gcc archive
date index for January, 2012

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2012
22:46 gcc-4.4-20120131 is now available gccadmin
19:50 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini Ryan S. Arnold
19:13 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini Roland McGrath
19:01 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Chris Lattner
18:58 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Chris Lattner
17:57 Probability notes in jumps at expand Paulo J. Matos
13:49 Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes Torvald Riegel
13:15 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
12:58 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Marc Glisse
12:39 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
10:26 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini Richard Guenther
08:21 Re: Assignment to volatile objects David Brown
07:17 Re: Assignment to volatile objects Gabriel Dos Reis
06:08 Re: Is it possible to get virtual function indication from mangled name? Ian Lance Taylor
02:20 Re: Assignment to volatile objects ZoltÃn KÃcsi
02:07 Re: Assignment to volatile objects ZoltÃn KÃcsi
01:52 Re: Assignment to volatile objects Gabriel Dos Reis
01:32 -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini Alexandre Oliva

January 30, 2012
23:39 Re: Assignment to volatile objects Georg-Johann Lay
23:25 Re: Assignment to volatile objects ZoltÃn KÃcsi
23:00 Re: Assignment to volatile objects ZoltÃn KÃcsi
22:50 Re: Assignment to volatile objects David Brown
22:22 RE: Assignment to volatile objects Paul_Koning
22:03 Assignment to volatile objects ZoltÃn KÃcsi
21:20 RESOLVED - Re: __sync_sychronize on ARM Jon Masters
18:05 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Chris Lattner
17:46 Re: __sync_sychronize on ARM Andrew Haley
17:27 Re: __sync_sychronize on ARM Jon Masters
15:57 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
14:04 Re: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'foo' Georg-Johann Lay
10:26 [AVR,committed]: out_movqi_mr_r: Fix length computation Georg-Johann Lay
08:50 Re: __sync_sychronize on ARM Ramana Radhakrishnan
06:57 __sync_sychronize on ARM Jon Masters
04:21 Re: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'foo' Miles Bader
03:34 Did you get my previous email? Burhan Kaya

January 29, 2012
23:44 Re: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'foo' Chris Lattner
21:31 expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'foo' Georg-Johann Lay
14:38 Is it possible to get virtual function indication from mangled name? Sergei Dyshel
14:07 Re: new port LINK_SPEC changes allowed during phase 4? Joseph S. Myers
14:05 Re: pointer modes for Harvard architecture.... Georg-Johann Lay
12:54 Re: RTL AND Instruction Matt Davis
03:52 pointer modes for Harvard architecture.... Alan Lehotsky

January 28, 2012
22:48 gcc-4.7-20120128 is now available gccadmin
13:23 new port LINK_SPEC changes allowed during phase 4? Joern Rennecke

January 27, 2012
22:47 gcc-4.6-20120127 is now available gccadmin
22:44 Re: Recovering REG_EXPR information after temporary expression replacement Peter Bergner
21:08 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Eric Botcazou
20:38 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Andreas Krebbel
20:32 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Andreas Krebbel
18:57 Re: Recovering REG_EXPR information after temporary expression replacement William J. Schmidt
18:32 Re: [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership Walter Lee
18:31 Re: [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership Gerald Pfeifer
18:10 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Eric Botcazou
17:50 [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership Walter Lee
17:50 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Andrew Haley
17:40 Re: Recovering REG_EXPR information after temporary expression replacement Michael Matz
17:19 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Dave Korn
17:16 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Andrew Haley
17:15 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Dave Korn
17:12 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Eric Botcazou
17:12 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Dave Korn
17:02 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Andrew Haley
16:59 Re: Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Dave Korn
16:46 Divide_1 testsuite fail due to a problem in the unwinding code Andreas Krebbel
16:27 Construction Management Question Chuck Lorrell
16:06 Recovering REG_EXPR information after temporary expression replacement William J. Schmidt
11:32 ANNOUNCE: MELT plugin 0.9.3 release for GCC 4.6 (& probably 4.7) Basile Starynkevitch
10:52 GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2012-01-27) Jakub Jelinek
10:02 GCC 4.7 is listed on Software Informer Kasey Bloome
10:01 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? David Brown
10:01 RE: ICE building compiler Henderson, Stuart
09:56 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? Richard Guenther
09:45 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? David Brown
09:02 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? Richard Guenther

January 26, 2012
22:55 gcc-4.5-20120126 is now available gccadmin
16:27 Re: -mavx option PaweÅ Sikora
16:02 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? David Brown
15:49 Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p Richard Guenther
14:53 -mavx option Ulrich Drepper
12:16 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? Jakub Jelinek
12:07 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? Richard Guenther
11:54 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? Konstantin Vladimirov
11:04 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? Jakub Jelinek
10:38 Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? Miles Bader
10:27 why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char? Konstantin Vladimirov

January 25, 2012
23:05 Re: How to define a built-in 24-bit type? Georg-Johann Lay
21:05 Re: How to define a built-in 24-bit type? Richard Henderson
19:21 Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p Richard Sandiford
17:47 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Oleg Smolsky
16:41 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Christophe Lyon
16:20 Re: How to define a built-in 24-bit type? Georg-Johann Lay
16:01 Re: How to define a built-in 24-bit type? Joseph S. Myers
15:14 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Richard Guenther
14:55 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Christophe Lyon
14:49 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Richard Guenther
14:44 forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Christophe Lyon
11:39 Re: How to define a built-in 24-bit type? Georg-Johann Lay
01:02 Re: Improvement of Cortex-A15 Michael Hope

January 24, 2012
22:49 gcc-4.4-20120124 is now available gccadmin
21:08 Re: Inline assembler + register values Georg-Johann Lay
20:49 Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares Paul S
20:48 Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares Paul S
16:39 Re: How to define a built-in 24-bit type? Joseph S. Myers
16:39 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Duncan Sands
16:32 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Joseph S. Myers
15:57 Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p Richard Guenther
15:51 Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p Richard Sandiford
15:15 multiple destructor calls of static objects Peter A. Felvegi
13:47 Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p Richard Guenther
11:36 Inline assembler + register values Konstantin Vladimirov

January 23, 2012
17:23 Re: gcc-4.6.2 fails to build on fedora 17 Ralf Corsepius
17:03 Re: gcc-4.6.2 fails to build on fedora 17 Markus Trippelsdorf
15:49 gcc-4.6.2 fails to build on fedora 17 Ralf Corsepius
11:02 Re: Getting rid of duplicate .debug_ranges Mark Wielaard
04:21 Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:54 Re: [GCC Steering Committee] Interix OS maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
01:39 Re: x86_64 -mcmodel=smallhigh, cont'd Richard Henderson
01:24 Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares Richard Henderson

January 22, 2012
21:29 [GCC Steering Committee] Interix OS maintainer Douglas Rupp
21:13 Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares Paul S
18:10 ANNOUNCE: MELT plugin 0.9.3 release candidate 2 for GCC 4.6 (& probably 4.7) Basile Starynkevitch
13:52 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Jonathan Wakely
11:35 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Vincent Lefevre
07:47 Re: RTL AND Instruction Ian Lance Taylor
07:09 RE: readonly register Hans-Peter Nilsson
06:54 RE: readonly register Hans-Peter Nilsson
06:12 Re: RTL AND Instruction Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:21 RTL AND Instruction Matt Davis

January 21, 2012
22:54 gcc-4.7-20120121 is now available gccadmin
22:37 ANNOUNCE: MELT plugin 0.9.3 release candidate 1 for GCC 4.6 (& probably 4.7) Basile Starynkevitch
17:02 GCCPLUGIN_VERSION and plugin-version.h Basile Starynkevitch
16:18 Re: Lapack tester Thomas Koenig
15:46 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others willus.com
14:24 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Eric Botcazou
14:01 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Jonathan Wakely
14:01 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Miles Bader
13:59 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Jonathan Wakely
13:56 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Chris Lattner
13:55 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Chris Lattner
13:42 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Vincent Lefevre
09:38 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Duncan Sands
09:33 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Marc Glisse
08:15 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Basile Starynkevitch
01:24 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Jonathan Wakely
00:32 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Vincent Lefevre

January 20, 2012
23:47 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Dave Korn
23:42 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
23:38 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
23:28 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Jonathan Wakely
22:48 gcc-4.6-20120120 is now available gccadmin
22:45 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC James Dennett
22:42 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Cary Coutant
22:32 Re: Getting rid of duplicate .debug_ranges Cary Coutant
22:20 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
21:41 Re: Access to source code from an analyser Tom Tromey
21:33 Re: gfortran 4.6 incompatible with previous? Tobias Burnus
19:19 gfortran 4.6 incompatible with previous? Sewell, Granville
17:41 Re: Access to source code from an analyser Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:28 Annual Agreement Update - Sage Payments sageID54488
17:11 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Dave Korn
15:42 Re: Interface Method Table Ian Lance Taylor
14:48 How to define a built-in 24-bit type? Georg-Johann Lay
14:09 const_int vs. const_double on 64-bit vs. 32-bit build platform Georg-Johann Lay
11:19 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Peter Rosin
09:42 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Richard Guenther
06:25 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Miles Bader
03:07 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Tim Prince
02:43 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others willus.com
02:25 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others willus.com
02:07 about hosting the gcc. Santosh Sharma Poudel
01:38 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Vincent Lefevre
00:27 Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares Dave Korn
00:15 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Dave Korn

January 19, 2012
22:56 gcc-4.5-20120119 is now available gccadmin
22:29 Interface Method Table Matt Davis
20:15 Re: Hashing regs and subregs Ian Lance Taylor
19:01 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Oleg Smolsky
19:00 Re: readonly register Ian Lance Taylor
17:36 RE: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Paul_Koning
17:20 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Xinliang David Li
16:57 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
16:51 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
16:02 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Tim Prince
15:54 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Paul Eggert
15:15 Re: Getting rid of duplicate .debug_ranges Mark Wielaard
15:08 GNU Tools Cauldron 2012 - Call for Abstracts and Participation Diego Novillo
14:58 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Duncan Sands
14:40 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
14:33 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Duncan Sands
14:30 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Richard Guenther
14:27 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others willus.com
14:25 Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
14:21 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Uros Bizjak
14:07 Request for price quote Purchase Manager
13:40 Re: Access to source code from an analyser David Malcolm
13:38 Re: auto-vectorization analysis/__builtin_assume_aligned on gcc-4.7-20120114 Richard Guenther
13:37 Re: Access to source code from an analyser Richard Guenther
13:12 Re: auto-vectorization analysis/__builtin_assume_aligned on gcc-4.7-20120114 Alexander Herz
13:07 Re: Access to source code from an analyser Alberto Lozano Alelu
12:48 Hashing regs and subregs Paulo J. Matos
12:12 Re: Access to source code from an analyser Richard Guenther
11:56 Access to source code from an analyser Alberto Lozano Alelu
10:59 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Richard Guenther
10:56 Re: Fortran Compil;er Jonathan Wakely
10:29 Re: auto-vectorization analysis/__builtin_assume_aligned on gcc-4.7-20120114 Richard Guenther
10:22 Fortran Compil;er tintu david joy
08:43 RE: readonly register BELBACHIR Selim
08:35 Improvement of Cortex-A15 Yang Yueming
07:56 Re: libobjc: Remove Traditional Objective-C runtime API Richard Frith-Macdonald
06:37 Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others Marc Glisse
06:14 Re: libobjc: Remove Traditional Objective-C runtime API Richard Frith-Macdonald
04:36 C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others willus.com
01:05 Re: libobjc: Remove Traditional Objective-C runtime API Nicola Pero

January 18, 2012
23:17 Re: readonly register Ian Lance Taylor
20:17 Re: Lapack tester Steve Kargl
19:35 Lapack tester Thomas Koenig
19:17 Re: libobjc: Remove Traditional Objective-C runtime API Andrew Pinski
18:34 Re: libobjc: Remove Traditional Objective-C runtime API Andrew Haley
17:37 auto-vectorization analysis/__builtin_assume_aligned on gcc-4.7-20120114 Alexander Herz
16:58 readonly register BELBACHIR Selim
16:12 Re: comp_type_attributes Marc Glisse

January 17, 2012
22:50 gcc-4.4-20120117 is now available gccadmin
21:20 x86_64 -mcmodel=smallhigh, cont'd Jed Davis
21:17 Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares Paul S
18:26 Re: comp_type_attributes Ian Lance Taylor
17:05 ICE building compiler Henderson, Stuart
15:55 init-regs double initialization Paulo J. Matos
14:44 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Hans Aberg
13:25 Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs Aldy Hernandez
12:48 Problems with references in documentation Georg-Johann Lay
12:35 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Jonathan Wakely
09:13 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Hans Aberg
05:19 Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares Hans-Peter Nilsson

January 16, 2012
18:02 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Hans Aberg
17:52 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Jonathan Wakely
17:31 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Hans Aberg
17:02 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Jonathan Wakely
14:49 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Hans Aberg
14:31 Re: GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Jonathan Wakely
13:56 GCC 4.7 compiles with llvm-gcc-4.2 but not with GCC 4.6.2 Hans Aberg
09:37 Re: question on inconsistent generated codes for builtin calls Richard Guenther
06:25 Re: question on inconsistent generated codes for builtin calls Amker.Cheng
01:02 Re: Changes to GNAT Library - is this the right place? Robert Dewar
00:21 Changes to GNAT Library - is this the right place? Mr Anthony Arnold

January 15, 2012
22:57 trouble emilinating redundant compares Paul S
20:23 [wwwdocs PATCH] for Re: GCC mirror Gerald Pfeifer
18:42 Getting rid of duplicate .debug_ranges Mark Wielaard
18:06 comp_type_attributes Marc Glisse

January 14, 2012
22:52 gcc-4.7-20120114 is now available gccadmin
12:01 Re: New GCC plugin: gcc-python-plugin David Malcolm
01:08 Konuşun Artık. Sevim Tuba GÜRLE

January 13, 2012
22:56 gcc-4.6-20120113 is now available gccadmin
20:28 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor
18:04 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Andreas Schwab
18:02 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Benjamin Kosnik
17:54 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Jonathan Wakely
17:51 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Benjamin Kosnik
17:45 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Benjamin Kosnik
17:42 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Joseph S. Myers
17:40 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Benjamin Kosnik
17:35 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Benjamin Kosnik
17:16 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor
15:57 [Patch] Tentative fix for PR51374: combine.c reorders volatile memory accesses Georg-Johann Lay
15:39 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Jonathan Wakely
14:17 Re: question on inconsistent generated codes for builtin calls Amker.Cheng
11:51 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Dennis Clarke
09:33 Re: question on inconsistent generated codes for builtin calls Richard Guenther
09:23 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Andreas Schwab
08:05 question on inconsistent generated codes for builtin calls Amker.Cheng
03:18 Re: IRA issue with shuffle copies... Peter Bergner
02:50 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor

January 12, 2012
22:47 gcc-4.5-20120112 is now available gccadmin
21:30 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Dennis Clarke
21:20 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Jonathan Wakely
21:03 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Jason Merrill
21:00 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Jason Merrill
20:55 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor
20:18 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Jonathan Wakely
19:49 Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Joseph S. Myers
19:17 C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)] Benjamin Kosnik
18:39 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Joel Sherrill
18:38 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Andreas Schwab
17:54 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor
17:09 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor
15:27 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Joel Sherrill
14:52 Re: 4.7 RC ? Dennis Clarke
14:39 Re: 4.7 RC ? Richard Guenther
14:15 4.7 RC ? Dennis Clarke
09:59 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Rainer Orth
08:03 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Richard Guenther

January 11, 2012
21:29 Re: Difficulty matching machine description to target - any way to specify a minimum register width ? Paul S
21:01 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor
19:32 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Dennis Clarke
19:28 Re: Go in gcc 4.7 Dennis Clarke
19:25 Re: IRA issue with shuffle copies... Vladimir Makarov
16:31 Re: struggling with make inside GCC MELT Jonathan Wakely
14:50 Re: struggling with make inside GCC MELT Ian Lance Taylor
12:03 GCC mirror NetGull Administrator
10:48 Re: struggling with make inside GCC MELT Jonathan Wakely
09:09 Re: struggling with make inside GCC MELT Mingjie Xing
04:43 Go in gcc 4.7 Ian Lance Taylor
01:24 Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes Patrick Marlier

January 10, 2012
22:50 gcc-4.4-20120110 is now available gccadmin
22:40 Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes Richard Henderson
22:29 Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes Patrick Marlier
19:59 ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.8 David Malcolm
18:10 WÅochy totalna wysprzedaÅ kryzysowa poland
18:03 WÅochy totalna wysprzedaÅ kryzysowa poland
18:01 Re: IRA issue with shuffle copies... Peter Bergner
17:58 Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs Aldy Hernandez
17:20 Re: IRA issue with shuffle copies... Vladimir Makarov
16:47 Re: struggling with make inside GCC MELT Ian Lance Taylor
15:39 Re: struggling with make inside GCC MELT Basile Starynkevitch
15:13 Re: struggling with make inside GCC MELT Ian Lance Taylor
10:09 struggling with make inside GCC MELT Basile Starynkevitch
09:01 Re: contributing to gcc Basile Starynkevitch
08:18 Re: Trouble installing gfortran Jonathan Wakely
03:13 Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes Patrick Marlier
01:49 Re: contributing to gcc Joe Buck
00:54 Trouble installing gfortran John Harper
00:34 contributing to gcc Aayush Upadhyay

January 09, 2012
22:54 Re: Broken links (HTTP 404) on http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ Benjamin Kosnik
22:17 Missed optimization opportunity Peter A. Felvegi
21:24 Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs Patrick Marlier
21:20 Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes Patrick Marlier
21:04 Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes Torvald Riegel
20:55 [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes Patrick Marlier
18:58 Broken links (HTTP 404) on http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ Filip JareÅ
17:39 Re: ChangeLog rotation Han Shen(ææ)
11:10 Re: return vs simple_return Bernd Schmidt
10:20 Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs Torvald Riegel
09:27 Re: Access to unused global variable declarations from a plugin Richard Guenther
09:18 GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2012-01-09), Stage 3 ends now Richard Guenther

January 08, 2012
21:14 Thanks for your response Gobnor Chris
05:47 FW: gcc uses too much stack? Jay K
03:14 ChangeLog rotation Joern Rennecke

January 07, 2012
22:56 gcc-4.7-20120107 is now available gccadmin
09:31 gcc-4.6-20120106 is now available (fwd) Gerald Pfeifer
05:24 IRA issue with shuffle copies... Peter Bergner

January 06, 2012
18:31 [pph] Merge from trunk rev 182919 Diego Novillo
14:26 Re: I think that may be a bug... Ian Lance Taylor
11:42 RE: Does neon_vset_lane<mode> expand wrong code when BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN? Joseph S. Myers
08:06 Re: reverse conditionnal jump Zdenek Dvorak
02:04 RE: Does neon_vset_lane<mode> expand wrong code when BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN? Xinyu Qi
00:24 I think that may be a bug... two2the8th_power_is256

January 05, 2012
22:38 Re: reverse conditionnal jump Georg-Johann Lay
22:23 Re: Difficulty matching machine description to target - any way to specify a minimum register width ? Richard Henderson
18:59 Re: Long-term plan for C++98/C++11 incompatibility Jason Merrill
18:55 Re: reverse conditionnal jump Oleg Endo
18:41 RE: Long-term plan for C++98/C++11 incompatibility Joe Buck
18:39 Re: ::gets has not been declared Jonathan Wakely
18:35 Re: Long-term plan for C++98/C++11 incompatibility Jason Merrill
18:27 Re: reverse conditionnal jump Ian Lance Taylor
18:25 Re: ::gets has not been declared Tom de Vries
17:40 Re: ::gets has not been declared Jonathan Wakely
17:32 Re: ::gets has not been declared Marc Glisse
16:59 NYC: Moving and other jobs 19$/hour/man on van+19$/truck and no hidden fees,discounts for 7th and latest hours of jobtime or fix rate for whole jobs ardis
16:33 Re: ::gets has not been declared Marc Glisse
16:17 Access to unused global variable declarations from a plugin David Malcolm
15:40 Re: ::gets has not been declared Joseph S. Myers
15:34 Re: Does neon_vset_lane<mode> expand wrong code when BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN? Joseph S. Myers
13:50 reverse conditionnal jump BELBACHIR Selim
12:06 ::gets has not been declared Tom de Vries
11:34 Difficulty matching machine description to target - any way to specify a minimum register width ? Paul S
09:56 RE: A case exposing code sink issue Jiangning Liu
09:32 Re: A case exposing code sink issue Richard Guenther
08:34 RE: A case exposing code sink issue Jiangning Liu
07:16 Does neon_vset_lane<mode> expand wrong code when BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN? Xinyu Qi
01:52 Re: major and minor macros in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/sysmacros.h Ian Lance Taylor
01:04 major and minor macros in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/sysmacros.h Pedro Larroy

January 04, 2012
21:23 Re: Misleading error if the type in catch() is ambiguous Peter A. Felvegi
11:54 Re: new mailing list language-experts Dave Korn

January 03, 2012
20:13 Re: GCC/GLIBC and non-temporal instructions Sergey Oboguev
20:08 Re: GCC/GLIBC and non-temporal instructions Ian Lance Taylor
19:39 Re: GCC/GLIBC and non-temporal instructions Sergey Oboguev
19:24 Re: GCC/GLIBC and non-temporal instructions Ian Lance Taylor
18:38 GCC/GLIBC and non-temporal instructions Sergey Oboguev
17:57 new mailing list language-experts Bruno Haible
13:03 Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Amker.Cheng
11:55 RE: [RFC, ARM] cortex_a8_call cost Ramana Radhakrishnan
09:58 Your friend DEPOSIT: $252 in 12 minutes has recommended this great product from eMac Jewelry DEPOSIT: $252 in 12 minutes
09:28 Re: [PATCH 1/3] colorize: use isatty module Jim Meyering
09:15 Re: [PATCH 1/3] colorize: use isatty module Paolo Bonzini

January 02, 2012
22:31 Re: LTO multiple definition failures Andi Kleen
18:57 Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p Eric Botcazou
16:48 Re: LTO multiple definition failures Sandra Loosemore
15:02 Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p Richard Guenther
14:54 Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Richard Guenther
14:42 Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p Richard Sandiford
14:09 Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Amker.Cheng
13:37 Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Richard Guenther
13:15 -fstack-protector, __stack_chk_fail_local and TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP Tijl Coosemans
13:11 Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Amker.Cheng
12:45 Re: A case exposing code sink issue Richard Guenther
12:33 Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Richard Guenther
11:37 RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Amker.Cheng
11:37 Re: Lingering tbaa in anti_dependence? Richard Guenther
09:22 Re: Bogus gcc.c-torture/execute/20071018-1.c testcase? Richard Guenther
07:22 Re: LTO multiple definition failures Andi Kleen

January 01, 2012
16:46 Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor Ruben Safir
12:58 Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor David Brown
12:38 RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor Richard Kenner
08:04 RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor R A
05:42 Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor Robert Dewar


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3