This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
February 29, 2012
| 21:56 | Re: random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report) | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 18:21 | Re: The state of glibc libm | David Miller |
| 17:17 | The state of glibc libm | Joseph S. Myers |
| 17:02 | Re: IVs optimization issue | Aurelien Buhrig |
| 16:08 | Re: IVs optimization issue | Richard Guenther |
| 15:41 | Re: IVs optimization issue | Aurelien Buhrig |
| 15:15 | Re: IVs optimization issue | Richard Guenther |
| 15:08 | Re: IVs optimization issue | Aurelien Buhrig |
| 15:01 | Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre | Richard Guenther |
| 14:50 | Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre | Bin.Cheng |
| 13:17 | Federal Tax Transfer was Disallowed Ref97798578 | 37221463993912 |
| 09:43 | Re: IVs optimization issue | Richard Guenther |
| 08:11 | IVs optimization issue | Aurelien Buhrig |
February 28, 2012
February 27, 2012
| 21:33 | Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums | Daniel Jacobowitz |
| 21:07 | Parma Polyhedra Library 0.12 | Roberto Bagnara |
| 15:32 | Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt | William J. Schmidt |
| 12:46 | GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2012-02-27) | Richard Guenther |
| 09:54 | Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 | Jakub Jelinek |
| 09:49 | Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 | Uros Bizjak |
| 09:45 | Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 | Richard Guenther |
| 09:28 | Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 | Uros Bizjak |
| 09:20 | Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 | Peter Garbett |
| 09:08 | Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 | Richard Guenther |
| 09:01 | backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 | Peter Garbett |
February 26, 2012
| 15:22 | Re: -floop-flatten and PR 52307 | Richard Guenther |
| 15:10 | Re: Proposal: Make TYPE_HASH != TYPE_UID | Richard Guenther |
| 12:33 | -floop-flatten and PR 52307 | Thomas Koenig |
February 25, 2012
| 22:43 | gcc-4.7-20120225 is now available | gccadmin |
| 19:20 | Re: Bootstrapping and C++ compiler | Marc Glisse |
| 19:20 | Re: optimization report | Jonathan Wakely |
| 19:06 | optimization report | Mahmood Naderan |
| 17:21 | Bootstrapping and C++ compiler | Gabriel Dos Reis |
| 14:01 | Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c | Jack Howarth |
| 03:07 | Re: inline assembly | Ian Lance Taylor |
February 24, 2012
| 22:49 | gcc-4.6-20120224 is now available | gccadmin |
| 21:59 | inline assembly | reed kotler |
| 21:29 | Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64 | Thomas Schwinge |
| 13:49 | Proposal: Make TYPE_HASH != TYPE_UID | Diego Novillo |
| 09:12 | Re: Is it a bug when use “<<”if the operator is out of the size "0~63" | Jonathan Wakely |
| 09:06 | Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt | Richard Guenther |
| 09:05 | Re: Is it a bug when use â<<âif the operator is out of the size "0~63" | Miles Bader |
| 08:35 | Is it a bug when use â<<âif the operator is out of the size "0~63" | Yang Yueming |
| 08:07 | A question about redundant PHI expression stmt | Jiangning Liu |
| 03:35 | Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c | Patrick Marlier |
| 02:34 | Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c | Jack Howarth |
February 23, 2012
| 22:43 | gcc-4.5-20120223 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:36 | RE: Differences in GCC and ICC compiled objects, GCC relocations broken? | Iyer, Balaji V |
| 22:29 | Function-Specific Optimization Branch | Iyer, Balaji V |
| 21:00 | GCC 4.6.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Jakub Jelinek |
| 19:50 | Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64 | Thomas Schwinge |
| 19:14 | Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c | Patrick Marlier |
| 19:04 | Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c | Patrick Marlier |
| 18:16 | Re: error in gcc version 4.6.2 ??? | Andreas Schwab |
| 18:10 | Re: error in gcc version 4.6.2 ??? | Dennis Clarke |
| 17:53 | error in gcc version 4.6.2 ??? | SchmiTTT |
| 15:31 | Differences in GCC and ICC compiled objects, GCC relocations broken? | J K |
February 22, 2012
February 21, 2012
| 22:43 | gcc-4.4-20120221 is now available | gccadmin |
| 20:16 | Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere? | Andrew Pinski |
| 15:31 | Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread | Jakub Jelinek |
| 15:24 | Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc | Andrew Haley |
| 15:19 | Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc | åè |
| 14:49 | Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread | Erotavlas_turbo |
| 14:33 | Re: GCC and x86intrin.h header | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 13:56 | GCC and x86intrin.h header | Erotavlas_turbo |
| 13:51 | Re: How to suppress frame pointer usage by default? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 13:37 | How to suppress frame pointer usage by default? | Konstantin Vladimirov |
| 10:18 | Re: A problem about loop store motion | Richard Guenther |
| 09:58 | RE: A problem about loop store motion | Jiangning Liu |
| 09:40 | Re: A problem about loop store motion | Richard Guenther |
| 09:27 | Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere? | Richard Guenther |
| 08:54 | RE: A problem about loop store motion | Jiangning Liu |
February 20, 2012
| 22:20 | Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere? | Ulrich Weigand |
| 15:50 | Re: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation | Bernd Schmidt |
| 15:42 | RE: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation | Henderson, Stuart |
| 15:02 | RE: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern. | Kumar, Venkataramanan |
| 14:37 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Vincent Lefevre |
| 11:33 | Re: A problem about loop store motion | Richard Guenther |
| 11:28 | Re: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern. | Richard Guenther |
| 08:47 | RE: A problem about loop store motion | Jiangning Liu |
February 19, 2012
| 15:44 | Re: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern. | Marc Glisse |
| 15:24 | [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern. | Kumar, Venkataramanan |
| 13:53 | Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread | Erotavlas_turbo |
| 13:43 | Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread | Tim Prince |
| 13:40 | GCC: OpenMP posix pthread | Erotavlas_turbo |
February 18, 2012
| 23:05 | Defaulting to -fno-math-errno (was: Fwd: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend) | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 22:54 | gcc-4.7-20120218 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:46 | Re: Iterating over RTL in Graphite | Arnaldo |
| 14:38 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | James Courtier-Dutton |
| 11:41 | Re: fortran/parse.c | Tobias Burnus |
| 10:37 | fortran/parse.c | Mads Jensen |
| 02:15 | Re: Iterating over RTL in Graphite | Tobias Grosser |
February 17, 2012
| 22:52 | gcc-4.6-20120217 is now available | gccadmin |
| 19:35 | Re: Iterating over RTL in Graphite | David Malcolm |
| 18:26 | BEWARE: PLATEAU + SUCCESSFACTORS + SAP | Paul Rahme |
| 18:04 | Re: Wrong REG_UNUSED notes for PARALLEL insns? | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 17:51 | Re: Wrong REG_UNUSED notes for PARALLEL insns? | Richard Henderson |
| 15:12 | Wrong REG_UNUSED notes for PARALLEL insns? | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 12:10 | Business inquiry for your site / | Katy Harvey |
| 11:54 | PR51782: Missing address-space information in .expand | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 09:53 | A problem about loop store motion | Jiangning Liu |
February 16, 2012
February 15, 2012
February 14, 2012
February 13, 2012
February 12, 2012
| 16:46 | Fwd: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Janne Blomqvist |
| 14:39 | Re: Altering OpenMP emitted code | Jakub Jelinek |
| 01:38 | [wwwdocs] Remove ia64-unknown-linux-gnu as secondary platform | Gerald Pfeifer |
February 11, 2012
| 22:48 | gcc-4.7-20120211 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:20 | Altering OpenMP emitted code | Amittai Aviram |
February 10, 2012
February 09, 2012
February 08, 2012
February 07, 2012
February 06, 2012
| 23:22 | Re: diff file for da.po | Joseph S. Myers |
| 22:15 | Re: Size of enumâ | Andrew Pinski |
| 22:14 | RE: Size o f enum | Alexandre Almeida |
| 20:24 | da.po.diff | Mads Jensen |
| 20:19 | Template Handling in G++ | Iyer, Balaji V |
| 19:35 | Re: libgcc maintainer | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 19:21 | Fwd: [Announce] Google Summer of Code 2012 | Diego Novillo |
| 19:08 | ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.9 | David Malcolm |
| 18:20 | diff file for da.po | Mads Jensen |
| 18:07 | Compile-time measurements in Chromium | Hans Wennborg |
| 15:38 | Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing | Torvald Riegel |
| 13:13 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Richard Guenther |
| 12:30 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Vincent Lefevre |
| 11:54 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Richard Guenther |
| 11:28 | Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre | Richard Guenther |
February 05, 2012
| 22:40 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Vincent Lefevre |
| 21:13 | Re: Size of enumâ | James Dennett |
| 20:58 | Re: Size of enumâ | Jonathan Wakely |
| 20:53 | Re: [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership | Walter Lee |
| 20:53 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Dave Korn |
| 20:51 | Re: [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 20:40 | Re: Size of enum | David Brown |
| 19:21 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Geert Bosch |
| 19:01 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Vincent Lefevre |
| 18:38 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Tim Prince |
| 16:29 | Size of en um | Alexandre Almeida |
| 16:18 | Tutorial on GCC for Parallelization | Uday Khedker |
| 16:08 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | James Courtier-Dutton |
| 11:43 | libgcc maintainer | ZoltÃn KÃcsi |
| 09:56 | question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre | Amker.Cheng |
| 00:44 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Dave Korn |
February 04, 2012
| 23:09 | Re: about hosting the gcc. | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 22:48 | gcc-4.7-20120204 is now available | gccadmin |
| 15:13 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Robert Dewar |
| 14:57 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Andreas Schwab |
| 14:16 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Robert Dewar |
| 14:09 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Andreas Schwab |
| 12:15 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Robert Dewar |
| 12:01 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Andreas Schwab |
| 10:21 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | James Courtier-Dutton |
| 00:39 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Vincent Lefevre |
| 00:26 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Vincent Lefevre |
| 00:07 | Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend | Vincent Lefevre |
February 03, 2012
February 02, 2012
February 01, 2012
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]