This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: fixincludes


Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Franz Fehringer <fehrin@t-online.de> wrote:

but an OS update could lead to updated C runtime headers?

Yes.


There is still one point I don't understand about fixincludes.

Why is it still useful on recent GNU/Linux systems?

From what I understood, fixinclude role is to correct system includes files w.r.t. GCC compatibility. I would imagine that in 2010, the GNU glibc is standards & GCC compliant enough, and that GCC is robust enough, to make that useless.

I do understand in theory the need of fixinclude on non GNU Glibc systems (like proprietary Unixes eg SunOS or HPUX or AIX), but I cannot understand its use on GNU systems.

Or perhaps I completely misunderstood the role of fixinclude.

Regards.


-- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]