This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Notice how we take the address of a CONSTRUCTOR this is wrong and we
should never do that.
And why is that? How else would you express making a "fat pointer" for a constant? (Yes, you could create a temporary, but why? If gimplification wants one, it can make one (and will)). This has always been done and hasn't caused any problems. If something suddenly broke, it's not related to that.
I think there was another case like this in the Objective-C front-end which fixed to create a CONST_DECL for it.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |