This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert at pobox dot com>, Joern Rennecke <amylaar at spamcop dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:07:00 +0100
Subject: Re: int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.devel
References: <20100123073057.pzhu5vatj40sw44w-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <84fc9c001001230436p623c7d26q78ba3621718955cc@mail.gmail.com> <4B5AFB88.6030803@gnu.org> <84fc9c001001230541t58c96b77l115af2dafc5ea938@mail.gmail.com> <20100123092147.h7x4x8nfi8w488s0-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <20100123151659.GA8146@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <84fc9c001001230729t2651fa50g6aec84fbeb12b76f@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/23/2010 04:29 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:

We could warn about this when building with C++ but with C we do not
see bools but ints here.

With such a warning there would be no reason not to build stage2 and stage3 with bool == _Bool.

Paolo

References:
- int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)
  - From: Olivier Galibert
- Re: int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]