This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?

From: Joshua Haberman <jhaberman at gmail dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
References: <loom.20100103T063932-636@post.gmane.org> <84fc9c001001030253g4911a5ebi97aab621b7505449@mail.gmail.com> <4B40E26C.7070802@yahoo.com>

Patrick Horgan <phorgan1 <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> Since it would be hard to read this any other way, it seems then you-
> maintain that you found a bug in the standard, has it been brought up to-
> the committee?  The latest draft I see still has that wording.  Doesn't-
> seem to be on the radar for C1x.

I strongly agree that the standard should be brought into line with
common practice, and that if this is not currently on the committee's
radar someone with connections should raise the issue to them.

Josh

References:
- GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
  - From: Joshua Haberman
- Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
  - From: Patrick Horgan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]