This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org, newlib at sourceware dot org, cygwin at cygwin dot com
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:26:33 +0100
Subject: Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
References: <571f6b511001090316h44fefc7k672f595117024475@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/09/2010 12:16 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:

This is with gcc SVN revision 155740, and src checked out yesterday
(top of src/Changelog is the fix from Kaveh and FX for gcc PR42424).

Not knowing a thing about libtool, I hope someone can tell me what's
wrong here;-)

src and gcc's libtool are out-of-sync (2.2.6 vs. 2.2.7a respectively). Since gcc's files dominate, you have ltmain.sh from GCC but bfd's configure uses src's libtool configuration.

Binutils should adopt GCC's libtool.m4, ltmain.sh, lt~obsolete.m4, ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and src should rerun autoconf on all of its scripts (CCing gdb, newlib and cygwin mailing lists).

DJ, can you add these files to the list that we get email about?

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]