gcc archive
author index for January, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Seongbae Park 박성배 朴成培

2009-01-08 18:01 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug
2009-01-08 18:32 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug

Stefan Dösinger

2009-01-07 19:52 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-07 21:40 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-08 13:52 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-08 15:51 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-08 21:00 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-12 12:40 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-12 14:29 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog

Manuel López-Ibáñez

2009-01-29 13:33 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 17:13 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose

Stefan Dösinger

2009-01-07 18:06 Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog

Дмитрий Дьяченко

2009-01-30 16:17 [strict-aliasing] incorrect warning with g++-current in STL

ZoltÃn KÃcsi

2009-01-21 08:48 ARM interworking question
2009-01-22 08:46 Re: ARM interworking question
2009-01-28 11:24 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 14:21 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-29 11:30 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-30 12:15 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

PaweÅ Sikora

2009-01-28 17:07 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Stefan Dösinger

2009-01-07 19:12 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog

Adam Nemet

2009-01-15 23:57 Missed bitfield packing?
2009-01-28 01:50 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-31 03:17 MIPS64 -msym32 and DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE

Alexandre Pereira Nunes

2009-01-19 16:22 Re: arm-elf-ld: undefined reference to 'xxx'

amylaar

2009-01-08 14:38 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-08 17:54 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-12 15:37 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-29 15:01 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose

Andi Kleen

2009-01-27 11:31 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-27 18:06 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-28 08:55 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-28 09:24 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs

Andreas Schwab

2009-01-15 09:26 Re: correct place for code.
2009-01-22 10:10 Re: Size of the GCC repository
2009-01-28 09:08 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc
2009-01-28 14:31 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

andrew babanin

2009-01-20 19:33 C integrated RPC
2009-01-21 08:08 Re: C integrated RPC
2009-01-21 18:40 Re: C integrated RPC
2009-01-21 19:25 Re: C integrated RPC
2009-01-21 19:56 Re: C integrated RPC

Andrew Haley

2009-01-21 09:42 Re: ARM interworking question
2009-01-27 10:45 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 15:41 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 11:50 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 16:40 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-29 08:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Andrew Pinski

2009-01-01 02:06 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly
2009-01-15 20:41 Re: missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m?
2009-01-15 20:58 Re: missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m?
2009-01-16 20:48 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86?

Andrew Thomas Pinski

2009-01-16 17:36 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86?

Andrew Walrond

2009-01-26 15:23 gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match

Andy Armstrong

2009-01-30 10:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Andy Scott

2009-01-07 08:22 This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-08 08:28 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-14 08:51 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-21 20:44 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-26 08:18 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

Balaji V. Iyer

2009-01-04 07:34 RE: Code Motion after Machine Dependent Reorganization??

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

2009-01-30 14:11 GCC & OpenCL ?

baver

2009-01-21 02:12 register int variable being written to/read from stack

Ben Elliston

2009-01-14 22:22 Re: Installing GCC:Configuration (GCC-4.3.2)
2009-01-14 22:24 Re: gcc binary download
2009-01-14 23:48 Re: GCC 4.4 SNAPSHOT - BUILD ERROR
2009-01-15 23:48 Re: Useless option parsing code in genautomata.c ?
2009-01-20 04:46 -fgraphite docs
2009-01-20 05:11 Re: -fgraphite docs
2009-01-20 05:27 Re: -fgraphite docs
2009-01-26 22:16 Re: cross-compilation, deprecated option and libgcc
2009-01-26 22:32 Re: GCC RES: Restrictive Exception Specification: 0.1 - Alpha. Feedback Request.
2009-01-28 22:30 incorrect license on some gcc/*.c files?

Bernd Roesch

2009-01-07 09:03 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-07 09:05 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-10 12:31 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

Bingfeng Mei

2009-01-02 11:51 [IRA] New register allocator question
2009-01-02 14:35 RE: [IRA] New register allocator question
2009-01-22 17:22 Document error on TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION ?
2009-01-30 12:44 Solve transitive closure issue in modulo scheduling

Bruce Korb

2009-01-29 05:54 sizeof in initializer expression not working as expected

Cary Coutant

2009-01-08 02:03 Re: Mixing languages in the same TU and dwarf2out_frame_finish

ccg ijsj

2009-01-15 09:52 Useless option parsing code in genautomata.c ?
2009-01-17 15:29 Re: Useless option parsing code in genautomata.c ?

Chao-Ying Fu

2009-01-04 05:48 Re: writing md rules for fixed-point conversion

Chris

2009-01-05 19:40 4.4 use static_assert or #warning for unimplemented c++0x std libs

Chris Lattner

2009-01-28 00:50 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 05:00 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 05:06 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 07:06 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 20:21 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-29 18:02 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 19:09 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-29 23:45 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch

Cody Moya

2009-01-17 14:56 Download link for 200 Master Resell Rights Products

confirmations

2009-01-17 14:39 Activate your Email Subscription to: AdBrite Blog

Daniel Berlin

2009-01-22 01:33 Re: Size of the GCC repository

Daniel Franke

2009-01-11 12:29 Re: Steve Kargle and Daniel Franke - reviewers.

Daniel Jacobowitz

2009-01-12 16:18 Re: marking ppc440 tests as unsupported
2009-01-27 13:42 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

daniel tian

2009-01-05 01:32 About Hazard Recognizer:DFA

Dave Korn

2009-01-07 12:01 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-09 19:44 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-12 15:53 Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?
2009-01-12 19:24 Re: Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?
2009-01-12 19:26 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?
2009-01-14 13:13 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-15 21:24 Re: Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?
2009-01-16 04:27 Libiberty issue vs cygwin [was Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?]
2009-01-18 01:04 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06)
2009-01-18 22:06 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?
2009-01-19 01:16 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06)
2009-01-24 01:29 IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]
2009-01-24 01:40 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06)
2009-01-24 01:48 Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]
2009-01-24 05:47 Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]
2009-01-24 06:21 Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]
2009-01-24 06:31 Definitely not IRA [was Re: Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]]
2009-01-26 00:09 Re: Definitely not IRA [was Re: Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]]
2009-01-31 17:48 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)
2009-01-31 18:21 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)
2009-01-31 19:02 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)

David Daney

2009-01-28 20:04 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-28 20:36 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include

David Edelsohn

2009-01-06 13:52 Re: Xtensa port maintainer
2009-01-12 19:49 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?
2009-01-27 18:45 New GCC Runtime Library Exception

David Miller

2009-01-21 20:14 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
2009-01-27 21:54 Re: RFD: simple instruction cache code layout heuristics

Denis Chertykov

2009-01-10 10:01 Re: having trouble with define_split

Dennis Clarke

2009-01-28 00:58 gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc
2009-01-28 01:29 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc
2009-01-28 02:40 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc
2009-01-28 16:29 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc

Diego Novillo

2009-01-07 15:27 Mixing languages in the same TU and dwarf2out_frame_finish
2009-01-27 19:48 [lto] Merged trunk@143693 into branch
2009-01-27 21:13 Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-27 21:32 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-27 22:02 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-27 22:12 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 12:55 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 12:59 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 13:00 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 13:15 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 13:34 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 13:40 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-31 13:11 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port
2009-01-31 13:28 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port

DJ Delorie

2009-01-07 00:46 m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c
2009-01-07 16:09 Re: m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c
2009-01-07 17:33 Re: m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c
2009-01-16 06:21 Re: Libiberty issue vs cygwin [was Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?]
2009-01-28 20:36 CGEN-generated files vs GPL
2009-01-28 22:18 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL
2009-01-30 01:43 TARGET_NARROW_VOLATILE_BITFIELD

Dodji Seketeli

2009-01-02 09:35 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly

eotrain

2009-01-22 03:14 He's short but with such an instrument. handy

Eric Botcazou

2009-01-21 14:22 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
2009-01-22 11:51 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
2009-01-28 17:22 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch

Eric Christopher

2009-01-21 19:49 Re: remaining new darwin regressions

Erik Trulsson

2009-01-28 21:42 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

ExtremeWebsiteTraffic . com

2009-01-17 10:32 I'm Telling a Friend - YOU!...
2009-01-17 10:34 Traffic/Hits Information
2009-01-17 10:37 Affiliate Account Information
2009-01-17 10:37 Validate Your Email Address
2009-01-17 15:08 Traffic/Hits Information

Florian Weimer

2009-01-27 20:38 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 20:51 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 12:21 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 15:55 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception

Frank Ch. Eigler

2009-01-04 15:43 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-05 18:11 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-28 22:04 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL

Franklyn Simon

2009-01-13 21:50 Installing GCC:Configuration (GCC-4.3.2)

gccadmin

2009-01-01 22:51 gcc-4.3-20090101 is now available
2009-01-02 22:45 gcc-4.4-20090102 is now available
2009-01-07 22:44 gcc-4.2-20090107 is now available
2009-01-08 22:46 gcc-4.3-20090108 is now available
2009-01-09 22:44 gcc-4.4-20090109 is now available
2009-01-14 22:40 gcc-4.2-20090114 is now available
2009-01-15 22:49 gcc-4.3-20090115 is now available
2009-01-16 22:44 gcc-4.4-20090116 is now available
2009-01-21 22:44 gcc-4.2-20090121 is now available
2009-01-22 22:48 gcc-4.3-20090122 is now available
2009-01-23 22:48 gcc-4.4-20090123 is now available
2009-01-28 22:42 gcc-4.2-20090128 is now available
2009-01-29 22:45 gcc-4.3-20090129 is now available
2009-01-30 22:48 gcc-4.4-20090130 is now available

Georg-Johann Lay

2009-01-21 17:04 [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%.
2009-01-21 21:10 Re: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%.
2009-01-21 21:21 Re: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%.
2009-01-21 22:53 Re: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%.

Gerald Pfeifer

2009-01-06 11:42 [PING] Re: Patch for Re: out of date docs?
2009-01-11 09:36 Re: Xtensa port maintainer
2009-01-22 15:05 Re: Size of the GCC repository
2009-01-25 20:01 PATCH for Re: New mirror
2009-01-28 01:46 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-28 10:30 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-30 23:44 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception

Grigori Fursin

2009-01-31 13:41 RE: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port

Guilherme Renato

2009-01-14 23:20 GCC 4.4 SNAPSHOT - BUILD ERROR

H.J. Lu

2009-01-02 15:05 Re: Documentation and behaviour of the "optimize" attribute
2009-01-06 18:33 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.1 is released
2009-01-07 15:23 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 16:02 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 18:13 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 18:32 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-07 22:54 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 15:56 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 17:15 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 18:27 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 19:06 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 19:51 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 21:17 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 22:28 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 01:12 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 01:15 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 01:36 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 15:03 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-16 17:24 How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86?
2009-01-16 21:28 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86?
2009-01-16 21:48 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86?
2009-01-16 23:08 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release
2009-01-18 15:38 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-18 17:09 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-18 21:35 We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch
2009-01-18 21:54 Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch
2009-01-18 21:57 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-19 19:33 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-21 01:50 Re: remaining new darwin regressions
2009-01-21 02:47 Re: remaining new darwin regressions
2009-01-24 01:39 Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]
2009-01-25 18:34 Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
2009-01-25 18:56 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
2009-01-25 19:18 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
2009-01-26 16:38 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match
2009-01-26 19:45 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
2009-01-26 22:37 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
2009-01-27 14:58 Re: RFD: simple instruction cache code layout heuristics
2009-01-27 17:40 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-27 17:47 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-27 21:24 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-27 21:58 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-27 22:06 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 14:21 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-28 19:51 RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-28 20:15 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-28 20:24 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-28 20:44 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-28 20:52 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-28 22:09 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-29 15:43 Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch
2009-01-31 17:36 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)

Hariharan

2009-01-08 18:11 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug
2009-01-09 10:59 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug
2009-01-21 12:02 GCC Profile base optimizations using simulator profile
2009-01-26 16:29 Inline limits

Hariharan Sandanagobalane

2009-01-08 14:31 fbranch-probabilities bug

holderlin

2009-01-20 13:37 What's the difference between (*(x)).a and (x)->a

IainS

2009-01-14 16:36 correct place for code.
2009-01-15 08:38 Re: correct place for code.
2009-01-15 20:14 missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m?
2009-01-15 20:52 Re: missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m?
2009-01-15 21:08 Re: missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m?

Ian Lance Taylor

2009-01-06 14:26 Re: [PING] Re: Patch for Re: out of date docs?
2009-01-07 15:37 Re: Question about UNSPEC rtx and a new instruction
2009-01-07 15:56 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 16:27 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 16:31 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 16:35 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 18:30 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 22:47 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 23:02 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 00:45 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 18:16 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 18:22 Re: Getting calling function in the C frontend
2009-01-08 18:49 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 19:38 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 20:40 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 23:35 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 23:36 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 00:56 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 01:22 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 05:42 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 15:31 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 15:57 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 15:59 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-15 01:45 Re: correct place for code.
2009-01-16 15:20 Re: Missed bitfield packing?
2009-01-16 16:38 Re: prologue length
2009-01-16 22:14 Re: prologue length
2009-01-17 00:34 Re: prologue length
2009-01-18 01:53 Re: putting operands in MEM even with register_operand predicate
2009-01-21 01:37 Re: C integrated RPC
2009-01-21 07:24 Re: register int variable being written to/read from stack
2009-01-21 15:28 Re: C integrated RPC
2009-01-22 22:21 Re: Document error on TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION ?
2009-01-26 18:54 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match
2009-01-26 19:32 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
2009-01-27 14:08 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match
2009-01-27 21:09 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 21:11 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 21:12 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 21:16 Re: RFD: simple instruction cache code layout heuristics
2009-01-27 21:18 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-28 01:11 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 06:48 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 17:36 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-28 20:32 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-28 20:49 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-28 21:00 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include
2009-01-29 06:10 Re: Void Pointer Alignment - GCC 3.4.6
2009-01-29 14:55 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 15:04 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 15:08 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 15:30 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 15:37 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 15:47 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 16:03 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 17:39 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 19:13 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 19:56 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 22:39 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-30 19:14 GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-30 20:51 Re: GCC Runtime Library Exception

igor

2009-01-17 09:15 New mirror

Jack Howarth

2009-01-20 23:29 remaining new darwin regressions
2009-01-21 02:22 Re: remaining new darwin regressions
2009-01-21 20:43 Re: remaining new darwin regressions

Jack Lloyd

2009-01-16 19:34 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86?

Jacques Lefrere

2009-01-20 18:23 gfortran manual : error in function range documentation ?

Jakub Jelinek

2009-01-02 14:53 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly
2009-01-07 10:43 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-31 12:30 GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)

James Dennett

2009-01-27 08:12 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Jan Engelhardt

2009-01-01 02:03 Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly
2009-01-01 02:12 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly

Jan Sjodin

2009-01-22 23:32 [graphite] Polyhedral Compilation Package Interface Specification

Jason Merrill

2009-01-26 18:09 Re: C++0x Concepts development schedule
2009-01-26 18:17 Re: C++0X constexpr implementation status

JCX

2009-01-07 06:15 Question about UNSPEC rtx and a new instruction

Jie Zhang

2009-01-04 10:22 libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-05 17:12 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-07 09:09 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-07 09:55 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-08 15:26 Re: libmudflap and emutls question

Joe Buck

2009-01-05 20:56 Re: 4.4 use static_assert or #warning for unimplemented c++0x std libs
2009-01-27 18:07 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 22:16 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-28 00:44 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 01:14 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc
2009-01-28 01:58 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc
2009-01-28 17:08 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 17:10 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-29 04:00 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL
2009-01-29 04:05 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-30 17:54 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose

Joel Brobecker

2009-01-21 11:09 DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB

Joel Sherrill

2009-01-12 16:11 marking ppc440 tests as unsupported
2009-01-12 17:36 Re: marking ppc440 tests as unsupported
2009-01-19 14:02 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06)
2009-01-21 18:47 Re: C integrated RPC
2009-01-21 19:32 Re: C integrated RPC

Joern Rennecke

2009-01-07 12:15 Re: Use longlong.h?
2009-01-07 19:17 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-07 20:43 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-08 12:39 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-08 13:11 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-27 14:41 RFD: simple instruction cache code layout heuristics
2009-01-28 14:01 New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-28 15:01 New GCC Runtime Library Exception: amendment proposal
2009-01-28 15:09 PS: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: amendment proposal
2009-01-28 16:13 PPS: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: amendment proposal
2009-01-29 12:34 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 13:57 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 14:38 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 15:11 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 15:20 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 15:38 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 16:03 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 16:15 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 17:42 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 18:22 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 19:39 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 20:11 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-30 01:27 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-30 18:18 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose

John David Anglin

2009-01-17 18:29 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release
2009-01-17 20:30 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for
2009-01-31 17:58 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)
2009-01-31 20:13 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)

John Regehr

2009-01-24 22:05 Re: register int variable being written to/read from stack

Joseph S. Myers

2009-01-07 15:28 Re: Use longlong.h?
2009-01-12 16:23 Re: marking ppc440 tests as unsupported
2009-01-12 17:57 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?
2009-01-20 22:03 Re: Use longlong.h?
2009-01-21 17:07 Re: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%.
2009-01-27 22:52 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-28 13:00 c-4_5-branch merge plan
2009-01-28 13:18 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 22:05 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL
2009-01-28 22:08 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-28 22:27 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL
2009-01-28 22:45 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-29 16:27 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC

Kaveh R. GHAZI

2009-01-06 05:38 Re: Xtensa port maintainer
2009-01-27 08:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-29 16:01 Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC
2009-01-31 04:27 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC
2009-01-31 18:48 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC

Laurent GUERBY

2009-01-10 14:34 -frtl-abstract-sequences broken?
2009-01-10 15:13 Re: -frtl-abstract-sequences broken?
2009-01-27 13:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 20:46 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Mark Kettenis

2009-01-21 12:37 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB

Mark Mitchell

2009-01-19 18:39 Re: Use longlong.h?
2009-01-19 18:46 Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch
2009-01-20 18:55 Re: Use longlong.h?
2009-01-28 19:24 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-28 22:17 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-28 23:03 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-01-31 00:17 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception

Markus Milleder

2009-01-22 10:48 Antwort: Re: Size of the GCC repository

Martin Jambor

2009-01-20 11:06 A question about SRA and out-of-bounds array accesses

martin krastev

2009-01-29 04:41 gcc 4.4.0 loop-unrolling optimizations peculiarity observed

Matthias Klose

2009-01-22 12:13 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

Maxim Kuvyrkov

2009-01-05 21:33 Re: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation
2009-01-07 07:06 Re: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation
2009-01-07 15:40 Re: About Hazard Recognizer:DFA

Michael Meissner

2009-01-08 23:49 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-30 21:56 Re: GCC & OpenCL ?

Mike Stump

2009-01-21 18:44 Re: remaining new darwin regressions
2009-01-21 19:59 Re: remaining new darwin regressions
2009-01-21 21:53 Re: remaining new darwin regressions

Nathan Froyd

2009-01-29 22:04 Re: Binary Autovectorization

Nathan Sidwell

2009-01-06 02:15 Re: Tru64 non-virtual thunks multiply defined
2009-01-06 15:23 Re: Tru64 non-virtual thunks multiply defined

NyitÃsi AKCIÃ!

2009-01-13 22:04 50.000 GB zene, jÃtÃk Ãs DVD filmek!

Paolo Bonzini

2009-01-02 11:05 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly
2009-01-07 07:52 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-07 09:20 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-07 10:39 Re: libmudflap and emutls question
2009-01-07 22:34 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-12 13:10 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-12 14:32 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog
2009-01-20 13:17 Re: A question about SRA and out-of-bounds array accesses
2009-01-27 08:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 10:29 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 10:36 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 11:07 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 12:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 13:14 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 08:39 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-28 09:21 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-29 15:46 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose
2009-01-29 16:16 Re: sizeof in initializer expression not working as expected

Paolo Carlini

2009-01-22 01:13 Size of the GCC repository
2009-01-22 09:52 Re: Size of the GCC repository
2009-01-22 10:06 Re: Size of the GCC repository
2009-01-22 11:12 Re: Antwort: Re: Size of the GCC repository
2009-01-30 16:36 Re: [strict-aliasing] incorrect warning with g++-current in STL

Paul Richard Thomas

2009-01-17 08:33 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release
2009-01-17 09:45 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release

payments

2009-01-17 16:27 Re: Extremewebsitetraffic.com

Per Ekman

2009-01-08 08:27 Getting calling function in the C frontend
2009-01-09 12:17 Re: Getting calling function in the C frontend

Perry Smith

2009-01-01 15:01 Building gcc on AIX 5.3 TL08
2009-01-31 06:13 -L<path> on AIX

Peter O'Gorman

2009-01-06 15:12 Re: Tru64 non-virtual thunks multiply defined

Philipp Marek

2009-01-23 15:56 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction

Prez Ahn

2009-01-19 12:52 arm-elf-ld: undefined reference to 'xxx'

Rafael Espindola

2009-01-28 08:44 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 12:00 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 12:13 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-29 19:25 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch

Rainer Orth

2009-01-21 12:00 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
2009-01-28 11:56 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 11:59 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc
2009-01-28 12:05 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 13:12 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 13:18 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 13:36 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 13:41 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 17:12 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-29 15:12 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc

Raoul Gough

2009-01-10 11:20 Help understanding gcc alias analysis
2009-01-11 18:59 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis
2009-01-11 23:04 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis
2009-01-12 21:51 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis

Richard Earnshaw

2009-01-21 09:49 Re: ARM interworking question

Richard Guenther

2009-01-02 12:06 Re: Documentation and behaviour of the "optimize" attribute
2009-01-03 14:45 -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-03 19:11 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-03 19:40 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-03 20:15 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-06 20:29 GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06)
2009-01-07 09:16 Re: m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c
2009-01-07 09:39 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 16:04 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-07 16:26 Re: m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c
2009-01-07 16:30 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 21:36 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 09:56 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 15:36 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-09 16:05 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-10 11:56 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis
2009-01-10 11:59 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis
2009-01-10 14:57 Re: -frtl-abstract-sequences broken?
2009-01-11 19:08 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis
2009-01-12 09:16 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis
2009-01-13 09:24 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis
2009-01-16 15:57 Re: Missed bitfield packing?
2009-01-16 23:03 GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release
2009-01-16 23:12 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release
2009-01-17 14:23 GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-17 19:56 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release
2009-01-18 12:13 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06)
2009-01-18 21:47 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-18 21:51 Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch
2009-01-19 09:27 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-20 08:27 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-20 12:45 Re: A question about SRA and out-of-bounds array accesses
2009-01-20 13:27 Re: A question about SRA and out-of-bounds array accesses
2009-01-20 15:32 [4.5] Alias-Improvements branch overview and merge proposal
2009-01-22 13:00 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
2009-01-24 14:04 GCC 4.3.4 Status Update
2009-01-25 18:45 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
2009-01-25 19:04 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
2009-01-26 15:53 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match
2009-01-26 16:42 Re: Inline limits
2009-01-26 16:45 Re: Inline limits
2009-01-26 16:49 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match
2009-01-27 09:53 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match
2009-01-27 10:07 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 10:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 10:41 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 10:36 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch
2009-01-28 22:35 Re: incorrect license on some gcc/*.c files?
2009-01-31 10:14 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port
2009-01-31 10:15 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC
2009-01-31 13:24 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port
2009-01-31 18:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)
2009-01-31 18:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31)

Richard Sandiford

2009-01-02 11:38 Documentation and behaviour of the "optimize" attribute
2009-01-03 13:23 Re: Documentation and behaviour of the "optimize" attribute
2009-01-31 12:41 Re: MIPS64 -msym32 and DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE

Robert Dewar

2009-01-22 15:10 Re: Size of the GCC repository
2009-01-27 12:09 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-27 15:01 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 00:29 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 08:41 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 11:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 21:26 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: amendment proposal
2009-01-28 21:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-28 21:34 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-30 11:35 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-30 11:36 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Roberto Bagnara

2009-01-12 17:36 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?
2009-01-12 20:33 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?

Rodrigo Dominguez

2009-01-29 21:47 Binary Autovectorization
2009-01-29 23:42 RE: Binary Autovectorization

Rohit Arul Raj

2009-01-29 05:59 Void Pointer Alignment - GCC 3.4.6
2009-01-29 06:32 Re: Void Pointer Alignment - GCC 3.4.6

Ross Smith

2009-01-30 05:11 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Sean Callanan

2009-01-31 04:02 GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port

Sean D'Epagnier

2009-01-02 16:01 writing md rules for fixed-point conversion
2009-01-09 06:59 having trouble with define_split
2009-01-18 01:41 putting operands in MEM even with register_operand predicate

Sebastian Huber

2009-01-29 12:43 Problems with DWARF debug info and GCC 4.3.2

Sebastian Pop

2009-01-12 17:03 Re: Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe?
2009-01-20 05:09 Re: -fgraphite docs
2009-01-20 05:20 Re: -fgraphite docs
2009-01-20 15:02 Re: -fgraphite docs

Sebastian Redl

2009-01-27 14:03 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-30 19:38 Re: GCC Runtime Library Exception

Simon Hill

2009-01-24 02:38 GCC RES: Restrictive Exception Specification: 0.1 - Alpha. Feedback Request.

Simon Tsai

2009-01-14 21:14 gcc binary download

Steinar Bang

2009-01-19 11:24 Re: Cygwin support

Sterling Augustine

2009-01-05 20:14 Re: Xtensa port maintainer

Steve Ellcey

2009-01-26 22:28 x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-27 17:34 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs
2009-01-27 17:44 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs

Steve Kargl

2009-01-03 20:09 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-12 21:58 Re: Steve Kargle and Daniel Franke - reviewers.

Taras Glek

2009-01-31 22:49 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port

Thomas Schwinge

2009-01-06 22:30 Re: Thomas Schwinge appointed GNU Hurd maintainer

Tim Prince

2009-01-15 15:07 Re: gcc binary download
2009-01-29 21:53 Re: Binary Autovectorization

Tobias Burnus

2009-01-15 09:17 Re: gcc binary download
2009-01-20 18:51 Re: gfortran manual : error in function range documentation ?
2009-01-29 17:03 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC
2009-01-30 22:33 Re: GCC & OpenCL ?

Tommaso Cucinotta

2009-01-16 15:13 C extension to catch function return type

Toon Moene

2009-01-03 18:49 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-03 19:15 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-03 19:37 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-03 19:44 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-03 20:16 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question
2009-01-10 18:07 Steve Kargle and Daniel Franke - reviewers.

Unruh, Erwin

2009-01-28 10:19 -ftime-report might wrap

Uros Bizjak

2009-01-21 19:41 Re: remaining new darwin regressions

Vincent Lefevre

2009-01-26 17:08 Announce: MPFR 2.4.0 is release
2009-01-27 14:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-29 11:06 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
2009-01-29 11:15 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Vincent R.

2009-01-16 16:30 prologue length
2009-01-16 21:23 Re: prologue length
2009-01-16 22:42 Re: prologue length
2009-01-21 21:13 cross-compilation and crt issues
2009-01-26 13:20 cross-compilation, deprecated option and libgcc
2009-01-28 14:48 Re: cross-compilation, deprecated option and libgcc

Vladimir Makarov

2009-01-05 15:57 Re: [IRA] New register allocator question
2009-01-05 16:01 Re: [IRA] New register allocator question
2009-01-05 16:51 Re: About Hazard Recognizer:DFA
2009-01-05 21:24 Re: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation
2009-01-07 16:15 Re: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation

Weddington, Eric

2009-01-21 17:21 RE: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%.

Ye, Joey

2009-01-05 09:38 How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation
2009-01-06 02:03 RE: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation
2009-01-07 06:38 RE: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation
2009-01-07 06:39 RE: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation
2009-01-07 07:31 RE: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation
2009-01-07 09:24 Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736
2009-01-08 00:23 RE: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736

zoltan

2009-01-27 07:52 Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for January, 2009

gcc archive
author index for January, 2009