This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: zoltan at bendor dot com dot au
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:30:38 +0100
Subject: Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0901271825250.29022-100000@susu.bendor.com.au>

> I don't think that the compiler has a right to remove my test, just
> because it assumes that if I derferenced a pointer then it surely was not
> NULL.

While not related to your testcase directly, you contributed to finding
a couple of relatively severe bugs in GCC, so thank you!

Paolo

References:
- Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
  - From: zoltan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]