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build
2005-01-06 22:55 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build
2005-01-07 20:39 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build
2005-01-07 21:36 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build
2005-01-08 12:27 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build
2005-01-09 13:04 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)
2005-01-10 16:02 Varasm.c change.
2005-01-10 22:14 Re: Varasm.c change.
2005-01-14 20:25 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-17 21:13 It's On.
2005-01-19 00:08 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-01-19 20:51 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch?
2005-01-21 20:51 Re: Gcc certification
2005-01-25 18:08 Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.

Tristan Wibberley

2005-01-11 18:01 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?

Ulrich Weigand

2005-01-03 17:05 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-11 16:31 Builtin argument type conversion and ftrapv-2.c failure
2005-01-12 18:18 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-12 18:18 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-12 18:39 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-13 15:17 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-16 21:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-18 15:55 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-19 00:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
2005-01-20 19:27 postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-22 01:54 Ada failures due to -largs
2005-01-22 18:08 Re: Ada failures due to -largs
2005-01-23 15:34 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-24 23:49 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 00:51 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?
2005-01-25 20:07 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.
2005-01-25 20:45 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-26 15:48 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-26 15:48 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?
2005-01-26 16:12 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?

Uros Bizjak

2005-01-03 07:32 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression
2005-01-03 09:05 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression
2005-01-03 10:05 Re: SSE testcase failure
2005-01-10 16:19 Re: Still fldl/fstpl use with fpmath=sse?
2005-01-13 08:22 make install fails?
2005-01-24 14:17 -mno-80387 / -mno-fp-ret-in-387 question
2005-01-24 16:44 [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insnsets
2005-01-25 15:04 [BENCHMARK] 3.4.4-pre Povray official benchmark scores for 387 andSSE insn sets
2005-01-26 08:44 Re: FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse?
2005-01-27 13:17 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-27 16:24 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles
2005-01-28 08:12 [PATCH]: Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64
2005-01-28 13:54 Failures in gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/copysign1.c execution on i686

Vaclav Haisman

2005-01-01 16:21 Re: Debugging backend with gdb

Vadim Karamov

2005-01-05 07:00 about gcc on Solaris8

Virender Kashyap

2005-01-22 17:35 HELP (change in control flow desired)
2005-01-23 13:34 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired)
2005-01-28 12:04 Building Supergraph (at call graph level)

Virgil Anuichi

2005-01-27 21:55 link problem: BFD: Warning: Writing section `.text' to huge

vivek sukumaran

2005-01-04 11:12 I require gcc4.0.0 source
2005-01-04 11:17 Any specific documentation for gcc3.4.3

Vladius

2005-01-07 17:51 New GCC logotype version 1.6.
2005-01-07 17:54 New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-07 18:06 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-07 18:20 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-07 20:03 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-08 10:04 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-08 10:16 Will someone answear me?
2005-01-10 12:06 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-10 12:41 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).
2005-01-10 16:42 New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6(Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-10 16:59 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-10 19:15 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 12:20 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-11 12:28 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-11 12:34 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-11 12:37 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 12:51 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 14:10 Re: Will someone answear me?
2005-01-11 15:03 New GCC logo (EGCS) smaller version for ml.
2005-01-11 19:12 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 19:51 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 20:06 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotypeversion1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 20:47 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 20:52 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotypeversion1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 20:57 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 20:58 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 21:09 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 21:37 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotypeversion1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-11 21:51 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)
2005-01-12 14:32 New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)
2005-01-12 15:58 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)
2005-01-12 21:20 I think I understood what You want.(Was:Re: New logo gone vectorised.(SVG format))
2005-01-13 21:17 Re: Will someone answear me?

Volker Reichelt

2005-01-03 10:45 Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option

Want something for Free? OK its here!

2005-01-30 03:02 Sorry my website was down!

Zack Weinberg

2005-01-16 00:10 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?
2005-01-18 18:31 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?
2005-01-20 18:42 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 18:46 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 18:56 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 19:10 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-20 19:41 Re: a question about fix-header.c
2005-01-21 04:26 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-21 05:13 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-21 06:39 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-25 02:50 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
2005-01-26 03:28 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.
2005-01-26 18:05 Re: define_constants and tm.h

Zdenek Dvorak

2005-01-01 00:29 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 12:18 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 16:46 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 16:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 21:11 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 22:05 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-01 22:52 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-03 17:15 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-04 22:30 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations
2005-01-07 09:19 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 14:31 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 15:46 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 19:55 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 20:00 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 20:04 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 20:20 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 20:35 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 20:44 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-07 21:07 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED
2005-01-10 00:07 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-10 07:52 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?
2005-01-12 19:25 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-12 19:47 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-12 20:44 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-13 15:03 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-13 19:11 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-13 19:24 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions
2005-01-18 15:52 Re: Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block.
2005-01-19 09:10 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for January, 2005

gcc archive
author index for January, 2005