This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities

From: Piotr Wyderski <piotr dot wyderski at gmail dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:29:33 +0100
Subject: Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
References: <1264759746.10841.32.camel@e200601-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <571f6b511001290212x6b1ffaa8j337768bd1091df33@mail.gmail.com>

Steven Bosscher wrote:

>>> Only RMs may set priority.
>>
>> I beg your pardon? ÂWhere in the docs does it say that?
>
> I don't know that, but it's been discussed many times on this list.

As a mere mortal I've used the priority setting combo
a few times to specify (perceived) priority, which later
was adjusted by a person reviewing bug reports (i.e.
Andrew or Paolo), so, at least technically, it is available
to anyone.

Anyway, speaking of reporting bugs: what's the rule of
specifying CCs? Especially to the submitter himself?
I would like to be aware of the status of several bugs,
so may I add myself to the CC list? Or is it supposed
to be used only by the fixers?

Best regards
Piotr Wyderski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Bugzilla and setting priorities
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]