This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: some remarks about gcc4.0
On Jan 06, 2005 01:46 PM, tbp <tbptbp@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:13:18 -0800, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Keep filing bugs, and we'll fix them.
> If i'm not mistaken
Oh but you are.
> missed optimizations don't have a high priority
Some do. Some don't.
> and really really hurt Real World performance;
Some do. Some don't.
Missed optimizations should be given a priority based on their
severeness. Your bug looks like it could be bumped a bit because
it is not just a missed optimization but a more-or-less latent
real bug.
> ie
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19252
Even if it doesn't say it's high priority in bugzilla, that doesn't
mean there isn't anyone interested in fixing it. Apparently Uros is
already on it.
Gr.
Steven