gcc archive
author index for January, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

DÃniel Fraga

2010-01-14 22:50 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2

Adam Butcher

2010-01-15 15:29 Re: Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?
2010-01-15 16:05 Re: Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?

Adam Nemet

2010-01-17 20:29 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?

Aldy Hernandez

2010-01-29 16:57 [trans-mem] ipa tm pass and dominator walks

Alex

2010-01-12 20:23 gcc backend beginner: only -O1 gives 'unrecongnizable insn' error

Alexei I. Adamovich

2010-01-21 12:21 A question about GGC/gengtype

Alfred M. Szmidt

2010-01-22 18:47 Re: printf enhancement

Amker.Cheng

2010-01-01 11:39 question about replace_in_call_usage in regmove.c

Andreas Schwab

2010-01-03 12:52 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-10 10:30 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 12:39 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 14:07 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 18:18 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-23 17:17 Re: what 68k platform config switch put float return values in fpu register ?
2010-01-25 13:18 Re: strict aliasing violation

Andrew Haley

2010-01-01 11:48 Re: gcc-2.95 OK, gcc-{3,4}.X not OK
2010-01-03 11:21 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-03 18:39 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-04 09:50 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-04 11:06 Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-04 16:08 Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-04 16:35 Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-05 10:23 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 10:31 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 15:29 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 20:50 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 21:29 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 09:35 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 10:16 Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-07 11:30 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-07 11:55 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-10 11:01 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 12:50 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 14:53 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 17:06 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-25 15:23 Re: strict aliasing violation
2010-01-28 18:53 Re: Treatment of builtin that receives function pointer

Andrew Hutchinson

2010-01-10 14:05 Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost
2010-01-10 20:16 Re: Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost
2010-01-10 20:28 Re: Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost
2010-01-10 21:35 Re: Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost

Andrew Pinski

2010-01-01 16:46 Re: Big regression showing up on darwin
2010-01-07 10:10 Re: ANSI/IEEE POSIX 1003.1 and GCC (+ Other GNU)
2010-01-12 21:02 Re: anti-optimization of _DecimalXX by -ffast-math
2010-01-14 17:08 Re: Sibcall on recursive functions
2010-01-19 00:28 Re: Possible bug: Template name lookup & overloaded functions.
2010-01-23 16:52 Re: speed of double-precision divide

Andris Kalnozols

2010-01-01 05:44 gcc-2.95 OK, gcc-{3,4}.X not OK

Axel Freyn

2010-01-18 09:59 Re: Possible bug: Template name lookup & overloaded functions.

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

2010-01-19 17:11 Re: C parser modification & questions
2010-01-22 17:39 Re: How to make make changes in gcc code
2010-01-23 16:58 Re: fixincludes

Benjamin Kosnik

2010-01-12 03:05 Re: g++ and _DecimalXX types

Benjamin Redelings I

2010-01-02 00:12 The "right way" to handle alignment of pointer targets in the compiler?
2010-01-02 17:59 Re: The "right way" to handle alignment of pointer targets in the compiler?
2010-01-22 14:56 Re: The "right way" to handle alignment of pointer targets in the compiler?

Bernd Roesch

2010-01-04 13:05 where can find source snapshots of first GCC 4.5.0 ?
2010-01-10 11:19 Regression in GCC4.5.0 m68k-elf with r146817 (Author: matz)
2010-01-23 13:09 what 68k platform config switch put float return values in fpu register ?

Bingfeng Mei

2010-01-04 16:15 RE: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-13 09:54 RE: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?
2010-01-13 10:35 RE: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?
2010-01-22 12:43 A bug on 32-bit host?
2010-01-22 15:17 RE: A bug on 32-bit host?

Byron Stanoszek

2010-01-28 16:14 Problem initializing volatile structures

Carrot Wei

2010-01-05 07:42 Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?
2010-01-06 08:28 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?
2010-01-07 01:10 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?
2010-01-09 11:25 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?
2010-01-20 01:33 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?

Christian Joensson

2010-01-25 11:16 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-25 19:20 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-26 08:01 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized

Christoph Rupp

2010-01-14 21:44 gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2

cirrus75

2010-01-15 19:49 how to specify instruction size for optimization

Daniel Jacobowitz

2010-01-06 01:42 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-11 13:42 Re: [ARM] Neon / Ocaml question
2010-01-30 16:10 Re: Obsoleting IRIX < 6.5, Solaris 7, and Tru64 UNIX < V5.1

Dave Hudson

2010-01-07 09:07 Question about instruction scheduling and dependencies between instructions in 2 different basic blocks

Dave Korn

2010-01-02 14:56 Re: Big regression showing up on darwin
2010-01-07 16:50 Re: Gcc 4.3.4 fails to call TARGET_FUNCTION_OK_FOR_SIBCALL
2010-01-07 17:12 Re: Deciding when to sibcall
2010-01-09 11:14 Over-sensitive warning, or some quirk of C++ language rules?
2010-01-09 19:26 Re: Over-sensitive warning, or some quirk of C++ language rules?
2010-01-09 19:27 Adding a new GCC Bugzilla Keyword?
2010-01-09 23:49 Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 17:32 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 17:35 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 18:07 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 18:21 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 18:55 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-13 19:45 Re: Target hook definition licensing problems (GPL vs GFDL)
2010-01-15 15:30 Re: Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?
2010-01-15 15:40 Re: Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?
2010-01-15 15:40 Re: Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?
2010-01-15 16:24 Re: Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?
2010-01-25 18:05 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-25 20:02 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-25 20:24 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-25 22:21 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-26 05:33 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-29 10:43 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 10:54 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 11:09 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 12:08 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities

David Daney

2010-01-14 22:07 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?

David Edelsohn

2010-01-16 13:23 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage
2010-01-19 18:37 Eric Weddington appointed AVR co-maintainer
2010-01-26 19:13 gccgo language contribution accepted

Denis Chertykov

2010-01-09 10:25 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO

Diego Novillo

2010-01-05 15:14 Re: entry point of gimplification

DJ Delorie

2010-01-11 19:09 Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

Dodji Seketeli

2010-01-30 19:15 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?

Ed Smith-Rowland

2010-01-20 14:14 Re: GCC development plan

Eric Botcazou

2010-01-05 08:40 Re: question about replace_in_call_usage in regmove.c
2010-01-05 08:59 [Ada] arm-linux port for GCC 4.5
2010-01-07 23:56 Re: ANSI/IEEE POSIX 1003.1 and GCC (+ Other GNU)
2010-01-10 14:44 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 18:36 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-13 23:32 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?

Eric Fisher

2010-01-05 08:46 threading jumps makes niter changed from INTEGER_CST to chrec_dont_know
2010-01-06 10:08 Re: threading jumps makes niter changed from INTEGER_CST to chrec_dont_know

Erik Trulsson

2010-01-05 01:17 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 02:32 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 15:53 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 20:21 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-10 17:46 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-11 01:42 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-25 14:42 Re: strict aliasing violation

fanqifei

2010-01-12 12:50 GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?
2010-01-13 09:32 Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass
2010-01-13 10:26 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?
2010-01-14 04:52 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?
2010-01-14 07:36 Re: Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass
2010-01-15 17:57 Re: Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass
2010-01-18 10:39 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?
2010-01-19 19:14 Re: Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass
2010-01-26 16:53 Re: Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass
2010-01-29 10:11 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?

Felyza Wishbringer

2010-01-18 04:48 Unknown CPU given in --with-tune=athlon64-sse3.

Fleaser

2010-01-02 08:12 Fleaser

Fleaser Team

2010-01-05 22:08 Thanks for your help!

Florian Weimer

2010-01-03 11:22 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-31 10:26 Git mirror needs a run of "git gc"

Franz Fehringer

2010-01-23 16:35 fixincludes
2010-01-23 16:43 Re: fixincludes

2010-01-01 12:07 Big regression showing up on darwin

Gabriel Paubert

2010-01-07 08:49 Re: [PATCH] Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-25 15:24 Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- what to write in LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS, LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS and micro.md ?!

Gary Funck

2010-01-06 17:26 reghunt and "trunk" (GCC 4.5.x)?
2010-01-07 17:19 Re: reghunt and "trunk" (GCC 4.5.x)?
2010-01-09 21:02 Re: dwarf2 - multiple DW_TAG_variable for global variable
2010-01-13 19:33 multiple defs. of TLS common symbols?
2010-01-14 06:52 Re: multiple defs. of TLS common symbols?
2010-01-14 09:44 Re: RFC: cgraph/lowering vs. finish_file for GCC/UPC rewrites?
2010-01-14 10:52 How to mark gimple values addressable?
2010-01-14 17:11 Re: multiple defs. of TLS common symbols?
2010-01-15 21:11 GCC and binutils dependencies

gccadmin

2010-01-03 23:02 gcc-4.3-20100103 is now available
2010-01-05 22:53 gcc-4.4-20100105 is now available
2010-01-07 22:46 gcc-4.5-20100107 is now available
2010-01-10 22:48 gcc-4.3-20100110 is now available
2010-01-12 22:55 gcc-4.4-20100112 is now available
2010-01-14 23:11 gcc-4.5-20100114 is now available
2010-01-17 22:50 gcc-4.3-20100117 is now available
2010-01-19 22:47 gcc-4.4-20100119 is now available
2010-01-21 23:07 gcc-4.5-20100121 is now available
2010-01-24 22:50 gcc-4.3-20100124 is now available
2010-01-26 22:53 gcc-4.4-20100126 is now available
2010-01-28 22:55 gcc-4.5-20100128 is now available
2010-01-31 22:47 gcc-4.3-20100131 is now available

Gerald Pfeifer

2010-01-02 15:30 Re: Please update GNU GCC mirror list
2010-01-02 17:11 Re: WTF?
2010-01-03 13:00 Re: gcc mirror in Bangalore, India
2010-01-17 23:16 Re: Target hook definition licensing problems (GPL vs GFDL)
2010-01-21 01:05 Dave Korn appointed Cygwin maintainer

Grigori Fursin

2010-01-04 15:42 Call for participation: GROW'10 - 2nd Workshop on GCC Research Opportunities

Gunther Nikl

2010-01-25 18:44 Re: what 68k platform config switch put float return values in fpu register ?

H.J. Lu

2010-01-05 21:40 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-06 04:23 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-09 15:48 Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
2010-01-09 16:07 Re: Over-sensitive warning, or some quirk of C++ language rules?
2010-01-12 15:27 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-15 19:44 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.5 is released
2010-01-17 18:06 Re: GCC 4.4.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2010-01-26 13:09 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized

HyperQuantum

2010-01-08 16:00 errors in example on profile mode libstdc++ (gcc-4.5/changes.html)

Ian Bolton

2010-01-04 14:19 RE: Possible IRA improvements for irregular register architectures
2010-01-11 14:34 RE: Possible IRA improvements for irregular register architectures
2010-01-21 18:22 Possible IRA bug in assign_hard_reg
2010-01-27 14:52 RE: Possible IRA bug in assign_hard_reg
2010-01-28 19:20 Question about IRA (setup_allocno_priorities)

Ian Lance Taylor

2010-01-05 18:40 Re: [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int
2010-01-05 18:50 Re: [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int
2010-01-05 19:08 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-05 21:22 Re: [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int
2010-01-05 21:35 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-05 22:29 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-05 22:31 Re: [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int
2010-01-06 00:24 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-06 20:54 Re: reghunt and "trunk" (GCC 4.5.x)?
2010-01-08 15:35 Re: pro_and_epilogue pass ran several time for same function?
2010-01-12 22:43 Re: gcc backend beginner: only -O1 gives 'unrecongnizable insn' error
2010-01-14 01:15 Re: multiple defs. of TLS common symbols?
2010-01-14 16:26 Re: multiple defs. of TLS common symbols?
2010-01-15 00:37 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?
2010-01-15 00:38 Re: Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass
2010-01-15 00:41 Re: Missing optimizations
2010-01-15 00:45 Re: Any difference between gcc 4.3 and 4.1 in exception handling?
2010-01-15 20:41 Re: how to specify instruction size for optimization
2010-01-16 02:22 Re: GCC and binutils dependencies
2010-01-19 15:10 Re: Unknown CPU given in --with-tune=athlon64-sse3.
2010-01-19 15:16 Re: Non-standard test?
2010-01-19 18:18 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout
2010-01-20 15:30 Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx
2010-01-21 06:06 Re: --enable-build-with-cxx vs plugins (Was: Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx)
2010-01-22 00:24 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?
2010-01-22 00:26 Re: A question about GGC/gengtype
2010-01-22 00:28 Re: [trans-mem] STM GCC Implementation
2010-01-22 15:04 Re: A bug on 32-bit host?
2010-01-25 18:12 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?
2010-01-25 18:23 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout
2010-01-25 22:44 Re: fixincludes
2010-01-26 15:50 Re: Tree-SSA question
2010-01-26 19:45 Re: gccgo language contribution accepted
2010-01-26 22:37 Re: gccgo language contribution accepted
2010-01-27 22:59 Re: Strange conversion to int64
2010-01-28 18:03 Re: gccgo language contribution accepted
2010-01-29 14:22 Re: help on gcc source code odification
2010-01-29 14:28 Re: Selective notifications for new bug reports
2010-01-30 00:15 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?
2010-01-30 02:27 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?
2010-01-30 15:28 Re: Obsoleting IRIX < 6.5, Solaris 7, and Tru64 UNIX < V5.1
2010-01-30 17:46 Re: Question about reworking internals manual
2010-01-30 17:48 Re: Register allocation and multi-reg HARD_FRAME_POINTER
2010-01-30 17:53 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?
2010-01-30 19:30 Re: gccgo language contribution accepted

Iris Heinrich

2010-01-05 14:28 Laeuft es im Bett) nicht so gut

Jack Howarth

2010-01-26 00:13 Re: Successful make profiledbootstrap of GCC 4.4.3 and GCC 4.5.0 (SVN revision 156177) on Snow Leopard 10.6.2 x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0

jacob navia

2010-01-14 16:50 Any difference between gcc 4.3 and 4.1 in exception handling?

Jakub Jelinek

2010-01-04 12:07 Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-06 15:18 [PATCH] Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-07 08:54 Re: [PATCH] Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-07 09:15 [PATCH] ppc64 rs6000_emit_set_long_const improvements
2010-01-16 15:23 GCC 4.4.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2010-01-17 18:23 Re: GCC 4.4.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2010-01-21 14:05 GCC 4.4.3 Status Report (2010-01-21)
2010-01-21 14:20 GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-01-21)
2010-01-22 17:14 GCC 4.4.3 Released

Jan Kratochvil

2010-01-09 21:18 Re: dwarf2 - multiple DW_TAG_variable for global variable
2010-01-10 08:43 Re: dwarf2 - multiple DW_TAG_variable for global variable

Janis Johnson

2010-01-11 17:52 Re: g++ and _DecimalXX types
2010-01-12 17:16 Re: g++ and _DecimalXX types
2010-01-12 17:23 Re: g++ and _DecimalXX types

Jean Christophe Beyler

2010-01-07 20:58 Re: New RTL instruction for my port
2010-01-07 21:44 Re: New RTL instruction for my port
2010-01-18 18:55 Changing the ABI
2010-01-20 14:39 Re: Changing the ABI

Jeff Johnston

2010-01-11 23:08 Fwd: OpenMP vs. <math.h>

Jeff Law

2010-01-05 17:13 Re: threading jumps makes niter changed from INTEGER_CST to chrec_dont_know
2010-01-18 16:16 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization?
2010-01-22 14:20 Re: Question about peephole2 and addressing mode
2010-01-22 14:45 Re: How to write legitimize_reload_address
2010-01-25 18:57 Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- what to write in LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS, LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS and micro.md ?!

Jerry Quinn

2010-01-23 01:31 Question about code licensing
2010-01-23 18:25 Re: Question about code licensing
2010-01-30 17:09 Question about reworking internals manual

Jianzhang Peng

2010-01-08 12:11 Use -fprofile-generate get basic block counts

Jie Zhang

2010-01-04 13:28 Re: where can find source snapshots of first GCC 4.5.0 ?
2010-01-05 03:26 Re: df_changeable_flags use in combine.c

Joe Buck

2010-01-23 04:17 Re: Question about code licensing
2010-01-24 17:55 Re: Question about code licensing
2010-01-30 02:45 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?

Joel Sherrill

2010-01-16 00:50 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage

Joern Rennecke

2010-01-05 17:06 Re: target hooks / plugins
2010-01-13 08:22 Re: target hooks / plugins
2010-01-13 15:48 Target hook definition licensing problems (GPL vs GFDL)
2010-01-13 16:09 Re: target hooks / plugins
2010-01-20 14:54 Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx
2010-01-20 16:14 --enable-build-with-cxx vs plugins (Was: Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx)
2010-01-23 14:21 int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)
2010-01-25 14:04 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-25 18:16 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-25 19:31 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized

John Regehr

2010-01-20 15:56 updated code size comparison

Jon Grant

2010-01-19 17:34 Long paths with ../../../../ throughout
2010-01-19 17:35 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout
2010-01-19 17:40 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout
2010-01-23 16:26 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout

Jonas Paulsson J

2010-01-28 12:32 FW: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-07/msg00484.html

Jonathan Wakely

2010-01-10 17:28 Re: help on debugging gcc using gdb
2010-01-11 20:47 Re: Exception object access
2010-01-14 22:37 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2
2010-01-19 09:14 Re: Possible bug: Template name lookup & overloaded functions.
2010-01-25 20:17 Re: strict aliasing violation

Joseph S. Myers

2010-01-05 11:57 Multilib selection issues
2010-01-05 15:30 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 16:17 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-10 17:28 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-13 13:49 Re: target hooks / plugins
2010-01-13 16:18 Re: target hooks / plugins
2010-01-18 13:48 Re: Non-standard test?
2010-01-27 01:47 Re: gccgo language contribution accepted

Joshua Haberman

2010-01-03 05:50 GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-03 21:55 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-03 22:15 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-03 22:25 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-03 22:54 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-03 23:19 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-04 20:17 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 02:10 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 19:39 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 19:59 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 04:09 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 19:25 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 19:30 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?

Julian Brown

2010-01-11 12:28 Re: [ARM] Neon / Ocaml question

k e

2010-01-29 18:07 Adding memory write to a sparc fsqrts insn

Kai Tietz

2010-01-10 20:20 Re: Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost
2010-01-10 20:46 Re: Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost
2010-01-10 21:05 Re: Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost
2010-01-29 13:25 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities

Kaveh R. GHAZI

2010-01-22 18:06 Re: printf enhancement

Kevin Hunter

2010-01-13 00:41 suggestion to use lzma for snapshots, maybe more?

koala01

2010-01-28 12:16 _cplusplus symbol's value

Laurent Desnogues

2010-01-07 07:14 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?

Laurent GUERBY

2010-01-13 18:55 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?

Mark Colby

2010-01-04 10:51 PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-04 11:54 RE: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-04 12:17 RE: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-06 09:59 RE: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-06 10:25 RE: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???

Mark Wielaard

2010-01-30 19:04 Re: gccgo language contribution accepted

Martin Guy

2010-01-16 14:00 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage

Matt

2010-01-04 23:12 df_changeable_flags use in combine.c
2010-01-05 00:40 [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int
2010-01-05 19:39 Re: [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int
2010-01-05 21:54 Re: [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int

Matthias Klose

2010-01-05 23:48 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-05 23:52 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-11 18:15 rebuild test of Debian packages with GCC trunk 20100107

Michael Eager

2010-01-05 19:07 Microblaze branch updated to gcc-4.5
2010-01-22 21:39 Re: Mangled Typedef names in GNU 4.1.2 DWARF data?
2010-01-25 16:31 Re: Mangled Typedef names in GNU 4.1.2 DWARF data?

Michael Han

2010-01-20 05:18 Fwd: Help - as a beginner how to get started to contribute

Michael Hope

2010-01-25 19:31 Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- what to write in LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS, LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS and micro.md ?!

Michael Matz

2010-01-12 17:05 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-13 12:10 Re: [discuss] Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc?
2010-01-13 13:22 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?

Michael Witten

2010-01-30 02:24 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?

Mikael Pettersson

2010-01-19 14:04 Re: Changing the ABI

Mohamed Shafi

2010-01-21 14:23 Question about peephole2 and addressing mode
2010-01-22 13:24 Re: Question about peephole2 and addressing mode
2010-01-22 14:11 How to write legitimize_reload_address

Nathan Froyd

2010-01-04 16:17 Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???

Nenad Vukicevic

2010-01-05 07:34 dwarf2 - multiple DW_TAG_variable for global variable
2010-01-09 20:40 Re: dwarf2 - multiple DW_TAG_variable for global variable
2010-01-09 23:32 Re: dwarf2 - multiple DW_TAG_variable for global variable

Nick Stoughton

2010-01-06 18:20 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?

NightStrike

2010-01-05 16:32 Re: [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int
2010-01-05 18:47 Re: [gcc-as-cxx] enum conversion to int

Nikola Ikonic

2010-01-19 15:15 C parser modification & questions

Nils Pipenbrinck

2010-01-22 20:44 Re: printf enhancement

Oleg Kravchenko

2010-01-28 16:38 Best -march & -mtune flags for XScale-PXA270 rev 7 (v5l)

Olexa Bilaniuk

2010-01-25 01:26 Successful make profiledbootstrap of GCC 4.4.3 and GCC 4.5.0 (SVN revision 156177) on Snow Leopard 10.6.2 x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0

Olivier Galibert

2010-01-23 15:17 Re: int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)

Paolo Bonzini

2010-01-04 09:51 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-09 14:26 Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
2010-01-09 18:06 Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
2010-01-24 15:01 Re: Question about code licensing
2010-01-24 15:07 Re: int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)
2010-01-24 18:52 Re: Question about code licensing
2010-01-25 17:54 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-25 20:58 Re: [gcc] can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-26 07:58 Re: can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized
2010-01-26 21:35 Re: can't build current trunk: ar: .libs/libgomp.lib: File format not recognized

Paolo Carlini

2010-01-08 16:50 Re: errors in example on profile mode libstdc++ (gcc-4.5/changes.html)
2010-01-11 17:39 Re: g++ and _DecimalXX types
2010-01-11 23:25 Re: Fwd: OpenMP vs. <math.h>
2010-01-12 11:49 Re: g++ and _DecimalXX types
2010-01-15 13:44 Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?
2010-01-15 16:09 Re: Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?
2010-01-18 11:38 Re: Non-standard test?
2010-01-18 11:45 Re: Non-standard test?
2010-01-20 11:22 Re: GCC development plan
2010-01-22 11:05 Re: printf enhancement
2010-01-22 11:33 Re: printf enhancement
2010-01-28 12:24 Re: _cplusplus symbol's value
2010-01-29 10:40 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 10:46 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-30 02:05 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?
2010-01-30 17:46 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?

Patrick Horgan

2010-01-03 18:31 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 06:45 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 19:19 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-10 16:59 Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?

Paul Brook

2010-01-06 18:27 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?
2010-01-07 11:05 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?
2010-01-16 23:14 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage

Paul Koning

2010-01-10 14:37 RE: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-10 14:40 RE: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?
2010-01-15 15:36 RE: Slightly offtpic: why svn stubbornly refuses to listen to ctrl-c?!?

Paulo De Oliveira Cantante De Matos

2010-01-15 08:57 RE: Sibcall on recursive functions

Paulo J. Matos

2010-01-07 09:20 Deciding when to sibcall
2010-01-07 11:46 Gcc 4.3.4 fails to call TARGET_FUNCTION_OK_FOR_SIBCALL
2010-01-07 12:11 Re: Gcc 4.3.4 fails to call TARGET_FUNCTION_OK_FOR_SIBCALL
2010-01-08 13:57 Re: Deciding when to sibcall
2010-01-08 15:06 pro_and_epilogue pass ran several time for same function?
2010-01-08 15:52 Re: pro_and_epilogue pass ran several time for same function?
2010-01-11 15:47 Looping through the gimple for CALL_EXPR
2010-01-11 19:39 Re: Looping through the gimple for CALL_EXPR
2010-01-12 11:13 Re: Looping through the gimple for CALL_EXPR
2010-01-12 13:12 Re: Looping through the gimple for CALL_EXPR
2010-01-14 11:13 Sibcall on recursive functions
2010-01-14 17:00 Accessing current_function_decl body
2010-01-15 10:28 Re: Sibcall on recursive functions
2010-01-18 08:50 Re: Accessing current_function_decl body
2010-01-18 10:25 cfun and current_function_decl
2010-01-18 12:41 Re: cfun and current_function_decl
2010-01-18 13:05 Re: cfun and current_function_decl
2010-01-18 13:39 Re: cfun and current_function_decl
2010-01-27 12:25 Treatment of builtin that receives function pointer
2010-01-28 14:45 Re: Treatment of builtin that receives function pointer

Piotr Wyderski

2010-01-11 13:50 Exception object access
2010-01-12 10:01 Re: Exception object access
2010-01-14 11:23 Missing optimizations
2010-01-20 11:17 GCC development plan
2010-01-20 13:28 Re: GCC development plan
2010-01-22 11:01 printf enhancement
2010-01-22 11:31 Re: printf enhancement
2010-01-22 11:35 Re: printf enhancement
2010-01-25 12:24 strict aliasing violation
2010-01-25 15:51 Re: strict aliasing violation
2010-01-29 10:29 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 10:54 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 11:09 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities

Rafael Espindola

2010-01-10 20:06 Re: Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost

Rainer Emrich

2010-01-13 19:56 suggestion for ppl and cloog-ppl configure enhancement

Rainer Orth

2010-01-27 16:27 Obsoleting IRIX < 6.5, Solaris 7, and Tru64 UNIX < V5.1
2010-01-29 13:58 Selective notifications for new bug reports

Ralf Wildenhues

2010-01-09 18:14 Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

Ramana Radhakrishnan

2010-01-11 09:53 [ARM] Neon / Ocaml question
2010-01-11 14:26 Re: [ARM] Neon / Ocaml question
2010-01-19 14:31 Re: GCC 4.4.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

Richard Earnshaw

2010-01-05 11:06 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?
2010-01-07 10:23 Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC?
2010-01-29 10:09 Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 12:00 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 12:02 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 13:24 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities

Richard Guenther

2010-01-03 10:53 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-03 22:25 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-03 23:08 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-04 00:45 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 10:56 Re: threading jumps makes niter changed from INTEGER_CST to chrec_dont_know
2010-01-05 13:46 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-05 15:27 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 13:27 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 15:45 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 15:49 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 15:51 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 18:44 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-07 11:42 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-10 22:49 Re: Success with MinGW and AVR and LTO - almost
2010-01-11 16:51 Re: Looping through the gimple for CALL_EXPR
2010-01-12 10:39 Re: rebuild test of Debian packages with GCC trunk 20100107
2010-01-12 10:44 Re: Looping through the gimple for CALL_EXPR
2010-01-12 11:30 Re: Looping through the gimple for CALL_EXPR
2010-01-18 10:30 Re: cfun and current_function_decl
2010-01-18 12:58 Re: cfun and current_function_decl
2010-01-18 13:25 Re: cfun and current_function_decl
2010-01-22 14:10 Re: How to make make changes in gcc code
2010-01-23 15:29 Re: int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)
2010-01-23 16:39 Re: fixincludes
2010-01-23 16:48 Re: fixincludes
2010-01-23 16:52 Re: speed of double-precision divide
2010-01-23 17:43 Re: speed of double-precision divide
2010-01-24 21:48 Re: speed of double-precision divide
2010-01-25 13:19 Re: strict aliasing violation
2010-01-25 15:48 Re: strict aliasing violation
2010-01-26 22:04 Re: gccgo language contribution accepted
2010-01-29 09:15 Re: Problem initializing volatile structures
2010-01-29 11:03 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 11:24 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-29 12:05 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
2010-01-30 15:32 Re: Obsoleting IRIX < 6.5, Solaris 7, and Tru64 UNIX < V5.1

Richard Henderson

2010-01-07 21:06 Re: ANSI/IEEE POSIX 1003.1 and GCC (+ Other GNU)
2010-01-07 21:14 Re: New RTL instruction for my port
2010-01-11 17:06 Re: [trans-mem] STM GCC Implementation
2010-01-21 21:40 Re: Question about peephole2 and addressing mode

Richard Kenner

2010-01-05 12:47 Re: Multilib selection issues
2010-01-23 04:06 Re: Question about code licensing

Richard Sandiford

2010-01-30 10:27 Re: Obsoleting IRIX < 6.5, Solaris 7, and Tru64 UNIX < V5.1

Riyadh Baghdadi

2010-01-11 12:09 [trans-mem] STM GCC Implementation
2010-01-11 18:38 Re: [trans-mem] STM GCC Implementation
2010-01-21 15:53 Re: [trans-mem] STM GCC Implementation

Robert Dewar

2010-01-05 12:23 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 16:22 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-23 09:02 Re: Question about code licensing

Robert Grimm

2010-01-15 23:43 powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage
2010-01-16 15:32 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage

Roland McGrath

2010-01-05 21:12 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-05 23:00 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-06 01:01 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
2010-01-06 21:49 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]

Roman Kononov

2010-01-11 16:30 g++ and _DecimalXX types
2010-01-12 21:00 anti-optimization of _DecimalXX by -ffast-math

Ron Louzon

2010-01-22 20:17 Mangled Typedef names in GNU 4.1.2 DWARF data?
2010-01-25 15:04 Re: Mangled Typedef names in GNU 4.1.2 DWARF data?

Ross Smith

2010-01-09 12:17 Re: Over-sensitive warning, or some quirk of C++ language rules?

sandeep soni

2010-01-04 19:57 entry point of gimplification
2010-01-06 07:18 Re: entry point of gimplification
2010-01-22 12:49 How to make make changes in gcc code
2010-01-26 10:41 Tree-SSA question

Sebastian Pop

2010-01-13 21:01 Re: suggestion for ppl and cloog-ppl configure enhancement

Sergio Ruocco

Simon Hill

2010-01-18 09:37 Possible bug: Template name lookup & overloaded functions.
2010-01-19 00:20 Re: Possible bug: Template name lookup & overloaded functions.
2010-01-19 07:49 Re: Possible bug: Template name lookup & overloaded functions.

Sriraman Tallam

2010-01-13 18:32 Re: Request for code review - (ZEE patch : Redundant Zero extension elimination)

Steve White

2010-01-23 16:47 speed of double-precision divide
2010-01-23 17:33 Re: speed of double-precision divide
2010-01-24 21:32 Re: speed of double-precision divide

Steven Bosscher

2010-01-04 11:19 Re: PowerPC : GCC2 optimises better than GCC4???
2010-01-09 11:16 Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
2010-01-11 08:25 Re: Feature request concerning bitwise operations
2010-01-26 23:47 Questions about compute_transpout in gcse.c code hoisting implementation
2010-01-29 10:12 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities

swati raina

2010-01-10 17:05 help on debugging gcc using gdb
2010-01-29 13:01 help on gcc source code odification

Takis Psarogiannakopoulos

2010-01-07 10:00 ANSI/IEEE POSIX 1003.1 and GCC (+ Other GNU)
2010-01-07 10:27 Re: ANSI/IEEE POSIX 1003.1 and GCC (+ Other GNU)

Tim Prince

2010-01-02 02:52 Re: The "right way" to handle alignment of pointer targets in the compiler?
2010-01-03 03:49 Re: The "right way" to handle alignment of pointer targets in the compiler?
2010-01-05 16:42 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-24 22:13 Re: speed of double-precision divide

Timothy Madden

2010-01-21 11:02 Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?
2010-01-23 06:35 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?
2010-01-29 23:47 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ?

Tobias Burnus

2010-01-20 12:45 Re: GCC development plan

Tony Bernardin

2010-01-27 19:08 Strange conversion to int64

torbenh

2010-01-05 13:40 adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-05 15:02 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-05 15:03 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-05 16:39 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 15:26 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 15:45 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 16:48 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-06 17:37 Re: adding -fnoalias ... would a patch be accepted ?
2010-01-15 03:02 some infinite recursion in gen_lsm_tmp_name()

Ulrich Weigand

2010-01-25 08:41 Re: Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass

Uros Bizjak

2010-01-30 17:09 Register allocation and multi-reg HARD_FRAME_POINTER

Vincent Lefevre

2010-01-05 15:23 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 15:38 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 15:42 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 21:06 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 21:24 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-05 22:18 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-06 08:21 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-07 03:11 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
2010-01-13 03:36 Re: suggestion to use lzma for snapshots, maybe more?

Vladimir Makarov

2010-01-21 21:07 Re: Possible IRA bug in assign_hard_reg
2010-01-28 17:52 Re: Possible IRA bug in assign_hard_reg
2010-01-28 19:30 Re: Question about IRA (setup_allocno_priorities)

Wen Li

2010-01-11 07:14 Feature request concerning bitwise operations

Wolfgang Griech

2010-01-30 13:47 gcc version 4.4.3 (GCC)

Xinliang David Li

2010-01-04 05:33 Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?

YuGr

2010-01-18 11:25 Non-standard test?
2010-01-18 11:42 Re: Non-standard test?
2010-01-18 11:57 Re: Non-standard test?
2010-01-18 13:23 Re: Non-standard test?

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for January, 2010

gcc archive
author index for January, 2010