This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at st dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:14:32 +0100
Subject: Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)
References: <4F20151E.5070007@st.com> <CAFiYyc0K72OsXJrHUhHsEm9pHF4teevCssmjHyM6muiO-BnpHA@mail.gmail.com> <4F2017DF.9080709@st.com>

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@st.com> wrote:
> On 25.01.2012 15:49, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>
>> You can change the linker used by adjusting your path or giving an
>> appropriate -B option to the gcc driver.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
> Yes, but part of the thread was precisely to discuss alternatives, more
> end-user friendly (for those won't know the full path to alternate linker).

Would they know that two different linkers exist, or even what a linker is?

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)
  - From: Christophe Lyon

References:
- forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)
  - From: Christophe Lyon
- Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)
  - From: Christophe Lyon

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]