This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes

On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 17:29 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> > On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> >>> On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
> >>> not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
> >>> was fixed.
> >>
> >> What do you mean? Do you still see issues with Genome, even with the
> >> returns-twice patch? If so, just on i686 or x86_64 too? With libitm?
> > Sorry for confusion. Of course, I disabled your returns-twice patch. I
> > patched at different places and I hope to figure out where is the
> > problem and that it is not a side effect...
> > I am currently testing on x86_64 with libitm.
> >
> > Patrick.
> >
> Attached the patch which makes genome works on my side on x86_64.
> Torvald: could you tell me if it fixes the problem for you?

Patrick: I haven't tested this yet, given that this seems to be an issue
that we'll revisit for 4.8 and one that seems to need a more thorough

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]