This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator

From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
To: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:14:54 -0500
Subject: Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
References: <3C03962D.A893E65D@unitus.it> <20011127140455.A12673@disaster.jaj.com> <200111280855.fAS8t4M84957@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:55:04AM -0600, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> BTW, did you see the
> comment that, under the current implementation, you can't just change
> _MAX_BYTES?

No, I didn't.  Where is it, and I'll go look?

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
  - From: Loren James Rittle

References:
- Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Less good ;-) results from Rittle's string allocator
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]