This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: How to define a built-in 24-bit type?
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> avr-gcc implements a 24-bit scalar integer types __int24 and __uint24 in
>> avr.c:TARGET_INIT_BUILTINS like so:
>> tree int24_type = make_signed_type (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (PSImode));
>> tree uint24_type = make_unsigned_type (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (PSImode));
>> (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (int24_type, "__int24");
>> (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (uint24_type, "__uint24");
>> PSImode is defined in avr-modes.c:
>> FRACTIONAL_INT_MODE (PSI, 24, 3);
>> Is this the right definition of a built-in type?
> FRACTIONAL_INT_MODE should work after Bernd's patch series from last July
> relating to 40-bit types, though it's certainly possible there are issues
> that appear with 24-bit types but not 40-bit types.
>> The question is because __int24 shreds the compiler, see PR51527
>> So the question is if there is something missing or broken in the definition
>> above or if it's actually a flaw in the front-end.
>> For the __int128 there is much more code sprinkled over the compiler sources,
>> so maybe it's not that easy to introduce a new, built-in type completely in the
> See my discussions with Bernd from last July. In essence, I don't think
> we should spread such code across the compiler for each non-power-of-2
> size; ultimately we should go the other way, stop having any TImode or
> __int128 references in files outside config/, libgcc/config/ etc. and have
> targets using those modes and types choose to use the relevant source
> files for them. (And, further along, the existence of HImode, SImode,
> DImode ought to be target-dependent as well, with files in config/ that
> are used by targets with 8-bit bytes but maybe not by any targets with
> wider bytes.)
You mean that thread?
For the 128-bit integers there is just one type __int128 and unsigned variant
is unsigned __int128, whereas for the 24-bit types are are two types: __int24
for signed and __uint24 for unsigned flavor.
Is there an advantage of one approach over the other?