libstdc++ archive
author index for November, 2001

This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Danny Smith

• 2001-11-07 17:54 FWD: libstdc++v3: add config/os/mingw32 bits

Alexandre Oliva

• 2001-11-28 21:59 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-29 06:23 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)

Balaraman S (Bala)

• 2001-11-01 12:05 LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_RUN_PATH

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2001-11-01 11:11 Re: GCC 3.0.1 build for sh-coff and sh-hms targets
• 2001-11-01 11:18 Re: kernel support
• 2001-11-01 12:30 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 13:32 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 13:54 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 13:59 Re: Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-01 18:23 Re: fix for toupper/tolower for newlib-based configs
• 2001-11-01 19:46 Re: [PATCH] Properly align boolalpha-ized booleans
• 2001-11-02 10:47 Re: patch, first iteration: 'long long' and C99
• 2001-11-02 10:52 Re: libstdc++ build failure: __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT' was not declared in this scope
• 2001-11-05 08:52 Re: Another libstdc++ build failure on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20: strtoll and strtoull undeclared
• 2001-11-05 14:00 Re: [libstdc++] new version of porting-howto
• 2001-11-05 16:41 Re: ABI FAQ (was Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0)
• 2001-11-05 17:26 Re: ABI FAQ (was Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0)
• 2001-11-08 13:57 Re: FWD: libstdc++v3: add config/os/mingw32 bits
• 2001-11-08 14:09 Re: [libstdc++] New FAQ entry (ABI)
• 2001-11-08 14:09 Re: FWD: libstdc++v3: add config/os/mingw32 bits
• 2001-11-08 14:18 Re: UnixWare 7 g++ testsuite Failures: Ugly std_cwchar.h patch.
• 2001-11-09 09:30 Re: Help: libstdc++-2.8.0 and malloc
• 2001-11-12 17:22 Re: Slightly improved fix for libstdc++/4402
• 2001-11-12 18:11 Re: Thread safety clarification
• 2001-11-13 09:41 Re: pfstream ?
• 2001-11-13 09:48 Re: Thread safety clarification
• 2001-11-13 15:18 Re: pfstream ?
• 2001-11-14 12:15 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-14 12:27 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-14 17:43 Re: [PATCH] *Much* better one for libstdc++/4402
• 2001-11-15 09:30 Re: verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-16 12:16 Re: verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-19 23:29 Re: [libstdc++] Docs, comments, and formatting tweaks
• 2001-11-20 19:37 Re: stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-20 19:45 Re: string::resize bug (PR4548)
• 2001-11-20 19:47 Re: basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-20 19:54 Re: [libstdc++] Docs, comments, and formatting tweaks
• 2001-11-20 20:00 Re: PATCH: Improve efficiency (as measured by system calls made)
• 2001-11-21 13:30 Re: stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-21 13:30 Re: basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-22 11:55 Re: [v3] new std::list test cases
• 2001-11-22 11:56 Re: [v3] stl_list.h reformat to C++STYLE
• 2001-11-22 12:08 Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator
• 2001-11-22 18:41 Re: Spelling patch for code
• 2001-11-23 20:45 Re: Spelling patch for code
• 2001-11-23 20:58 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-25 12:09 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-25 12:09 Re: Are these files used anywhere?
• 2001-11-25 22:56 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-27 10:28 final string patch
• 2001-11-27 10:35 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-27 17:25 [v3] numeric facets cleanup
• 2001-11-27 23:36 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 10:49 Re: [PATCH] Remove cruft from basic_string::_Rep
• 2001-11-28 11:02 Re: stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-28 11:27 Re: Unformatted Input in C++ ...
• 2001-11-28 16:30 Re: [PATCH] Correctly output internal-adjusted hexadecimals
• 2001-11-28 16:37 Re: PATCH: Improve efficiency (as measured by system calls made)
• 2001-11-28 18:11 Re: [PATCH] Correctly output internal-adjusted hexadecimals
• 2001-11-29 10:49 Re: Shared libraries: keeping 2 version simultaneously
• 2001-11-29 12:49 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-29 14:32 Re: [PATCH] Fix second half of PR3655
• 2001-11-30 12:33 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator

Brad Spencer

• 2001-11-29 09:13 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-30 08:11 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator

Carlo Wood

• 2001-11-24 08:38 Re: Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers
• 2001-11-26 08:39 Re: Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers
• 2001-11-26 09:54 Re: Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers

Dan McGuirk

• 2001-11-22 20:16 Thread safety of basic_string

Dan Mosedale

• 2001-11-28 12:25 Re: C++ debugging progress

Dana, Eric

• 2001-11-02 09:07 RE: LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_RUN_PATH

Daniel Berlin

• 2001-11-25 08:34 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-25 12:29 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-26 16:43 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-26 16:53 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-27 23:43 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 10:36 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 12:56 Re: [dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu: Re: C++ debugging progress]

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2001-11-26 15:38 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-26 16:53 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-26 17:18 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-27 23:02 C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 09:40 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 10:49 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 12:18 [dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu: Re: C++ debugging progress]
• 2001-11-28 12:32 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 13:31 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-29 12:26 Re: C++ debugging progress

David Waite

• 2001-11-10 16:44 Thread safety clarification
• 2001-11-13 08:08 Re: Thread safety clarification
• 2001-11-13 08:10 Re: Thread safety clarification

egor duda

• 2001-11-01 03:19 fix for toupper/tolower for newlib-based configs

Eli Zaretskii

• 2001-11-25 01:24 Re: c++ debugging hosed

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2001-11-01 08:37 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 08:50 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 09:42 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 10:43 Re: New failure of 26_numerics/complex_value
• 2001-11-02 07:14 Pessimization in compiler support for builtin __complex__
• 2001-11-15 15:59 Re: verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-15 16:01 Re: verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-20 07:15 Re: verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-20 07:18 Re: V3 PATCH to add verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-21 03:26 Re: stl_alloc.h

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2001-11-07 13:41 Re: [libstdc++] New FAQ entry (ABI)
• 2001-11-23 09:13 Re: Spelling patch for code

Giuseppe Martino

• 2001-11-04 13:43 Strange error with list iterator

GNUTeam

• 2001-11-20 20:53 Why gcc 3.0.1 fails for sh target (coff,hms)
• 2001-11-20 21:09 Why gcc 3.0.1 fails for sh target (coff,hms)

Jack Reeves

• 2001-11-12 01:02 Re: How is unexpected() defined?

Jason Merrill

• 2001-11-14 08:04 Re: c++ debugging hosed
• 2001-11-15 05:32 verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-16 11:06 Re: verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-17 18:04 V3 PATCH to add verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-17 18:07 V3 PATCH to fix warnings
• 2001-11-23 03:31 Re: Thread safety of basic_string
• 2001-11-27 05:38 Re: Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers
• 2001-11-28 01:31 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 11:41 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 13:03 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-28 13:14 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-29 09:42 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-29 19:11 Re: C++ debugging progress
• 2001-11-30 09:46 Re: __cxa_pure_virtual

John David Anglin

• 2001-11-02 07:33 libstdc++ build failure: __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT' was not declared in this scope
• 2001-11-02 10:56 Re: libstdc++ build failure: __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT' was not declared in this scope
• 2001-11-02 15:01 Re: libstdc++ build failure: __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT' was not declared in this scope
• 2001-11-03 12:26 Re: libstdc++ build failure: __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT' was not declared in this scope
• 2001-11-04 10:16 Another libstdc++ build failure on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20: strtoll and strtoull undeclared
• 2001-11-05 10:24 Re: Another libstdc++ build failure on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20: strtoll and strtoull undeclared
• 2001-11-05 22:07 Re: Another libstdc++ build failure on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20: strtoll and strtoull undeclared
• 2001-11-30 19:09 Enhancement to mathconf.h for VAX

Joseph S. Myers

• 2001-11-07 18:38 Re: [libstdc++] New FAQ entry (ABI)
• 2001-11-22 17:38 Spelling patch for code
• 2001-11-23 08:32 Re: Spelling patch for code
• 2001-11-23 09:59 Re: Spelling patch for code
• 2001-11-24 02:49 Re: Spelling patch for code

Kevin Buettner

• 2001-11-29 13:10 Re: C++ debugging progress

krish K

• 2001-11-08 13:32 STL help
• 2001-11-09 09:05 Help: libstdc++-2.8.0 and malloc

Kumar Gala

• 2001-11-13 06:05 pfstream ?
• 2001-11-13 13:46 Re: pfstream ?

Levente Farkas

• 2001-11-16 03:43 deque bug
• 2001-11-16 05:43 pair (or template class) in constuctor
• 2001-11-16 05:56 Re: deque bug
• 2001-11-16 05:59 Re: pair (or template class) in constuctor
• 2001-11-19 07:41 abs(int)

Loren James Rittle

• 2001-11-01 15:30 Re: STL with thread-safety
• 2001-11-01 22:55 Re: Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-02 01:55 Re: Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-02 14:18 Re: libstdc++ build failure: __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT' was not declared in this scope
• 2001-11-02 14:59 PATCH: libstdc++ build failure: __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT was not declared in this scope
• 2001-11-07 14:38 Re: STL with thread-safety
• 2001-11-07 20:41 Re: FWD: libstdc++v3: add config/os/mingw32 bits
• 2001-11-12 20:38 Re: GNU Technical Consulting
• 2001-11-12 22:17 Re: Thread safety clarification
• 2001-11-13 15:27 Re: Thread safety clarification
• 2001-11-13 16:41 Re: Thread safety clarification
• 2001-11-15 00:54 PATCH: for libstc++/4219
• 2001-11-15 01:09 PATCH: clarify FAQ wording
• 2001-11-15 18:48 PATCH: Add common linking flags
• 2001-11-16 16:31 PATCH: Improve efficiency (as measured by system calls made)
• 2001-11-26 17:18 Re: PATCH: Improve efficiency (as measured by system calls made)
• 2001-11-26 18:41 Re: stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-26 20:52 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-26 21:21 Re: Thread safety of basic_string
• 2001-11-26 22:15 Re: Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers
• 2001-11-26 22:35 Re: Are these files used anywhere?
• 2001-11-26 22:45 Re: PATCH: Improve efficiency (as measured by system calls made)
• 2001-11-26 22:52 Re: stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-27 21:27 PATCH (mainline): First-order improve string<> allocation performance
• 2001-11-28 00:50 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-28 00:55 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-29 15:13 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-29 15:20 Re: PATCH: Improve efficiency (as measured by system calls made)
• 2001-11-29 22:05 PATCH: Remove support for (compile-time) ad hoc mutex configuration

Martin Sebor

• 2001-11-12 10:05 Re: How is unexpected() defined?

Maurizio Loreti

• 2001-11-11 23:49 How is unexpected() defined?

nagarama kodali

• 2001-11-16 10:20 libstdc++ help

Naren Reddy

• 2001-11-19 20:19 Unformatted Input in C++ ...

Nathan Myers

• 2001-11-01 12:21 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 13:10 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 14:28 Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_RUN_PATH
• 2001-11-01 15:22 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 16:09 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-05 14:22 ABI FAQ (was Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0)
• 2001-11-05 16:10 Re: ABI FAQ (was Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0)
• 2001-11-07 14:03 Re: [libstdc++] New FAQ entry (ABI)
• 2001-11-12 14:10 Libstdc++ thread-unsafe statics audit
• 2001-11-13 15:55 Re: Thread safety clarification
• 2001-11-19 07:08 Re: Bug in bitset
• 2001-11-20 17:31 bad bug in map<>::insert
• 2001-11-20 18:20 Re: bad bug in map<>::insert
• 2001-11-20 19:42 string::resize bug (PR4548)
• 2001-11-22 13:53 Re: Good numbers from Rittle's new string allocator
• 2001-11-23 10:06 Re: Thread safety of basic_string

Paolo Carlini

• 2001-11-01 02:22 [PATCH] Properly align boolalpha-ized booleans
• 2001-11-01 10:11 New failure of 26_numerics/complex_value
• 2001-11-04 14:17 Re: Strange error with list iterator
• 2001-11-11 08:54 [PATCH] Fix for libstdc++/4402
• 2001-11-12 04:59 Re: How is unexpected() defined?
• 2001-11-12 16:18 Slightly improved fix for libstdc++/4402
• 2001-11-13 00:53 Re: Slightly improved fix for libstdc++/4402
• 2001-11-13 12:58 Standard Changelog (Was: Re: Slightly improved fix for libstdc++/4402)
• 2001-11-13 15:47 Re:pfstream ?
• 2001-11-14 15:08 [PATCH] *Much* better one for libstdc++/4402
• 2001-11-16 05:55 Re: deque bug
• 2001-11-17 13:35 [PATCH] Fix basic_string::reserve bug PR4548
• 2001-11-18 10:07 libstdc++/4735 & libstdc++/4185 may be closed
• 2001-11-19 08:16 Re: abs(int)
• 2001-11-20 04:55 Re: Bug in bitset
• 2001-11-20 08:39 Re: Bug in bitset
• 2001-11-20 17:41 Re: bad bug in map<>::insert
• 2001-11-21 02:45 Re: string::resize bug (PR4548)
• 2001-11-21 03:28 Re: basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-21 04:23 Re: basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-21 05:02 Re: basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-21 08:15 Re: [PATCH] Fix basic_string::reserve bug PR4548
• 2001-11-22 10:49 Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator
• 2001-11-22 11:55 Ritter -> Rittle
• 2001-11-22 12:52 Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator
• 2001-11-22 14:26 Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-23 16:20 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-24 01:34 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-25 10:56 Corrected ChangeLog (was: Re: Dead code...)
• 2001-11-26 18:06 __pad_char and PR3655
• 2001-11-27 01:46 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-27 05:34 Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-27 05:41 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-27 10:01 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-27 10:40 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-27 10:44 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-27 12:01 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-27 15:44 First draft of string exponential alloc
• 2001-11-28 05:01 [PATCH] Remove cruft from basic_string::_Rep
• 2001-11-28 10:56 Re: [PATCH] Remove cruft from basic_string::_Rep
• 2001-11-28 12:46 [PATCH] Correctly output internal-adjusted hexadecimals
• 2001-11-28 13:32 Re: [PATCH] Correctly output internal-adjusted hexadecimals
• 2001-11-28 16:53 Re: [PATCH] Correctly output internal-adjusted hexadecimals
• 2001-11-29 00:01 Re: [PATCH] Correctly output internal-adjusted hexadecimals
• 2001-11-29 04:35 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-29 09:11 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-29 10:22 [PATCH] Fix second half of PR3655
• 2001-11-29 10:31 Re: [PATCH] Fix second half of PR3655
• 2001-11-29 15:55 First beta of the basic_string exponential shaper
• 2001-11-30 11:07 Second beta of basic_string exponential shaper
• 2001-11-30 12:40 Re: Second beta of basic_string exponential shaper

Paul Dubuc

• 2001-11-06 08:03 HELP: GCC 2.95.3 Thread Safe IO

Peter Schmid

• 2001-11-06 16:51 Results for g++ 3.1 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Phil Edwards

• 2001-11-01 07:51 [libstdc++-v3] Concept-checking tweaks and --enable
• 2001-11-01 08:33 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 08:42 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 09:06 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 09:51 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 13:48 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-01 13:50 Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_RUN_PATH
• 2001-11-01 14:00 Re: Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-01 14:27 Re: Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-01 15:38 Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
• 2001-11-02 09:44 [libstdc++] Add Doxygen hooks to headers, more man pages
• 2001-11-02 10:24 patch, first iteration: 'long long' and C99
• 2001-11-02 12:20 Re: patch, first iteration: 'long long' and C99
• 2001-11-02 14:39 [libstdc++ trunk&3.0] Fix 'long long' I/O vs C99 tests
• 2001-11-05 13:55 [libstdc++] new version of porting-howto
• 2001-11-05 16:17 Re: [libstdc++] new version of porting-howto
• 2001-11-05 17:05 Re: Another libstdc++ build failure on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20: strtoll and strtoull undeclared
• 2001-11-06 10:53 Re: Another libstdc++ build failure on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20: strtoll and strtoull undeclared
• 2001-11-06 14:50 Re: Another libstdc++ build failure on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20: strtoll and strtoull undeclared
• 2001-11-06 15:04 Re: HELP: GCC 2.95.3 Thread Safe IO
• 2001-11-07 08:48 [libstdc++] Add FAQ entries about libsupc++ and long long
• 2001-11-07 13:09 [libstdc++] New FAQ entry (ABI)
• 2001-11-07 13:50 Re: [libstdc++] New FAQ entry (ABI)
• 2001-11-09 13:34 [libstdc++ 3.0] GLIBCPP_ENABLE_LONG_LONG fix with AC_LANG backported
• 2001-11-15 09:20 Re: verbose terminate_handler
• 2001-11-15 18:22 Re: PATCH: clarify FAQ wording
• 2001-11-16 05:40 Re: PATCH: Add common linking flags
• 2001-11-16 05:44 Re: deque bug
• 2001-11-16 05:47 Re: pair (or template class) in constuctor
• 2001-11-16 06:06 Re: pair (or template class) in constuctor
• 2001-11-16 07:22 Re: deque bug
• 2001-11-16 12:46 Re: libstdc++ help
• 2001-11-19 16:53 [libstdc++] Docs, comments, and formatting tweaks
• 2001-11-20 11:12 Re: [libstdc++] Docs, comments, and formatting tweaks
• 2001-11-20 17:50 Re: bad bug in map<>::insert
• 2001-11-20 18:50 stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-20 19:48 Re: stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-20 20:10 Re: string::resize bug (PR4548)
• 2001-11-21 13:12 Re: stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-21 14:07 [libstdc++ trunk & 3.0] Re: string::resize bug (PR4548)
• 2001-11-23 18:53 Re: Spelling patch for code
• 2001-11-23 19:29 [libstdc++] maintainers' docs, allocator cleanup
• 2001-11-24 20:12 Re: Spelling patch for code
• 2001-11-24 21:24 Something needs to change but I'm not certain what.
• 2001-11-24 22:05 Are these files used anywhere?
• 2001-11-24 23:05 Re: Something needs to change but I'm not certain what.
• 2001-11-26 12:23 Re: Are these files used anywhere?
• 2001-11-26 18:12 How much can stl_alloc.h be changed?
• 2001-11-26 19:01 Re: stl_alloc.h
• 2001-11-27 09:58 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-27 10:43 Re: Dead code (was: Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator)
• 2001-11-27 11:01 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-27 12:21 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-27 14:47 Re: Are these files used anywhere?
• 2001-11-27 16:02 [libstdc++] Document the allocators.
• 2001-11-28 13:11 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-29 09:01 Re: Shared libraries: keeping 2 version simultaneously
• 2001-11-29 13:03 [libstdc++] Finish documenting the allocators
• 2001-11-29 13:16 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-29 15:25 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
• 2001-11-30 11:53 Re: PATCH: Remove support for (compile-time) ad hoc mutex configuration
• 2001-11-30 12:45 Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator

rbrown64

• 2001-11-04 23:42 Re: UnixWare 7 g++ Failures: Proposed fixinclude patch
• 2001-11-07 00:54 UnixWare 7 g++ testsuite Failures: Ugly std_cwchar.h patch.
• 2001-11-18 21:41 hppa2.0-hp-hpux1[01]: testsuite: Unsatisfied symbols: std::basic_string<unsignedchar, ....
• 2001-11-19 20:17 rs6000-ibm-aix4.2.0.0: 3.1 libstdc++ testsuite link failures

Reza Roboubi

• 2001-11-16 03:52 Customized Allocator (on disk)

Robert Lipe

• 2001-11-05 06:19 Re: UnixWare 7 g++ Failures: Proposed fixinclude patch

Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.

• 2001-11-04 15:50 c++ callong convention
• 2001-11-05 17:12 Re: ABI FAQ (was Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0)

Rohit Mediratta

• 2001-11-29 05:33 Shared libraries: keeping 2 version simultaneously

Sinisa Milivojevic

• 2001-11-30 08:38 __cxa_pure_virtual

Stefan Olsson

• 2001-11-01 13:53 Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-01 14:18 Re: Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-02 00:01 Re: Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-02 02:20 Re: Change default allocator?
• 2001-11-03 11:28 Overload of <string>
• 2001-11-16 08:28 Calling an allocator destroy?
• 2001-11-20 07:47 basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-21 03:13 Re: basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-21 03:40 Re: basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-21 05:04 Re: basic_string - once more...
• 2001-11-22 11:00 Re: Good numbers from Ritter's new string allocator
• 2001-11-26 01:47 Re: Are these files used anywhere?

Stephen M. Webb

• 2001-11-22 06:56 [v3] new std::list test cases
• 2001-11-22 09:39 [v3] stl_list.h reformat to C++STYLE
• 2001-11-26 16:20 RE: Something needs to change but I'm not certain what.

Tomasz Czajka

• 2001-11-19 06:41 Bug in bitset
• 2001-11-20 04:33 Re: Bug in bitset
• 2001-11-20 07:02 Re: Bug in bitset

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2001-11-23 09:07 Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers
• 2001-11-26 02:22 Re: Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers
• 2001-11-26 09:29 Re: Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers
• 2001-11-27 02:42 Re: Circumventing __USE_MALLOC and templatized containers

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)