This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
- To: Denis Chertykov <denisc at overta dot ru>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>, Jan Vroonhof <jvlists at ntlworld dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, BjÑrn Haase <Bjoern dot M dot Haase at web dot de>, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:23:06 +0100
- Subject: Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
- Organization: SUSE Labs
- References: <1238991885@web.de> <200501061923.15988.stevenb@suse.de> <wtuqgw5u.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On Thursday 06 January 2005 21:06, Denis Chertykov wrote:
> Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de> writes:
> > On Thursday 06 January 2005 18:43, Denis Chertykov wrote:
> > > I believe that reload can be removed at all for all targets.
> >
> > What about fixed register elimination?
>
> What is 'fixed register elimination' ?
> (I ask because I discuss new-ra only with Michael Matz and we have
> used many definitions of many processes)
Eliminating the frame pointer and such. Turn stack slots into
actual MEM refs with valid instructions, iiuc.
Gr.
Steven